Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed external fixation in high-risk geriatric patients: can it be the most reliable method that reduces mortality to minimum compared to proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty?
The optimal surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITF) to minimize the increased mortality in geriatric patients with high anesthetic risk was investigated by comparing closed external fixation (EF), a minimal invasive and biological osteosynthesis technique, proximal femoral nail...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medicine (Baltimore) 2022-01, Vol.101 (1), p.e28369-e28369 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e28369 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e28369 |
container_title | Medicine (Baltimore) |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Bedrettin, Akar Sahin, Fatih Yucel, Mucahid Osman |
description | The optimal surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITF) to minimize the increased mortality in geriatric patients with high anesthetic risk was investigated by comparing closed external fixation (EF), a minimal invasive and biological osteosynthesis technique, proximal femoral nail (PFN) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) methods.Three different surgical methods were performed to 167 patients who were admitted to our clinic for ITF between 2014 and 2020 and considered at high risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists III - American Society of Anesthesiologists IV) by the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department. Patients with multi-trauma, osteoarthritis, those with malignancies and developmental hip dysplasia were excluded from the study. Group I included patients who underwent closed reduction - external fixation (n = 46), Group II included patients who underwent partial arthroplasty (n = 77), and Group III included those who received PFN (n = 44). All fractures were classified according to the Modified Evans (Kyle) method and divided into 2 categories as type 1-2 (stable) and type 3-4 (unstable).The mean operation duration was 23 minutes and follow-up time was 14 months in Group 1, in which there was no in-hospital mortality. Five patients died due to non-operative reasons within 1 year. The mean operation duration and follow-up time in Group 2 were 40 minutes and 12 months, respectively. Six patients (7.8%) died during the operation or hospitalization, while 17 patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. In Group 3, the mean operation duration and follow-up time were 40 minutes and 13 months, respectively. One patient died during the operation and 1 patient (n = 2, 4.5%), within 24 hours in the postoperative intensive care unit. Seven patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. Statistical analysis revealed that the mean duration of operation, postoperative hospital stay, overall mortality and blood product transfusion amount were significantly lower in the EF group compared to other treatment methods.Closed EF is the most reliable surgical method that can minimize mortality in geriatric patients compared to other surgical options, due to the short duration of the operation, no evacuation of the fracture hematoma, early mobilization, lack of blood transfusion requirement, and early union. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/MD.0000000000028369 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8735793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2620082621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-937c01cb02b85257ef9ed10e2e14838961c24af724298ef30d884a4be2bb3d963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUstu1TAQtRCIXgpfgIS8ZJPiRx4OCxBqeUmt2JS15TiTG0McB9uBez-Zv2CilvLwwmPPnHPm2BpCnnJ2xlnbvLi6OGN_llCybu-RHa9kXVRtXd4nO8xWRdM25Ql5lNIXxrhsRPmQnMiKiVYpuSM_ryOY7GHONAzUzRlijsGOZjs5Swfwa6RDNDavEegPl0dqp5Cgp3BAyGwmOriDyS7MSKej249FdOkr3SPf5E1jwSo2SC-pNQjKtAOaR6A-pEwjTM50E94gj6HHgtmS_WohISJmM7l8pDlQ72bnV09t8ItBxJZbYjg4v3kAxGKcjZuomXs6gncm5jGGZTIpH18_Jg8GMyV4chtPyed3b6_PPxSXn95_PH9zWdiSVbloZWMZtx0TnapE1cDQQs8ZCOClkqqtuRWlGfAf8QdhkKxXqjRlB6LrZN_W8pS8utFd1s5Db_HlaEwvEX3Gow7G6X8rsxv1PnzXqpFV00oUeH4rEMO3FVLW3iUL02RmCGvSohaMKdw5QuUN1MaQUoThrg1nehsSfXWh_x8SZD372-Ed5_dUyF9hPcAu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2620082621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed external fixation in high-risk geriatric patients: can it be the most reliable method that reduces mortality to minimum compared to proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty?</title><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bedrettin, Akar ; Sahin, Fatih ; Yucel, Mucahid Osman</creator><creatorcontrib>Bedrettin, Akar ; Sahin, Fatih ; Yucel, Mucahid Osman</creatorcontrib><description>The optimal surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITF) to minimize the increased mortality in geriatric patients with high anesthetic risk was investigated by comparing closed external fixation (EF), a minimal invasive and biological osteosynthesis technique, proximal femoral nail (PFN) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) methods.Three different surgical methods were performed to 167 patients who were admitted to our clinic for ITF between 2014 and 2020 and considered at high risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists III - American Society of Anesthesiologists IV) by the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department. Patients with multi-trauma, osteoarthritis, those with malignancies and developmental hip dysplasia were excluded from the study. Group I included patients who underwent closed reduction - external fixation (n = 46), Group II included patients who underwent partial arthroplasty (n = 77), and Group III included those who received PFN (n = 44). All fractures were classified according to the Modified Evans (Kyle) method and divided into 2 categories as type 1-2 (stable) and type 3-4 (unstable).The mean operation duration was 23 minutes and follow-up time was 14 months in Group 1, in which there was no in-hospital mortality. Five patients died due to non-operative reasons within 1 year. The mean operation duration and follow-up time in Group 2 were 40 minutes and 12 months, respectively. Six patients (7.8%) died during the operation or hospitalization, while 17 patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. In Group 3, the mean operation duration and follow-up time were 40 minutes and 13 months, respectively. One patient died during the operation and 1 patient (n = 2, 4.5%), within 24 hours in the postoperative intensive care unit. Seven patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. Statistical analysis revealed that the mean duration of operation, postoperative hospital stay, overall mortality and blood product transfusion amount were significantly lower in the EF group compared to other treatment methods.Closed EF is the most reliable surgical method that can minimize mortality in geriatric patients compared to other surgical options, due to the short duration of the operation, no evacuation of the fracture hematoma, early mobilization, lack of blood transfusion requirement, and early union.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028369</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35029883</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Aged ; Bone Nails ; External Fixators ; Female ; Femoral Fractures - complications ; Femoral Fractures - mortality ; Femoral Fractures - surgery ; Femur - surgery ; Fracture Fixation - adverse effects ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary ; Hemiarthroplasty - adverse effects ; Hip Fractures - mortality ; Hip Fractures - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Observational Study ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2022-01, Vol.101 (1), p.e28369-e28369</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-937c01cb02b85257ef9ed10e2e14838961c24af724298ef30d884a4be2bb3d963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-937c01cb02b85257ef9ed10e2e14838961c24af724298ef30d884a4be2bb3d963</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7461-1777</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8735793/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8735793/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35029883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bedrettin, Akar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yucel, Mucahid Osman</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed external fixation in high-risk geriatric patients: can it be the most reliable method that reduces mortality to minimum compared to proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty?</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>The optimal surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITF) to minimize the increased mortality in geriatric patients with high anesthetic risk was investigated by comparing closed external fixation (EF), a minimal invasive and biological osteosynthesis technique, proximal femoral nail (PFN) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) methods.Three different surgical methods were performed to 167 patients who were admitted to our clinic for ITF between 2014 and 2020 and considered at high risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists III - American Society of Anesthesiologists IV) by the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department. Patients with multi-trauma, osteoarthritis, those with malignancies and developmental hip dysplasia were excluded from the study. Group I included patients who underwent closed reduction - external fixation (n = 46), Group II included patients who underwent partial arthroplasty (n = 77), and Group III included those who received PFN (n = 44). All fractures were classified according to the Modified Evans (Kyle) method and divided into 2 categories as type 1-2 (stable) and type 3-4 (unstable).The mean operation duration was 23 minutes and follow-up time was 14 months in Group 1, in which there was no in-hospital mortality. Five patients died due to non-operative reasons within 1 year. The mean operation duration and follow-up time in Group 2 were 40 minutes and 12 months, respectively. Six patients (7.8%) died during the operation or hospitalization, while 17 patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. In Group 3, the mean operation duration and follow-up time were 40 minutes and 13 months, respectively. One patient died during the operation and 1 patient (n = 2, 4.5%), within 24 hours in the postoperative intensive care unit. Seven patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. Statistical analysis revealed that the mean duration of operation, postoperative hospital stay, overall mortality and blood product transfusion amount were significantly lower in the EF group compared to other treatment methods.Closed EF is the most reliable surgical method that can minimize mortality in geriatric patients compared to other surgical options, due to the short duration of the operation, no evacuation of the fracture hematoma, early mobilization, lack of blood transfusion requirement, and early union.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bone Nails</subject><subject>External Fixators</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - complications</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - mortality</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary</subject><subject>Hemiarthroplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - mortality</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Observational Study</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUstu1TAQtRCIXgpfgIS8ZJPiRx4OCxBqeUmt2JS15TiTG0McB9uBez-Zv2CilvLwwmPPnHPm2BpCnnJ2xlnbvLi6OGN_llCybu-RHa9kXVRtXd4nO8xWRdM25Ql5lNIXxrhsRPmQnMiKiVYpuSM_ryOY7GHONAzUzRlijsGOZjs5Swfwa6RDNDavEegPl0dqp5Cgp3BAyGwmOriDyS7MSKej249FdOkr3SPf5E1jwSo2SC-pNQjKtAOaR6A-pEwjTM50E94gj6HHgtmS_WohISJmM7l8pDlQ72bnV09t8ItBxJZbYjg4v3kAxGKcjZuomXs6gncm5jGGZTIpH18_Jg8GMyV4chtPyed3b6_PPxSXn95_PH9zWdiSVbloZWMZtx0TnapE1cDQQs8ZCOClkqqtuRWlGfAf8QdhkKxXqjRlB6LrZN_W8pS8utFd1s5Db_HlaEwvEX3Gow7G6X8rsxv1PnzXqpFV00oUeH4rEMO3FVLW3iUL02RmCGvSohaMKdw5QuUN1MaQUoThrg1nehsSfXWh_x8SZD372-Ed5_dUyF9hPcAu</recordid><startdate>20220107</startdate><enddate>20220107</enddate><creator>Bedrettin, Akar</creator><creator>Sahin, Fatih</creator><creator>Yucel, Mucahid Osman</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7461-1777</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220107</creationdate><title>Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed external fixation in high-risk geriatric patients: can it be the most reliable method that reduces mortality to minimum compared to proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty?</title><author>Bedrettin, Akar ; Sahin, Fatih ; Yucel, Mucahid Osman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-937c01cb02b85257ef9ed10e2e14838961c24af724298ef30d884a4be2bb3d963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bone Nails</topic><topic>External Fixators</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - complications</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - mortality</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary</topic><topic>Hemiarthroplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - mortality</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Observational Study</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bedrettin, Akar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yucel, Mucahid Osman</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bedrettin, Akar</au><au>Sahin, Fatih</au><au>Yucel, Mucahid Osman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed external fixation in high-risk geriatric patients: can it be the most reliable method that reduces mortality to minimum compared to proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty?</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2022-01-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e28369</spage><epage>e28369</epage><pages>e28369-e28369</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>The optimal surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITF) to minimize the increased mortality in geriatric patients with high anesthetic risk was investigated by comparing closed external fixation (EF), a minimal invasive and biological osteosynthesis technique, proximal femoral nail (PFN) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) methods.Three different surgical methods were performed to 167 patients who were admitted to our clinic for ITF between 2014 and 2020 and considered at high risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists III - American Society of Anesthesiologists IV) by the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department. Patients with multi-trauma, osteoarthritis, those with malignancies and developmental hip dysplasia were excluded from the study. Group I included patients who underwent closed reduction - external fixation (n = 46), Group II included patients who underwent partial arthroplasty (n = 77), and Group III included those who received PFN (n = 44). All fractures were classified according to the Modified Evans (Kyle) method and divided into 2 categories as type 1-2 (stable) and type 3-4 (unstable).The mean operation duration was 23 minutes and follow-up time was 14 months in Group 1, in which there was no in-hospital mortality. Five patients died due to non-operative reasons within 1 year. The mean operation duration and follow-up time in Group 2 were 40 minutes and 12 months, respectively. Six patients (7.8%) died during the operation or hospitalization, while 17 patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. In Group 3, the mean operation duration and follow-up time were 40 minutes and 13 months, respectively. One patient died during the operation and 1 patient (n = 2, 4.5%), within 24 hours in the postoperative intensive care unit. Seven patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. Statistical analysis revealed that the mean duration of operation, postoperative hospital stay, overall mortality and blood product transfusion amount were significantly lower in the EF group compared to other treatment methods.Closed EF is the most reliable surgical method that can minimize mortality in geriatric patients compared to other surgical options, due to the short duration of the operation, no evacuation of the fracture hematoma, early mobilization, lack of blood transfusion requirement, and early union.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>35029883</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000028369</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7461-1777</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-7974 |
ispartof | Medicine (Baltimore), 2022-01, Vol.101 (1), p.e28369-e28369 |
issn | 0025-7974 1536-5964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8735793 |
source | Wolters Kluwer Open Health; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Bone Nails External Fixators Female Femoral Fractures - complications Femoral Fractures - mortality Femoral Fractures - surgery Femur - surgery Fracture Fixation - adverse effects Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary Hemiarthroplasty - adverse effects Hip Fractures - mortality Hip Fractures - surgery Humans Male Observational Study Retrospective Studies Treatment Outcome |
title | Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed external fixation in high-risk geriatric patients: can it be the most reliable method that reduces mortality to minimum compared to proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A39%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20intertrochanteric%20femur%20fracture%20with%20closed%20external%20fixation%20in%20high-risk%20geriatric%20patients:%20can%20it%20be%20the%20most%20reliable%20method%20that%20reduces%20mortality%20to%20minimum%20compared%20to%20proximal%20femoral%20nail%20and%20hemiarthroplasty?&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Bedrettin,%20Akar&rft.date=2022-01-07&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e28369&rft.epage=e28369&rft.pages=e28369-e28369&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000028369&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2620082621%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2620082621&rft_id=info:pmid/35029883&rfr_iscdi=true |