Gender attitude towards environmental protection: a comparative survey during COVID-19 lockdown situation
Attitude towards environmental protection is a crucial component in environmental safeguard psychology. It is a psychological tendency expressed by evaluating the environmental gender attitude with favour or disfavour. This study aimed to compare the attitude level of male and female trainees toward...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environment, development and sustainability development and sustainability, 2022-12, Vol.24 (12), p.13841-13886 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 13886 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 13841 |
| container_title | Environment, development and sustainability |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Dhenge, S. A. Ghadge, S. N. Ahire, M. C. Gorantiwar, S. D. Shinde, M. G. |
| description | Attitude towards environmental protection is a crucial component in environmental safeguard psychology. It is a psychological tendency expressed by evaluating the environmental gender attitude with favour or disfavour. This study aimed to compare the attitude level of male and female trainees towards environmental protection based on personal, psychological and sociocultural variables by using an ex post facto research design. The research population was composed of the trainees (
N
=177) who participated in the online training programmes organized from April 07 to May 31, 2020, by the Centre for Advanced Agricultural Science and Technology (CAAST) for Climate Smart Agriculture and Water Management (CSAWM), MPKV, Rahuri, Maharashtra, during COVID-19 lockdown period. In this study, an online survey method was used. The research instrument was a well-designed and structured online questionnaire using a Google Form consisting of two sections. The first section consisted of 11 independent variables of personal, psychological and sociocultural characteristics. The second section consisted of 17 environmental attitude questions focusing on closed structure questions with a five-point Likert scale, i.e. Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree. The results revealed that age, training received, membership of environmental societies or organizations, courses taught, waste management and social media use significantly affect the trainees’ attitudes to environment protection. The female respondents had a favourable environmental attitude when compared with the male respondents. Therefore, the study concluded that a set of factors influences the gender attitude of the online trainees. These factors alone cannot change trainees’ attitudes towards environmental protection. Accordingly, necessary and appropriate conditions should be provided to change the attitude of male trainees for environmental protection. Sustained support is necessary to efficiently understand the role of gender in environment protection through government policies, social media, policymakers, scientists, extension workers, research organizations, various training programmes, participation of students and faculty in the environmental cleanliness drive and awareness programs, etc. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10668-021-02015-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8754552</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2732898386</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8361dac429d9f605b75c37b031e6c7c2ed32aeaf343da17c06283f209ca0f55e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctvFSEYxSdGYx_6D7gwJG7cjPIYHuPCpLna2qRJN2rcES58U6kzMAJzm_73Mt5aHwsXBBJ-53wcTtM8I_gVwVi-zgQLoVpMSV2Y8FY8aA4Jl6ylveQP65kp2XLFvxw0Rzlf40r1VDxuDhjHrJedPGz8GQQHCZlSfFkcoBJvTHIZQdj5FMMEoZgRzSkWsMXH8AYZZOM0m2SK3wHKS9rBLXJL8uEKbS4_n79rSY_GaL-5eBNQrrZmFT5pHg1mzPD0bj9uPp2-_7j50F5cnp1vTi5a28mutIoJ4oztaO_6QWC-ldwyucWMgLDSUnCMGjAD65gzRFosqGJDDWYNHjgHdty83fvOy3YCZ2uAZEY9Jz-ZdKuj8frvm-C_6qu400ryjnNaDV7eGaT4fYFc9OSzhXE0AeKSNRWUYNJzKSr64h_0Oi4p1HiaSkZVr5haKbqnbIo5JxjuH0OwXpvU-yZ1bVL_bFKvoud_xriX_KquAmwP5Hn9eki_Z__H9geyhKuS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2732898386</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender attitude towards environmental protection: a comparative survey during COVID-19 lockdown situation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Dhenge, S. A. ; Ghadge, S. N. ; Ahire, M. C. ; Gorantiwar, S. D. ; Shinde, M. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dhenge, S. A. ; Ghadge, S. N. ; Ahire, M. C. ; Gorantiwar, S. D. ; Shinde, M. G.</creatorcontrib><description>Attitude towards environmental protection is a crucial component in environmental safeguard psychology. It is a psychological tendency expressed by evaluating the environmental gender attitude with favour or disfavour. This study aimed to compare the attitude level of male and female trainees towards environmental protection based on personal, psychological and sociocultural variables by using an ex post facto research design. The research population was composed of the trainees (
N
=177) who participated in the online training programmes organized from April 07 to May 31, 2020, by the Centre for Advanced Agricultural Science and Technology (CAAST) for Climate Smart Agriculture and Water Management (CSAWM), MPKV, Rahuri, Maharashtra, during COVID-19 lockdown period. In this study, an online survey method was used. The research instrument was a well-designed and structured online questionnaire using a Google Form consisting of two sections. The first section consisted of 11 independent variables of personal, psychological and sociocultural characteristics. The second section consisted of 17 environmental attitude questions focusing on closed structure questions with a five-point Likert scale, i.e. Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree. The results revealed that age, training received, membership of environmental societies or organizations, courses taught, waste management and social media use significantly affect the trainees’ attitudes to environment protection. The female respondents had a favourable environmental attitude when compared with the male respondents. Therefore, the study concluded that a set of factors influences the gender attitude of the online trainees. These factors alone cannot change trainees’ attitudes towards environmental protection. Accordingly, necessary and appropriate conditions should be provided to change the attitude of male trainees for environmental protection. Sustained support is necessary to efficiently understand the role of gender in environment protection through government policies, social media, policymakers, scientists, extension workers, research organizations, various training programmes, participation of students and faculty in the environmental cleanliness drive and awareness programs, etc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-585X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-2975</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-02015-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35039747</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural sciences ; Agriculture ; Attitudes ; Change agents ; Climate-smart agriculture ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Digital agriculture ; Digital media ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Economic Geology ; Economic Growth ; Environment ; Environmental attitudes ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Management ; Environmental protection ; Environmental psychology ; Ex post facto design ; Females ; Gender ; Hygiene ; Independent variables ; Males ; Organizations ; Policy making ; Polls & surveys ; Psychology ; Public policy ; Questions ; Research design ; Science and technology ; Shelter in place ; Social media ; Social networks ; Sociocultural factors ; Staff participation ; Student participation ; Surveys ; Sustainable Development ; Trainees ; Training ; Waste management ; Water management ; Water resources management</subject><ispartof>Environment, development and sustainability, 2022-12, Vol.24 (12), p.13841-13886</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8361dac429d9f605b75c37b031e6c7c2ed32aeaf343da17c06283f209ca0f55e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8361dac429d9f605b75c37b031e6c7c2ed32aeaf343da17c06283f209ca0f55e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0369-9772</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10668-021-02015-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-02015-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35039747$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dhenge, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghadge, S. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahire, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorantiwar, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinde, M. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Gender attitude towards environmental protection: a comparative survey during COVID-19 lockdown situation</title><title>Environment, development and sustainability</title><addtitle>Environ Dev Sustain</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Dev Sustain</addtitle><description>Attitude towards environmental protection is a crucial component in environmental safeguard psychology. It is a psychological tendency expressed by evaluating the environmental gender attitude with favour or disfavour. This study aimed to compare the attitude level of male and female trainees towards environmental protection based on personal, psychological and sociocultural variables by using an ex post facto research design. The research population was composed of the trainees (
N
=177) who participated in the online training programmes organized from April 07 to May 31, 2020, by the Centre for Advanced Agricultural Science and Technology (CAAST) for Climate Smart Agriculture and Water Management (CSAWM), MPKV, Rahuri, Maharashtra, during COVID-19 lockdown period. In this study, an online survey method was used. The research instrument was a well-designed and structured online questionnaire using a Google Form consisting of two sections. The first section consisted of 11 independent variables of personal, psychological and sociocultural characteristics. The second section consisted of 17 environmental attitude questions focusing on closed structure questions with a five-point Likert scale, i.e. Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree. The results revealed that age, training received, membership of environmental societies or organizations, courses taught, waste management and social media use significantly affect the trainees’ attitudes to environment protection. The female respondents had a favourable environmental attitude when compared with the male respondents. Therefore, the study concluded that a set of factors influences the gender attitude of the online trainees. These factors alone cannot change trainees’ attitudes towards environmental protection. Accordingly, necessary and appropriate conditions should be provided to change the attitude of male trainees for environmental protection. Sustained support is necessary to efficiently understand the role of gender in environment protection through government policies, social media, policymakers, scientists, extension workers, research organizations, various training programmes, participation of students and faculty in the environmental cleanliness drive and awareness programs, etc.</description><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Change agents</subject><subject>Climate-smart agriculture</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Digital agriculture</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic Geology</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental attitudes</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmental psychology</subject><subject>Ex post facto design</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Science and technology</subject><subject>Shelter in place</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Sociocultural factors</subject><subject>Staff participation</subject><subject>Student participation</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Trainees</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><issn>1387-585X</issn><issn>1573-2975</issn><issn>1573-2975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctvFSEYxSdGYx_6D7gwJG7cjPIYHuPCpLna2qRJN2rcES58U6kzMAJzm_73Mt5aHwsXBBJ-53wcTtM8I_gVwVi-zgQLoVpMSV2Y8FY8aA4Jl6ylveQP65kp2XLFvxw0Rzlf40r1VDxuDhjHrJedPGz8GQQHCZlSfFkcoBJvTHIZQdj5FMMEoZgRzSkWsMXH8AYZZOM0m2SK3wHKS9rBLXJL8uEKbS4_n79rSY_GaL-5eBNQrrZmFT5pHg1mzPD0bj9uPp2-_7j50F5cnp1vTi5a28mutIoJ4oztaO_6QWC-ldwyucWMgLDSUnCMGjAD65gzRFosqGJDDWYNHjgHdty83fvOy3YCZ2uAZEY9Jz-ZdKuj8frvm-C_6qu400ryjnNaDV7eGaT4fYFc9OSzhXE0AeKSNRWUYNJzKSr64h_0Oi4p1HiaSkZVr5haKbqnbIo5JxjuH0OwXpvU-yZ1bVL_bFKvoud_xriX_KquAmwP5Hn9eki_Z__H9geyhKuS</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Dhenge, S. A.</creator><creator>Ghadge, S. N.</creator><creator>Ahire, M. C.</creator><creator>Gorantiwar, S. D.</creator><creator>Shinde, M. G.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0369-9772</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Gender attitude towards environmental protection: a comparative survey during COVID-19 lockdown situation</title><author>Dhenge, S. A. ; Ghadge, S. N. ; Ahire, M. C. ; Gorantiwar, S. D. ; Shinde, M. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8361dac429d9f605b75c37b031e6c7c2ed32aeaf343da17c06283f209ca0f55e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Change agents</topic><topic>Climate-smart agriculture</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Digital agriculture</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic Geology</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental attitudes</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmental psychology</topic><topic>Ex post facto design</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Science and technology</topic><topic>Shelter in place</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Sociocultural factors</topic><topic>Staff participation</topic><topic>Student participation</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Trainees</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dhenge, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghadge, S. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahire, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorantiwar, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinde, M. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dhenge, S. A.</au><au>Ghadge, S. N.</au><au>Ahire, M. C.</au><au>Gorantiwar, S. D.</au><au>Shinde, M. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender attitude towards environmental protection: a comparative survey during COVID-19 lockdown situation</atitle><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle><stitle>Environ Dev Sustain</stitle><addtitle>Environ Dev Sustain</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>13841</spage><epage>13886</epage><pages>13841-13886</pages><issn>1387-585X</issn><issn>1573-2975</issn><eissn>1573-2975</eissn><abstract>Attitude towards environmental protection is a crucial component in environmental safeguard psychology. It is a psychological tendency expressed by evaluating the environmental gender attitude with favour or disfavour. This study aimed to compare the attitude level of male and female trainees towards environmental protection based on personal, psychological and sociocultural variables by using an ex post facto research design. The research population was composed of the trainees (
N
=177) who participated in the online training programmes organized from April 07 to May 31, 2020, by the Centre for Advanced Agricultural Science and Technology (CAAST) for Climate Smart Agriculture and Water Management (CSAWM), MPKV, Rahuri, Maharashtra, during COVID-19 lockdown period. In this study, an online survey method was used. The research instrument was a well-designed and structured online questionnaire using a Google Form consisting of two sections. The first section consisted of 11 independent variables of personal, psychological and sociocultural characteristics. The second section consisted of 17 environmental attitude questions focusing on closed structure questions with a five-point Likert scale, i.e. Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree. The results revealed that age, training received, membership of environmental societies or organizations, courses taught, waste management and social media use significantly affect the trainees’ attitudes to environment protection. The female respondents had a favourable environmental attitude when compared with the male respondents. Therefore, the study concluded that a set of factors influences the gender attitude of the online trainees. These factors alone cannot change trainees’ attitudes towards environmental protection. Accordingly, necessary and appropriate conditions should be provided to change the attitude of male trainees for environmental protection. Sustained support is necessary to efficiently understand the role of gender in environment protection through government policies, social media, policymakers, scientists, extension workers, research organizations, various training programmes, participation of students and faculty in the environmental cleanliness drive and awareness programs, etc.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>35039747</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10668-021-02015-6</doi><tpages>46</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0369-9772</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1387-585X |
| ispartof | Environment, development and sustainability, 2022-12, Vol.24 (12), p.13841-13886 |
| issn | 1387-585X 1573-2975 1573-2975 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8754552 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Agricultural sciences Agriculture Attitudes Change agents Climate-smart agriculture Coronaviruses COVID-19 Digital agriculture Digital media Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Economic Geology Economic Growth Environment Environmental attitudes Environmental Economics Environmental Management Environmental protection Environmental psychology Ex post facto design Females Gender Hygiene Independent variables Males Organizations Policy making Polls & surveys Psychology Public policy Questions Research design Science and technology Shelter in place Social media Social networks Sociocultural factors Staff participation Student participation Surveys Sustainable Development Trainees Training Waste management Water management Water resources management |
| title | Gender attitude towards environmental protection: a comparative survey during COVID-19 lockdown situation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T23%3A26%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20attitude%20towards%20environmental%20protection:%20a%20comparative%20survey%20during%20COVID-19%20lockdown%20situation&rft.jtitle=Environment,%20development%20and%20sustainability&rft.au=Dhenge,%20S.%20A.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=13841&rft.epage=13886&rft.pages=13841-13886&rft.issn=1387-585X&rft.eissn=1573-2975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10668-021-02015-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2732898386%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2732898386&rft_id=info:pmid/35039747&rfr_iscdi=true |