Risk-Factor Based Lead Screening and Correlation with Blood Lead Levels in Pregnancy
Objectives Lead exposure has devastating neurologic consequences for children and may begin in utero. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends prenatal lead screening using a risk factor-based approach rather than universal blood testing. The clinical utility of this approa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Maternal and child health journal 2022, Vol.26 (1), p.185-192 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 192 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 185 |
container_title | Maternal and child health journal |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Johnson, Katherine M. Specht, Aaron J. Hart, Jessica M. Salahuddin, Saira Erlinger, Adrienne L. Hacker, Michele R. Woolf, Alan D. Hauptman, Marissa Karumanchi, S. Ananth O’Brien, Karen Wylie, Blair J. |
description | Objectives
Lead exposure has devastating neurologic consequences for children and may begin in utero. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends prenatal lead screening using a risk factor-based approach rather than universal blood testing. The clinical utility of this approach has not been studied. We evaluated a risk-factor based questionnaire to detect elevated blood lead levels in pregnancy.
Methods
We performed a secondary analysis of a cohort of parturients enrolled to evaluate the association of lead with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. We included participants in this analysis if they had a singleton pregnancy ≥ 34 weeks’ gestation with blood lead levels recorded. Participants completed a lead risk factor survey modified for pregnancy. We defined elevated blood lead as ≥ 2 μg/dL, as this was the clinically reportable level.
Results
Of 102 participants enrolled in the cohort, 92 had blood lead measured as part of the study. The vast majority (78%) had 1 or more risk factor for elevated lead using the questionnaire yet none had clinical blood lead testing during routine visits. Only two participants (2.2%) had elevated blood lead levels. The questionnaire had high sensitivity but poor specificity for predicting detectable lead levels (sensitivity 100%, specificity 22%).
Conclusions for Practice
Prenatal risk-factor based lead screening appears underutilized in practice and does not adequately discriminate between those with and without elevated blood levels. Given the complexity of the risk factor-based approach and underutilization, the benefit and cost-effectiveness of universal lead testing should be further explored. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10995-021-03325-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8826746</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A689970140</galeid><sourcerecordid>A689970140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-5b400b733cf3449bd6d7199b49e08959b1b1b143f5d9562e4e9f84d69e05d8643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl9rFDEUxQex2Fr9Aj7IgNC31PyfyYvQLlaFhYrW55BJ7symziY1ma3ttzfrrm0XFslDQu7vnCQnt6reEHxKMG7eZ4KVEghTgjBjVKC7Z9UREQ1DUtL2eVljRVHTNuKwepnzNcZFhvmL6pAJTDFuxVF19c3nn-jC2Cmm-txkcPUcjKu_2wQQfBhqE1w9iynBaCYfQ_3bT4v6fIxxS87hFsZc-1B_TTAEE-z9q-qgN2OG19v5uPpx8fFq9hnNLz99mZ3NkZUET0h0HOOuYcz2jHPVOekaolTHFeBWCdWR9eCsF04JSYGD6lvuZCkL10rOjqsPG9-bVbcEZyFMyYz6JvmlSfc6Gq93K8Ev9BBvddtS2XBZDN5tDVL8tYI86eu4SqHcWVNJSYmLEvVIDWYE7UMfi5ld-mz1mWyVajDhuFBoDzVAgHJyDND7sr3Dn-7hy3Cw9Hav4OSJYAFmnBY5jqv1r-RdkG5Am2LOCfqHRAjW687Rm87R5XX6b-fouyJ6-zTLB8m_VikA2wC5lMIA6TGr_9j-AfDdy6o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621100219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk-Factor Based Lead Screening and Correlation with Blood Lead Levels in Pregnancy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Johnson, Katherine M. ; Specht, Aaron J. ; Hart, Jessica M. ; Salahuddin, Saira ; Erlinger, Adrienne L. ; Hacker, Michele R. ; Woolf, Alan D. ; Hauptman, Marissa ; Karumanchi, S. Ananth ; O’Brien, Karen ; Wylie, Blair J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Katherine M. ; Specht, Aaron J. ; Hart, Jessica M. ; Salahuddin, Saira ; Erlinger, Adrienne L. ; Hacker, Michele R. ; Woolf, Alan D. ; Hauptman, Marissa ; Karumanchi, S. Ananth ; O’Brien, Karen ; Wylie, Blair J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
Lead exposure has devastating neurologic consequences for children and may begin in utero. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends prenatal lead screening using a risk factor-based approach rather than universal blood testing. The clinical utility of this approach has not been studied. We evaluated a risk-factor based questionnaire to detect elevated blood lead levels in pregnancy.
Methods
We performed a secondary analysis of a cohort of parturients enrolled to evaluate the association of lead with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. We included participants in this analysis if they had a singleton pregnancy ≥ 34 weeks’ gestation with blood lead levels recorded. Participants completed a lead risk factor survey modified for pregnancy. We defined elevated blood lead as ≥ 2 μg/dL, as this was the clinically reportable level.
Results
Of 102 participants enrolled in the cohort, 92 had blood lead measured as part of the study. The vast majority (78%) had 1 or more risk factor for elevated lead using the questionnaire yet none had clinical blood lead testing during routine visits. Only two participants (2.2%) had elevated blood lead levels. The questionnaire had high sensitivity but poor specificity for predicting detectable lead levels (sensitivity 100%, specificity 22%).
Conclusions for Practice
Prenatal risk-factor based lead screening appears underutilized in practice and does not adequately discriminate between those with and without elevated blood levels. Given the complexity of the risk factor-based approach and underutilization, the benefit and cost-effectiveness of universal lead testing should be further explored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03325-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35020085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Blood levels ; Child ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Gestational Age ; Gynecology ; Health aspects ; Health surveys ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Lead ; Lead content ; Lead in the body ; Lead poisoning ; Mass Screening ; Maternal and Child Health ; Medical screening ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Methods ; Pediatrics ; Population Economics ; Pregnancy ; Pregnant women ; Prenatal influences ; Public Health ; Questionnaires ; Risk Factors ; Secondary analysis ; Sociology ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Maternal and child health journal, 2022, Vol.26 (1), p.185-192</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-5b400b733cf3449bd6d7199b49e08959b1b1b143f5d9562e4e9f84d69e05d8643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-5b400b733cf3449bd6d7199b49e08959b1b1b143f5d9562e4e9f84d69e05d8643</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5127-8139</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10995-021-03325-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10995-021-03325-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35020085$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Katherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Specht, Aaron J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salahuddin, Saira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erlinger, Adrienne L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hacker, Michele R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolf, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauptman, Marissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karumanchi, S. Ananth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Brien, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wylie, Blair J.</creatorcontrib><title>Risk-Factor Based Lead Screening and Correlation with Blood Lead Levels in Pregnancy</title><title>Maternal and child health journal</title><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><description>Objectives
Lead exposure has devastating neurologic consequences for children and may begin in utero. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends prenatal lead screening using a risk factor-based approach rather than universal blood testing. The clinical utility of this approach has not been studied. We evaluated a risk-factor based questionnaire to detect elevated blood lead levels in pregnancy.
Methods
We performed a secondary analysis of a cohort of parturients enrolled to evaluate the association of lead with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. We included participants in this analysis if they had a singleton pregnancy ≥ 34 weeks’ gestation with blood lead levels recorded. Participants completed a lead risk factor survey modified for pregnancy. We defined elevated blood lead as ≥ 2 μg/dL, as this was the clinically reportable level.
Results
Of 102 participants enrolled in the cohort, 92 had blood lead measured as part of the study. The vast majority (78%) had 1 or more risk factor for elevated lead using the questionnaire yet none had clinical blood lead testing during routine visits. Only two participants (2.2%) had elevated blood lead levels. The questionnaire had high sensitivity but poor specificity for predicting detectable lead levels (sensitivity 100%, specificity 22%).
Conclusions for Practice
Prenatal risk-factor based lead screening appears underutilized in practice and does not adequately discriminate between those with and without elevated blood levels. Given the complexity of the risk factor-based approach and underutilization, the benefit and cost-effectiveness of universal lead testing should be further explored.</description><subject>Blood levels</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Lead content</subject><subject>Lead in the body</subject><subject>Lead poisoning</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Maternal and Child Health</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnant women</subject><subject>Prenatal influences</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Secondary analysis</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>1092-7875</issn><issn>1573-6628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl9rFDEUxQex2Fr9Aj7IgNC31PyfyYvQLlaFhYrW55BJ7symziY1ma3ttzfrrm0XFslDQu7vnCQnt6reEHxKMG7eZ4KVEghTgjBjVKC7Z9UREQ1DUtL2eVljRVHTNuKwepnzNcZFhvmL6pAJTDFuxVF19c3nn-jC2Cmm-txkcPUcjKu_2wQQfBhqE1w9iynBaCYfQ_3bT4v6fIxxS87hFsZc-1B_TTAEE-z9q-qgN2OG19v5uPpx8fFq9hnNLz99mZ3NkZUET0h0HOOuYcz2jHPVOekaolTHFeBWCdWR9eCsF04JSYGD6lvuZCkL10rOjqsPG9-bVbcEZyFMyYz6JvmlSfc6Gq93K8Ev9BBvddtS2XBZDN5tDVL8tYI86eu4SqHcWVNJSYmLEvVIDWYE7UMfi5ld-mz1mWyVajDhuFBoDzVAgHJyDND7sr3Dn-7hy3Cw9Hav4OSJYAFmnBY5jqv1r-RdkG5Am2LOCfqHRAjW687Rm87R5XX6b-fouyJ6-zTLB8m_VikA2wC5lMIA6TGr_9j-AfDdy6o</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Johnson, Katherine M.</creator><creator>Specht, Aaron J.</creator><creator>Hart, Jessica M.</creator><creator>Salahuddin, Saira</creator><creator>Erlinger, Adrienne L.</creator><creator>Hacker, Michele R.</creator><creator>Woolf, Alan D.</creator><creator>Hauptman, Marissa</creator><creator>Karumanchi, S. Ananth</creator><creator>O’Brien, Karen</creator><creator>Wylie, Blair J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-8139</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Risk-Factor Based Lead Screening and Correlation with Blood Lead Levels in Pregnancy</title><author>Johnson, Katherine M. ; Specht, Aaron J. ; Hart, Jessica M. ; Salahuddin, Saira ; Erlinger, Adrienne L. ; Hacker, Michele R. ; Woolf, Alan D. ; Hauptman, Marissa ; Karumanchi, S. Ananth ; O’Brien, Karen ; Wylie, Blair J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-5b400b733cf3449bd6d7199b49e08959b1b1b143f5d9562e4e9f84d69e05d8643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Blood levels</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Lead content</topic><topic>Lead in the body</topic><topic>Lead poisoning</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Maternal and Child Health</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnant women</topic><topic>Prenatal influences</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Secondary analysis</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Katherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Specht, Aaron J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salahuddin, Saira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erlinger, Adrienne L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hacker, Michele R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolf, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauptman, Marissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karumanchi, S. Ananth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Brien, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wylie, Blair J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Katherine M.</au><au>Specht, Aaron J.</au><au>Hart, Jessica M.</au><au>Salahuddin, Saira</au><au>Erlinger, Adrienne L.</au><au>Hacker, Michele R.</au><au>Woolf, Alan D.</au><au>Hauptman, Marissa</au><au>Karumanchi, S. Ananth</au><au>O’Brien, Karen</au><au>Wylie, Blair J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk-Factor Based Lead Screening and Correlation with Blood Lead Levels in Pregnancy</atitle><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle><stitle>Matern Child Health J</stitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>185-192</pages><issn>1092-7875</issn><eissn>1573-6628</eissn><abstract>Objectives
Lead exposure has devastating neurologic consequences for children and may begin in utero. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends prenatal lead screening using a risk factor-based approach rather than universal blood testing. The clinical utility of this approach has not been studied. We evaluated a risk-factor based questionnaire to detect elevated blood lead levels in pregnancy.
Methods
We performed a secondary analysis of a cohort of parturients enrolled to evaluate the association of lead with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. We included participants in this analysis if they had a singleton pregnancy ≥ 34 weeks’ gestation with blood lead levels recorded. Participants completed a lead risk factor survey modified for pregnancy. We defined elevated blood lead as ≥ 2 μg/dL, as this was the clinically reportable level.
Results
Of 102 participants enrolled in the cohort, 92 had blood lead measured as part of the study. The vast majority (78%) had 1 or more risk factor for elevated lead using the questionnaire yet none had clinical blood lead testing during routine visits. Only two participants (2.2%) had elevated blood lead levels. The questionnaire had high sensitivity but poor specificity for predicting detectable lead levels (sensitivity 100%, specificity 22%).
Conclusions for Practice
Prenatal risk-factor based lead screening appears underutilized in practice and does not adequately discriminate between those with and without elevated blood levels. Given the complexity of the risk factor-based approach and underutilization, the benefit and cost-effectiveness of universal lead testing should be further explored.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>35020085</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10995-021-03325-x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-8139</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1092-7875 |
ispartof | Maternal and child health journal, 2022, Vol.26 (1), p.185-192 |
issn | 1092-7875 1573-6628 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8826746 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Blood levels Child Diagnosis Female Gestational Age Gynecology Health aspects Health surveys Humans Hypertension Lead Lead content Lead in the body Lead poisoning Mass Screening Maternal and Child Health Medical screening Medicine Medicine & Public Health Methods Pediatrics Population Economics Pregnancy Pregnant women Prenatal influences Public Health Questionnaires Risk Factors Secondary analysis Sociology Surveys |
title | Risk-Factor Based Lead Screening and Correlation with Blood Lead Levels in Pregnancy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A49%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk-Factor%20Based%20Lead%20Screening%20and%20Correlation%20with%20Blood%20Lead%20Levels%20in%20Pregnancy&rft.jtitle=Maternal%20and%20child%20health%20journal&rft.au=Johnson,%20Katherine%20M.&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=185-192&rft.issn=1092-7875&rft.eissn=1573-6628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10995-021-03325-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA689970140%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621100219&rft_id=info:pmid/35020085&rft_galeid=A689970140&rfr_iscdi=true |