Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis services
In Portugal, Outpatient Tuberculosis Centres (OTBC) are responsible for the diagnosis, treatment, screening and prevention of tuberculosis (TB), and only severe or resistant cases are hospitalized. To understand how infection control norms and standards were applied and how these centres responded d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pulmonology 2022-05, Vol.28 (3), p.210-219 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 219 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 210 |
container_title | Pulmonology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Rodrigues, I. Aguiar, A. Migliori, G.B. Duarte, R. |
description | In Portugal, Outpatient Tuberculosis Centres (OTBC) are responsible for the diagnosis, treatment, screening and prevention of tuberculosis (TB), and only severe or resistant cases are hospitalized.
To understand how infection control norms and standards were applied and how these centres responded during the pandemic.
We sent an electronic questionnaire to all coordinators of OTBC. The questionnaire included questions on infection control during the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluation of the functioning of the OTBC in two periods: during the 1st National State of Emergency and after 1 year.
Thirty-two responses were obtained (52.5%). The infection control norms were globally applied; diagnosis, treatment, and prevention were kept, and contact screening was only affected during the 1st State of Emergency. However, half of the respondents (53.1%) believed that there were diagnostic delays during the 1st State of Emergency, rising to 68.8% after 1 year. Only 31.3% performed Directly Observed Therapy (DOT) in all patients during the 1st State of Emergency, and 59.4% after 1 year. Half the inquiries expected an increase in TB incidence in the near future.
The pandemic affected OTBC functioning, although the services were kept open; diagnostic delay and DOT appliance were the most affected. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.01.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8818351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2531043722000277</els_id><sourcerecordid>2634523790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-6623e226e951efad116f66e374eee9ead336af0be135cac3c878b32e3082d4a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRrNT-A5EcvSTuR3a7uQhSvwqFXtTrstlM7JYkG3eTgv_elNZaL8ILMzAz78w8CF0RnBBMxO06afuqdpBQTGmCySB-gi4oZyTGKZueHuUjNAlhjTGmg5gk52jEOCWZoOkFkvO61aaLXBl1K4hmy_f5Q0yyqNVNAbU1kWuirs_Bm75ywYYogN9YA-ESnZW6CjDZxzF6e3p8nb3Ei-XzfHa_iE2KOY-FoAwoFZBxAqUuCBGlEMCmKQBkoAvGhC5xDoRxow0zcipzRoFhSYtUCzZGdzvfts9rKAw0ndeVar2ttf9STlv1t9LYlfpwGyUlkYyTweBmb-DdZw-hU7UNBqpKN-D6oKhgKadsmuGhNd21Gu9C8FAe1hCsttzVWu24qy13hckgPoxdH594GPqh_PsDDKA2FrwKxkJjoLAeTKcKZ__f8A1zW5U4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2634523790</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis services</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rodrigues, I. ; Aguiar, A. ; Migliori, G.B. ; Duarte, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, I. ; Aguiar, A. ; Migliori, G.B. ; Duarte, R.</creatorcontrib><description>In Portugal, Outpatient Tuberculosis Centres (OTBC) are responsible for the diagnosis, treatment, screening and prevention of tuberculosis (TB), and only severe or resistant cases are hospitalized.
To understand how infection control norms and standards were applied and how these centres responded during the pandemic.
We sent an electronic questionnaire to all coordinators of OTBC. The questionnaire included questions on infection control during the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluation of the functioning of the OTBC in two periods: during the 1st National State of Emergency and after 1 year.
Thirty-two responses were obtained (52.5%). The infection control norms were globally applied; diagnosis, treatment, and prevention were kept, and contact screening was only affected during the 1st State of Emergency. However, half of the respondents (53.1%) believed that there were diagnostic delays during the 1st State of Emergency, rising to 68.8% after 1 year. Only 31.3% performed Directly Observed Therapy (DOT) in all patients during the 1st State of Emergency, and 59.4% after 1 year. Half the inquiries expected an increase in TB incidence in the near future.
The pandemic affected OTBC functioning, although the services were kept open; diagnostic delay and DOT appliance were the most affected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2531-0437</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2531-0429</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2531-0437</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.01.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35219624</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain: Elsevier España, S.L.U</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Delayed Diagnosis ; Diagnostic delay ; Directly observed therapy (DOT) ; Humans ; Infection control ; Original ; Pandemics ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Tuberculosis ; Tuberculosis - diagnosis ; Tuberculosis - drug therapy ; Tuberculosis - epidemiology ; Workplace safety</subject><ispartof>Pulmonology, 2022-05, Vol.28 (3), p.210-219</ispartof><rights>2022 Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022 Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. 2022 Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-6623e226e951efad116f66e374eee9ead336af0be135cac3c878b32e3082d4a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-6623e226e951efad116f66e374eee9ead336af0be135cac3c878b32e3082d4a63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7643-8963 ; 0000-0003-2257-3099 ; 0000-0002-2597-574X ; 0000-0002-5469-4074</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35219624$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguiar, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Migliori, G.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis services</title><title>Pulmonology</title><addtitle>Pulmonology</addtitle><description>In Portugal, Outpatient Tuberculosis Centres (OTBC) are responsible for the diagnosis, treatment, screening and prevention of tuberculosis (TB), and only severe or resistant cases are hospitalized.
To understand how infection control norms and standards were applied and how these centres responded during the pandemic.
We sent an electronic questionnaire to all coordinators of OTBC. The questionnaire included questions on infection control during the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluation of the functioning of the OTBC in two periods: during the 1st National State of Emergency and after 1 year.
Thirty-two responses were obtained (52.5%). The infection control norms were globally applied; diagnosis, treatment, and prevention were kept, and contact screening was only affected during the 1st State of Emergency. However, half of the respondents (53.1%) believed that there were diagnostic delays during the 1st State of Emergency, rising to 68.8% after 1 year. Only 31.3% performed Directly Observed Therapy (DOT) in all patients during the 1st State of Emergency, and 59.4% after 1 year. Half the inquiries expected an increase in TB incidence in the near future.
The pandemic affected OTBC functioning, although the services were kept open; diagnostic delay and DOT appliance were the most affected.</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Delayed Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic delay</subject><subject>Directly observed therapy (DOT)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection control</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Workplace safety</subject><issn>2531-0437</issn><issn>2531-0429</issn><issn>2531-0437</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRrNT-A5EcvSTuR3a7uQhSvwqFXtTrstlM7JYkG3eTgv_elNZaL8ILMzAz78w8CF0RnBBMxO06afuqdpBQTGmCySB-gi4oZyTGKZueHuUjNAlhjTGmg5gk52jEOCWZoOkFkvO61aaLXBl1K4hmy_f5Q0yyqNVNAbU1kWuirs_Bm75ywYYogN9YA-ESnZW6CjDZxzF6e3p8nb3Ei-XzfHa_iE2KOY-FoAwoFZBxAqUuCBGlEMCmKQBkoAvGhC5xDoRxow0zcipzRoFhSYtUCzZGdzvfts9rKAw0ndeVar2ttf9STlv1t9LYlfpwGyUlkYyTweBmb-DdZw-hU7UNBqpKN-D6oKhgKadsmuGhNd21Gu9C8FAe1hCsttzVWu24qy13hckgPoxdH594GPqh_PsDDKA2FrwKxkJjoLAeTKcKZ__f8A1zW5U4</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Rodrigues, I.</creator><creator>Aguiar, A.</creator><creator>Migliori, G.B.</creator><creator>Duarte, R.</creator><general>Elsevier España, S.L.U</general><general>Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7643-8963</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2257-3099</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2597-574X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5469-4074</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis services</title><author>Rodrigues, I. ; Aguiar, A. ; Migliori, G.B. ; Duarte, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-6623e226e951efad116f66e374eee9ead336af0be135cac3c878b32e3082d4a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Delayed Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic delay</topic><topic>Directly observed therapy (DOT)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection control</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Workplace safety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguiar, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Migliori, G.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Pulmonology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodrigues, I.</au><au>Aguiar, A.</au><au>Migliori, G.B.</au><au>Duarte, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis services</atitle><jtitle>Pulmonology</jtitle><addtitle>Pulmonology</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>210</spage><epage>219</epage><pages>210-219</pages><issn>2531-0437</issn><issn>2531-0429</issn><eissn>2531-0437</eissn><abstract>In Portugal, Outpatient Tuberculosis Centres (OTBC) are responsible for the diagnosis, treatment, screening and prevention of tuberculosis (TB), and only severe or resistant cases are hospitalized.
To understand how infection control norms and standards were applied and how these centres responded during the pandemic.
We sent an electronic questionnaire to all coordinators of OTBC. The questionnaire included questions on infection control during the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluation of the functioning of the OTBC in two periods: during the 1st National State of Emergency and after 1 year.
Thirty-two responses were obtained (52.5%). The infection control norms were globally applied; diagnosis, treatment, and prevention were kept, and contact screening was only affected during the 1st State of Emergency. However, half of the respondents (53.1%) believed that there were diagnostic delays during the 1st State of Emergency, rising to 68.8% after 1 year. Only 31.3% performed Directly Observed Therapy (DOT) in all patients during the 1st State of Emergency, and 59.4% after 1 year. Half the inquiries expected an increase in TB incidence in the near future.
The pandemic affected OTBC functioning, although the services were kept open; diagnostic delay and DOT appliance were the most affected.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pub>Elsevier España, S.L.U</pub><pmid>35219624</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.01.015</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7643-8963</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2257-3099</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2597-574X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5469-4074</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2531-0437 |
ispartof | Pulmonology, 2022-05, Vol.28 (3), p.210-219 |
issn | 2531-0437 2531-0429 2531-0437 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8818351 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology Delayed Diagnosis Diagnostic delay Directly observed therapy (DOT) Humans Infection control Original Pandemics SARS-CoV-2 Tuberculosis Tuberculosis - diagnosis Tuberculosis - drug therapy Tuberculosis - epidemiology Workplace safety |
title | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis services |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T12%3A08%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic%20on%20tuberculosis%20services&rft.jtitle=Pulmonology&rft.au=Rodrigues,%20I.&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=210&rft.epage=219&rft.pages=210-219&rft.issn=2531-0437&rft.eissn=2531-0437&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.01.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2634523790%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2634523790&rft_id=info:pmid/35219624&rft_els_id=S2531043722000277&rfr_iscdi=true |