Basis of the superiority of cefoperazone amphotericin teicoplanin for isolating Campylobacter upsaliensis from stools
The optimum method for isolating Campylobacter upsaliensis from stools has not been clearly defined. In a preliminary study, cefoperazone amphotericin teicoplanin (CAT) selective medium isolated six C. upsaliensis strains which were not detected using modified cefoperazone charcoal deoxycholate (mCC...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical microbiology 2001-07, Vol.39 (7), p.2713-2716 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2716 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 2713 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical microbiology |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | BYRNE, Catherine DOHERTY, Deirdre MOONEY, Adele BYRNE, Margaret WOODWARD, David JOHNSON, Wendy RODGERS, Frank BOURKE, Billy |
| description | The optimum method for isolating Campylobacter upsaliensis from stools has not been clearly defined. In a preliminary study, cefoperazone amphotericin teicoplanin (CAT) selective medium isolated six C. upsaliensis strains which were not detected using modified cefoperazone charcoal deoxycholate (mCCDA). In order to identify the factors that underlie the superiority of CAT over mCCDA for isolating C. upsaliensis, we examined the effect of incubation time and antibiotic content of culture media on the growth of C. upsaliensis isolates using semiquantitative methods. The recovery of a subgroup of C. upsaliensis isolates from seeded stool specimens was also evaluated. Differences in growth of C. upsaliensis on CAT and mCCDA were modest and were not explained by the antibiotic profiles of the two media. Recovery of C. upsaliensis from spiked human feces on CAT was superior to that on mCCDA at lower concentrations of organisms (10(3) CFU/ml). We conclude that although CAT is more suitable than mCCDA for the isolation of C. upsaliensis from stools, the superiority of CAT for detecting this organism is not accounted for by the antibiotic composition of the medium. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2713-2716.2001 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_88219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70992951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-edc3da0f2eeb608d9b69fc7682488c08b6d1085ea6e42862c1ef5f73eea8b72c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuO1DAQRS0EYpqBX4BsYJfgR-KHxIZp8dQgNiCxsxx3edrIiYPtIDVfj6NpMbBiU1WqOrfs0kXoGcEdIVS-_Lj_1DHViY4KwtoaeEcxJvfQjmAlW87xt_toh7EaWkKYuECPcv5egb4fhofogpCeCo7ZDq1XJvvcRNeUIzR5XSD5mHw5bS0LLtaG-RVnaMy0HGOpY-vnpoC3cQlmrrWLqfE5BlP8fNPsK3cKcTS2ss26ZBM8zNsbLsWpySXGkB-jB86EDE_O-RJ9ffvmy_59e_353Yf96-vW9oKWFg6WHQx2FGDkWB7UyJWzgkvaS2mxHPmBYDmA4dBTyakl4AYnGICRo6CWXaJXt3uXdZzqNphLMkEvyU8mnXQ0Xv87mf1R38SfWkpKVJW_OMtT_LFCLnry2UKod0NcsxZYKaoG8l-QCEU55qKC4ha0KeacwP35C8F6c1ZXZzVTWujN2S1wvTlblU__PuVOd7ayAs_PgMnWBJfMbH2-43rCsRKK_QbeQrHq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17926067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Basis of the superiority of cefoperazone amphotericin teicoplanin for isolating Campylobacter upsaliensis from stools</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>BYRNE, Catherine ; DOHERTY, Deirdre ; MOONEY, Adele ; BYRNE, Margaret ; WOODWARD, David ; JOHNSON, Wendy ; RODGERS, Frank ; BOURKE, Billy</creator><creatorcontrib>BYRNE, Catherine ; DOHERTY, Deirdre ; MOONEY, Adele ; BYRNE, Margaret ; WOODWARD, David ; JOHNSON, Wendy ; RODGERS, Frank ; BOURKE, Billy</creatorcontrib><description>The optimum method for isolating Campylobacter upsaliensis from stools has not been clearly defined. In a preliminary study, cefoperazone amphotericin teicoplanin (CAT) selective medium isolated six C. upsaliensis strains which were not detected using modified cefoperazone charcoal deoxycholate (mCCDA). In order to identify the factors that underlie the superiority of CAT over mCCDA for isolating C. upsaliensis, we examined the effect of incubation time and antibiotic content of culture media on the growth of C. upsaliensis isolates using semiquantitative methods. The recovery of a subgroup of C. upsaliensis isolates from seeded stool specimens was also evaluated. Differences in growth of C. upsaliensis on CAT and mCCDA were modest and were not explained by the antibiotic profiles of the two media. Recovery of C. upsaliensis from spiked human feces on CAT was superior to that on mCCDA at lower concentrations of organisms (10(3) CFU/ml). We conclude that although CAT is more suitable than mCCDA for the isolation of C. upsaliensis from stools, the superiority of CAT for detecting this organism is not accounted for by the antibiotic composition of the medium.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2713-2716.2001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11427603</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMIDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Amphotericin B - pharmacology ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Antifungal agents ; Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen ; Bacteriology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Campylobacter - drug effects ; Campylobacter - growth & development ; Campylobacter - isolation & purification ; Campylobacter Infections - microbiology ; Campylobacter Infections - veterinary ; Campylobacter upsaliensis ; Cat Diseases - microbiology ; Cats ; Cefoperazone - pharmacology ; Child ; Culture Media - chemistry ; Dog Diseases - microbiology ; Dogs ; Feces - microbiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Medical sciences ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods ; Microbiology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Rabbits ; Teicoplanin - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2001-07, Vol.39 (7), p.2713-2716</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-edc3da0f2eeb608d9b69fc7682488c08b6d1085ea6e42862c1ef5f73eea8b72c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-edc3da0f2eeb608d9b69fc7682488c08b6d1085ea6e42862c1ef5f73eea8b72c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC88219/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC88219/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,3177,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14160979$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11427603$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BYRNE, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOHERTY, Deirdre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOONEY, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BYRNE, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOODWARD, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RODGERS, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOURKE, Billy</creatorcontrib><title>Basis of the superiority of cefoperazone amphotericin teicoplanin for isolating Campylobacter upsaliensis from stools</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>The optimum method for isolating Campylobacter upsaliensis from stools has not been clearly defined. In a preliminary study, cefoperazone amphotericin teicoplanin (CAT) selective medium isolated six C. upsaliensis strains which were not detected using modified cefoperazone charcoal deoxycholate (mCCDA). In order to identify the factors that underlie the superiority of CAT over mCCDA for isolating C. upsaliensis, we examined the effect of incubation time and antibiotic content of culture media on the growth of C. upsaliensis isolates using semiquantitative methods. The recovery of a subgroup of C. upsaliensis isolates from seeded stool specimens was also evaluated. Differences in growth of C. upsaliensis on CAT and mCCDA were modest and were not explained by the antibiotic profiles of the two media. Recovery of C. upsaliensis from spiked human feces on CAT was superior to that on mCCDA at lower concentrations of organisms (10(3) CFU/ml). We conclude that although CAT is more suitable than mCCDA for the isolation of C. upsaliensis from stools, the superiority of CAT for detecting this organism is not accounted for by the antibiotic composition of the medium.</description><subject>Amphotericin B - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Antifungal agents</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Campylobacter - drug effects</subject><subject>Campylobacter - growth & development</subject><subject>Campylobacter - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Campylobacter Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Campylobacter Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Campylobacter upsaliensis</subject><subject>Cat Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Cefoperazone - pharmacology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Culture Media - chemistry</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Teicoplanin - pharmacology</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcuO1DAQRS0EYpqBX4BsYJfgR-KHxIZp8dQgNiCxsxx3edrIiYPtIDVfj6NpMbBiU1WqOrfs0kXoGcEdIVS-_Lj_1DHViY4KwtoaeEcxJvfQjmAlW87xt_toh7EaWkKYuECPcv5egb4fhofogpCeCo7ZDq1XJvvcRNeUIzR5XSD5mHw5bS0LLtaG-RVnaMy0HGOpY-vnpoC3cQlmrrWLqfE5BlP8fNPsK3cKcTS2ss26ZBM8zNsbLsWpySXGkB-jB86EDE_O-RJ9ffvmy_59e_353Yf96-vW9oKWFg6WHQx2FGDkWB7UyJWzgkvaS2mxHPmBYDmA4dBTyakl4AYnGICRo6CWXaJXt3uXdZzqNphLMkEvyU8mnXQ0Xv87mf1R38SfWkpKVJW_OMtT_LFCLnry2UKod0NcsxZYKaoG8l-QCEU55qKC4ha0KeacwP35C8F6c1ZXZzVTWujN2S1wvTlblU__PuVOd7ayAs_PgMnWBJfMbH2-43rCsRKK_QbeQrHq</recordid><startdate>20010701</startdate><enddate>20010701</enddate><creator>BYRNE, Catherine</creator><creator>DOHERTY, Deirdre</creator><creator>MOONEY, Adele</creator><creator>BYRNE, Margaret</creator><creator>WOODWARD, David</creator><creator>JOHNSON, Wendy</creator><creator>RODGERS, Frank</creator><creator>BOURKE, Billy</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010701</creationdate><title>Basis of the superiority of cefoperazone amphotericin teicoplanin for isolating Campylobacter upsaliensis from stools</title><author>BYRNE, Catherine ; DOHERTY, Deirdre ; MOONEY, Adele ; BYRNE, Margaret ; WOODWARD, David ; JOHNSON, Wendy ; RODGERS, Frank ; BOURKE, Billy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-edc3da0f2eeb608d9b69fc7682488c08b6d1085ea6e42862c1ef5f73eea8b72c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Amphotericin B - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Antifungal agents</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Campylobacter - drug effects</topic><topic>Campylobacter - growth & development</topic><topic>Campylobacter - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Campylobacter Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Campylobacter Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Campylobacter upsaliensis</topic><topic>Cat Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Cefoperazone - pharmacology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Culture Media - chemistry</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Teicoplanin - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BYRNE, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOHERTY, Deirdre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOONEY, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BYRNE, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOODWARD, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RODGERS, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOURKE, Billy</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BYRNE, Catherine</au><au>DOHERTY, Deirdre</au><au>MOONEY, Adele</au><au>BYRNE, Margaret</au><au>WOODWARD, David</au><au>JOHNSON, Wendy</au><au>RODGERS, Frank</au><au>BOURKE, Billy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Basis of the superiority of cefoperazone amphotericin teicoplanin for isolating Campylobacter upsaliensis from stools</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2001-07-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2713</spage><epage>2716</epage><pages>2713-2716</pages><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><coden>JCMIDW</coden><abstract>The optimum method for isolating Campylobacter upsaliensis from stools has not been clearly defined. In a preliminary study, cefoperazone amphotericin teicoplanin (CAT) selective medium isolated six C. upsaliensis strains which were not detected using modified cefoperazone charcoal deoxycholate (mCCDA). In order to identify the factors that underlie the superiority of CAT over mCCDA for isolating C. upsaliensis, we examined the effect of incubation time and antibiotic content of culture media on the growth of C. upsaliensis isolates using semiquantitative methods. The recovery of a subgroup of C. upsaliensis isolates from seeded stool specimens was also evaluated. Differences in growth of C. upsaliensis on CAT and mCCDA were modest and were not explained by the antibiotic profiles of the two media. Recovery of C. upsaliensis from spiked human feces on CAT was superior to that on mCCDA at lower concentrations of organisms (10(3) CFU/ml). We conclude that although CAT is more suitable than mCCDA for the isolation of C. upsaliensis from stools, the superiority of CAT for detecting this organism is not accounted for by the antibiotic composition of the medium.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>11427603</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.39.7.2713-2716.2001</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0095-1137 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical microbiology, 2001-07, Vol.39 (7), p.2713-2716 |
| issn | 0095-1137 1098-660X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_88219 |
| source | American Society for Microbiology; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Amphotericin B - pharmacology Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents Antifungal agents Bacterial diseases Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen Bacteriology Biological and medical sciences Campylobacter - drug effects Campylobacter - growth & development Campylobacter - isolation & purification Campylobacter Infections - microbiology Campylobacter Infections - veterinary Campylobacter upsaliensis Cat Diseases - microbiology Cats Cefoperazone - pharmacology Child Culture Media - chemistry Dog Diseases - microbiology Dogs Feces - microbiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human bacterial diseases Humans Infectious diseases Medical sciences Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods Microbiology Pharmacology. Drug treatments Rabbits Teicoplanin - pharmacology |
| title | Basis of the superiority of cefoperazone amphotericin teicoplanin for isolating Campylobacter upsaliensis from stools |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T07%3A06%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Basis%20of%20the%20superiority%20of%20cefoperazone%20amphotericin%20teicoplanin%20for%20isolating%20Campylobacter%20upsaliensis%20from%20stools&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=BYRNE,%20Catherine&rft.date=2001-07-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2713&rft.epage=2716&rft.pages=2713-2716&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft.coden=JCMIDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.39.7.2713-2716.2001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70992951%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17926067&rft_id=info:pmid/11427603&rfr_iscdi=true |