Risk-Factor Based Lead Screening and Correlation with Blood Lead Levels in Pregnancy

Objectives Lead exposure has devastating neurologic consequences for children and may begin in utero. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends prenatal lead screening using a risk factor-based approach rather than universal blood testing. The clinical utility of this approa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Maternal and child health journal 2022, Vol.26 (1), p.185-192
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, Katherine M., Specht, Aaron J., Hart, Jessica M., Salahuddin, Saira, Erlinger, Adrienne L., Hacker, Michele R., Woolf, Alan D., Hauptman, Marissa, Karumanchi, S. Ananth, O’Brien, Karen, Wylie, Blair J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 192
container_issue 1
container_start_page 185
container_title Maternal and child health journal
container_volume 26
creator Johnson, Katherine M.
Specht, Aaron J.
Hart, Jessica M.
Salahuddin, Saira
Erlinger, Adrienne L.
Hacker, Michele R.
Woolf, Alan D.
Hauptman, Marissa
Karumanchi, S. Ananth
O’Brien, Karen
Wylie, Blair J.
description Objectives Lead exposure has devastating neurologic consequences for children and may begin in utero. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends prenatal lead screening using a risk factor-based approach rather than universal blood testing. The clinical utility of this approach has not been studied. We evaluated a risk-factor based questionnaire to detect elevated blood lead levels in pregnancy. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of a cohort of parturients enrolled to evaluate the association of lead with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. We included participants in this analysis if they had a singleton pregnancy ≥ 34 weeks’ gestation with blood lead levels recorded. Participants completed a lead risk factor survey modified for pregnancy. We defined elevated blood lead as ≥ 2 μg/dL, as this was the clinically reportable level. Results Of 102 participants enrolled in the cohort, 92 had blood lead measured as part of the study. The vast majority (78%) had 1 or more risk factor for elevated lead using the questionnaire yet none had clinical blood lead testing during routine visits. Only two participants (2.2%) had elevated blood lead levels. The questionnaire had high sensitivity but poor specificity for predicting detectable lead levels (sensitivity 100%, specificity 22%). Conclusions for Practice Prenatal risk-factor based lead screening appears underutilized in practice and does not adequately discriminate between those with and without elevated blood levels. Given the complexity of the risk factor-based approach and underutilization, the benefit and cost-effectiveness of universal lead testing should be further explored.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10995-021-03325-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8826746</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A689970140</galeid><sourcerecordid>A689970140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-5b400b733cf3449bd6d7199b49e08959b1b1b143f5d9562e4e9f84d69e05d8643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl9rFDEUxQex2Fr9Aj7IgNC31PyfyYvQLlaFhYrW55BJ7symziY1ma3ttzfrrm0XFslDQu7vnCQnt6reEHxKMG7eZ4KVEghTgjBjVKC7Z9UREQ1DUtL2eVljRVHTNuKwepnzNcZFhvmL6pAJTDFuxVF19c3nn-jC2Cmm-txkcPUcjKu_2wQQfBhqE1w9iynBaCYfQ_3bT4v6fIxxS87hFsZc-1B_TTAEE-z9q-qgN2OG19v5uPpx8fFq9hnNLz99mZ3NkZUET0h0HOOuYcz2jHPVOekaolTHFeBWCdWR9eCsF04JSYGD6lvuZCkL10rOjqsPG9-bVbcEZyFMyYz6JvmlSfc6Gq93K8Ev9BBvddtS2XBZDN5tDVL8tYI86eu4SqHcWVNJSYmLEvVIDWYE7UMfi5ld-mz1mWyVajDhuFBoDzVAgHJyDND7sr3Dn-7hy3Cw9Hav4OSJYAFmnBY5jqv1r-RdkG5Am2LOCfqHRAjW687Rm87R5XX6b-fouyJ6-zTLB8m_VikA2wC5lMIA6TGr_9j-AfDdy6o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621100219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk-Factor Based Lead Screening and Correlation with Blood Lead Levels in Pregnancy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Johnson, Katherine M. ; Specht, Aaron J. ; Hart, Jessica M. ; Salahuddin, Saira ; Erlinger, Adrienne L. ; Hacker, Michele R. ; Woolf, Alan D. ; Hauptman, Marissa ; Karumanchi, S. Ananth ; O’Brien, Karen ; Wylie, Blair J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Katherine M. ; Specht, Aaron J. ; Hart, Jessica M. ; Salahuddin, Saira ; Erlinger, Adrienne L. ; Hacker, Michele R. ; Woolf, Alan D. ; Hauptman, Marissa ; Karumanchi, S. Ananth ; O’Brien, Karen ; Wylie, Blair J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Lead exposure has devastating neurologic consequences for children and may begin in utero. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends prenatal lead screening using a risk factor-based approach rather than universal blood testing. The clinical utility of this approach has not been studied. We evaluated a risk-factor based questionnaire to detect elevated blood lead levels in pregnancy. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of a cohort of parturients enrolled to evaluate the association of lead with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. We included participants in this analysis if they had a singleton pregnancy ≥ 34 weeks’ gestation with blood lead levels recorded. Participants completed a lead risk factor survey modified for pregnancy. We defined elevated blood lead as ≥ 2 μg/dL, as this was the clinically reportable level. Results Of 102 participants enrolled in the cohort, 92 had blood lead measured as part of the study. The vast majority (78%) had 1 or more risk factor for elevated lead using the questionnaire yet none had clinical blood lead testing during routine visits. Only two participants (2.2%) had elevated blood lead levels. The questionnaire had high sensitivity but poor specificity for predicting detectable lead levels (sensitivity 100%, specificity 22%). Conclusions for Practice Prenatal risk-factor based lead screening appears underutilized in practice and does not adequately discriminate between those with and without elevated blood levels. Given the complexity of the risk factor-based approach and underutilization, the benefit and cost-effectiveness of universal lead testing should be further explored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03325-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35020085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Blood levels ; Child ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Gestational Age ; Gynecology ; Health aspects ; Health surveys ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Lead ; Lead content ; Lead in the body ; Lead poisoning ; Mass Screening ; Maternal and Child Health ; Medical screening ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Methods ; Pediatrics ; Population Economics ; Pregnancy ; Pregnant women ; Prenatal influences ; Public Health ; Questionnaires ; Risk Factors ; Secondary analysis ; Sociology ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Maternal and child health journal, 2022, Vol.26 (1), p.185-192</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-5b400b733cf3449bd6d7199b49e08959b1b1b143f5d9562e4e9f84d69e05d8643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-5b400b733cf3449bd6d7199b49e08959b1b1b143f5d9562e4e9f84d69e05d8643</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5127-8139</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10995-021-03325-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10995-021-03325-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35020085$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Katherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Specht, Aaron J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salahuddin, Saira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erlinger, Adrienne L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hacker, Michele R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolf, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauptman, Marissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karumanchi, S. Ananth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Brien, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wylie, Blair J.</creatorcontrib><title>Risk-Factor Based Lead Screening and Correlation with Blood Lead Levels in Pregnancy</title><title>Maternal and child health journal</title><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><description>Objectives Lead exposure has devastating neurologic consequences for children and may begin in utero. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends prenatal lead screening using a risk factor-based approach rather than universal blood testing. The clinical utility of this approach has not been studied. We evaluated a risk-factor based questionnaire to detect elevated blood lead levels in pregnancy. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of a cohort of parturients enrolled to evaluate the association of lead with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. We included participants in this analysis if they had a singleton pregnancy ≥ 34 weeks’ gestation with blood lead levels recorded. Participants completed a lead risk factor survey modified for pregnancy. We defined elevated blood lead as ≥ 2 μg/dL, as this was the clinically reportable level. Results Of 102 participants enrolled in the cohort, 92 had blood lead measured as part of the study. The vast majority (78%) had 1 or more risk factor for elevated lead using the questionnaire yet none had clinical blood lead testing during routine visits. Only two participants (2.2%) had elevated blood lead levels. The questionnaire had high sensitivity but poor specificity for predicting detectable lead levels (sensitivity 100%, specificity 22%). Conclusions for Practice Prenatal risk-factor based lead screening appears underutilized in practice and does not adequately discriminate between those with and without elevated blood levels. Given the complexity of the risk factor-based approach and underutilization, the benefit and cost-effectiveness of universal lead testing should be further explored.</description><subject>Blood levels</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Lead content</subject><subject>Lead in the body</subject><subject>Lead poisoning</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Maternal and Child Health</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnant women</subject><subject>Prenatal influences</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Secondary analysis</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>1092-7875</issn><issn>1573-6628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl9rFDEUxQex2Fr9Aj7IgNC31PyfyYvQLlaFhYrW55BJ7symziY1ma3ttzfrrm0XFslDQu7vnCQnt6reEHxKMG7eZ4KVEghTgjBjVKC7Z9UREQ1DUtL2eVljRVHTNuKwepnzNcZFhvmL6pAJTDFuxVF19c3nn-jC2Cmm-txkcPUcjKu_2wQQfBhqE1w9iynBaCYfQ_3bT4v6fIxxS87hFsZc-1B_TTAEE-z9q-qgN2OG19v5uPpx8fFq9hnNLz99mZ3NkZUET0h0HOOuYcz2jHPVOekaolTHFeBWCdWR9eCsF04JSYGD6lvuZCkL10rOjqsPG9-bVbcEZyFMyYz6JvmlSfc6Gq93K8Ev9BBvddtS2XBZDN5tDVL8tYI86eu4SqHcWVNJSYmLEvVIDWYE7UMfi5ld-mz1mWyVajDhuFBoDzVAgHJyDND7sr3Dn-7hy3Cw9Hav4OSJYAFmnBY5jqv1r-RdkG5Am2LOCfqHRAjW687Rm87R5XX6b-fouyJ6-zTLB8m_VikA2wC5lMIA6TGr_9j-AfDdy6o</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Johnson, Katherine M.</creator><creator>Specht, Aaron J.</creator><creator>Hart, Jessica M.</creator><creator>Salahuddin, Saira</creator><creator>Erlinger, Adrienne L.</creator><creator>Hacker, Michele R.</creator><creator>Woolf, Alan D.</creator><creator>Hauptman, Marissa</creator><creator>Karumanchi, S. Ananth</creator><creator>O’Brien, Karen</creator><creator>Wylie, Blair J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-8139</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Risk-Factor Based Lead Screening and Correlation with Blood Lead Levels in Pregnancy</title><author>Johnson, Katherine M. ; Specht, Aaron J. ; Hart, Jessica M. ; Salahuddin, Saira ; Erlinger, Adrienne L. ; Hacker, Michele R. ; Woolf, Alan D. ; Hauptman, Marissa ; Karumanchi, S. Ananth ; O’Brien, Karen ; Wylie, Blair J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-5b400b733cf3449bd6d7199b49e08959b1b1b143f5d9562e4e9f84d69e05d8643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Blood levels</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Lead content</topic><topic>Lead in the body</topic><topic>Lead poisoning</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Maternal and Child Health</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnant women</topic><topic>Prenatal influences</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Secondary analysis</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Katherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Specht, Aaron J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salahuddin, Saira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erlinger, Adrienne L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hacker, Michele R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolf, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauptman, Marissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karumanchi, S. Ananth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Brien, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wylie, Blair J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Katherine M.</au><au>Specht, Aaron J.</au><au>Hart, Jessica M.</au><au>Salahuddin, Saira</au><au>Erlinger, Adrienne L.</au><au>Hacker, Michele R.</au><au>Woolf, Alan D.</au><au>Hauptman, Marissa</au><au>Karumanchi, S. Ananth</au><au>O’Brien, Karen</au><au>Wylie, Blair J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk-Factor Based Lead Screening and Correlation with Blood Lead Levels in Pregnancy</atitle><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle><stitle>Matern Child Health J</stitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>185-192</pages><issn>1092-7875</issn><eissn>1573-6628</eissn><abstract>Objectives Lead exposure has devastating neurologic consequences for children and may begin in utero. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends prenatal lead screening using a risk factor-based approach rather than universal blood testing. The clinical utility of this approach has not been studied. We evaluated a risk-factor based questionnaire to detect elevated blood lead levels in pregnancy. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of a cohort of parturients enrolled to evaluate the association of lead with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. We included participants in this analysis if they had a singleton pregnancy ≥ 34 weeks’ gestation with blood lead levels recorded. Participants completed a lead risk factor survey modified for pregnancy. We defined elevated blood lead as ≥ 2 μg/dL, as this was the clinically reportable level. Results Of 102 participants enrolled in the cohort, 92 had blood lead measured as part of the study. The vast majority (78%) had 1 or more risk factor for elevated lead using the questionnaire yet none had clinical blood lead testing during routine visits. Only two participants (2.2%) had elevated blood lead levels. The questionnaire had high sensitivity but poor specificity for predicting detectable lead levels (sensitivity 100%, specificity 22%). Conclusions for Practice Prenatal risk-factor based lead screening appears underutilized in practice and does not adequately discriminate between those with and without elevated blood levels. Given the complexity of the risk factor-based approach and underutilization, the benefit and cost-effectiveness of universal lead testing should be further explored.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>35020085</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10995-021-03325-x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-8139</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-7875
ispartof Maternal and child health journal, 2022, Vol.26 (1), p.185-192
issn 1092-7875
1573-6628
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8826746
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Blood levels
Child
Diagnosis
Female
Gestational Age
Gynecology
Health aspects
Health surveys
Humans
Hypertension
Lead
Lead content
Lead in the body
Lead poisoning
Mass Screening
Maternal and Child Health
Medical screening
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Methods
Pediatrics
Population Economics
Pregnancy
Pregnant women
Prenatal influences
Public Health
Questionnaires
Risk Factors
Secondary analysis
Sociology
Surveys
title Risk-Factor Based Lead Screening and Correlation with Blood Lead Levels in Pregnancy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A49%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk-Factor%20Based%20Lead%20Screening%20and%20Correlation%20with%20Blood%20Lead%20Levels%20in%20Pregnancy&rft.jtitle=Maternal%20and%20child%20health%20journal&rft.au=Johnson,%20Katherine%20M.&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=185-192&rft.issn=1092-7875&rft.eissn=1573-6628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10995-021-03325-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA689970140%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621100219&rft_id=info:pmid/35020085&rft_galeid=A689970140&rfr_iscdi=true