Polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch (hemopatch®) in open partial nephrectomy

Purpose To describe the results of a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch, Hemopatch ® on blood loss, surgical time and renal function in partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods Out of a single surgeon cohort of n  = 565 patients undergoing conventional open PN (CPN) be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of urology 2022-01, Vol.40 (1), p.127-132
Hauptverfasser: Staehler, Michael, Rodler, S., Schott, M., Casuscelli, J., Stief, C., Spek, A., Schlenker, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 132
container_issue 1
container_start_page 127
container_title World journal of urology
container_volume 40
creator Staehler, Michael
Rodler, S.
Schott, M.
Casuscelli, J.
Stief, C.
Spek, A.
Schlenker, B.
description Purpose To describe the results of a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch, Hemopatch ® on blood loss, surgical time and renal function in partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods Out of a single surgeon cohort of n  = 565 patients undergoing conventional open PN (CPN) between 01/2015 and 12/2017 at the University of Munich a consecutive subgroup ( n  = 42) was operated on using a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen-based sealant Hemopatch ® (Baxter International Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA) (HPN). Results Median age was 65.2 years (range 12.7–95.2) with median follow-up of 9.43 months (0.03–49.15). Baseline renal function (CKD-EPI) was 78.56 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (range 20.38–143.09) with a non-significant decline to 74.78 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (range 3.75–167.74) at follow-up. In CPN 46% had low complexity, 33% moderate complexity and 20% high complexity lesions with 33% low, 40% moderate and 27% high complexity masses in HPN. Median tumor size was 4.3 cm (range 1–38 cm) in CPN with 4.8 cm (range 3.8–18.3 cm) with HPN, p  = 0.293. Median blood loss and duration of surgery was significantly lower in the HPN group vs. CPN (146 ml ± 195 vs. 114 ml ± 159 ml; p  = 0.021; 43 min ± 27 for HPN vs. 53 min ± 49; p  = 0.035) with no difference in clamping time (12.6 min ± 8.6 for HPN vs. 12.0 min ± 9.5; p  = 0.701). Conclusions Hemopatch ® supported renoraphy shows promising results compared to standard renoraphy in PN. No side effects were seen. Further studies should evaluate the prevention of arterio-venous or urinary fistulas. In complex partial nephrectomies Hemopatch ® supported renoraphy should be considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00345-021-03827-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8813698</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2569374528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-116204463c87ad64bdb187cbad82e4ff4e5a0583add9bc741b318d536452558d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1uFDEQhS0EIsPABVigltiEhcH_9myQUAQJUiSQgLXltmumO-q2G7sHpS_FITgZzkwIPwtWLqm-elXPD6GnlLykhOhXhRAuJCaMYsIN0_j6HlpRwTk2mqn7aEU0E1hsDD9Bj0q5IoRqReRDdMKFMIRxuUKfPqZhgblbBojQ7IbFpwH75GYITS0Ht4PYTG72XXPawZgO5Y_vL5o-Nmk69PLcu6GJMHUZ_JzG5TF6sHVDgSe37xp9eff289kFvvxw_v7szSX2gskZU6oYEUJxb7QLSrShpUb71gXDQGy3AqQj0nAXwqb1WtCWUxMkV0IyKU3ga_T6qDvt2xGChzhnN9gp96PLi02ut393Yt_ZXfpmjaFc1W9Zo9NbgZy-7qHMduyLh-o6QtoXy6TacF3X3aDP_0Gv0j7Has8yxSRlkjNVKXakfE6lZNjeHUOJvcnMHjOzNTN7yMxe16Fnf9q4G_kVUgX4ESi1FXeQf-_-j-xPoeCkLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2625125326</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch (hemopatch®) in open partial nephrectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Staehler, Michael ; Rodler, S. ; Schott, M. ; Casuscelli, J. ; Stief, C. ; Spek, A. ; Schlenker, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Staehler, Michael ; Rodler, S. ; Schott, M. ; Casuscelli, J. ; Stief, C. ; Spek, A. ; Schlenker, B.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To describe the results of a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch, Hemopatch ® on blood loss, surgical time and renal function in partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods Out of a single surgeon cohort of n  = 565 patients undergoing conventional open PN (CPN) between 01/2015 and 12/2017 at the University of Munich a consecutive subgroup ( n  = 42) was operated on using a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen-based sealant Hemopatch ® (Baxter International Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA) (HPN). Results Median age was 65.2 years (range 12.7–95.2) with median follow-up of 9.43 months (0.03–49.15). Baseline renal function (CKD-EPI) was 78.56 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (range 20.38–143.09) with a non-significant decline to 74.78 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (range 3.75–167.74) at follow-up. In CPN 46% had low complexity, 33% moderate complexity and 20% high complexity lesions with 33% low, 40% moderate and 27% high complexity masses in HPN. Median tumor size was 4.3 cm (range 1–38 cm) in CPN with 4.8 cm (range 3.8–18.3 cm) with HPN, p  = 0.293. Median blood loss and duration of surgery was significantly lower in the HPN group vs. CPN (146 ml ± 195 vs. 114 ml ± 159 ml; p  = 0.021; 43 min ± 27 for HPN vs. 53 min ± 49; p  = 0.035) with no difference in clamping time (12.6 min ± 8.6 for HPN vs. 12.0 min ± 9.5; p  = 0.701). Conclusions Hemopatch ® supported renoraphy shows promising results compared to standard renoraphy in PN. No side effects were seen. Further studies should evaluate the prevention of arterio-venous or urinary fistulas. In complex partial nephrectomies Hemopatch ® supported renoraphy should be considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0724-4983</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1433-8726</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03827-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34480235</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention &amp; control ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery ; Child ; Coatings ; Collagen ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney cancer ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nephrectomy ; Nephrectomy - methods ; Nephrology ; Oncology ; Original ; Original Article ; Polyethylene glycol ; Polyethylene Glycols ; Renal function ; Tumors ; Urology ; Vascular Closure Devices ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>World journal of urology, 2022-01, Vol.40 (1), p.127-132</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-116204463c87ad64bdb187cbad82e4ff4e5a0583add9bc741b318d536452558d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4574-6522</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00345-021-03827-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00345-021-03827-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34480235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Staehler, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodler, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schott, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casuscelli, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stief, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spek, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlenker, B.</creatorcontrib><title>Polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch (hemopatch®) in open partial nephrectomy</title><title>World journal of urology</title><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><description>Purpose To describe the results of a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch, Hemopatch ® on blood loss, surgical time and renal function in partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods Out of a single surgeon cohort of n  = 565 patients undergoing conventional open PN (CPN) between 01/2015 and 12/2017 at the University of Munich a consecutive subgroup ( n  = 42) was operated on using a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen-based sealant Hemopatch ® (Baxter International Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA) (HPN). Results Median age was 65.2 years (range 12.7–95.2) with median follow-up of 9.43 months (0.03–49.15). Baseline renal function (CKD-EPI) was 78.56 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (range 20.38–143.09) with a non-significant decline to 74.78 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (range 3.75–167.74) at follow-up. In CPN 46% had low complexity, 33% moderate complexity and 20% high complexity lesions with 33% low, 40% moderate and 27% high complexity masses in HPN. Median tumor size was 4.3 cm (range 1–38 cm) in CPN with 4.8 cm (range 3.8–18.3 cm) with HPN, p  = 0.293. Median blood loss and duration of surgery was significantly lower in the HPN group vs. CPN (146 ml ± 195 vs. 114 ml ± 159 ml; p  = 0.021; 43 min ± 27 for HPN vs. 53 min ± 49; p  = 0.035) with no difference in clamping time (12.6 min ± 8.6 for HPN vs. 12.0 min ± 9.5; p  = 0.701). Conclusions Hemopatch ® supported renoraphy shows promising results compared to standard renoraphy in PN. No side effects were seen. Further studies should evaluate the prevention of arterio-venous or urinary fistulas. In complex partial nephrectomies Hemopatch ® supported renoraphy should be considered.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Coatings</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney cancer</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrectomy</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - methods</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Polyethylene glycol</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols</subject><subject>Renal function</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Vascular Closure Devices</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0724-4983</issn><issn>1433-8726</issn><issn>1433-8726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1uFDEQhS0EIsPABVigltiEhcH_9myQUAQJUiSQgLXltmumO-q2G7sHpS_FITgZzkwIPwtWLqm-elXPD6GnlLykhOhXhRAuJCaMYsIN0_j6HlpRwTk2mqn7aEU0E1hsDD9Bj0q5IoRqReRDdMKFMIRxuUKfPqZhgblbBojQ7IbFpwH75GYITS0Ht4PYTG72XXPawZgO5Y_vL5o-Nmk69PLcu6GJMHUZ_JzG5TF6sHVDgSe37xp9eff289kFvvxw_v7szSX2gskZU6oYEUJxb7QLSrShpUb71gXDQGy3AqQj0nAXwqb1WtCWUxMkV0IyKU3ga_T6qDvt2xGChzhnN9gp96PLi02ut393Yt_ZXfpmjaFc1W9Zo9NbgZy-7qHMduyLh-o6QtoXy6TacF3X3aDP_0Gv0j7Has8yxSRlkjNVKXakfE6lZNjeHUOJvcnMHjOzNTN7yMxe16Fnf9q4G_kVUgX4ESi1FXeQf-_-j-xPoeCkLQ</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Staehler, Michael</creator><creator>Rodler, S.</creator><creator>Schott, M.</creator><creator>Casuscelli, J.</creator><creator>Stief, C.</creator><creator>Spek, A.</creator><creator>Schlenker, B.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4574-6522</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch (hemopatch®) in open partial nephrectomy</title><author>Staehler, Michael ; Rodler, S. ; Schott, M. ; Casuscelli, J. ; Stief, C. ; Spek, A. ; Schlenker, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-116204463c87ad64bdb187cbad82e4ff4e5a0583add9bc741b318d536452558d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Coatings</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney cancer</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrectomy</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - methods</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Polyethylene glycol</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols</topic><topic>Renal function</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Vascular Closure Devices</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Staehler, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodler, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schott, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casuscelli, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stief, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spek, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlenker, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Staehler, Michael</au><au>Rodler, S.</au><au>Schott, M.</au><au>Casuscelli, J.</au><au>Stief, C.</au><au>Spek, A.</au><au>Schlenker, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch (hemopatch®) in open partial nephrectomy</atitle><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle><stitle>World J Urol</stitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>127-132</pages><issn>0724-4983</issn><issn>1433-8726</issn><eissn>1433-8726</eissn><abstract>Purpose To describe the results of a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch, Hemopatch ® on blood loss, surgical time and renal function in partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods Out of a single surgeon cohort of n  = 565 patients undergoing conventional open PN (CPN) between 01/2015 and 12/2017 at the University of Munich a consecutive subgroup ( n  = 42) was operated on using a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen-based sealant Hemopatch ® (Baxter International Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA) (HPN). Results Median age was 65.2 years (range 12.7–95.2) with median follow-up of 9.43 months (0.03–49.15). Baseline renal function (CKD-EPI) was 78.56 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (range 20.38–143.09) with a non-significant decline to 74.78 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (range 3.75–167.74) at follow-up. In CPN 46% had low complexity, 33% moderate complexity and 20% high complexity lesions with 33% low, 40% moderate and 27% high complexity masses in HPN. Median tumor size was 4.3 cm (range 1–38 cm) in CPN with 4.8 cm (range 3.8–18.3 cm) with HPN, p  = 0.293. Median blood loss and duration of surgery was significantly lower in the HPN group vs. CPN (146 ml ± 195 vs. 114 ml ± 159 ml; p  = 0.021; 43 min ± 27 for HPN vs. 53 min ± 49; p  = 0.035) with no difference in clamping time (12.6 min ± 8.6 for HPN vs. 12.0 min ± 9.5; p  = 0.701). Conclusions Hemopatch ® supported renoraphy shows promising results compared to standard renoraphy in PN. No side effects were seen. Further studies should evaluate the prevention of arterio-venous or urinary fistulas. In complex partial nephrectomies Hemopatch ® supported renoraphy should be considered.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34480235</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00345-021-03827-x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4574-6522</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0724-4983
ispartof World journal of urology, 2022-01, Vol.40 (1), p.127-132
issn 0724-4983
1433-8726
1433-8726
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8813698
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention & control
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery
Child
Coatings
Collagen
Female
Humans
Kidney cancer
Kidney Neoplasms - surgery
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Nephrectomy
Nephrectomy - methods
Nephrology
Oncology
Original
Original Article
Polyethylene glycol
Polyethylene Glycols
Renal function
Tumors
Urology
Vascular Closure Devices
Young Adult
title Polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch (hemopatch®) in open partial nephrectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T18%3A16%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Polyethylene%20glycol-coated%20collagen%20patch%20(hemopatch%C2%AE)%20in%20open%20partial%20nephrectomy&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Staehler,%20Michael&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=127-132&rft.issn=0724-4983&rft.eissn=1433-8726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00345-021-03827-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2569374528%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2625125326&rft_id=info:pmid/34480235&rfr_iscdi=true