Comparison of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer

This study aimed to compare diagnostic efficiency for axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis between lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS) and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ICEUS) in patients with breast cancer. We also examined whether adding ICEUS to LCEUS could improve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of radiology 2022-02, Vol.95 (1130), p.20210897-20210897
Hauptverfasser: Zhuang, Lingling, Ming, Xu, Liu, Jun, Jia, Chao, Jin, Yubiao, Wang, Jing, Shi, Qiusheng, Wu, Rong, Jin, Lifang, Du, Lianfang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20210897
container_issue 1130
container_start_page 20210897
container_title British journal of radiology
container_volume 95
creator Zhuang, Lingling
Ming, Xu
Liu, Jun
Jia, Chao
Jin, Yubiao
Wang, Jing
Shi, Qiusheng
Wu, Rong
Jin, Lifang
Du, Lianfang
description This study aimed to compare diagnostic efficiency for axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis between lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS) and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ICEUS) in patients with breast cancer. We also examined whether adding ICEUS to LCEUS could improve the diagnostic accuracy of LCEUS. Sixty-nine patients with breast cancer were recruited preoperatively. All patients underwent LCEUS followed by ICEUS, and the enhancement pattern of one SLN was analysed for each patient. The targeted SLN was marked with wire and excised during surgery. The imaging diagnosis was compared with the histopathological result. Diagnostic efficiency was compared among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS. The sensitivity values for LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS were 86.2%, 82.6% and 93.1%, respectively. Specificity values for the three methods were 95.0%, 92.5% and 87.5%, respectively. Accuracy values for the three methods were 91.3%, 88.4% and 89.9%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for LCEUS was 0.906, and there was no significant difference among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS ( = 0.752). LCEUS may represent an accurate method for predicting SLN metastasis preoperatively. Our findings suggest that adding ICEUS to LCEUS for SLN evaluation in patients with breast cancer is unnecessary. This is the first study in which both LCEUS and ICEUS were performed for the same lymph node and the first to compare the diagnostic efficiency of LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS + ICEUS.
doi_str_mv 10.1259/bjr.20210897
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8822558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2600287074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-ea9ab7db2b0dcfdb2500074d4ec3cc8e84b873fe5962a2f658b4c8a2e7427b0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1TAQtBCIPgo3zshHDqQ4jvPsXJDQE19SJS4gcbNsZ9O4SuxgJ6_0J_KvWOu1FVw4WCt7xzOzO4S8rNlFzdvurb1OF5zxmqlOPiK7WgpVKcV-PCY7xpisaq7aM_Is5-tybTv2lJw1QnZy34kd-X2I82KSzzHQONDpdl5Gs3pHXQxrMnmtIIwmOOjpNpWHuIWeGjy-9I8Q4pb_D_aBriPQJUFcICH5EWjvzVWI2ecian75aTLplmYIqw8wnWzQEHugM6xIbAoUiRb8jqBMb_w6UpsAe9QVyfScPBnMlOHFXT0n3z9--Hb4XF1-_fTl8P6yco0S6NB0xsrecst6N2Bty1pEL8A1zilQwirZDNB2e274sG-VFU4ZDlJwaZltzsm7E--y2Rl6B2X0SS_JzziDjsbrfzvBj_oqHrVSnLetQoLXdwQp_twgr3r22QGuIAAuU_M9Y1xJNIXQNyeoSzHnBMODTM10SV9j-vo-fYS_-tvaA_g-7uYP4LG1Cw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2600287074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Zhuang, Lingling ; Ming, Xu ; Liu, Jun ; Jia, Chao ; Jin, Yubiao ; Wang, Jing ; Shi, Qiusheng ; Wu, Rong ; Jin, Lifang ; Du, Lianfang</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Lingling ; Ming, Xu ; Liu, Jun ; Jia, Chao ; Jin, Yubiao ; Wang, Jing ; Shi, Qiusheng ; Wu, Rong ; Jin, Lifang ; Du, Lianfang</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to compare diagnostic efficiency for axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis between lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS) and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ICEUS) in patients with breast cancer. We also examined whether adding ICEUS to LCEUS could improve the diagnostic accuracy of LCEUS. Sixty-nine patients with breast cancer were recruited preoperatively. All patients underwent LCEUS followed by ICEUS, and the enhancement pattern of one SLN was analysed for each patient. The targeted SLN was marked with wire and excised during surgery. The imaging diagnosis was compared with the histopathological result. Diagnostic efficiency was compared among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS. The sensitivity values for LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS were 86.2%, 82.6% and 93.1%, respectively. Specificity values for the three methods were 95.0%, 92.5% and 87.5%, respectively. Accuracy values for the three methods were 91.3%, 88.4% and 89.9%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for LCEUS was 0.906, and there was no significant difference among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS ( = 0.752). LCEUS may represent an accurate method for predicting SLN metastasis preoperatively. Our findings suggest that adding ICEUS to LCEUS for SLN evaluation in patients with breast cancer is unnecessary. This is the first study in which both LCEUS and ICEUS were performed for the same lymph node and the first to compare the diagnostic efficiency of LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS + ICEUS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210897</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34797694</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Administration, Intravenous ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Axilla ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage ; Female ; Fiducial Markers ; Humans ; Injections, Intradermal - methods ; Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging ; Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology ; Lymphatic Vessels ; Middle Aged ; Phospholipids - administration &amp; dosage ; Preoperative Care ; Prospective Studies ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sentinel Lymph Node - diagnostic imaging ; Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology ; Sulfur Hexafluoride - administration &amp; dosage ; Ultrasonography - methods</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2022-02, Vol.95 (1130), p.20210897-20210897</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2022 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-ea9ab7db2b0dcfdb2500074d4ec3cc8e84b873fe5962a2f658b4c8a2e7427b0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-ea9ab7db2b0dcfdb2500074d4ec3cc8e84b873fe5962a2f658b4c8a2e7427b0b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34797694$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Lingling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ming, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Yubiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Qiusheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Lifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Lianfang</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>This study aimed to compare diagnostic efficiency for axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis between lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS) and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ICEUS) in patients with breast cancer. We also examined whether adding ICEUS to LCEUS could improve the diagnostic accuracy of LCEUS. Sixty-nine patients with breast cancer were recruited preoperatively. All patients underwent LCEUS followed by ICEUS, and the enhancement pattern of one SLN was analysed for each patient. The targeted SLN was marked with wire and excised during surgery. The imaging diagnosis was compared with the histopathological result. Diagnostic efficiency was compared among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS. The sensitivity values for LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS were 86.2%, 82.6% and 93.1%, respectively. Specificity values for the three methods were 95.0%, 92.5% and 87.5%, respectively. Accuracy values for the three methods were 91.3%, 88.4% and 89.9%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for LCEUS was 0.906, and there was no significant difference among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS ( = 0.752). LCEUS may represent an accurate method for predicting SLN metastasis preoperatively. Our findings suggest that adding ICEUS to LCEUS for SLN evaluation in patients with breast cancer is unnecessary. This is the first study in which both LCEUS and ICEUS were performed for the same lymph node and the first to compare the diagnostic efficiency of LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS + ICEUS.</description><subject>Administration, Intravenous</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fiducial Markers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Intradermal - methods</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Vessels</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Phospholipids - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology</subject><subject>Sulfur Hexafluoride - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v1TAQtBCIPgo3zshHDqQ4jvPsXJDQE19SJS4gcbNsZ9O4SuxgJ6_0J_KvWOu1FVw4WCt7xzOzO4S8rNlFzdvurb1OF5zxmqlOPiK7WgpVKcV-PCY7xpisaq7aM_Is5-tybTv2lJw1QnZy34kd-X2I82KSzzHQONDpdl5Gs3pHXQxrMnmtIIwmOOjpNpWHuIWeGjy-9I8Q4pb_D_aBriPQJUFcICH5EWjvzVWI2ecian75aTLplmYIqw8wnWzQEHugM6xIbAoUiRb8jqBMb_w6UpsAe9QVyfScPBnMlOHFXT0n3z9--Hb4XF1-_fTl8P6yco0S6NB0xsrecst6N2Bty1pEL8A1zilQwirZDNB2e274sG-VFU4ZDlJwaZltzsm7E--y2Rl6B2X0SS_JzziDjsbrfzvBj_oqHrVSnLetQoLXdwQp_twgr3r22QGuIAAuU_M9Y1xJNIXQNyeoSzHnBMODTM10SV9j-vo-fYS_-tvaA_g-7uYP4LG1Cw</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Zhuang, Lingling</creator><creator>Ming, Xu</creator><creator>Liu, Jun</creator><creator>Jia, Chao</creator><creator>Jin, Yubiao</creator><creator>Wang, Jing</creator><creator>Shi, Qiusheng</creator><creator>Wu, Rong</creator><creator>Jin, Lifang</creator><creator>Du, Lianfang</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Comparison of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer</title><author>Zhuang, Lingling ; Ming, Xu ; Liu, Jun ; Jia, Chao ; Jin, Yubiao ; Wang, Jing ; Shi, Qiusheng ; Wu, Rong ; Jin, Lifang ; Du, Lianfang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-ea9ab7db2b0dcfdb2500074d4ec3cc8e84b873fe5962a2f658b4c8a2e7427b0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Administration, Intravenous</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fiducial Markers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Intradermal - methods</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Vessels</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Phospholipids - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology</topic><topic>Sulfur Hexafluoride - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Lingling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ming, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Yubiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Qiusheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Lifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Lianfang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhuang, Lingling</au><au>Ming, Xu</au><au>Liu, Jun</au><au>Jia, Chao</au><au>Jin, Yubiao</au><au>Wang, Jing</au><au>Shi, Qiusheng</au><au>Wu, Rong</au><au>Jin, Lifang</au><au>Du, Lianfang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1130</issue><spage>20210897</spage><epage>20210897</epage><pages>20210897-20210897</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to compare diagnostic efficiency for axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis between lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS) and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ICEUS) in patients with breast cancer. We also examined whether adding ICEUS to LCEUS could improve the diagnostic accuracy of LCEUS. Sixty-nine patients with breast cancer were recruited preoperatively. All patients underwent LCEUS followed by ICEUS, and the enhancement pattern of one SLN was analysed for each patient. The targeted SLN was marked with wire and excised during surgery. The imaging diagnosis was compared with the histopathological result. Diagnostic efficiency was compared among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS. The sensitivity values for LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS were 86.2%, 82.6% and 93.1%, respectively. Specificity values for the three methods were 95.0%, 92.5% and 87.5%, respectively. Accuracy values for the three methods were 91.3%, 88.4% and 89.9%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for LCEUS was 0.906, and there was no significant difference among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS ( = 0.752). LCEUS may represent an accurate method for predicting SLN metastasis preoperatively. Our findings suggest that adding ICEUS to LCEUS for SLN evaluation in patients with breast cancer is unnecessary. This is the first study in which both LCEUS and ICEUS were performed for the same lymph node and the first to compare the diagnostic efficiency of LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS + ICEUS.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>34797694</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20210897</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1285
ispartof British journal of radiology, 2022-02, Vol.95 (1130), p.20210897-20210897
issn 0007-1285
1748-880X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8822558
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Administration, Intravenous
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Axilla
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Contrast Media - administration & dosage
Female
Fiducial Markers
Humans
Injections, Intradermal - methods
Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging
Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology
Lymphatic Vessels
Middle Aged
Phospholipids - administration & dosage
Preoperative Care
Prospective Studies
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sentinel Lymph Node - diagnostic imaging
Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology
Sulfur Hexafluoride - administration & dosage
Ultrasonography - methods
title Comparison of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T01%3A35%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20lymphatic%20contrast-enhanced%20ultrasound%20and%20intravenous%20contrast-enhanced%20ultrasound%20in%20the%20preoperative%20diagnosis%20of%20axillary%20sentinel%20lymph%20node%20metastasis%20in%20patients%20with%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Zhuang,%20Lingling&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1130&rft.spage=20210897&rft.epage=20210897&rft.pages=20210897-20210897&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20210897&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2600287074%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2600287074&rft_id=info:pmid/34797694&rfr_iscdi=true