Débats autour des races canines et de la santé publique à Montréal et au Québec (2016–2019)
Objectives We examine the public policies that have been formulated to reduce the incidence of dog bites. We do so to encourage the adoption of policies aligned with One Health promotion. Methods This case-study research involved an ethnographic approach. Our qualitative analysis derived from partic...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of public health 2022-02, Vol.113 (1), p.165-173 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 173 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 165 |
| container_title | Canadian journal of public health |
| container_volume | 113 |
| creator | Mouton, Morgan Rock, Melanie J. |
| description | Objectives
We examine the public policies that have been formulated to reduce the incidence of dog bites. We do so to encourage the adoption of policies aligned with One Health promotion.
Methods
This case-study research involved an ethnographic approach. Our qualitative analysis derived from participant observation, policy documents, media coverage, and interviews with stakeholders in Montreal (Quebec).
Results
Following on from a human fatality due to dog bite injuries, the City of Montreal decided to ban certain types of dogs based on their ‘breed.’ In the ensuing discussions, the ‘Calgary model’ emerged as an alternative to breed-specific legislation. These discussions led to a change in policy direction for Montreal, and for Quebec as a whole. Furthermore, we discerned marked improvements with respect to intersectoral coordination in the wake of this controversy.
Conclusion
‘Policy mobilities’ offer a useful conceptual apparatus for understanding how public policies for dog bite prevention are polarized around controversial proposals, to the detriment of discussions that focus on policy implementation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.17269/s41997-021-00550-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8825900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2626534428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-b278a74a375a7750e758d08055e72b9069743c85c8f8585751b732a8cdb774d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUtuFDEQtRARmQycAAlZYpMsOvhf9gYpCoFEGoSQYG253Z6ko57u0O6OlB134AJs5xxzE05CTToJkAUbl1z16lXVe4S85OyQgzDuTVbcOSiY4AVjWrNCPiEz7gQrQIF5SmaMMVsoYeQu2cv5Er9SgnxGdqWSVnAjZqR8t1mXYcg0jEM39rRKmfYh4htDW7cY04BJ2gSaQzts1vRqLJv625jo5if92LVDv1mHZosKI_08IluKdF8wbn59_4HBHTwnO8vQ5PTiLs7J1_cnX45Pi8WnD2fHR4siaiuGohRgA6ggQQcAzRJoWzGLhyUQpWPGgZLR6miXVlsNmpcgRbCxKgFUBXJO3k68uOEqVTHhbqHxV329Cv2N70Lt_6209YU_7669tUI71GZODiaCi0dtp0cLv81t5TNO8GuO2P27YX2HYuTBr-ocU9OENnVj9kIbZqXkxiD09SPoJSrdohReGGG0VEpYRMkJFfsu5z4tHzbgzN_67Se_Pfrtb_32Erte_X3zQ8-9wQhQEyBjqT1P_Z_h_-P9DYaGtk0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2626534428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Débats autour des races canines et de la santé publique à Montréal et au Québec (2016–2019)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>REPÈRE - Free</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mouton, Morgan ; Rock, Melanie J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mouton, Morgan ; Rock, Melanie J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
We examine the public policies that have been formulated to reduce the incidence of dog bites. We do so to encourage the adoption of policies aligned with One Health promotion.
Methods
This case-study research involved an ethnographic approach. Our qualitative analysis derived from participant observation, policy documents, media coverage, and interviews with stakeholders in Montreal (Quebec).
Results
Following on from a human fatality due to dog bite injuries, the City of Montreal decided to ban certain types of dogs based on their ‘breed.’ In the ensuing discussions, the ‘Calgary model’ emerged as an alternative to breed-specific legislation. These discussions led to a change in policy direction for Montreal, and for Quebec as a whole. Furthermore, we discerned marked improvements with respect to intersectoral coordination in the wake of this controversy.
Conclusion
‘Policy mobilities’ offer a useful conceptual apparatus for understanding how public policies for dog bite prevention are polarized around controversial proposals, to the detriment of discussions that focus on policy implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1920-7476</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17269/s41997-021-00550-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34382162</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Animal bites ; Animals ; Anthropology, Cultural ; Bites and Stings - epidemiology ; Bites and Stings - prevention & control ; Dogs ; Health Promotion ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Legislation ; Life Sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Public Health ; Public Policy ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative research ; Quebec ; Recherche Qualitative ; Santé publique et épidémiologie</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of public health, 2022-02, Vol.113 (1), p.165-173</ispartof><rights>The Canadian Public Health Association 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Canadian Public Health Association.</rights><rights>The Canadian Public Health Association 2021.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-b278a74a375a7750e758d08055e72b9069743c85c8f8585751b732a8cdb774d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-b278a74a375a7750e758d08055e72b9069743c85c8f8585751b732a8cdb774d73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2436-3159 ; 0000-0002-3324-4808</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825900/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825900/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34382162$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03376921$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mouton, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rock, Melanie J.</creatorcontrib><title>Débats autour des races canines et de la santé publique à Montréal et au Québec (2016–2019)</title><title>Canadian journal of public health</title><addtitle>Can J Public Health</addtitle><addtitle>Can J Public Health</addtitle><description>Objectives
We examine the public policies that have been formulated to reduce the incidence of dog bites. We do so to encourage the adoption of policies aligned with One Health promotion.
Methods
This case-study research involved an ethnographic approach. Our qualitative analysis derived from participant observation, policy documents, media coverage, and interviews with stakeholders in Montreal (Quebec).
Results
Following on from a human fatality due to dog bite injuries, the City of Montreal decided to ban certain types of dogs based on their ‘breed.’ In the ensuing discussions, the ‘Calgary model’ emerged as an alternative to breed-specific legislation. These discussions led to a change in policy direction for Montreal, and for Quebec as a whole. Furthermore, we discerned marked improvements with respect to intersectoral coordination in the wake of this controversy.
Conclusion
‘Policy mobilities’ offer a useful conceptual apparatus for understanding how public policies for dog bite prevention are polarized around controversial proposals, to the detriment of discussions that focus on policy implementation.</description><subject>Animal bites</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropology, Cultural</subject><subject>Bites and Stings - epidemiology</subject><subject>Bites and Stings - prevention & control</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Health Promotion</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Quebec</subject><subject>Recherche Qualitative</subject><subject>Santé publique et épidémiologie</subject><issn>0008-4263</issn><issn>1920-7476</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UUtuFDEQtRARmQycAAlZYpMsOvhf9gYpCoFEGoSQYG253Z6ko57u0O6OlB134AJs5xxzE05CTToJkAUbl1z16lXVe4S85OyQgzDuTVbcOSiY4AVjWrNCPiEz7gQrQIF5SmaMMVsoYeQu2cv5Er9SgnxGdqWSVnAjZqR8t1mXYcg0jEM39rRKmfYh4htDW7cY04BJ2gSaQzts1vRqLJv625jo5if92LVDv1mHZosKI_08IluKdF8wbn59_4HBHTwnO8vQ5PTiLs7J1_cnX45Pi8WnD2fHR4siaiuGohRgA6ggQQcAzRJoWzGLhyUQpWPGgZLR6miXVlsNmpcgRbCxKgFUBXJO3k68uOEqVTHhbqHxV329Cv2N70Lt_6209YU_7669tUI71GZODiaCi0dtp0cLv81t5TNO8GuO2P27YX2HYuTBr-ocU9OENnVj9kIbZqXkxiD09SPoJSrdohReGGG0VEpYRMkJFfsu5z4tHzbgzN_67Se_Pfrtb_32Erte_X3zQ8-9wQhQEyBjqT1P_Z_h_-P9DYaGtk0</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Mouton, Morgan</creator><creator>Rock, Melanie J.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Canadian Public Health Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-3159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3324-4808</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Débats autour des races canines et de la santé publique à Montréal et au Québec (2016–2019)</title><author>Mouton, Morgan ; Rock, Melanie J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-b278a74a375a7750e758d08055e72b9069743c85c8f8585751b732a8cdb774d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animal bites</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropology, Cultural</topic><topic>Bites and Stings - epidemiology</topic><topic>Bites and Stings - prevention & control</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Health Promotion</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Quebec</topic><topic>Recherche Qualitative</topic><topic>Santé publique et épidémiologie</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mouton, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rock, Melanie J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mouton, Morgan</au><au>Rock, Melanie J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Débats autour des races canines et de la santé publique à Montréal et au Québec (2016–2019)</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of public health</jtitle><stitle>Can J Public Health</stitle><addtitle>Can J Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>165-173</pages><issn>0008-4263</issn><eissn>1920-7476</eissn><abstract>Objectives
We examine the public policies that have been formulated to reduce the incidence of dog bites. We do so to encourage the adoption of policies aligned with One Health promotion.
Methods
This case-study research involved an ethnographic approach. Our qualitative analysis derived from participant observation, policy documents, media coverage, and interviews with stakeholders in Montreal (Quebec).
Results
Following on from a human fatality due to dog bite injuries, the City of Montreal decided to ban certain types of dogs based on their ‘breed.’ In the ensuing discussions, the ‘Calgary model’ emerged as an alternative to breed-specific legislation. These discussions led to a change in policy direction for Montreal, and for Quebec as a whole. Furthermore, we discerned marked improvements with respect to intersectoral coordination in the wake of this controversy.
Conclusion
‘Policy mobilities’ offer a useful conceptual apparatus for understanding how public policies for dog bite prevention are polarized around controversial proposals, to the detriment of discussions that focus on policy implementation.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>34382162</pmid><doi>10.17269/s41997-021-00550-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-3159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3324-4808</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0008-4263 |
| ispartof | Canadian journal of public health, 2022-02, Vol.113 (1), p.165-173 |
| issn | 0008-4263 1920-7476 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8825900 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; REPÈRE - Free; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Animal bites Animals Anthropology, Cultural Bites and Stings - epidemiology Bites and Stings - prevention & control Dogs Health Promotion Humanities and Social Sciences Humans Legislation Life Sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Public Health Public Policy Qualitative analysis Qualitative research Quebec Recherche Qualitative Santé publique et épidémiologie |
| title | Débats autour des races canines et de la santé publique à Montréal et au Québec (2016–2019) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T04%3A37%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=D%C3%A9bats%20autour%20des%20races%20canines%20et%20de%20la%20sant%C3%A9%20publique%20%C3%A0%20Montr%C3%A9al%20et%20au%20Qu%C3%A9bec%20(2016%E2%80%932019)&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Mouton,%20Morgan&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=165-173&rft.issn=0008-4263&rft.eissn=1920-7476&rft_id=info:doi/10.17269/s41997-021-00550-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2626534428%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2626534428&rft_id=info:pmid/34382162&rfr_iscdi=true |