Comparison of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer
This study aimed to compare diagnostic efficiency for axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis between lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS) and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ICEUS) in patients with breast cancer. We also examined whether adding ICEUS to LCEUS could improve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of radiology 2022-02, Vol.95 (1130), p.20210897-20210897 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20210897 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1130 |
container_start_page | 20210897 |
container_title | British journal of radiology |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Zhuang, Lingling Ming, Xu Liu, Jun Jia, Chao Jin, Yubiao Wang, Jing Shi, Qiusheng Wu, Rong Jin, Lifang Du, Lianfang |
description | This study aimed to compare diagnostic efficiency for axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis between lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS) and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ICEUS) in patients with breast cancer. We also examined whether adding ICEUS to LCEUS could improve the diagnostic accuracy of LCEUS.
Sixty-nine patients with breast cancer were recruited preoperatively. All patients underwent LCEUS followed by ICEUS, and the enhancement pattern of one SLN was analysed for each patient. The targeted SLN was marked with wire and excised during surgery. The imaging diagnosis was compared with the histopathological result. Diagnostic efficiency was compared among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS.
The sensitivity values for LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS were 86.2%, 82.6% and 93.1%, respectively. Specificity values for the three methods were 95.0%, 92.5% and 87.5%, respectively. Accuracy values for the three methods were 91.3%, 88.4% and 89.9%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for LCEUS was 0.906, and there was no significant difference among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS (
= 0.752).
LCEUS may represent an accurate method for predicting SLN metastasis preoperatively. Our findings suggest that adding ICEUS to LCEUS for SLN evaluation in patients with breast cancer is unnecessary.
This is the first study in which both LCEUS and ICEUS were performed for the same lymph node and the first to compare the diagnostic efficiency of LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS + ICEUS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1259/bjr.20210897 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8822558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2600287074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-ea9ab7db2b0dcfdb2500074d4ec3cc8e84b873fe5962a2f658b4c8a2e7427b0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1TAQtBCIPgo3zshHDqQ4jvPsXJDQE19SJS4gcbNsZ9O4SuxgJ6_0J_KvWOu1FVw4WCt7xzOzO4S8rNlFzdvurb1OF5zxmqlOPiK7WgpVKcV-PCY7xpisaq7aM_Is5-tybTv2lJw1QnZy34kd-X2I82KSzzHQONDpdl5Gs3pHXQxrMnmtIIwmOOjpNpWHuIWeGjy-9I8Q4pb_D_aBriPQJUFcICH5EWjvzVWI2ecian75aTLplmYIqw8wnWzQEHugM6xIbAoUiRb8jqBMb_w6UpsAe9QVyfScPBnMlOHFXT0n3z9--Hb4XF1-_fTl8P6yco0S6NB0xsrecst6N2Bty1pEL8A1zilQwirZDNB2e274sG-VFU4ZDlJwaZltzsm7E--y2Rl6B2X0SS_JzziDjsbrfzvBj_oqHrVSnLetQoLXdwQp_twgr3r22QGuIAAuU_M9Y1xJNIXQNyeoSzHnBMODTM10SV9j-vo-fYS_-tvaA_g-7uYP4LG1Cw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2600287074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Zhuang, Lingling ; Ming, Xu ; Liu, Jun ; Jia, Chao ; Jin, Yubiao ; Wang, Jing ; Shi, Qiusheng ; Wu, Rong ; Jin, Lifang ; Du, Lianfang</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Lingling ; Ming, Xu ; Liu, Jun ; Jia, Chao ; Jin, Yubiao ; Wang, Jing ; Shi, Qiusheng ; Wu, Rong ; Jin, Lifang ; Du, Lianfang</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to compare diagnostic efficiency for axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis between lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS) and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ICEUS) in patients with breast cancer. We also examined whether adding ICEUS to LCEUS could improve the diagnostic accuracy of LCEUS.
Sixty-nine patients with breast cancer were recruited preoperatively. All patients underwent LCEUS followed by ICEUS, and the enhancement pattern of one SLN was analysed for each patient. The targeted SLN was marked with wire and excised during surgery. The imaging diagnosis was compared with the histopathological result. Diagnostic efficiency was compared among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS.
The sensitivity values for LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS were 86.2%, 82.6% and 93.1%, respectively. Specificity values for the three methods were 95.0%, 92.5% and 87.5%, respectively. Accuracy values for the three methods were 91.3%, 88.4% and 89.9%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for LCEUS was 0.906, and there was no significant difference among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS (
= 0.752).
LCEUS may represent an accurate method for predicting SLN metastasis preoperatively. Our findings suggest that adding ICEUS to LCEUS for SLN evaluation in patients with breast cancer is unnecessary.
This is the first study in which both LCEUS and ICEUS were performed for the same lymph node and the first to compare the diagnostic efficiency of LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS + ICEUS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210897</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34797694</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Administration, Intravenous ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Axilla ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Contrast Media - administration & dosage ; Female ; Fiducial Markers ; Humans ; Injections, Intradermal - methods ; Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging ; Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology ; Lymphatic Vessels ; Middle Aged ; Phospholipids - administration & dosage ; Preoperative Care ; Prospective Studies ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sentinel Lymph Node - diagnostic imaging ; Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology ; Sulfur Hexafluoride - administration & dosage ; Ultrasonography - methods</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2022-02, Vol.95 (1130), p.20210897-20210897</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2022 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-ea9ab7db2b0dcfdb2500074d4ec3cc8e84b873fe5962a2f658b4c8a2e7427b0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-ea9ab7db2b0dcfdb2500074d4ec3cc8e84b873fe5962a2f658b4c8a2e7427b0b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34797694$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Lingling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ming, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Yubiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Qiusheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Lifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Lianfang</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>This study aimed to compare diagnostic efficiency for axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis between lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS) and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ICEUS) in patients with breast cancer. We also examined whether adding ICEUS to LCEUS could improve the diagnostic accuracy of LCEUS.
Sixty-nine patients with breast cancer were recruited preoperatively. All patients underwent LCEUS followed by ICEUS, and the enhancement pattern of one SLN was analysed for each patient. The targeted SLN was marked with wire and excised during surgery. The imaging diagnosis was compared with the histopathological result. Diagnostic efficiency was compared among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS.
The sensitivity values for LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS were 86.2%, 82.6% and 93.1%, respectively. Specificity values for the three methods were 95.0%, 92.5% and 87.5%, respectively. Accuracy values for the three methods were 91.3%, 88.4% and 89.9%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for LCEUS was 0.906, and there was no significant difference among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS (
= 0.752).
LCEUS may represent an accurate method for predicting SLN metastasis preoperatively. Our findings suggest that adding ICEUS to LCEUS for SLN evaluation in patients with breast cancer is unnecessary.
This is the first study in which both LCEUS and ICEUS were performed for the same lymph node and the first to compare the diagnostic efficiency of LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS + ICEUS.</description><subject>Administration, Intravenous</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Contrast Media - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fiducial Markers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Intradermal - methods</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Vessels</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Phospholipids - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology</subject><subject>Sulfur Hexafluoride - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v1TAQtBCIPgo3zshHDqQ4jvPsXJDQE19SJS4gcbNsZ9O4SuxgJ6_0J_KvWOu1FVw4WCt7xzOzO4S8rNlFzdvurb1OF5zxmqlOPiK7WgpVKcV-PCY7xpisaq7aM_Is5-tybTv2lJw1QnZy34kd-X2I82KSzzHQONDpdl5Gs3pHXQxrMnmtIIwmOOjpNpWHuIWeGjy-9I8Q4pb_D_aBriPQJUFcICH5EWjvzVWI2ecian75aTLplmYIqw8wnWzQEHugM6xIbAoUiRb8jqBMb_w6UpsAe9QVyfScPBnMlOHFXT0n3z9--Hb4XF1-_fTl8P6yco0S6NB0xsrecst6N2Bty1pEL8A1zilQwirZDNB2e274sG-VFU4ZDlJwaZltzsm7E--y2Rl6B2X0SS_JzziDjsbrfzvBj_oqHrVSnLetQoLXdwQp_twgr3r22QGuIAAuU_M9Y1xJNIXQNyeoSzHnBMODTM10SV9j-vo-fYS_-tvaA_g-7uYP4LG1Cw</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Zhuang, Lingling</creator><creator>Ming, Xu</creator><creator>Liu, Jun</creator><creator>Jia, Chao</creator><creator>Jin, Yubiao</creator><creator>Wang, Jing</creator><creator>Shi, Qiusheng</creator><creator>Wu, Rong</creator><creator>Jin, Lifang</creator><creator>Du, Lianfang</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Comparison of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer</title><author>Zhuang, Lingling ; Ming, Xu ; Liu, Jun ; Jia, Chao ; Jin, Yubiao ; Wang, Jing ; Shi, Qiusheng ; Wu, Rong ; Jin, Lifang ; Du, Lianfang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-ea9ab7db2b0dcfdb2500074d4ec3cc8e84b873fe5962a2f658b4c8a2e7427b0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Administration, Intravenous</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Contrast Media - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fiducial Markers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Intradermal - methods</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Vessels</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Phospholipids - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology</topic><topic>Sulfur Hexafluoride - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Lingling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ming, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Yubiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Qiusheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Lifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Lianfang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhuang, Lingling</au><au>Ming, Xu</au><au>Liu, Jun</au><au>Jia, Chao</au><au>Jin, Yubiao</au><au>Wang, Jing</au><au>Shi, Qiusheng</au><au>Wu, Rong</au><au>Jin, Lifang</au><au>Du, Lianfang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1130</issue><spage>20210897</spage><epage>20210897</epage><pages>20210897-20210897</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to compare diagnostic efficiency for axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis between lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS) and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ICEUS) in patients with breast cancer. We also examined whether adding ICEUS to LCEUS could improve the diagnostic accuracy of LCEUS.
Sixty-nine patients with breast cancer were recruited preoperatively. All patients underwent LCEUS followed by ICEUS, and the enhancement pattern of one SLN was analysed for each patient. The targeted SLN was marked with wire and excised during surgery. The imaging diagnosis was compared with the histopathological result. Diagnostic efficiency was compared among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS.
The sensitivity values for LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS were 86.2%, 82.6% and 93.1%, respectively. Specificity values for the three methods were 95.0%, 92.5% and 87.5%, respectively. Accuracy values for the three methods were 91.3%, 88.4% and 89.9%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for LCEUS was 0.906, and there was no significant difference among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS (
= 0.752).
LCEUS may represent an accurate method for predicting SLN metastasis preoperatively. Our findings suggest that adding ICEUS to LCEUS for SLN evaluation in patients with breast cancer is unnecessary.
This is the first study in which both LCEUS and ICEUS were performed for the same lymph node and the first to compare the diagnostic efficiency of LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS + ICEUS.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>34797694</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20210897</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1285 |
ispartof | British journal of radiology, 2022-02, Vol.95 (1130), p.20210897-20210897 |
issn | 0007-1285 1748-880X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8822558 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Administration, Intravenous Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Axilla Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - pathology Contrast Media - administration & dosage Female Fiducial Markers Humans Injections, Intradermal - methods Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology Lymphatic Vessels Middle Aged Phospholipids - administration & dosage Preoperative Care Prospective Studies ROC Curve Sensitivity and Specificity Sentinel Lymph Node - diagnostic imaging Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology Sulfur Hexafluoride - administration & dosage Ultrasonography - methods |
title | Comparison of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T01%3A35%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20lymphatic%20contrast-enhanced%20ultrasound%20and%20intravenous%20contrast-enhanced%20ultrasound%20in%20the%20preoperative%20diagnosis%20of%20axillary%20sentinel%20lymph%20node%20metastasis%20in%20patients%20with%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Zhuang,%20Lingling&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1130&rft.spage=20210897&rft.epage=20210897&rft.pages=20210897-20210897&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20210897&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2600287074%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2600287074&rft_id=info:pmid/34797694&rfr_iscdi=true |