A review of risky decision-making in psychosis-spectrum disorders

The investigation of risky decision-making has a prominent place in clinical science, with sundry behavioral tasks aimed at empirically quantifying the psychological construct of risk-taking. However, use of differing behavioral tasks has resulted in lack of agreement on risky decision-making within...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical psychology review 2022-02, Vol.91, p.102112-102112, Article 102112
Hauptverfasser: Purcell, John R., Herms, Emma N., Morales, Jaime, Hetrick, William P., Wisner, Krista M., Brown, Joshua W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102112
container_issue
container_start_page 102112
container_title Clinical psychology review
container_volume 91
creator Purcell, John R.
Herms, Emma N.
Morales, Jaime
Hetrick, William P.
Wisner, Krista M.
Brown, Joshua W.
description The investigation of risky decision-making has a prominent place in clinical science, with sundry behavioral tasks aimed at empirically quantifying the psychological construct of risk-taking. However, use of differing behavioral tasks has resulted in lack of agreement on risky decision-making within psychosis-spectrum disorders, as findings fail to converge upon the typical, binary conceptualization of increased risk-seeking or risk-aversion. The current review synthesizes the behavioral, risky decision-making literature to elucidate how specific task parameters may contribute to differences in task performance, and their associations with psychosis symptomatology and cognitive functioning. A paring of the literature suggests that: 1) Explicit risk-taking may be characterized by risk imperception, evidenced by less discrimination between choices of varying degrees of risk, potentially secondary to cognitive deficits. 2) Ambiguous risk-taking findings are inconclusive with few published studies. 3) Uncertain risk-taking findings, consistently interpreted as more risk-averse, have not parsed risk attitudes from confounding processes that may impact decision-making (e.g. risk imperception, reward processing, motivation). Thus, overgeneralized interpretations of task-specific risk-seeking/aversion should be curtailed, as they may fail to appropriately characterize decision-making phenomena. Future research in psychosis-spectrum disorders would benefit from empirically isolating contributions of specific processes during risky decision-making, including the newly hypothesized risk imperception. •Explicit, ambiguous, and uncertain risk-taking were reviewed in psychosis.•Risk imperception, rather than risk-seeking, is implicated in explicit risk-taking.•Risk aversion is implicated in uncertain risk-taking, though not exclusively.•Risk imperception may be secondary to, or associated with, cognitive deficits.•Symptoms are not consistently associated with risky decision-making behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102112
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8754677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0272735821001550</els_id><sourcerecordid>2618226966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-1f8dfd99426eb76edf55077204bff6abfa6d75beda7de9789957dc1b43c653563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEuLFDEQx4Mo7rj6AbxIH730mEp3XgjCsPiCBS96DumkspvZ6U6bmlmZb28Psy568VQU9X8UP8ZeA18DB_Vuuw5zXQsuYNkFgHjCVmB012oD8JStuNCi1Z00F-wF0ZZzDqaH5-yi663l1pgV22yaivcZfzUlNTXT3bGJGDLlMrWjv8vTTZOnZqZjuC2UqaUZw74exiZmKjVipZfsWfI7wlcP85L9-PTx-9WX9vrb569Xm-s29BL2LSQTU7S2FwoHrTAmKbnWgvdDSsoPyauo5YDR64hWG2uljgGGvgtKdlJ1l-zDOXc-DCPGgNO--p2bax59Pbris_v3MuVbd1PundGyV1ovAW8fAmr5eUDauzFTwN3OT1gO5IQCI4Sy6tQFZ2mohahieqwB7k7o3dYt6N0JvTujXzxv_v7v0fGH9SJ4fxbgQmlBXh2FjFPAmOsC1cWS_xP_G3e4lhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2618226966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review of risky decision-making in psychosis-spectrum disorders</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Purcell, John R. ; Herms, Emma N. ; Morales, Jaime ; Hetrick, William P. ; Wisner, Krista M. ; Brown, Joshua W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Purcell, John R. ; Herms, Emma N. ; Morales, Jaime ; Hetrick, William P. ; Wisner, Krista M. ; Brown, Joshua W.</creatorcontrib><description>The investigation of risky decision-making has a prominent place in clinical science, with sundry behavioral tasks aimed at empirically quantifying the psychological construct of risk-taking. However, use of differing behavioral tasks has resulted in lack of agreement on risky decision-making within psychosis-spectrum disorders, as findings fail to converge upon the typical, binary conceptualization of increased risk-seeking or risk-aversion. The current review synthesizes the behavioral, risky decision-making literature to elucidate how specific task parameters may contribute to differences in task performance, and their associations with psychosis symptomatology and cognitive functioning. A paring of the literature suggests that: 1) Explicit risk-taking may be characterized by risk imperception, evidenced by less discrimination between choices of varying degrees of risk, potentially secondary to cognitive deficits. 2) Ambiguous risk-taking findings are inconclusive with few published studies. 3) Uncertain risk-taking findings, consistently interpreted as more risk-averse, have not parsed risk attitudes from confounding processes that may impact decision-making (e.g. risk imperception, reward processing, motivation). Thus, overgeneralized interpretations of task-specific risk-seeking/aversion should be curtailed, as they may fail to appropriately characterize decision-making phenomena. Future research in psychosis-spectrum disorders would benefit from empirically isolating contributions of specific processes during risky decision-making, including the newly hypothesized risk imperception. •Explicit, ambiguous, and uncertain risk-taking were reviewed in psychosis.•Risk imperception, rather than risk-seeking, is implicated in explicit risk-taking.•Risk aversion is implicated in uncertain risk-taking, though not exclusively.•Risk imperception may be secondary to, or associated with, cognitive deficits.•Symptoms are not consistently associated with risky decision-making behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-7358</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7811</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102112</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34990988</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Ambiguous ; Cognition ; Decision Making ; Humans ; Psychosis ; Psychotic Disorders ; Reward ; Risk ; Risk-Taking ; Schizophrenia ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Clinical psychology review, 2022-02, Vol.91, p.102112-102112, Article 102112</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-1f8dfd99426eb76edf55077204bff6abfa6d75beda7de9789957dc1b43c653563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-1f8dfd99426eb76edf55077204bff6abfa6d75beda7de9789957dc1b43c653563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102112$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34990988$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Purcell, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herms, Emma N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hetrick, William P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisner, Krista M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Joshua W.</creatorcontrib><title>A review of risky decision-making in psychosis-spectrum disorders</title><title>Clinical psychology review</title><addtitle>Clin Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>The investigation of risky decision-making has a prominent place in clinical science, with sundry behavioral tasks aimed at empirically quantifying the psychological construct of risk-taking. However, use of differing behavioral tasks has resulted in lack of agreement on risky decision-making within psychosis-spectrum disorders, as findings fail to converge upon the typical, binary conceptualization of increased risk-seeking or risk-aversion. The current review synthesizes the behavioral, risky decision-making literature to elucidate how specific task parameters may contribute to differences in task performance, and their associations with psychosis symptomatology and cognitive functioning. A paring of the literature suggests that: 1) Explicit risk-taking may be characterized by risk imperception, evidenced by less discrimination between choices of varying degrees of risk, potentially secondary to cognitive deficits. 2) Ambiguous risk-taking findings are inconclusive with few published studies. 3) Uncertain risk-taking findings, consistently interpreted as more risk-averse, have not parsed risk attitudes from confounding processes that may impact decision-making (e.g. risk imperception, reward processing, motivation). Thus, overgeneralized interpretations of task-specific risk-seeking/aversion should be curtailed, as they may fail to appropriately characterize decision-making phenomena. Future research in psychosis-spectrum disorders would benefit from empirically isolating contributions of specific processes during risky decision-making, including the newly hypothesized risk imperception. •Explicit, ambiguous, and uncertain risk-taking were reviewed in psychosis.•Risk imperception, rather than risk-seeking, is implicated in explicit risk-taking.•Risk aversion is implicated in uncertain risk-taking, though not exclusively.•Risk imperception may be secondary to, or associated with, cognitive deficits.•Symptoms are not consistently associated with risky decision-making behavior.</description><subject>Ambiguous</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0272-7358</issn><issn>1873-7811</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEuLFDEQx4Mo7rj6AbxIH730mEp3XgjCsPiCBS96DumkspvZ6U6bmlmZb28Psy568VQU9X8UP8ZeA18DB_Vuuw5zXQsuYNkFgHjCVmB012oD8JStuNCi1Z00F-wF0ZZzDqaH5-yi663l1pgV22yaivcZfzUlNTXT3bGJGDLlMrWjv8vTTZOnZqZjuC2UqaUZw74exiZmKjVipZfsWfI7wlcP85L9-PTx-9WX9vrb569Xm-s29BL2LSQTU7S2FwoHrTAmKbnWgvdDSsoPyauo5YDR64hWG2uljgGGvgtKdlJ1l-zDOXc-DCPGgNO--p2bax59Pbris_v3MuVbd1PundGyV1ovAW8fAmr5eUDauzFTwN3OT1gO5IQCI4Sy6tQFZ2mohahieqwB7k7o3dYt6N0JvTujXzxv_v7v0fGH9SJ4fxbgQmlBXh2FjFPAmOsC1cWS_xP_G3e4lhQ</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Purcell, John R.</creator><creator>Herms, Emma N.</creator><creator>Morales, Jaime</creator><creator>Hetrick, William P.</creator><creator>Wisner, Krista M.</creator><creator>Brown, Joshua W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>A review of risky decision-making in psychosis-spectrum disorders</title><author>Purcell, John R. ; Herms, Emma N. ; Morales, Jaime ; Hetrick, William P. ; Wisner, Krista M. ; Brown, Joshua W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-1f8dfd99426eb76edf55077204bff6abfa6d75beda7de9789957dc1b43c653563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ambiguous</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Purcell, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herms, Emma N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hetrick, William P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisner, Krista M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Joshua W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical psychology review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Purcell, John R.</au><au>Herms, Emma N.</au><au>Morales, Jaime</au><au>Hetrick, William P.</au><au>Wisner, Krista M.</au><au>Brown, Joshua W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review of risky decision-making in psychosis-spectrum disorders</atitle><jtitle>Clinical psychology review</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Psychol Rev</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>91</volume><spage>102112</spage><epage>102112</epage><pages>102112-102112</pages><artnum>102112</artnum><issn>0272-7358</issn><eissn>1873-7811</eissn><abstract>The investigation of risky decision-making has a prominent place in clinical science, with sundry behavioral tasks aimed at empirically quantifying the psychological construct of risk-taking. However, use of differing behavioral tasks has resulted in lack of agreement on risky decision-making within psychosis-spectrum disorders, as findings fail to converge upon the typical, binary conceptualization of increased risk-seeking or risk-aversion. The current review synthesizes the behavioral, risky decision-making literature to elucidate how specific task parameters may contribute to differences in task performance, and their associations with psychosis symptomatology and cognitive functioning. A paring of the literature suggests that: 1) Explicit risk-taking may be characterized by risk imperception, evidenced by less discrimination between choices of varying degrees of risk, potentially secondary to cognitive deficits. 2) Ambiguous risk-taking findings are inconclusive with few published studies. 3) Uncertain risk-taking findings, consistently interpreted as more risk-averse, have not parsed risk attitudes from confounding processes that may impact decision-making (e.g. risk imperception, reward processing, motivation). Thus, overgeneralized interpretations of task-specific risk-seeking/aversion should be curtailed, as they may fail to appropriately characterize decision-making phenomena. Future research in psychosis-spectrum disorders would benefit from empirically isolating contributions of specific processes during risky decision-making, including the newly hypothesized risk imperception. •Explicit, ambiguous, and uncertain risk-taking were reviewed in psychosis.•Risk imperception, rather than risk-seeking, is implicated in explicit risk-taking.•Risk aversion is implicated in uncertain risk-taking, though not exclusively.•Risk imperception may be secondary to, or associated with, cognitive deficits.•Symptoms are not consistently associated with risky decision-making behavior.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34990988</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102112</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-7358
ispartof Clinical psychology review, 2022-02, Vol.91, p.102112-102112, Article 102112
issn 0272-7358
1873-7811
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8754677
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Ambiguous
Cognition
Decision Making
Humans
Psychosis
Psychotic Disorders
Reward
Risk
Risk-Taking
Schizophrenia
Uncertainty
title A review of risky decision-making in psychosis-spectrum disorders
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A51%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20of%20risky%20decision-making%20in%20psychosis-spectrum%20disorders&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20psychology%20review&rft.au=Purcell,%20John%20R.&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=91&rft.spage=102112&rft.epage=102112&rft.pages=102112-102112&rft.artnum=102112&rft.issn=0272-7358&rft.eissn=1873-7811&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102112&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2618226966%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2618226966&rft_id=info:pmid/34990988&rft_els_id=S0272735821001550&rfr_iscdi=true