How Has Access to Care for Medi-Cal Enrollees Fared Relative to Employer-Sponsored Insurance 4 Years After the Affordable Care Act Expansion?

Background The number of Californians covered by Medi-Cal increased more than 50% between 2013 and 2018, largely due to expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This rapid expansion of Medicaid rolls prompted concerns that Medi-Cal enrollees would face greater difficulty accessing health care....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2022-10, Vol.37 (13), p.3338-3345
Hauptverfasser: Babey, Susan H., Ponce, Ninez A., Becker, Tara, Rasmussen, Petra W., Scheitler, A. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3345
container_issue 13
container_start_page 3338
container_title Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM
container_volume 37
creator Babey, Susan H.
Ponce, Ninez A.
Becker, Tara
Rasmussen, Petra W.
Scheitler, A. J.
description Background The number of Californians covered by Medi-Cal increased more than 50% between 2013 and 2018, largely due to expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This rapid expansion of Medicaid rolls prompted concerns that Medi-Cal enrollees would face greater difficulty accessing health care. Objective Examine whether gaps in access to care between Medi-Cal and employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) present in 2013 (prior to ACA implementation) had changed by 2018 (several years post implementation). Design Secondary analysis of data from the 2013 and 2018 California Health Interview Survey. The sample included adults of ages 18–64 insured all year and covered by ESI or Medi-Cal at time of interview. Logistic regressions were used to examine variation across years in the association between access to care and insurance type. Main Measures Five access to care outcomes were assessed: no usual source of care, not accepted as new patient in past year, insurance not accepted in past year, delayed medical care in past year, and difficulty getting timely appointment. The main predictors of interest were type of insurance (Medi-Cal or ESI) and survey year (2013 or 2018). Key Results The association between insurance type and access to care changed significantly over time for three outcomes: not accepted as new patient in past year (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.32–0.97), delayed medical care in past year (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.06–2.25), and difficulty getting timely appointment (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.23–0.74). Predicted probabilities indicate gaps between Medi-Cal and ESI narrowed for not accepted as new patient in past year and difficulty getting timely appointment, but widened for delayed medical care. Conclusions Despite the rapid expansion in the number of Californians covered by Medi-Cal, most gaps in access to care between Medi-Cal and ESI enrollees improved or did not significantly change between 2013 and 2018.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11606-021-07383-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8796736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2723284462</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-c0918edb8ee16538f35e5294cde3e3cdb7d979a058b5380ec5eb551b3e3a76683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRVsIRIbAD7BAlthkY_Cj_egNaDSaMJGCkHgsWFlud3XSkcdu7O5APoJ_xkOH8FiwqpLuqVtVulX1lJIXlBD1MlMqicSEUUwU1xzze9WKCiYwrRt1v1oRrWusFa-Pqkc5XxFCOWP6YXXEBWloQ-tV9X0Xv6KdzWjtHOSMpog2NgHqY0JvoRvwxnq0DSl6D5DRadE69B68nYZrONDb_ejjDST8YYwhx4N8FvKcbHCAavQZbCrm_QQJTZdQuuLc2dbDsmftJrT9NtqQhxheP64e9NZneHJbj6tPp9uPmx0-f_fmbLM-x65mYsKuXK-hazUAlYLrngsQrKldBxy461rVNaqxROi2qAScgFYI2hbRKik1P65eLb7j3O6hcxCmZL0Z07C36cZEO5i_lTBcmot4bbRqpOKyGJzcGqT4ZYY8mf2QHXhvA8Q5GyYZ17qRghX0-T_oVZxTKO8Zphhnuq7lgWIL5VLMOUF_dwwl5pC2WdI2JW3zM23Dy9CzP9-4G_kVbwH4AuQihQtIv3f_x_YH1na18A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2723284462</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Has Access to Care for Medi-Cal Enrollees Fared Relative to Employer-Sponsored Insurance 4 Years After the Affordable Care Act Expansion?</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Babey, Susan H. ; Ponce, Ninez A. ; Becker, Tara ; Rasmussen, Petra W. ; Scheitler, A. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Babey, Susan H. ; Ponce, Ninez A. ; Becker, Tara ; Rasmussen, Petra W. ; Scheitler, A. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background The number of Californians covered by Medi-Cal increased more than 50% between 2013 and 2018, largely due to expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This rapid expansion of Medicaid rolls prompted concerns that Medi-Cal enrollees would face greater difficulty accessing health care. Objective Examine whether gaps in access to care between Medi-Cal and employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) present in 2013 (prior to ACA implementation) had changed by 2018 (several years post implementation). Design Secondary analysis of data from the 2013 and 2018 California Health Interview Survey. The sample included adults of ages 18–64 insured all year and covered by ESI or Medi-Cal at time of interview. Logistic regressions were used to examine variation across years in the association between access to care and insurance type. Main Measures Five access to care outcomes were assessed: no usual source of care, not accepted as new patient in past year, insurance not accepted in past year, delayed medical care in past year, and difficulty getting timely appointment. The main predictors of interest were type of insurance (Medi-Cal or ESI) and survey year (2013 or 2018). Key Results The association between insurance type and access to care changed significantly over time for three outcomes: not accepted as new patient in past year (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.32–0.97), delayed medical care in past year (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.06–2.25), and difficulty getting timely appointment (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.23–0.74). Predicted probabilities indicate gaps between Medi-Cal and ESI narrowed for not accepted as new patient in past year and difficulty getting timely appointment, but widened for delayed medical care. Conclusions Despite the rapid expansion in the number of Californians covered by Medi-Cal, most gaps in access to care between Medi-Cal and ESI enrollees improved or did not significantly change between 2013 and 2018.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07383-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35091914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Government programs ; Health care ; Health services ; Indigent care ; Insurance ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Research ; Patient Protection &amp; Affordable Care Act 2010-US ; Patients ; Secondary analysis ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2022-10, Vol.37 (13), p.3338-3345</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-c0918edb8ee16538f35e5294cde3e3cdb7d979a058b5380ec5eb551b3e3a76683</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8113-1739</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796736/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8796736/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35091914$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Babey, Susan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponce, Ninez A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Petra W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheitler, A. J.</creatorcontrib><title>How Has Access to Care for Medi-Cal Enrollees Fared Relative to Employer-Sponsored Insurance 4 Years After the Affordable Care Act Expansion?</title><title>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</title><addtitle>J GEN INTERN MED</addtitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><description>Background The number of Californians covered by Medi-Cal increased more than 50% between 2013 and 2018, largely due to expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This rapid expansion of Medicaid rolls prompted concerns that Medi-Cal enrollees would face greater difficulty accessing health care. Objective Examine whether gaps in access to care between Medi-Cal and employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) present in 2013 (prior to ACA implementation) had changed by 2018 (several years post implementation). Design Secondary analysis of data from the 2013 and 2018 California Health Interview Survey. The sample included adults of ages 18–64 insured all year and covered by ESI or Medi-Cal at time of interview. Logistic regressions were used to examine variation across years in the association between access to care and insurance type. Main Measures Five access to care outcomes were assessed: no usual source of care, not accepted as new patient in past year, insurance not accepted in past year, delayed medical care in past year, and difficulty getting timely appointment. The main predictors of interest were type of insurance (Medi-Cal or ESI) and survey year (2013 or 2018). Key Results The association between insurance type and access to care changed significantly over time for three outcomes: not accepted as new patient in past year (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.32–0.97), delayed medical care in past year (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.06–2.25), and difficulty getting timely appointment (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.23–0.74). Predicted probabilities indicate gaps between Medi-Cal and ESI narrowed for not accepted as new patient in past year and difficulty getting timely appointment, but widened for delayed medical care. Conclusions Despite the rapid expansion in the number of Californians covered by Medi-Cal, most gaps in access to care between Medi-Cal and ESI enrollees improved or did not significantly change between 2013 and 2018.</description><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Indigent care</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Patient Protection &amp; Affordable Care Act 2010-US</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Secondary analysis</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>0884-8734</issn><issn>1525-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRVsIRIbAD7BAlthkY_Cj_egNaDSaMJGCkHgsWFlud3XSkcdu7O5APoJ_xkOH8FiwqpLuqVtVulX1lJIXlBD1MlMqicSEUUwU1xzze9WKCiYwrRt1v1oRrWusFa-Pqkc5XxFCOWP6YXXEBWloQ-tV9X0Xv6KdzWjtHOSMpog2NgHqY0JvoRvwxnq0DSl6D5DRadE69B68nYZrONDb_ejjDST8YYwhx4N8FvKcbHCAavQZbCrm_QQJTZdQuuLc2dbDsmftJrT9NtqQhxheP64e9NZneHJbj6tPp9uPmx0-f_fmbLM-x65mYsKuXK-hazUAlYLrngsQrKldBxy461rVNaqxROi2qAScgFYI2hbRKik1P65eLb7j3O6hcxCmZL0Z07C36cZEO5i_lTBcmot4bbRqpOKyGJzcGqT4ZYY8mf2QHXhvA8Q5GyYZ17qRghX0-T_oVZxTKO8Zphhnuq7lgWIL5VLMOUF_dwwl5pC2WdI2JW3zM23Dy9CzP9-4G_kVbwH4AuQihQtIv3f_x_YH1na18A</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Babey, Susan H.</creator><creator>Ponce, Ninez A.</creator><creator>Becker, Tara</creator><creator>Rasmussen, Petra W.</creator><creator>Scheitler, A. J.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8113-1739</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>How Has Access to Care for Medi-Cal Enrollees Fared Relative to Employer-Sponsored Insurance 4 Years After the Affordable Care Act Expansion?</title><author>Babey, Susan H. ; Ponce, Ninez A. ; Becker, Tara ; Rasmussen, Petra W. ; Scheitler, A. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-c0918edb8ee16538f35e5294cde3e3cdb7d979a058b5380ec5eb551b3e3a76683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Indigent care</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Patient Protection &amp; Affordable Care Act 2010-US</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Secondary analysis</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Babey, Susan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponce, Ninez A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Petra W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheitler, A. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Babey, Susan H.</au><au>Ponce, Ninez A.</au><au>Becker, Tara</au><au>Rasmussen, Petra W.</au><au>Scheitler, A. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Has Access to Care for Medi-Cal Enrollees Fared Relative to Employer-Sponsored Insurance 4 Years After the Affordable Care Act Expansion?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle><stitle>J GEN INTERN MED</stitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>3338</spage><epage>3345</epage><pages>3338-3345</pages><issn>0884-8734</issn><eissn>1525-1497</eissn><abstract>Background The number of Californians covered by Medi-Cal increased more than 50% between 2013 and 2018, largely due to expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This rapid expansion of Medicaid rolls prompted concerns that Medi-Cal enrollees would face greater difficulty accessing health care. Objective Examine whether gaps in access to care between Medi-Cal and employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) present in 2013 (prior to ACA implementation) had changed by 2018 (several years post implementation). Design Secondary analysis of data from the 2013 and 2018 California Health Interview Survey. The sample included adults of ages 18–64 insured all year and covered by ESI or Medi-Cal at time of interview. Logistic regressions were used to examine variation across years in the association between access to care and insurance type. Main Measures Five access to care outcomes were assessed: no usual source of care, not accepted as new patient in past year, insurance not accepted in past year, delayed medical care in past year, and difficulty getting timely appointment. The main predictors of interest were type of insurance (Medi-Cal or ESI) and survey year (2013 or 2018). Key Results The association between insurance type and access to care changed significantly over time for three outcomes: not accepted as new patient in past year (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.32–0.97), delayed medical care in past year (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.06–2.25), and difficulty getting timely appointment (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.23–0.74). Predicted probabilities indicate gaps between Medi-Cal and ESI narrowed for not accepted as new patient in past year and difficulty getting timely appointment, but widened for delayed medical care. Conclusions Despite the rapid expansion in the number of Californians covered by Medi-Cal, most gaps in access to care between Medi-Cal and ESI enrollees improved or did not significantly change between 2013 and 2018.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>35091914</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11606-021-07383-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8113-1739</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-8734
ispartof Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2022-10, Vol.37 (13), p.3338-3345
issn 0884-8734
1525-1497
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8796736
source SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Government programs
Health care
Health services
Indigent care
Insurance
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Research
Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US
Patients
Secondary analysis
Surveys
title How Has Access to Care for Medi-Cal Enrollees Fared Relative to Employer-Sponsored Insurance 4 Years After the Affordable Care Act Expansion?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T08%3A24%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Has%20Access%20to%20Care%20for%20Medi-Cal%20Enrollees%20Fared%20Relative%20to%20Employer-Sponsored%20Insurance%204%20Years%20After%20the%20Affordable%20Care%20Act%20Expansion?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20internal%20medicine%20:%20JGIM&rft.au=Babey,%20Susan%20H.&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=3338&rft.epage=3345&rft.pages=3338-3345&rft.issn=0884-8734&rft.eissn=1525-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11606-021-07383-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2723284462%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2723284462&rft_id=info:pmid/35091914&rfr_iscdi=true