The Portuguese Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: Preliminary Validation Studies of the Middle Version among Municipal and Healthcare Workers

A third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) was developed internationally aiming to respond to new trends in working conditions, theoretical concepts, and international experience. This article aims to present the preliminary validation studies for the Portuguese middle...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2022-01, Vol.19 (3), p.1167
Hauptverfasser: Cotrim, Teresa P, Bem-Haja, Pedro, Pereira, Anabela, Fernandes, Cláudia, Azevedo, Rui, Antunes, Samuel, Pinto, Joaquim S, Kanazawa, Flávio, Souto, Isabel, Brito, Elisabeth, Silva, Carlos F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1167
container_title International journal of environmental research and public health
container_volume 19
creator Cotrim, Teresa P
Bem-Haja, Pedro
Pereira, Anabela
Fernandes, Cláudia
Azevedo, Rui
Antunes, Samuel
Pinto, Joaquim S
Kanazawa, Flávio
Souto, Isabel
Brito, Elisabeth
Silva, Carlos F
description A third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) was developed internationally aiming to respond to new trends in working conditions, theoretical concepts, and international experience. This article aims to present the preliminary validation studies for the Portuguese middle version of COPSOQ III. This is an exploratory cross-sectional study viewing the cross-cultural adaption of COPSOQ III to Portugal, ensuring the contents and face validity and performing field-testing in order to reduce the number of items and to obtain insight into the data structure, through classic test theory and item response theory approaches. The qualitative study encompassed 29 participants and the quantitative one 659 participants from municipalities and healthcare settings. Content analysis suggested that minor re-wording could improve the face validity of items, while a reduced version, with 85 items, shows psychometric stability, achieving good internal consistency in all subscales. The COPSOQ III Portuguese middle version proved to be a valid preliminary version for future validation studies with various populations, able to be used in correlational studies with other dimensions.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijerph19031167
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8834667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2629064733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-b890c04df2dcdd5100b24930bb257af8e759fc5c4178b929f88f9bfed8fed2f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkktv1DAUhSMEog_YskSW2LCZ4lecmAUSGgFFasUghrKMHPt64iGxg50g9Q_1d-Ko7ahlYdnS-e65PvYtilcEnzEm8Tu3hzh2RGJGiKieFMdECLziApOnD85HxUlKe4xZzYV8XhyxkghKJD0ubrYdoE2I07ybIQHadi4adAUxueBRsGjK-jqM4Du1A4826Vp3IQXtVI--55Ipc165CO_RJkLvBudVvEZXqndGLSL6Mc3GQbo3u3TG9HBooYbgd-hy9k67MXsqb9A5qH7qtIqAfoX4O5MvimdW9Qle3u2nxc_Pn7br89XFty9f1x8vVppzMa3aWmKNubHUaGNKgnFLuWS4bWlZKVtDVUqrS81JVbeSSlvXVrYWTJ0XtYydFh9ufce5HcBo8FNUfTNGN-RUTVCueax41zW78Lepa8aFqLLB2zuDGP4sz9MMLmnoe-UhzKmhgkoseMWWXm_-Q_dhjj7HW6iqZASTMlNnt5SOIaUI9nAZgptlBJrHI5ALXj-McMDv_5z9A0vFsrs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627531015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Portuguese Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: Preliminary Validation Studies of the Middle Version among Municipal and Healthcare Workers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Cotrim, Teresa P ; Bem-Haja, Pedro ; Pereira, Anabela ; Fernandes, Cláudia ; Azevedo, Rui ; Antunes, Samuel ; Pinto, Joaquim S ; Kanazawa, Flávio ; Souto, Isabel ; Brito, Elisabeth ; Silva, Carlos F</creator><creatorcontrib>Cotrim, Teresa P ; Bem-Haja, Pedro ; Pereira, Anabela ; Fernandes, Cláudia ; Azevedo, Rui ; Antunes, Samuel ; Pinto, Joaquim S ; Kanazawa, Flávio ; Souto, Isabel ; Brito, Elisabeth ; Silva, Carlos F</creatorcontrib><description>A third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) was developed internationally aiming to respond to new trends in working conditions, theoretical concepts, and international experience. This article aims to present the preliminary validation studies for the Portuguese middle version of COPSOQ III. This is an exploratory cross-sectional study viewing the cross-cultural adaption of COPSOQ III to Portugal, ensuring the contents and face validity and performing field-testing in order to reduce the number of items and to obtain insight into the data structure, through classic test theory and item response theory approaches. The qualitative study encompassed 29 participants and the quantitative one 659 participants from municipalities and healthcare settings. Content analysis suggested that minor re-wording could improve the face validity of items, while a reduced version, with 85 items, shows psychometric stability, achieving good internal consistency in all subscales. The COPSOQ III Portuguese middle version proved to be a valid preliminary version for future validation studies with various populations, able to be used in correlational studies with other dimensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031167</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35162192</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Consent ; Content analysis ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Data structures ; Evolution ; Health care ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; ISO standards ; Medical personnel ; Municipalities ; Population studies ; Portugal ; Psychological aspects ; Psychometrics - methods ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Safety management ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validation studies ; Validity ; Work environment ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-01, Vol.19 (3), p.1167</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-b890c04df2dcdd5100b24930bb257af8e759fc5c4178b929f88f9bfed8fed2f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-b890c04df2dcdd5100b24930bb257af8e759fc5c4178b929f88f9bfed8fed2f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2950-5208 ; 0000-0001-5504-4332 ; 0000-0001-8773-3757 ; 0000-0002-8943-3528 ; 0000-0001-6666-6268</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834667/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834667/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27915,27916,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162192$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cotrim, Teresa P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bem-Haja, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Anabela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Cláudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antunes, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Joaquim S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanazawa, Flávio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souto, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Carlos F</creatorcontrib><title>The Portuguese Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: Preliminary Validation Studies of the Middle Version among Municipal and Healthcare Workers</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>A third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) was developed internationally aiming to respond to new trends in working conditions, theoretical concepts, and international experience. This article aims to present the preliminary validation studies for the Portuguese middle version of COPSOQ III. This is an exploratory cross-sectional study viewing the cross-cultural adaption of COPSOQ III to Portugal, ensuring the contents and face validity and performing field-testing in order to reduce the number of items and to obtain insight into the data structure, through classic test theory and item response theory approaches. The qualitative study encompassed 29 participants and the quantitative one 659 participants from municipalities and healthcare settings. Content analysis suggested that minor re-wording could improve the face validity of items, while a reduced version, with 85 items, shows psychometric stability, achieving good internal consistency in all subscales. The COPSOQ III Portuguese middle version proved to be a valid preliminary version for future validation studies with various populations, able to be used in correlational studies with other dimensions.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Data structures</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ISO standards</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Portugal</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkktv1DAUhSMEog_YskSW2LCZ4lecmAUSGgFFasUghrKMHPt64iGxg50g9Q_1d-Ko7ahlYdnS-e65PvYtilcEnzEm8Tu3hzh2RGJGiKieFMdECLziApOnD85HxUlKe4xZzYV8XhyxkghKJD0ubrYdoE2I07ybIQHadi4adAUxueBRsGjK-jqM4Du1A4826Vp3IQXtVI--55Ipc165CO_RJkLvBudVvEZXqndGLSL6Mc3GQbo3u3TG9HBooYbgd-hy9k67MXsqb9A5qH7qtIqAfoX4O5MvimdW9Qle3u2nxc_Pn7br89XFty9f1x8vVppzMa3aWmKNubHUaGNKgnFLuWS4bWlZKVtDVUqrS81JVbeSSlvXVrYWTJ0XtYydFh9ufce5HcBo8FNUfTNGN-RUTVCueax41zW78Lepa8aFqLLB2zuDGP4sz9MMLmnoe-UhzKmhgkoseMWWXm_-Q_dhjj7HW6iqZASTMlNnt5SOIaUI9nAZgptlBJrHI5ALXj-McMDv_5z9A0vFsrs</recordid><startdate>20220121</startdate><enddate>20220121</enddate><creator>Cotrim, Teresa P</creator><creator>Bem-Haja, Pedro</creator><creator>Pereira, Anabela</creator><creator>Fernandes, Cláudia</creator><creator>Azevedo, Rui</creator><creator>Antunes, Samuel</creator><creator>Pinto, Joaquim S</creator><creator>Kanazawa, Flávio</creator><creator>Souto, Isabel</creator><creator>Brito, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Silva, Carlos F</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2950-5208</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5504-4332</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8773-3757</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8943-3528</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6666-6268</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220121</creationdate><title>The Portuguese Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: Preliminary Validation Studies of the Middle Version among Municipal and Healthcare Workers</title><author>Cotrim, Teresa P ; Bem-Haja, Pedro ; Pereira, Anabela ; Fernandes, Cláudia ; Azevedo, Rui ; Antunes, Samuel ; Pinto, Joaquim S ; Kanazawa, Flávio ; Souto, Isabel ; Brito, Elisabeth ; Silva, Carlos F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-b890c04df2dcdd5100b24930bb257af8e759fc5c4178b929f88f9bfed8fed2f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Data structures</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ISO standards</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Portugal</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cotrim, Teresa P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bem-Haja, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Anabela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Cláudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antunes, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Joaquim S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanazawa, Flávio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souto, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Carlos F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cotrim, Teresa P</au><au>Bem-Haja, Pedro</au><au>Pereira, Anabela</au><au>Fernandes, Cláudia</au><au>Azevedo, Rui</au><au>Antunes, Samuel</au><au>Pinto, Joaquim S</au><au>Kanazawa, Flávio</au><au>Souto, Isabel</au><au>Brito, Elisabeth</au><au>Silva, Carlos F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Portuguese Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: Preliminary Validation Studies of the Middle Version among Municipal and Healthcare Workers</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-01-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1167</spage><pages>1167-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>A third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) was developed internationally aiming to respond to new trends in working conditions, theoretical concepts, and international experience. This article aims to present the preliminary validation studies for the Portuguese middle version of COPSOQ III. This is an exploratory cross-sectional study viewing the cross-cultural adaption of COPSOQ III to Portugal, ensuring the contents and face validity and performing field-testing in order to reduce the number of items and to obtain insight into the data structure, through classic test theory and item response theory approaches. The qualitative study encompassed 29 participants and the quantitative one 659 participants from municipalities and healthcare settings. Content analysis suggested that minor re-wording could improve the face validity of items, while a reduced version, with 85 items, shows psychometric stability, achieving good internal consistency in all subscales. The COPSOQ III Portuguese middle version proved to be a valid preliminary version for future validation studies with various populations, able to be used in correlational studies with other dimensions.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35162192</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph19031167</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2950-5208</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5504-4332</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8773-3757</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8943-3528</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6666-6268</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-4601
ispartof International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-01, Vol.19 (3), p.1167
issn 1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8834667
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adaptation
Consent
Content analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Data structures
Evolution
Health care
Health Personnel
Humans
ISO standards
Medical personnel
Municipalities
Population studies
Portugal
Psychological aspects
Psychometrics - methods
Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Safety management
Surveys and Questionnaires
Validation studies
Validity
Work environment
Working conditions
title The Portuguese Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: Preliminary Validation Studies of the Middle Version among Municipal and Healthcare Workers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T02%3A37%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Portuguese%20Third%20Version%20of%20the%20Copenhagen%20Psychosocial%20Questionnaire:%20Preliminary%20Validation%20Studies%20of%20the%20Middle%20Version%20among%20Municipal%20and%20Healthcare%20Workers&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Cotrim,%20Teresa%20P&rft.date=2022-01-21&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1167&rft.pages=1167-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph19031167&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2629064733%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627531015&rft_id=info:pmid/35162192&rfr_iscdi=true