A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression
There has been recent debate regarding the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of depression. This has been based on narrative reviews that contradict existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In this special article, we highlight the mistakes that occur when interpreting evi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences 2022-01, Vol.31, p.e10-e10, Article e10 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e10 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | e10 |
| container_title | Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Meechan, C. F. Laws, K. R. Young, A. H. McLoughlin, D. M. Jauhar, S. |
| description | There has been recent debate regarding the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of depression. This has been based on narrative reviews that contradict existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In this special article, we highlight the mistakes that occur when interpreting evidence using narrative reviews, as opposed to conventional systematic reviews and meta-analyses. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S2045796021000731 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8851059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S2045796021000731</cupid><sourcerecordid>2623329033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-d865f4d0c504cde151d4dc96ba0d7464d09a8c7a3ab6ad492b9b7e57718ea9263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoKtof4EYCbtyM5jGTTDaClPpCcGFdh0xyRyPtpCbTiv_eFGt94So39373JIeD0AElJ5RQeXrPSFlJJQijhBDJ6QbaXbYKqaTaXNeC7KBBSs-ZIaUiNRfbaIdXuVCi3kU359hG3_uXOeDQ4s7EaHq_ABxh4eE1LZv9E-B8c9BZKBqTALch4tFwjH2HHcwipORDt4-2WjNJMFide-jhYjQeXhW3d5fXw_PbwpaS9oWrRdWWjtiKlNYBragrnVWiMcTJUuSJMrWVhptGGFcq1qhGQiUlrcEoJvgeOvvQnc2bKTgLXR_NRM-in5r4poPx-uek80_6MSx0XVeUVCoLHK8EYsi-U6-nPlmYTEwHYZ40E4xzpgjnGT36hT6HeeyyvSXFFKWU1ZmiH5SNIaUI7fozlOhlWPpPWHnn8LuL9cZnNBngK1EzbaJ3j_D19v-y7yYPncw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2622911128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Meechan, C. F. ; Laws, K. R. ; Young, A. H. ; McLoughlin, D. M. ; Jauhar, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meechan, C. F. ; Laws, K. R. ; Young, A. H. ; McLoughlin, D. M. ; Jauhar, S.</creatorcontrib><description>There has been recent debate regarding the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of depression. This has been based on narrative reviews that contradict existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In this special article, we highlight the mistakes that occur when interpreting evidence using narrative reviews, as opposed to conventional systematic reviews and meta-analyses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7979</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S2045796021000731</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35083968</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Depression - therapy ; Electroconvulsive Therapy ; Humans ; Mental depression ; Meta-analysis ; Narration ; Psychiatry ; Special ; Special Article ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2022-01, Vol.31, p.e10-e10, Article e10</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022 2022 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-d865f4d0c504cde151d4dc96ba0d7464d09a8c7a3ab6ad492b9b7e57718ea9263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-d865f4d0c504cde151d4dc96ba0d7464d09a8c7a3ab6ad492b9b7e57718ea9263</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3878-3659 ; 0000-0002-4527-4633 ; 0000-0003-2291-6952</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851059/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2045796021000731/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,315,728,781,785,865,886,23322,27928,27929,53795,53797,55632,55808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35083968$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meechan, C. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laws, K. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLoughlin, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jauhar, S.</creatorcontrib><title>A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression</title><title>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences</title><addtitle>Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci</addtitle><description>There has been recent debate regarding the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of depression. This has been based on narrative reviews that contradict existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In this special article, we highlight the mistakes that occur when interpreting evidence using narrative reviews, as opposed to conventional systematic reviews and meta-analyses.</description><subject>Depression - therapy</subject><subject>Electroconvulsive Therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Narration</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Special</subject><subject>Special Article</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>2045-7960</issn><issn>2045-7979</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoKtof4EYCbtyM5jGTTDaClPpCcGFdh0xyRyPtpCbTiv_eFGt94So39373JIeD0AElJ5RQeXrPSFlJJQijhBDJ6QbaXbYKqaTaXNeC7KBBSs-ZIaUiNRfbaIdXuVCi3kU359hG3_uXOeDQ4s7EaHq_ABxh4eE1LZv9E-B8c9BZKBqTALch4tFwjH2HHcwipORDt4-2WjNJMFide-jhYjQeXhW3d5fXw_PbwpaS9oWrRdWWjtiKlNYBragrnVWiMcTJUuSJMrWVhptGGFcq1qhGQiUlrcEoJvgeOvvQnc2bKTgLXR_NRM-in5r4poPx-uek80_6MSx0XVeUVCoLHK8EYsi-U6-nPlmYTEwHYZ40E4xzpgjnGT36hT6HeeyyvSXFFKWU1ZmiH5SNIaUI7fozlOhlWPpPWHnn8LuL9cZnNBngK1EzbaJ3j_D19v-y7yYPncw</recordid><startdate>20220127</startdate><enddate>20220127</enddate><creator>Meechan, C. F.</creator><creator>Laws, K. R.</creator><creator>Young, A. H.</creator><creator>McLoughlin, D. M.</creator><creator>Jauhar, S.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3878-3659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4527-4633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2291-6952</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220127</creationdate><title>A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression</title><author>Meechan, C. F. ; Laws, K. R. ; Young, A. H. ; McLoughlin, D. M. ; Jauhar, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-d865f4d0c504cde151d4dc96ba0d7464d09a8c7a3ab6ad492b9b7e57718ea9263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Depression - therapy</topic><topic>Electroconvulsive Therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Narration</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Special</topic><topic>Special Article</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meechan, C. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laws, K. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLoughlin, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jauhar, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meechan, C. F.</au><au>Laws, K. R.</au><au>Young, A. H.</au><au>McLoughlin, D. M.</au><au>Jauhar, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression</atitle><jtitle>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci</addtitle><date>2022-01-27</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><spage>e10</spage><epage>e10</epage><pages>e10-e10</pages><artnum>e10</artnum><issn>2045-7960</issn><eissn>2045-7979</eissn><abstract>There has been recent debate regarding the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of depression. This has been based on narrative reviews that contradict existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In this special article, we highlight the mistakes that occur when interpreting evidence using narrative reviews, as opposed to conventional systematic reviews and meta-analyses.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>35083968</pmid><doi>10.1017/S2045796021000731</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3878-3659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4527-4633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2291-6952</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2045-7960 |
| ispartof | Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2022-01, Vol.31, p.e10-e10, Article e10 |
| issn | 2045-7960 2045-7979 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8851059 |
| source | MEDLINE; Cambridge Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Cambridge Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Depression - therapy Electroconvulsive Therapy Humans Mental depression Meta-analysis Narration Psychiatry Special Special Article Systematic review |
| title | A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T23%3A32%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20critique%20of%20narrative%20reviews%20of%20the%20evidence-base%20for%20ECT%20in%20depression&rft.jtitle=Epidemiology%20and%20psychiatric%20sciences&rft.au=Meechan,%20C.%20F.&rft.date=2022-01-27&rft.volume=31&rft.spage=e10&rft.epage=e10&rft.pages=e10-e10&rft.artnum=e10&rft.issn=2045-7960&rft.eissn=2045-7979&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S2045796021000731&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2623329033%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2622911128&rft_id=info:pmid/35083968&rft_cupid=10_1017_S2045796021000731&rfr_iscdi=true |