Measuring Religiousness in Health Research: Review and Critique

Although existing measures of religiousness are sophisticated, no single approach has yet emerged as a standard. We review the measures of religiousness most commonly used in the religion and health literature with particular attention to their limitations, suggesting that vigilance is required to a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of religion and health 2008-06, Vol.47 (2), p.134-163
Hauptverfasser: Hall, Daniel E., Meador, Keith G., Koenig, Harold G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 163
container_issue 2
container_start_page 134
container_title Journal of religion and health
container_volume 47
creator Hall, Daniel E.
Meador, Keith G.
Koenig, Harold G.
description Although existing measures of religiousness are sophisticated, no single approach has yet emerged as a standard. We review the measures of religiousness most commonly used in the religion and health literature with particular attention to their limitations, suggesting that vigilance is required to avoid over-generalization. After placing the development of these scales in historical context, we discuss measures of religious attendance, private religious practice, and intrinsic/extrinsic religious motivation. We also discuss measures of religious coping, wellbeing, belief, affiliation, maturity, history, and experience. We also address the current trend in favor of multi-dimensional and functional measures of religiousness. We conclude with a critique of the standard, "context-free" approach aimed at measuring "religiousness-in-general", suggesting that future work might more fruitfully focus on developing ways to measure religiousness in specific, theologically relevant contexts.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/S10943-008-9165-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8823950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40344432</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40344432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-f2ac4122a2a07bbcc604067ddd124c8b663e8f18391562ace43bceb5964b60ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUha2Kig6FH9AFKOqCXcr1I36waFWNWopUhMRjbTnOzYxHmWRqJ0X8-3o6o1JYsPLru8f33EPICYUzCqA-fKdgBC8BdGmorEp2QGa0UryUlaIvyAyAsVJQo47Iq5RWkEFp1EtyRA2FKp9m5OILujTF0C-Kb9iFRRim1GNKReiLG3TduMz3CV30y495dx_wV-H6ppjHMIa7CV-Tw9Z1Cd_s12Py8_rqx_ymvP366fP88rb0QpuxbJnzgjLmmANV195LECBV0zSUCa9rKTnqlmpuaCUzi4LXHuvKSFFLaFt-TM53upupXmPjsR-j6-wmhrWLv-3ggv37pQ9LuxjurdaMmwqywPu9QBxy32m065A8dp3rMXu20hjKqdqCp_-Aq2GKfTZn8ySNVqBNhugO8nFIKWL71AkFu83GpsdsbB6y3WZjWa5599zCn4p9GBlgOyBttoFgfPbzf1Tf7opWaRzik6gALoTgjD8AZ6OjeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197987089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Religiousness in Health Research: Review and Critique</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hall, Daniel E. ; Meador, Keith G. ; Koenig, Harold G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hall, Daniel E. ; Meador, Keith G. ; Koenig, Harold G.</creatorcontrib><description>Although existing measures of religiousness are sophisticated, no single approach has yet emerged as a standard. We review the measures of religiousness most commonly used in the religion and health literature with particular attention to their limitations, suggesting that vigilance is required to avoid over-generalization. After placing the development of these scales in historical context, we discuss measures of religious attendance, private religious practice, and intrinsic/extrinsic religious motivation. We also discuss measures of religious coping, wellbeing, belief, affiliation, maturity, history, and experience. We also address the current trend in favor of multi-dimensional and functional measures of religiousness. We conclude with a critique of the standard, "context-free" approach aimed at measuring "religiousness-in-general", suggesting that future work might more fruitfully focus on developing ways to measure religiousness in specific, theologically relevant contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/S10943-008-9165-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19105008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer</publisher><subject>Aging ; Biomedical Research ; Christianity ; Clinical Psychology ; Faith ; Health ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; On the Boundaries of Religion, Psychology and Medicine: Studies in the Social, Behavioral and Medical Sciences ; Original Paper ; Philosophy ; Psychology of religion ; Psychometrics ; Public Health ; Religion ; Religion and Medicine ; Religiosity ; Religious practices ; Religious Studies ; Spiritual belief systems ; Spirituality ; Theology ; Wellbeing</subject><ispartof>Journal of religion and health, 2008-06, Vol.47 (2), p.134-163</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Blanton-Peale Institute</rights><rights>Blanton-Peale Institute 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-f2ac4122a2a07bbcc604067ddd124c8b663e8f18391562ace43bceb5964b60ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-f2ac4122a2a07bbcc604067ddd124c8b663e8f18391562ace43bceb5964b60ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40344432$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40344432$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19105008$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hall, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meador, Keith G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Harold G.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Religiousness in Health Research: Review and Critique</title><title>Journal of religion and health</title><addtitle>J Relig Health</addtitle><addtitle>J Relig Health</addtitle><description>Although existing measures of religiousness are sophisticated, no single approach has yet emerged as a standard. We review the measures of religiousness most commonly used in the religion and health literature with particular attention to their limitations, suggesting that vigilance is required to avoid over-generalization. After placing the development of these scales in historical context, we discuss measures of religious attendance, private religious practice, and intrinsic/extrinsic religious motivation. We also discuss measures of religious coping, wellbeing, belief, affiliation, maturity, history, and experience. We also address the current trend in favor of multi-dimensional and functional measures of religiousness. We conclude with a critique of the standard, "context-free" approach aimed at measuring "religiousness-in-general", suggesting that future work might more fruitfully focus on developing ways to measure religiousness in specific, theologically relevant contexts.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Biomedical Research</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Faith</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>On the Boundaries of Religion, Psychology and Medicine: Studies in the Social, Behavioral and Medical Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Psychology of religion</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion and Medicine</subject><subject>Religiosity</subject><subject>Religious practices</subject><subject>Religious Studies</subject><subject>Spiritual belief systems</subject><subject>Spirituality</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Wellbeing</subject><issn>0022-4197</issn><issn>1573-6571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUha2Kig6FH9AFKOqCXcr1I36waFWNWopUhMRjbTnOzYxHmWRqJ0X8-3o6o1JYsPLru8f33EPICYUzCqA-fKdgBC8BdGmorEp2QGa0UryUlaIvyAyAsVJQo47Iq5RWkEFp1EtyRA2FKp9m5OILujTF0C-Kb9iFRRim1GNKReiLG3TduMz3CV30y495dx_wV-H6ppjHMIa7CV-Tw9Z1Cd_s12Py8_rqx_ymvP366fP88rb0QpuxbJnzgjLmmANV195LECBV0zSUCa9rKTnqlmpuaCUzi4LXHuvKSFFLaFt-TM53upupXmPjsR-j6-wmhrWLv-3ggv37pQ9LuxjurdaMmwqywPu9QBxy32m065A8dp3rMXu20hjKqdqCp_-Aq2GKfTZn8ySNVqBNhugO8nFIKWL71AkFu83GpsdsbB6y3WZjWa5599zCn4p9GBlgOyBttoFgfPbzf1Tf7opWaRzik6gALoTgjD8AZ6OjeQ</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>Hall, Daniel E.</creator><creator>Meador, Keith G.</creator><creator>Koenig, Harold G.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>Measuring Religiousness in Health Research: Review and Critique</title><author>Hall, Daniel E. ; Meador, Keith G. ; Koenig, Harold G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-f2ac4122a2a07bbcc604067ddd124c8b663e8f18391562ace43bceb5964b60ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Biomedical Research</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Faith</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>On the Boundaries of Religion, Psychology and Medicine: Studies in the Social, Behavioral and Medical Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Psychology of religion</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion and Medicine</topic><topic>Religiosity</topic><topic>Religious practices</topic><topic>Religious Studies</topic><topic>Spiritual belief systems</topic><topic>Spirituality</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Wellbeing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hall, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meador, Keith G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Harold G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of religion and health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hall, Daniel E.</au><au>Meador, Keith G.</au><au>Koenig, Harold G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Religiousness in Health Research: Review and Critique</atitle><jtitle>Journal of religion and health</jtitle><stitle>J Relig Health</stitle><addtitle>J Relig Health</addtitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>134-163</pages><issn>0022-4197</issn><eissn>1573-6571</eissn><abstract>Although existing measures of religiousness are sophisticated, no single approach has yet emerged as a standard. We review the measures of religiousness most commonly used in the religion and health literature with particular attention to their limitations, suggesting that vigilance is required to avoid over-generalization. After placing the development of these scales in historical context, we discuss measures of religious attendance, private religious practice, and intrinsic/extrinsic religious motivation. We also discuss measures of religious coping, wellbeing, belief, affiliation, maturity, history, and experience. We also address the current trend in favor of multi-dimensional and functional measures of religiousness. We conclude with a critique of the standard, "context-free" approach aimed at measuring "religiousness-in-general", suggesting that future work might more fruitfully focus on developing ways to measure religiousness in specific, theologically relevant contexts.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>19105008</pmid><doi>10.1007/S10943-008-9165-2</doi><tpages>30</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4197
ispartof Journal of religion and health, 2008-06, Vol.47 (2), p.134-163
issn 0022-4197
1573-6571
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8823950
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aging
Biomedical Research
Christianity
Clinical Psychology
Faith
Health
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
On the Boundaries of Religion, Psychology and Medicine: Studies in the Social, Behavioral and Medical Sciences
Original Paper
Philosophy
Psychology of religion
Psychometrics
Public Health
Religion
Religion and Medicine
Religiosity
Religious practices
Religious Studies
Spiritual belief systems
Spirituality
Theology
Wellbeing
title Measuring Religiousness in Health Research: Review and Critique
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A25%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Religiousness%20in%20Health%20Research:%20Review%20and%20Critique&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20religion%20and%20health&rft.au=Hall,%20Daniel%20E.&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=134-163&rft.issn=0022-4197&rft.eissn=1573-6571&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/S10943-008-9165-2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E40344432%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197987089&rft_id=info:pmid/19105008&rft_jstor_id=40344432&rfr_iscdi=true