Association between quantitative and qualitative image features of contrast-enhanced mammography and molecular subtypes of breast cancer

The molecular subtype of breast cancer is one of the most important factors affecting patient prognosis. The study aimed to analyze the association between quantitative and qualitative features of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images and breast cancer molecular subtypes. This retrospective dou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery 2022-02, Vol.12 (2), p.1270-1280
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Simin, Wang, Zhenxun, Li, Ruimin, You, Chao, Mao, Ning, Jiang, Tingting, Wang, Zhongyi, Xie, Haizhu, Gu, Yajia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1280
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1270
container_title Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery
container_volume 12
creator Wang, Simin
Wang, Zhenxun
Li, Ruimin
You, Chao
Mao, Ning
Jiang, Tingting
Wang, Zhongyi
Xie, Haizhu
Gu, Yajia
description The molecular subtype of breast cancer is one of the most important factors affecting patient prognosis. The study aimed to analyze the association between quantitative and qualitative features of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images and breast cancer molecular subtypes. This retrospective double-center study included women who underwent CEM between November 2017 and April 2020. Each patient had at least 1 malignant lesion confirmed by pathology. The CEM images were evaluated by 2 radiologists to obtain quantitative and qualitative image features. The molecular subtypes were studied as dichotomous outcomes, including luminal versus non-luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-enriched versus non-HER2-enriched, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus non-TNBC subtypes. The association between the image features and molecular subtypes was analyzed by multivariate logistic regression, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) provided. A total of 151 patients with 160 malignant lesions were included in the study. For quantitative features, a higher standard deviation of lesion density was associated with non-luminal (OR =0.88, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.96, P=0.004) and HER2-enriched breast cancers (OR =1.16, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.28, P=0.006). The relative degree of enhancement (RDE) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were not associated with molecular subtypes. However, a higher CNR/lesion size (OR =1.06, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.12, P=0.012) was associated with luminal subtype cancers, and a higher RDE/lesion size (OR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.00, P=0.035) or a higher CNR/lesion size (OR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.88-1.00, P=0.038) was associated with non-TNBCs. For qualitative features, the presence of calcification was associated with HER2-enriched breast cancers (OR =2.91, 95% CI: 1.10 to 7.67, P=0.031). The presence of architectural distortion was associated with luminal cancer (OR =14.50, 95% CI: 1.91 to 110.14, P=0.010) and non-TNBC (OR =0.05, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.43, P=0.022). Non-mass enhancement (OR =2.78, 95% CI: 1.08 to 7.14, P=0.033) was associated with HER2-enriched breast cancers. An association remained after adjustments for age, breast thickness, and breast density (all adjusted P
doi_str_mv 10.21037/qims-21-589
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8739155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2625267140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-50f77477ac62c325d1e205835b8db939f758a5a3b98c4f5f33702cb0a0005d553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctO5DAQtBArQCw3zshHDoT1I46TCxJC-0BC4gJnq-N0ZoISe8Z2WM0f7GevZ4ZBu770w1XV3SpCLjm7FZxJ_W09TLEQvFB1c0TOhBCyKCWrjg-5aMQpuYjxjeWna645OyGnUnHOKyHOyJ_7GL0dIA3e0RbTb0RH1zO4NKTcfEcKrts2xkM9TLBA2iOkOWCkvqfWuxQgpgLdEpzFjk4wTX4RYLXc7PiTH9HOIwQa5zZtVnteGzCzqN1ywlfypYcx4sVHPCevP76_PPwqnp5_Pj7cPxVW1mUqFOu1LrUGWwkrheo4CqZqqdq6axvZ9FrVoEC2TW3LXvVSaiZsyyCfrzql5Dm52-uu5nbCzuJ299GsQr4rbIyHwfz_44alWfh3U2vZ8J3A9YdA8OsZYzLTEC2OIzj0czSiEkpUmpcsQ2_2UBt8jAH7zzGcmZ1_ZutfTk32L8Ov_l3tE3xwS_4FL5mazg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2625267140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association between quantitative and qualitative image features of contrast-enhanced mammography and molecular subtypes of breast cancer</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wang, Simin ; Wang, Zhenxun ; Li, Ruimin ; You, Chao ; Mao, Ning ; Jiang, Tingting ; Wang, Zhongyi ; Xie, Haizhu ; Gu, Yajia</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Simin ; Wang, Zhenxun ; Li, Ruimin ; You, Chao ; Mao, Ning ; Jiang, Tingting ; Wang, Zhongyi ; Xie, Haizhu ; Gu, Yajia</creatorcontrib><description>The molecular subtype of breast cancer is one of the most important factors affecting patient prognosis. The study aimed to analyze the association between quantitative and qualitative features of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images and breast cancer molecular subtypes. This retrospective double-center study included women who underwent CEM between November 2017 and April 2020. Each patient had at least 1 malignant lesion confirmed by pathology. The CEM images were evaluated by 2 radiologists to obtain quantitative and qualitative image features. The molecular subtypes were studied as dichotomous outcomes, including luminal versus non-luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-enriched versus non-HER2-enriched, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus non-TNBC subtypes. The association between the image features and molecular subtypes was analyzed by multivariate logistic regression, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) provided. A total of 151 patients with 160 malignant lesions were included in the study. For quantitative features, a higher standard deviation of lesion density was associated with non-luminal (OR =0.88, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.96, P=0.004) and HER2-enriched breast cancers (OR =1.16, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.28, P=0.006). The relative degree of enhancement (RDE) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were not associated with molecular subtypes. However, a higher CNR/lesion size (OR =1.06, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.12, P=0.012) was associated with luminal subtype cancers, and a higher RDE/lesion size (OR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.00, P=0.035) or a higher CNR/lesion size (OR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.88-1.00, P=0.038) was associated with non-TNBCs. For qualitative features, the presence of calcification was associated with HER2-enriched breast cancers (OR =2.91, 95% CI: 1.10 to 7.67, P=0.031). The presence of architectural distortion was associated with luminal cancer (OR =14.50, 95% CI: 1.91 to 110.14, P=0.010) and non-TNBC (OR =0.05, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.43, P=0.022). Non-mass enhancement (OR =2.78, 95% CI: 1.08 to 7.14, P=0.033) was associated with HER2-enriched breast cancers. An association remained after adjustments for age, breast thickness, and breast density (all adjusted P&lt;0.050). The quantitative and qualitative imaging features of CEM could contribute to distinguishing breast cancer molecular subtypes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2223-4292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2223-4306</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-589</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35111622</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China: AME Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022-02, Vol.12 (2), p.1270-1280</ispartof><rights>2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-50f77477ac62c325d1e205835b8db939f758a5a3b98c4f5f33702cb0a0005d553</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739155/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739155/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35111622$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Simin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhenxun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ruimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Tingting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhongyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Haizhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Yajia</creatorcontrib><title>Association between quantitative and qualitative image features of contrast-enhanced mammography and molecular subtypes of breast cancer</title><title>Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery</title><addtitle>Quant Imaging Med Surg</addtitle><description>The molecular subtype of breast cancer is one of the most important factors affecting patient prognosis. The study aimed to analyze the association between quantitative and qualitative features of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images and breast cancer molecular subtypes. This retrospective double-center study included women who underwent CEM between November 2017 and April 2020. Each patient had at least 1 malignant lesion confirmed by pathology. The CEM images were evaluated by 2 radiologists to obtain quantitative and qualitative image features. The molecular subtypes were studied as dichotomous outcomes, including luminal versus non-luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-enriched versus non-HER2-enriched, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus non-TNBC subtypes. The association between the image features and molecular subtypes was analyzed by multivariate logistic regression, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) provided. A total of 151 patients with 160 malignant lesions were included in the study. For quantitative features, a higher standard deviation of lesion density was associated with non-luminal (OR =0.88, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.96, P=0.004) and HER2-enriched breast cancers (OR =1.16, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.28, P=0.006). The relative degree of enhancement (RDE) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were not associated with molecular subtypes. However, a higher CNR/lesion size (OR =1.06, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.12, P=0.012) was associated with luminal subtype cancers, and a higher RDE/lesion size (OR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.00, P=0.035) or a higher CNR/lesion size (OR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.88-1.00, P=0.038) was associated with non-TNBCs. For qualitative features, the presence of calcification was associated with HER2-enriched breast cancers (OR =2.91, 95% CI: 1.10 to 7.67, P=0.031). The presence of architectural distortion was associated with luminal cancer (OR =14.50, 95% CI: 1.91 to 110.14, P=0.010) and non-TNBC (OR =0.05, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.43, P=0.022). Non-mass enhancement (OR =2.78, 95% CI: 1.08 to 7.14, P=0.033) was associated with HER2-enriched breast cancers. An association remained after adjustments for age, breast thickness, and breast density (all adjusted P&lt;0.050). The quantitative and qualitative imaging features of CEM could contribute to distinguishing breast cancer molecular subtypes.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2223-4292</issn><issn>2223-4306</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUctO5DAQtBArQCw3zshHDoT1I46TCxJC-0BC4gJnq-N0ZoISe8Z2WM0f7GevZ4ZBu770w1XV3SpCLjm7FZxJ_W09TLEQvFB1c0TOhBCyKCWrjg-5aMQpuYjxjeWna645OyGnUnHOKyHOyJ_7GL0dIA3e0RbTb0RH1zO4NKTcfEcKrts2xkM9TLBA2iOkOWCkvqfWuxQgpgLdEpzFjk4wTX4RYLXc7PiTH9HOIwQa5zZtVnteGzCzqN1ywlfypYcx4sVHPCevP76_PPwqnp5_Pj7cPxVW1mUqFOu1LrUGWwkrheo4CqZqqdq6axvZ9FrVoEC2TW3LXvVSaiZsyyCfrzql5Dm52-uu5nbCzuJ299GsQr4rbIyHwfz_44alWfh3U2vZ8J3A9YdA8OsZYzLTEC2OIzj0czSiEkpUmpcsQ2_2UBt8jAH7zzGcmZ1_ZutfTk32L8Ov_l3tE3xwS_4FL5mazg</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Wang, Simin</creator><creator>Wang, Zhenxun</creator><creator>Li, Ruimin</creator><creator>You, Chao</creator><creator>Mao, Ning</creator><creator>Jiang, Tingting</creator><creator>Wang, Zhongyi</creator><creator>Xie, Haizhu</creator><creator>Gu, Yajia</creator><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Association between quantitative and qualitative image features of contrast-enhanced mammography and molecular subtypes of breast cancer</title><author>Wang, Simin ; Wang, Zhenxun ; Li, Ruimin ; You, Chao ; Mao, Ning ; Jiang, Tingting ; Wang, Zhongyi ; Xie, Haizhu ; Gu, Yajia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-50f77477ac62c325d1e205835b8db939f758a5a3b98c4f5f33702cb0a0005d553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Simin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhenxun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ruimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Tingting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhongyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Haizhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Yajia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Simin</au><au>Wang, Zhenxun</au><au>Li, Ruimin</au><au>You, Chao</au><au>Mao, Ning</au><au>Jiang, Tingting</au><au>Wang, Zhongyi</au><au>Xie, Haizhu</au><au>Gu, Yajia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association between quantitative and qualitative image features of contrast-enhanced mammography and molecular subtypes of breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Quant Imaging Med Surg</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1270</spage><epage>1280</epage><pages>1270-1280</pages><issn>2223-4292</issn><eissn>2223-4306</eissn><abstract>The molecular subtype of breast cancer is one of the most important factors affecting patient prognosis. The study aimed to analyze the association between quantitative and qualitative features of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images and breast cancer molecular subtypes. This retrospective double-center study included women who underwent CEM between November 2017 and April 2020. Each patient had at least 1 malignant lesion confirmed by pathology. The CEM images were evaluated by 2 radiologists to obtain quantitative and qualitative image features. The molecular subtypes were studied as dichotomous outcomes, including luminal versus non-luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-enriched versus non-HER2-enriched, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus non-TNBC subtypes. The association between the image features and molecular subtypes was analyzed by multivariate logistic regression, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) provided. A total of 151 patients with 160 malignant lesions were included in the study. For quantitative features, a higher standard deviation of lesion density was associated with non-luminal (OR =0.88, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.96, P=0.004) and HER2-enriched breast cancers (OR =1.16, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.28, P=0.006). The relative degree of enhancement (RDE) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were not associated with molecular subtypes. However, a higher CNR/lesion size (OR =1.06, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.12, P=0.012) was associated with luminal subtype cancers, and a higher RDE/lesion size (OR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.00, P=0.035) or a higher CNR/lesion size (OR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.88-1.00, P=0.038) was associated with non-TNBCs. For qualitative features, the presence of calcification was associated with HER2-enriched breast cancers (OR =2.91, 95% CI: 1.10 to 7.67, P=0.031). The presence of architectural distortion was associated with luminal cancer (OR =14.50, 95% CI: 1.91 to 110.14, P=0.010) and non-TNBC (OR =0.05, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.43, P=0.022). Non-mass enhancement (OR =2.78, 95% CI: 1.08 to 7.14, P=0.033) was associated with HER2-enriched breast cancers. An association remained after adjustments for age, breast thickness, and breast density (all adjusted P&lt;0.050). The quantitative and qualitative imaging features of CEM could contribute to distinguishing breast cancer molecular subtypes.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pub>AME Publishing Company</pub><pmid>35111622</pmid><doi>10.21037/qims-21-589</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2223-4292
ispartof Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022-02, Vol.12 (2), p.1270-1280
issn 2223-4292
2223-4306
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8739155
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Association between quantitative and qualitative image features of contrast-enhanced mammography and molecular subtypes of breast cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T17%3A09%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20between%20quantitative%20and%20qualitative%20image%20features%20of%20contrast-enhanced%20mammography%20and%20molecular%20subtypes%20of%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Quantitative%20imaging%20in%20medicine%20and%20surgery&rft.au=Wang,%20Simin&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1270&rft.epage=1280&rft.pages=1270-1280&rft.issn=2223-4292&rft.eissn=2223-4306&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/qims-21-589&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2625267140%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2625267140&rft_id=info:pmid/35111622&rfr_iscdi=true