Management of tympanic membrane retractions: a systematic review
Importance Tympanic membrane retraction (TMR) is a relatively common otological finding. However, no consensus on its management exists. We are looking especially for a treatment strategy in the military population who are unable to attend frequent follow-up visits, and who experience relatively mor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2022-02, Vol.279 (2), p.723-737 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 737 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 723 |
container_title | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology |
container_volume | 279 |
creator | Bayoumy, Ahmed B. Veugen, Christianne C. A. F. M. van der Veen, Erwin L. Bok, Jan-Willem M. de Ru, Jacob A. Thomeer, Hans G. X. M. |
description | Importance
Tympanic membrane retraction (TMR) is a relatively common otological finding. However, no consensus on its management exists. We are looking especially for a treatment strategy in the military population who are unable to attend frequent follow-up visits, and who experience relatively more barotrauma at great heights and depths and easily suffer from otitis externa from less hygienic circumstances.
Objective
To assess and summarize the available evidence for the effectiveness of surgical interventions and watchful waiting policy in patients with a tympanic membrane retraction.
Evidence review
The protocol for this systematic review was published at Prospero (207859). PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were systematically searched from inception up to September 2020 for published and unpublished studies. We included randomized trials and observational studies that investigated surgical interventions (tympanoplasty, ventilation tube insertion) and wait-and-see policy. The primary outcomes of this study were clinical remission of the tympanic membrane retraction, tympanic membrane perforations and cholesteatoma development.
Findings
In total, 27 studies were included, consisting of 1566 patients with TMRs. We included data from 2 randomized controlled trials (76 patients) and 25 observational studies (1490 patients). Seven studies (329 patients) investigated excision of the TMR with and without ventilation tube placement, 3 studies (207 patients) investigated the wait-and-see policy and 17 studies (1030 patients) investigated tympanoplasty for the treatment of TMRs.
Conclusions and relevance
This study provides all the studies that have been published on the surgical management and wait-and-policy for tympanic membrane retractions. No high level of evidence comparative studies has been performed. The evidence for the management of tympanic membrane retractions is heterogenous and depends on many factors such as the patient population, location and severity of the TMR and presence of other ear pathologies (e.g., perforation, risk of cholesteatoma and serous otitis media). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00405-021-06719-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8794915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2499927944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-8a1e419da8eb46f0ee24ba3c0d191f3d8239274a67b47d889e995724ff62bd053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwBxhQRpbA2b7GMQMCVXxJRSwwW05yKamapNhpUf89Li0VLEwe7rnX7z2MnXK44ADq0gMgDGMQPIZEcR3LPdbnKDFGJZJ91gctVYyoVI8deT8FgCFqech6UiapBiH67ObZNnZCNTVd1JZRt6rntqnyqKY6c7ahyFHnbN5VbeOvIhv5le-otl1AHC0r-jxmB6WdeTrZvgP2dn_3OnqMxy8PT6PbcZwjJl2cWk7IdWFTyjApgUhgZmUOBde8lEUqpBYKbaIyVEWaatJ6qASWZSKyAoZywK43ufNFVlORh8LOzszcVbV1K9PayvydNNW7mbRLkyqNmq8DzrcBrv1YkO9MXfmcZrNwZbvwRqDWoYJGDKjYoLlrvXdU7r7hYNbqzUa9CerNt3ojw9LZ74K7lR_XAZAbwIdRMyFnpu3CNUHaf7Ffu26QNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2499927944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management of tympanic membrane retractions: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Bayoumy, Ahmed B. ; Veugen, Christianne C. A. F. M. ; van der Veen, Erwin L. ; Bok, Jan-Willem M. ; de Ru, Jacob A. ; Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bayoumy, Ahmed B. ; Veugen, Christianne C. A. F. M. ; van der Veen, Erwin L. ; Bok, Jan-Willem M. ; de Ru, Jacob A. ; Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Importance
Tympanic membrane retraction (TMR) is a relatively common otological finding. However, no consensus on its management exists. We are looking especially for a treatment strategy in the military population who are unable to attend frequent follow-up visits, and who experience relatively more barotrauma at great heights and depths and easily suffer from otitis externa from less hygienic circumstances.
Objective
To assess and summarize the available evidence for the effectiveness of surgical interventions and watchful waiting policy in patients with a tympanic membrane retraction.
Evidence review
The protocol for this systematic review was published at Prospero (207859). PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were systematically searched from inception up to September 2020 for published and unpublished studies. We included randomized trials and observational studies that investigated surgical interventions (tympanoplasty, ventilation tube insertion) and wait-and-see policy. The primary outcomes of this study were clinical remission of the tympanic membrane retraction, tympanic membrane perforations and cholesteatoma development.
Findings
In total, 27 studies were included, consisting of 1566 patients with TMRs. We included data from 2 randomized controlled trials (76 patients) and 25 observational studies (1490 patients). Seven studies (329 patients) investigated excision of the TMR with and without ventilation tube placement, 3 studies (207 patients) investigated the wait-and-see policy and 17 studies (1030 patients) investigated tympanoplasty for the treatment of TMRs.
Conclusions and relevance
This study provides all the studies that have been published on the surgical management and wait-and-policy for tympanic membrane retractions. No high level of evidence comparative studies has been performed. The evidence for the management of tympanic membrane retractions is heterogenous and depends on many factors such as the patient population, location and severity of the TMR and presence of other ear pathologies (e.g., perforation, risk of cholesteatoma and serous otitis media).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-4477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-4726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06719-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33689022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Head and Neck Surgery ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Ear Ventilation ; Neurosurgery ; Otitis Media with Effusion - surgery ; Otology ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Tympanic Membrane - surgery ; Tympanoplasty</subject><ispartof>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2022-02, Vol.279 (2), p.723-737</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-8a1e419da8eb46f0ee24ba3c0d191f3d8239274a67b47d889e995724ff62bd053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-8a1e419da8eb46f0ee24ba3c0d191f3d8239274a67b47d889e995724ff62bd053</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5302-9312</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00405-021-06719-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00405-021-06719-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33689022$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bayoumy, Ahmed B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veugen, Christianne C. A. F. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Veen, Erwin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bok, Jan-Willem M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Ru, Jacob A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Management of tympanic membrane retractions: a systematic review</title><title>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</title><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Importance
Tympanic membrane retraction (TMR) is a relatively common otological finding. However, no consensus on its management exists. We are looking especially for a treatment strategy in the military population who are unable to attend frequent follow-up visits, and who experience relatively more barotrauma at great heights and depths and easily suffer from otitis externa from less hygienic circumstances.
Objective
To assess and summarize the available evidence for the effectiveness of surgical interventions and watchful waiting policy in patients with a tympanic membrane retraction.
Evidence review
The protocol for this systematic review was published at Prospero (207859). PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were systematically searched from inception up to September 2020 for published and unpublished studies. We included randomized trials and observational studies that investigated surgical interventions (tympanoplasty, ventilation tube insertion) and wait-and-see policy. The primary outcomes of this study were clinical remission of the tympanic membrane retraction, tympanic membrane perforations and cholesteatoma development.
Findings
In total, 27 studies were included, consisting of 1566 patients with TMRs. We included data from 2 randomized controlled trials (76 patients) and 25 observational studies (1490 patients). Seven studies (329 patients) investigated excision of the TMR with and without ventilation tube placement, 3 studies (207 patients) investigated the wait-and-see policy and 17 studies (1030 patients) investigated tympanoplasty for the treatment of TMRs.
Conclusions and relevance
This study provides all the studies that have been published on the surgical management and wait-and-policy for tympanic membrane retractions. No high level of evidence comparative studies has been performed. The evidence for the management of tympanic membrane retractions is heterogenous and depends on many factors such as the patient population, location and severity of the TMR and presence of other ear pathologies (e.g., perforation, risk of cholesteatoma and serous otitis media).</description><subject>Head and Neck Surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Ear Ventilation</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Otitis Media with Effusion - surgery</subject><subject>Otology</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Tympanic Membrane - surgery</subject><subject>Tympanoplasty</subject><issn>0937-4477</issn><issn>1434-4726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwBxhQRpbA2b7GMQMCVXxJRSwwW05yKamapNhpUf89Li0VLEwe7rnX7z2MnXK44ADq0gMgDGMQPIZEcR3LPdbnKDFGJZJ91gctVYyoVI8deT8FgCFqech6UiapBiH67ObZNnZCNTVd1JZRt6rntqnyqKY6c7ahyFHnbN5VbeOvIhv5le-otl1AHC0r-jxmB6WdeTrZvgP2dn_3OnqMxy8PT6PbcZwjJl2cWk7IdWFTyjApgUhgZmUOBde8lEUqpBYKbaIyVEWaatJ6qASWZSKyAoZywK43ufNFVlORh8LOzszcVbV1K9PayvydNNW7mbRLkyqNmq8DzrcBrv1YkO9MXfmcZrNwZbvwRqDWoYJGDKjYoLlrvXdU7r7hYNbqzUa9CerNt3ojw9LZ74K7lR_XAZAbwIdRMyFnpu3CNUHaf7Ffu26QNA</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Bayoumy, Ahmed B.</creator><creator>Veugen, Christianne C. A. F. M.</creator><creator>van der Veen, Erwin L.</creator><creator>Bok, Jan-Willem M.</creator><creator>de Ru, Jacob A.</creator><creator>Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5302-9312</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Management of tympanic membrane retractions: a systematic review</title><author>Bayoumy, Ahmed B. ; Veugen, Christianne C. A. F. M. ; van der Veen, Erwin L. ; Bok, Jan-Willem M. ; de Ru, Jacob A. ; Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-8a1e419da8eb46f0ee24ba3c0d191f3d8239274a67b47d889e995724ff62bd053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Head and Neck Surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Ear Ventilation</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Otitis Media with Effusion - surgery</topic><topic>Otology</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Tympanic Membrane - surgery</topic><topic>Tympanoplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bayoumy, Ahmed B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veugen, Christianne C. A. F. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Veen, Erwin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bok, Jan-Willem M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Ru, Jacob A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bayoumy, Ahmed B.</au><au>Veugen, Christianne C. A. F. M.</au><au>van der Veen, Erwin L.</au><au>Bok, Jan-Willem M.</au><au>de Ru, Jacob A.</au><au>Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management of tympanic membrane retractions: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>279</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>723</spage><epage>737</epage><pages>723-737</pages><issn>0937-4477</issn><eissn>1434-4726</eissn><abstract>Importance
Tympanic membrane retraction (TMR) is a relatively common otological finding. However, no consensus on its management exists. We are looking especially for a treatment strategy in the military population who are unable to attend frequent follow-up visits, and who experience relatively more barotrauma at great heights and depths and easily suffer from otitis externa from less hygienic circumstances.
Objective
To assess and summarize the available evidence for the effectiveness of surgical interventions and watchful waiting policy in patients with a tympanic membrane retraction.
Evidence review
The protocol for this systematic review was published at Prospero (207859). PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were systematically searched from inception up to September 2020 for published and unpublished studies. We included randomized trials and observational studies that investigated surgical interventions (tympanoplasty, ventilation tube insertion) and wait-and-see policy. The primary outcomes of this study were clinical remission of the tympanic membrane retraction, tympanic membrane perforations and cholesteatoma development.
Findings
In total, 27 studies were included, consisting of 1566 patients with TMRs. We included data from 2 randomized controlled trials (76 patients) and 25 observational studies (1490 patients). Seven studies (329 patients) investigated excision of the TMR with and without ventilation tube placement, 3 studies (207 patients) investigated the wait-and-see policy and 17 studies (1030 patients) investigated tympanoplasty for the treatment of TMRs.
Conclusions and relevance
This study provides all the studies that have been published on the surgical management and wait-and-policy for tympanic membrane retractions. No high level of evidence comparative studies has been performed. The evidence for the management of tympanic membrane retractions is heterogenous and depends on many factors such as the patient population, location and severity of the TMR and presence of other ear pathologies (e.g., perforation, risk of cholesteatoma and serous otitis media).</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33689022</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00405-021-06719-3</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5302-9312</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0937-4477 |
ispartof | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2022-02, Vol.279 (2), p.723-737 |
issn | 0937-4477 1434-4726 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8794915 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Head and Neck Surgery Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Ear Ventilation Neurosurgery Otitis Media with Effusion - surgery Otology Otorhinolaryngology Tympanic Membrane - surgery Tympanoplasty |
title | Management of tympanic membrane retractions: a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A32%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20of%20tympanic%20membrane%20retractions:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=European%20archives%20of%20oto-rhino-laryngology&rft.au=Bayoumy,%20Ahmed%20B.&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=279&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=723&rft.epage=737&rft.pages=723-737&rft.issn=0937-4477&rft.eissn=1434-4726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00405-021-06719-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2499927944%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2499927944&rft_id=info:pmid/33689022&rfr_iscdi=true |