Estimated Plan Enrollment Outcomes After Changes to US Health Insurance Marketplace Automatic Renewal Rules
The American Rescue Plan increases premium subsidies for health insurance marketplace enrollees, potentially leading to situations in which enrollees could switch to other health care plans with lower premiums and less cost sharing (ie, deductibles and copayments). Current policy defaults enrollees...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA health forum 2021-07, Vol.2 (7), p.e211642-e211642 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e211642 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e211642 |
container_title | JAMA health forum |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Anderson, David M Rasmussen, Petra W Drake, Coleman |
description | The American Rescue Plan increases premium subsidies for health insurance marketplace enrollees, potentially leading to situations in which enrollees could switch to other health care plans with lower premiums and less cost sharing (ie, deductibles and copayments). Current policy defaults enrollees to their current health care plan if they automatically renew their coverage, which may cause them to stay in health care plans that, because of the American Rescue Plan, are now dominated in that they have higher premiums and cost sharing than other options.
To estimate the extent to which a smart default policy could reduce US health insurance marketplace enrollees' cost sharing and premiums.
Using 2018 individual enrollment data and 2021 premium data from California's marketplace and the American Rescue Plan premium tax credit subsidy schedule, this economic analysis estimated the characteristics of enrollees' default health care plans if they defaulted into 2021 health care plans under current and smart default policies. The analysis was conducted from March 20 to April 8, 2021.
Characteristics of enrollees' default health care plans under current and smart default policies, including net premiums, plan levels, and cost sharing.
The analytic sample consisted of 748 087 Covered California enrollees from 2018 (mean [SD] age, 44.80 [13.72] years; 408 410 [54.6%] women). Under current policy with the enhanced subsidies implemented under the American Rescue Plan, 5.8% of sample enrollees would default into dominated health plans. Of these enrollees, 98.0% would have incomes below 250% of the federal poverty level. A smart default policy would lead to a mean $102.47 decrease in monthly premiums (95% CI, $103.84-$101.10), a mean $1960 reduction in individual annual medical deductibles (95% CI, $1991-$1928), and a $49.56 reduction in specialty prescription copays (95% CI, $49.77-$49.34).
The findings of this economic analysis suggest that a smart default policy could avoid defaulting lower-income marketplace enrollees to objectively inferior health care insurance plans and may lead to large reductions in lower-income enrollees' deductibles, copayments, and maximum out-of-pocket amounts. Implementation of a smart default policy could enable marketplace administrators to reduce the prevalence of underinsurance among lower-income marketplace enrollees. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1642 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8796975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2666939979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-375a3acfd4012223279989ab377af801058d6c476a0f259f4962c9ca635c29f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtPWzEQha2qqCDKX6hcddNNUj9y7etNpShKAYkKROnaGhyb3OBrp35Q8e9xgCLKambkM0dz_CH0mZIpJYR-28AIawu-rF1MdZwywuiUihl7hw6Y6NWE0F68f9Xvo6OcN4QQ1lEqJP-A9nmnpGSUHKDbZS7DCMWu8IWHgJchRe9HGwo-r8XE0WY8d8UmvFhDuGlTifj3L3zyeAE-DbkmCMbin5Bubdl6aP28ltg8B4MvbbB_wePL6m3-iPYc-GyPnushuvqxvFqcTM7Oj08X87OJ4T0tEy474GDcakYoY4wzqVSv4JpLCa4nlHT9SpiZFEAc65SbKcGMMiB4Z5hy_BB9f7Ld1uvRrkzLksDrbWo5072OMOj_X8Kw1jfxTvdSCSW7ZvD12SDFP9XmoschG-vb_9hYs2aScNULSlSTfnkj3cSaQkunmRBCcaXkTqWeVCbFnJN1L8dQondQ9RuoegdV76C23U-v07xs_kPIHwDxKaNc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2666939979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimated Plan Enrollment Outcomes After Changes to US Health Insurance Marketplace Automatic Renewal Rules</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Anderson, David M ; Rasmussen, Petra W ; Drake, Coleman</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, David M ; Rasmussen, Petra W ; Drake, Coleman</creatorcontrib><description>The American Rescue Plan increases premium subsidies for health insurance marketplace enrollees, potentially leading to situations in which enrollees could switch to other health care plans with lower premiums and less cost sharing (ie, deductibles and copayments). Current policy defaults enrollees to their current health care plan if they automatically renew their coverage, which may cause them to stay in health care plans that, because of the American Rescue Plan, are now dominated in that they have higher premiums and cost sharing than other options.
To estimate the extent to which a smart default policy could reduce US health insurance marketplace enrollees' cost sharing and premiums.
Using 2018 individual enrollment data and 2021 premium data from California's marketplace and the American Rescue Plan premium tax credit subsidy schedule, this economic analysis estimated the characteristics of enrollees' default health care plans if they defaulted into 2021 health care plans under current and smart default policies. The analysis was conducted from March 20 to April 8, 2021.
Characteristics of enrollees' default health care plans under current and smart default policies, including net premiums, plan levels, and cost sharing.
The analytic sample consisted of 748 087 Covered California enrollees from 2018 (mean [SD] age, 44.80 [13.72] years; 408 410 [54.6%] women). Under current policy with the enhanced subsidies implemented under the American Rescue Plan, 5.8% of sample enrollees would default into dominated health plans. Of these enrollees, 98.0% would have incomes below 250% of the federal poverty level. A smart default policy would lead to a mean $102.47 decrease in monthly premiums (95% CI, $103.84-$101.10), a mean $1960 reduction in individual annual medical deductibles (95% CI, $1991-$1928), and a $49.56 reduction in specialty prescription copays (95% CI, $49.77-$49.34).
The findings of this economic analysis suggest that a smart default policy could avoid defaulting lower-income marketplace enrollees to objectively inferior health care insurance plans and may lead to large reductions in lower-income enrollees' deductibles, copayments, and maximum out-of-pocket amounts. Implementation of a smart default policy could enable marketplace administrators to reduce the prevalence of underinsurance among lower-income marketplace enrollees.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2689-0186</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2689-0186</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1642</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35977210</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; American Rescue Plan Act 2021-US ; Comments ; Cost Sharing ; Default ; Economic analysis ; Female ; Health economics ; Health insurance ; Health Insurance Exchanges ; Health Planning ; Humans ; Insurance premiums ; Male ; Online Only ; Original Investigation ; Poverty ; Subsidies ; United States</subject><ispartof>JAMA health forum, 2021-07, Vol.2 (7), p.e211642-e211642</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2021 Anderson DM et al. JAMA Health Forum.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright 2021 Anderson DM et al. .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-375a3acfd4012223279989ab377af801058d6c476a0f259f4962c9ca635c29f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-375a3acfd4012223279989ab377af801058d6c476a0f259f4962c9ca635c29f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35977210$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Petra W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drake, Coleman</creatorcontrib><title>Estimated Plan Enrollment Outcomes After Changes to US Health Insurance Marketplace Automatic Renewal Rules</title><title>JAMA health forum</title><addtitle>JAMA Health Forum</addtitle><description>The American Rescue Plan increases premium subsidies for health insurance marketplace enrollees, potentially leading to situations in which enrollees could switch to other health care plans with lower premiums and less cost sharing (ie, deductibles and copayments). Current policy defaults enrollees to their current health care plan if they automatically renew their coverage, which may cause them to stay in health care plans that, because of the American Rescue Plan, are now dominated in that they have higher premiums and cost sharing than other options.
To estimate the extent to which a smart default policy could reduce US health insurance marketplace enrollees' cost sharing and premiums.
Using 2018 individual enrollment data and 2021 premium data from California's marketplace and the American Rescue Plan premium tax credit subsidy schedule, this economic analysis estimated the characteristics of enrollees' default health care plans if they defaulted into 2021 health care plans under current and smart default policies. The analysis was conducted from March 20 to April 8, 2021.
Characteristics of enrollees' default health care plans under current and smart default policies, including net premiums, plan levels, and cost sharing.
The analytic sample consisted of 748 087 Covered California enrollees from 2018 (mean [SD] age, 44.80 [13.72] years; 408 410 [54.6%] women). Under current policy with the enhanced subsidies implemented under the American Rescue Plan, 5.8% of sample enrollees would default into dominated health plans. Of these enrollees, 98.0% would have incomes below 250% of the federal poverty level. A smart default policy would lead to a mean $102.47 decrease in monthly premiums (95% CI, $103.84-$101.10), a mean $1960 reduction in individual annual medical deductibles (95% CI, $1991-$1928), and a $49.56 reduction in specialty prescription copays (95% CI, $49.77-$49.34).
The findings of this economic analysis suggest that a smart default policy could avoid defaulting lower-income marketplace enrollees to objectively inferior health care insurance plans and may lead to large reductions in lower-income enrollees' deductibles, copayments, and maximum out-of-pocket amounts. Implementation of a smart default policy could enable marketplace administrators to reduce the prevalence of underinsurance among lower-income marketplace enrollees.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>American Rescue Plan Act 2021-US</subject><subject>Comments</subject><subject>Cost Sharing</subject><subject>Default</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health Insurance Exchanges</subject><subject>Health Planning</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance premiums</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Online Only</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>2689-0186</issn><issn>2689-0186</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtPWzEQha2qqCDKX6hcddNNUj9y7etNpShKAYkKROnaGhyb3OBrp35Q8e9xgCLKambkM0dz_CH0mZIpJYR-28AIawu-rF1MdZwywuiUihl7hw6Y6NWE0F68f9Xvo6OcN4QQ1lEqJP-A9nmnpGSUHKDbZS7DCMWu8IWHgJchRe9HGwo-r8XE0WY8d8UmvFhDuGlTifj3L3zyeAE-DbkmCMbin5Bubdl6aP28ltg8B4MvbbB_wePL6m3-iPYc-GyPnushuvqxvFqcTM7Oj08X87OJ4T0tEy474GDcakYoY4wzqVSv4JpLCa4nlHT9SpiZFEAc65SbKcGMMiB4Z5hy_BB9f7Ld1uvRrkzLksDrbWo5072OMOj_X8Kw1jfxTvdSCSW7ZvD12SDFP9XmoschG-vb_9hYs2aScNULSlSTfnkj3cSaQkunmRBCcaXkTqWeVCbFnJN1L8dQondQ9RuoegdV76C23U-v07xs_kPIHwDxKaNc</recordid><startdate>20210716</startdate><enddate>20210716</enddate><creator>Anderson, David M</creator><creator>Rasmussen, Petra W</creator><creator>Drake, Coleman</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210716</creationdate><title>Estimated Plan Enrollment Outcomes After Changes to US Health Insurance Marketplace Automatic Renewal Rules</title><author>Anderson, David M ; Rasmussen, Petra W ; Drake, Coleman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-375a3acfd4012223279989ab377af801058d6c476a0f259f4962c9ca635c29f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>American Rescue Plan Act 2021-US</topic><topic>Comments</topic><topic>Cost Sharing</topic><topic>Default</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health Insurance Exchanges</topic><topic>Health Planning</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance premiums</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Online Only</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Petra W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drake, Coleman</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA health forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, David M</au><au>Rasmussen, Petra W</au><au>Drake, Coleman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimated Plan Enrollment Outcomes After Changes to US Health Insurance Marketplace Automatic Renewal Rules</atitle><jtitle>JAMA health forum</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Health Forum</addtitle><date>2021-07-16</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e211642</spage><epage>e211642</epage><pages>e211642-e211642</pages><issn>2689-0186</issn><eissn>2689-0186</eissn><abstract>The American Rescue Plan increases premium subsidies for health insurance marketplace enrollees, potentially leading to situations in which enrollees could switch to other health care plans with lower premiums and less cost sharing (ie, deductibles and copayments). Current policy defaults enrollees to their current health care plan if they automatically renew their coverage, which may cause them to stay in health care plans that, because of the American Rescue Plan, are now dominated in that they have higher premiums and cost sharing than other options.
To estimate the extent to which a smart default policy could reduce US health insurance marketplace enrollees' cost sharing and premiums.
Using 2018 individual enrollment data and 2021 premium data from California's marketplace and the American Rescue Plan premium tax credit subsidy schedule, this economic analysis estimated the characteristics of enrollees' default health care plans if they defaulted into 2021 health care plans under current and smart default policies. The analysis was conducted from March 20 to April 8, 2021.
Characteristics of enrollees' default health care plans under current and smart default policies, including net premiums, plan levels, and cost sharing.
The analytic sample consisted of 748 087 Covered California enrollees from 2018 (mean [SD] age, 44.80 [13.72] years; 408 410 [54.6%] women). Under current policy with the enhanced subsidies implemented under the American Rescue Plan, 5.8% of sample enrollees would default into dominated health plans. Of these enrollees, 98.0% would have incomes below 250% of the federal poverty level. A smart default policy would lead to a mean $102.47 decrease in monthly premiums (95% CI, $103.84-$101.10), a mean $1960 reduction in individual annual medical deductibles (95% CI, $1991-$1928), and a $49.56 reduction in specialty prescription copays (95% CI, $49.77-$49.34).
The findings of this economic analysis suggest that a smart default policy could avoid defaulting lower-income marketplace enrollees to objectively inferior health care insurance plans and may lead to large reductions in lower-income enrollees' deductibles, copayments, and maximum out-of-pocket amounts. Implementation of a smart default policy could enable marketplace administrators to reduce the prevalence of underinsurance among lower-income marketplace enrollees.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>35977210</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1642</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2689-0186 |
ispartof | JAMA health forum, 2021-07, Vol.2 (7), p.e211642-e211642 |
issn | 2689-0186 2689-0186 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8796975 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adult American Rescue Plan Act 2021-US Comments Cost Sharing Default Economic analysis Female Health economics Health insurance Health Insurance Exchanges Health Planning Humans Insurance premiums Male Online Only Original Investigation Poverty Subsidies United States |
title | Estimated Plan Enrollment Outcomes After Changes to US Health Insurance Marketplace Automatic Renewal Rules |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T02%3A39%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimated%20Plan%20Enrollment%20Outcomes%20After%20Changes%20to%20US%20Health%20Insurance%20Marketplace%20Automatic%20Renewal%20Rules&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20health%20forum&rft.au=Anderson,%20David%20M&rft.date=2021-07-16&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e211642&rft.epage=e211642&rft.pages=e211642-e211642&rft.issn=2689-0186&rft.eissn=2689-0186&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1642&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2666939979%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2666939979&rft_id=info:pmid/35977210&rfr_iscdi=true |