Abortion and the Mission of MCH: Perspectives of MCH and Family Planning Professionals in Health Departments
Introduction Prior research shows that maternal and child health (MCH) and family planning (FP) divisions in health departments (HDs) engage in some abortion-related activities, largely when legally mandated; some agencies also initiate abortion-related activities. Yet little is known about health d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Maternal and child health journal 2022-02, Vol.26 (2), p.381-388 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 388 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 381 |
container_title | Maternal and child health journal |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Woodruff, Katie Wingo, Erin Berglas, Nancy F. Roberts, Sarah C. M. |
description | Introduction
Prior research shows that maternal and child health (MCH) and family planning (FP) divisions in health departments (HDs) engage in some abortion-related activities, largely when legally mandated; some agencies also initiate abortion-related activities. Yet little is known about health department MCH/FP professionals’ views on how abortion-related work aligns with their professional mission.
Methods
Between November 2017 and June 2018, we conducted in-depth interviews with 29 MCH/FP professionals working in 22 state and local HDs across the U.S. We conducted inductive thematic analysis to identify themes regarding participants’ professional mission and values in relation to abortion-related work.
Results
Participants described a strong sense of professional mission. Two contrasting perspectives on abortion and the MCH/FP mission emerged: some participants saw abortion as clearly outside the scope of their mission, even a threat to it, while others saw abortion as solidly within their mission. In states with supportive or restrictive abortion policy environments, professionals’ views on abortion and professional mission generally aligned with their overall state policy environment; in states with middle-ground abortion policy environments, a range of perspectives on abortion and professional mission were expressed. Participants who saw abortion as within their mission anchored their work in core public health values such as evidence-based practice, social justice, and ensuring access to health care.
Discussion
There appears to be a lack of consensus about whether and how abortion fits into the mission of MCH/FP. More work is needed to articulate whether and how abortion aligns with the MCH/FP mission. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10995-021-03235-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8813816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A691808359</galeid><sourcerecordid>A691808359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-e29965453feaba08895ecf57e20a6db7f87a88247d53404d619edda34089f2903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9klFv0zAUhSMEYmPwB3hAlpAQLxm2E8c2D5OqwijSJvoAz5abXKeeErvYyaT-e5y2bCuqUB7s-H7n3vjkZNlbgi8JxvxTJFhKlmNKclzQguXbZ9k5YbzIq4qK52mPJc254OwsexXjHcZJhsuX2VlRVpQJjs-zbrbyYbDeIe0aNKwB3doYp3dv0O188RktIcQN1IO9h3g43LHXurfdFi077Zx1LVoGb2An1V1E1qEF6G5Yoy-w0WHowQ3xdfbCpCK8OawX2a_rrz_ni_zmx7fv89lNXrOKDDlQKStWssKAXmkshGRQG8aBYl01K24E10LQkjesKHHZVERC0-i0F9JQiYuL7GrfdzOuemjqNDvoTm2C7XXYKq-tOq44u1atv1dCkEKQKjX4eGgQ_O8R4qB6G2vo0l3Bj1El83AlZSmmWe__Qe_8GCYPFE0mE8opl49UqztQ1hmf5tZTUzWrJBFYFGyi8hNUCw7SR3oHxqbjI_7yBJ-eBnpbnxR8eCJY735Q9N04BSAeg3QP1sHHGMA8mEewmsKn9uFTKXxqFz61TaJ3T21_kPxNWwKKPRBTybUQHr36T9s_KXji3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2625127279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abortion and the Mission of MCH: Perspectives of MCH and Family Planning Professionals in Health Departments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Woodruff, Katie ; Wingo, Erin ; Berglas, Nancy F. ; Roberts, Sarah C. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Woodruff, Katie ; Wingo, Erin ; Berglas, Nancy F. ; Roberts, Sarah C. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Prior research shows that maternal and child health (MCH) and family planning (FP) divisions in health departments (HDs) engage in some abortion-related activities, largely when legally mandated; some agencies also initiate abortion-related activities. Yet little is known about health department MCH/FP professionals’ views on how abortion-related work aligns with their professional mission.
Methods
Between November 2017 and June 2018, we conducted in-depth interviews with 29 MCH/FP professionals working in 22 state and local HDs across the U.S. We conducted inductive thematic analysis to identify themes regarding participants’ professional mission and values in relation to abortion-related work.
Results
Participants described a strong sense of professional mission. Two contrasting perspectives on abortion and the MCH/FP mission emerged: some participants saw abortion as clearly outside the scope of their mission, even a threat to it, while others saw abortion as solidly within their mission. In states with supportive or restrictive abortion policy environments, professionals’ views on abortion and professional mission generally aligned with their overall state policy environment; in states with middle-ground abortion policy environments, a range of perspectives on abortion and professional mission were expressed. Participants who saw abortion as within their mission anchored their work in core public health values such as evidence-based practice, social justice, and ensuring access to health care.
Discussion
There appears to be a lack of consensus about whether and how abortion fits into the mission of MCH/FP. More work is needed to articulate whether and how abortion aligns with the MCH/FP mission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03235-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34625870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Abortion, Induced ; Child ; Child health services ; Delivery of Health Care ; Ethical aspects ; Family planning ; Family Planning Services ; Female ; Gynecology ; Health care access ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Maternal & child health ; Maternal and Child Health ; Maternal health services ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Pediatrics ; Population Economics ; Pregnancy ; Professionals ; Public Health ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Maternal and child health journal, 2022-02, Vol.26 (2), p.381-388</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-e29965453feaba08895ecf57e20a6db7f87a88247d53404d619edda34089f2903</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1413-6948</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10995-021-03235-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10995-021-03235-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625870$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woodruff, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wingo, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berglas, Nancy F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Sarah C. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Abortion and the Mission of MCH: Perspectives of MCH and Family Planning Professionals in Health Departments</title><title>Maternal and child health journal</title><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><description>Introduction
Prior research shows that maternal and child health (MCH) and family planning (FP) divisions in health departments (HDs) engage in some abortion-related activities, largely when legally mandated; some agencies also initiate abortion-related activities. Yet little is known about health department MCH/FP professionals’ views on how abortion-related work aligns with their professional mission.
Methods
Between November 2017 and June 2018, we conducted in-depth interviews with 29 MCH/FP professionals working in 22 state and local HDs across the U.S. We conducted inductive thematic analysis to identify themes regarding participants’ professional mission and values in relation to abortion-related work.
Results
Participants described a strong sense of professional mission. Two contrasting perspectives on abortion and the MCH/FP mission emerged: some participants saw abortion as clearly outside the scope of their mission, even a threat to it, while others saw abortion as solidly within their mission. In states with supportive or restrictive abortion policy environments, professionals’ views on abortion and professional mission generally aligned with their overall state policy environment; in states with middle-ground abortion policy environments, a range of perspectives on abortion and professional mission were expressed. Participants who saw abortion as within their mission anchored their work in core public health values such as evidence-based practice, social justice, and ensuring access to health care.
Discussion
There appears to be a lack of consensus about whether and how abortion fits into the mission of MCH/FP. More work is needed to articulate whether and how abortion aligns with the MCH/FP mission.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Abortion, Induced</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child health services</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Ethical aspects</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>Family Planning Services</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maternal & child health</subject><subject>Maternal and Child Health</subject><subject>Maternal health services</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>1092-7875</issn><issn>1573-6628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9klFv0zAUhSMEYmPwB3hAlpAQLxm2E8c2D5OqwijSJvoAz5abXKeeErvYyaT-e5y2bCuqUB7s-H7n3vjkZNlbgi8JxvxTJFhKlmNKclzQguXbZ9k5YbzIq4qK52mPJc254OwsexXjHcZJhsuX2VlRVpQJjs-zbrbyYbDeIe0aNKwB3doYp3dv0O188RktIcQN1IO9h3g43LHXurfdFi077Zx1LVoGb2An1V1E1qEF6G5Yoy-w0WHowQ3xdfbCpCK8OawX2a_rrz_ni_zmx7fv89lNXrOKDDlQKStWssKAXmkshGRQG8aBYl01K24E10LQkjesKHHZVERC0-i0F9JQiYuL7GrfdzOuemjqNDvoTm2C7XXYKq-tOq44u1atv1dCkEKQKjX4eGgQ_O8R4qB6G2vo0l3Bj1El83AlZSmmWe__Qe_8GCYPFE0mE8opl49UqztQ1hmf5tZTUzWrJBFYFGyi8hNUCw7SR3oHxqbjI_7yBJ-eBnpbnxR8eCJY735Q9N04BSAeg3QP1sHHGMA8mEewmsKn9uFTKXxqFz61TaJ3T21_kPxNWwKKPRBTybUQHr36T9s_KXji3A</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Woodruff, Katie</creator><creator>Wingo, Erin</creator><creator>Berglas, Nancy F.</creator><creator>Roberts, Sarah C. M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1413-6948</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Abortion and the Mission of MCH: Perspectives of MCH and Family Planning Professionals in Health Departments</title><author>Woodruff, Katie ; Wingo, Erin ; Berglas, Nancy F. ; Roberts, Sarah C. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-e29965453feaba08895ecf57e20a6db7f87a88247d53404d619edda34089f2903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Abortion, Induced</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child health services</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Ethical aspects</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>Family Planning Services</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maternal & child health</topic><topic>Maternal and Child Health</topic><topic>Maternal health services</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woodruff, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wingo, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berglas, Nancy F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Sarah C. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woodruff, Katie</au><au>Wingo, Erin</au><au>Berglas, Nancy F.</au><au>Roberts, Sarah C. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abortion and the Mission of MCH: Perspectives of MCH and Family Planning Professionals in Health Departments</atitle><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle><stitle>Matern Child Health J</stitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>381-388</pages><issn>1092-7875</issn><eissn>1573-6628</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Prior research shows that maternal and child health (MCH) and family planning (FP) divisions in health departments (HDs) engage in some abortion-related activities, largely when legally mandated; some agencies also initiate abortion-related activities. Yet little is known about health department MCH/FP professionals’ views on how abortion-related work aligns with their professional mission.
Methods
Between November 2017 and June 2018, we conducted in-depth interviews with 29 MCH/FP professionals working in 22 state and local HDs across the U.S. We conducted inductive thematic analysis to identify themes regarding participants’ professional mission and values in relation to abortion-related work.
Results
Participants described a strong sense of professional mission. Two contrasting perspectives on abortion and the MCH/FP mission emerged: some participants saw abortion as clearly outside the scope of their mission, even a threat to it, while others saw abortion as solidly within their mission. In states with supportive or restrictive abortion policy environments, professionals’ views on abortion and professional mission generally aligned with their overall state policy environment; in states with middle-ground abortion policy environments, a range of perspectives on abortion and professional mission were expressed. Participants who saw abortion as within their mission anchored their work in core public health values such as evidence-based practice, social justice, and ensuring access to health care.
Discussion
There appears to be a lack of consensus about whether and how abortion fits into the mission of MCH/FP. More work is needed to articulate whether and how abortion aligns with the MCH/FP mission.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>34625870</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10995-021-03235-y</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1413-6948</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1092-7875 |
ispartof | Maternal and child health journal, 2022-02, Vol.26 (2), p.381-388 |
issn | 1092-7875 1573-6628 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8813816 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Abortion Abortion, Induced Child Child health services Delivery of Health Care Ethical aspects Family planning Family Planning Services Female Gynecology Health care access Health Personnel Humans Maternal & child health Maternal and Child Health Maternal health services Medicine Medicine & Public Health Pediatrics Population Economics Pregnancy Professionals Public Health Sociology |
title | Abortion and the Mission of MCH: Perspectives of MCH and Family Planning Professionals in Health Departments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A15%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abortion%20and%20the%20Mission%20of%20MCH:%20Perspectives%20of%20MCH%20and%20Family%20Planning%20Professionals%20in%20Health%20Departments&rft.jtitle=Maternal%20and%20child%20health%20journal&rft.au=Woodruff,%20Katie&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=381-388&rft.issn=1092-7875&rft.eissn=1573-6628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10995-021-03235-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA691808359%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2625127279&rft_id=info:pmid/34625870&rft_galeid=A691808359&rfr_iscdi=true |