Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed external fixation in high-risk geriatric patients: can it be the most reliable method that reduces mortality to minimum compared to proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty?

The optimal surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITF) to minimize the increased mortality in geriatric patients with high anesthetic risk was investigated by comparing closed external fixation (EF), a minimal invasive and biological osteosynthesis technique, proximal femoral nail...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2022-01, Vol.101 (1), p.e28369-e28369
Hauptverfasser: Bedrettin, Akar, Sahin, Fatih, Yucel, Mucahid Osman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e28369
container_issue 1
container_start_page e28369
container_title Medicine (Baltimore)
container_volume 101
creator Bedrettin, Akar
Sahin, Fatih
Yucel, Mucahid Osman
description The optimal surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITF) to minimize the increased mortality in geriatric patients with high anesthetic risk was investigated by comparing closed external fixation (EF), a minimal invasive and biological osteosynthesis technique, proximal femoral nail (PFN) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) methods.Three different surgical methods were performed to 167 patients who were admitted to our clinic for ITF between 2014 and 2020 and considered at high risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists III - American Society of Anesthesiologists IV) by the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department. Patients with multi-trauma, osteoarthritis, those with malignancies and developmental hip dysplasia were excluded from the study. Group I included patients who underwent closed reduction - external fixation (n = 46), Group II included patients who underwent partial arthroplasty (n = 77), and Group III included those who received PFN (n = 44). All fractures were classified according to the Modified Evans (Kyle) method and divided into 2 categories as type 1-2 (stable) and type 3-4 (unstable).The mean operation duration was 23 minutes and follow-up time was 14 months in Group 1, in which there was no in-hospital mortality. Five patients died due to non-operative reasons within 1 year. The mean operation duration and follow-up time in Group 2 were 40 minutes and 12 months, respectively. Six patients (7.8%) died during the operation or hospitalization, while 17 patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. In Group 3, the mean operation duration and follow-up time were 40 minutes and 13 months, respectively. One patient died during the operation and 1 patient (n = 2, 4.5%), within 24 hours in the postoperative intensive care unit. Seven patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. Statistical analysis revealed that the mean duration of operation, postoperative hospital stay, overall mortality and blood product transfusion amount were significantly lower in the EF group compared to other treatment methods.Closed EF is the most reliable surgical method that can minimize mortality in geriatric patients compared to other surgical options, due to the short duration of the operation, no evacuation of the fracture hematoma, early mobilization, lack of blood transfusion requirement, and early union.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MD.0000000000028369
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8735793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2620082621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-937c01cb02b85257ef9ed10e2e14838961c24af724298ef30d884a4be2bb3d963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUstu1TAQtRCIXgpfgIS8ZJPiRx4OCxBqeUmt2JS15TiTG0McB9uBez-Zv2CilvLwwmPPnHPm2BpCnnJ2xlnbvLi6OGN_llCybu-RHa9kXVRtXd4nO8xWRdM25Ql5lNIXxrhsRPmQnMiKiVYpuSM_ryOY7GHONAzUzRlijsGOZjs5Swfwa6RDNDavEegPl0dqp5Cgp3BAyGwmOriDyS7MSKej249FdOkr3SPf5E1jwSo2SC-pNQjKtAOaR6A-pEwjTM50E94gj6HHgtmS_WohISJmM7l8pDlQ72bnV09t8ItBxJZbYjg4v3kAxGKcjZuomXs6gncm5jGGZTIpH18_Jg8GMyV4chtPyed3b6_PPxSXn95_PH9zWdiSVbloZWMZtx0TnapE1cDQQs8ZCOClkqqtuRWlGfAf8QdhkKxXqjRlB6LrZN_W8pS8utFd1s5Db_HlaEwvEX3Gow7G6X8rsxv1PnzXqpFV00oUeH4rEMO3FVLW3iUL02RmCGvSohaMKdw5QuUN1MaQUoThrg1nehsSfXWh_x8SZD372-Ed5_dUyF9hPcAu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2620082621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed external fixation in high-risk geriatric patients: can it be the most reliable method that reduces mortality to minimum compared to proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty?</title><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bedrettin, Akar ; Sahin, Fatih ; Yucel, Mucahid Osman</creator><creatorcontrib>Bedrettin, Akar ; Sahin, Fatih ; Yucel, Mucahid Osman</creatorcontrib><description>The optimal surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITF) to minimize the increased mortality in geriatric patients with high anesthetic risk was investigated by comparing closed external fixation (EF), a minimal invasive and biological osteosynthesis technique, proximal femoral nail (PFN) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) methods.Three different surgical methods were performed to 167 patients who were admitted to our clinic for ITF between 2014 and 2020 and considered at high risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists III - American Society of Anesthesiologists IV) by the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department. Patients with multi-trauma, osteoarthritis, those with malignancies and developmental hip dysplasia were excluded from the study. Group I included patients who underwent closed reduction - external fixation (n = 46), Group II included patients who underwent partial arthroplasty (n = 77), and Group III included those who received PFN (n = 44). All fractures were classified according to the Modified Evans (Kyle) method and divided into 2 categories as type 1-2 (stable) and type 3-4 (unstable).The mean operation duration was 23 minutes and follow-up time was 14 months in Group 1, in which there was no in-hospital mortality. Five patients died due to non-operative reasons within 1 year. The mean operation duration and follow-up time in Group 2 were 40 minutes and 12 months, respectively. Six patients (7.8%) died during the operation or hospitalization, while 17 patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. In Group 3, the mean operation duration and follow-up time were 40 minutes and 13 months, respectively. One patient died during the operation and 1 patient (n = 2, 4.5%), within 24 hours in the postoperative intensive care unit. Seven patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. Statistical analysis revealed that the mean duration of operation, postoperative hospital stay, overall mortality and blood product transfusion amount were significantly lower in the EF group compared to other treatment methods.Closed EF is the most reliable surgical method that can minimize mortality in geriatric patients compared to other surgical options, due to the short duration of the operation, no evacuation of the fracture hematoma, early mobilization, lack of blood transfusion requirement, and early union.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028369</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35029883</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Aged ; Bone Nails ; External Fixators ; Female ; Femoral Fractures - complications ; Femoral Fractures - mortality ; Femoral Fractures - surgery ; Femur - surgery ; Fracture Fixation - adverse effects ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary ; Hemiarthroplasty - adverse effects ; Hip Fractures - mortality ; Hip Fractures - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Observational Study ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2022-01, Vol.101 (1), p.e28369-e28369</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-937c01cb02b85257ef9ed10e2e14838961c24af724298ef30d884a4be2bb3d963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-937c01cb02b85257ef9ed10e2e14838961c24af724298ef30d884a4be2bb3d963</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7461-1777</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8735793/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8735793/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35029883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bedrettin, Akar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yucel, Mucahid Osman</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed external fixation in high-risk geriatric patients: can it be the most reliable method that reduces mortality to minimum compared to proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty?</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>The optimal surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITF) to minimize the increased mortality in geriatric patients with high anesthetic risk was investigated by comparing closed external fixation (EF), a minimal invasive and biological osteosynthesis technique, proximal femoral nail (PFN) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) methods.Three different surgical methods were performed to 167 patients who were admitted to our clinic for ITF between 2014 and 2020 and considered at high risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists III - American Society of Anesthesiologists IV) by the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department. Patients with multi-trauma, osteoarthritis, those with malignancies and developmental hip dysplasia were excluded from the study. Group I included patients who underwent closed reduction - external fixation (n = 46), Group II included patients who underwent partial arthroplasty (n = 77), and Group III included those who received PFN (n = 44). All fractures were classified according to the Modified Evans (Kyle) method and divided into 2 categories as type 1-2 (stable) and type 3-4 (unstable).The mean operation duration was 23 minutes and follow-up time was 14 months in Group 1, in which there was no in-hospital mortality. Five patients died due to non-operative reasons within 1 year. The mean operation duration and follow-up time in Group 2 were 40 minutes and 12 months, respectively. Six patients (7.8%) died during the operation or hospitalization, while 17 patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. In Group 3, the mean operation duration and follow-up time were 40 minutes and 13 months, respectively. One patient died during the operation and 1 patient (n = 2, 4.5%), within 24 hours in the postoperative intensive care unit. Seven patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. Statistical analysis revealed that the mean duration of operation, postoperative hospital stay, overall mortality and blood product transfusion amount were significantly lower in the EF group compared to other treatment methods.Closed EF is the most reliable surgical method that can minimize mortality in geriatric patients compared to other surgical options, due to the short duration of the operation, no evacuation of the fracture hematoma, early mobilization, lack of blood transfusion requirement, and early union.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bone Nails</subject><subject>External Fixators</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - complications</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - mortality</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary</subject><subject>Hemiarthroplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - mortality</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Observational Study</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUstu1TAQtRCIXgpfgIS8ZJPiRx4OCxBqeUmt2JS15TiTG0McB9uBez-Zv2CilvLwwmPPnHPm2BpCnnJ2xlnbvLi6OGN_llCybu-RHa9kXVRtXd4nO8xWRdM25Ql5lNIXxrhsRPmQnMiKiVYpuSM_ryOY7GHONAzUzRlijsGOZjs5Swfwa6RDNDavEegPl0dqp5Cgp3BAyGwmOriDyS7MSKej249FdOkr3SPf5E1jwSo2SC-pNQjKtAOaR6A-pEwjTM50E94gj6HHgtmS_WohISJmM7l8pDlQ72bnV09t8ItBxJZbYjg4v3kAxGKcjZuomXs6gncm5jGGZTIpH18_Jg8GMyV4chtPyed3b6_PPxSXn95_PH9zWdiSVbloZWMZtx0TnapE1cDQQs8ZCOClkqqtuRWlGfAf8QdhkKxXqjRlB6LrZN_W8pS8utFd1s5Db_HlaEwvEX3Gow7G6X8rsxv1PnzXqpFV00oUeH4rEMO3FVLW3iUL02RmCGvSohaMKdw5QuUN1MaQUoThrg1nehsSfXWh_x8SZD372-Ed5_dUyF9hPcAu</recordid><startdate>20220107</startdate><enddate>20220107</enddate><creator>Bedrettin, Akar</creator><creator>Sahin, Fatih</creator><creator>Yucel, Mucahid Osman</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7461-1777</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220107</creationdate><title>Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed external fixation in high-risk geriatric patients: can it be the most reliable method that reduces mortality to minimum compared to proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty?</title><author>Bedrettin, Akar ; Sahin, Fatih ; Yucel, Mucahid Osman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-937c01cb02b85257ef9ed10e2e14838961c24af724298ef30d884a4be2bb3d963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bone Nails</topic><topic>External Fixators</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - complications</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - mortality</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary</topic><topic>Hemiarthroplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - mortality</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Observational Study</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bedrettin, Akar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yucel, Mucahid Osman</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bedrettin, Akar</au><au>Sahin, Fatih</au><au>Yucel, Mucahid Osman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed external fixation in high-risk geriatric patients: can it be the most reliable method that reduces mortality to minimum compared to proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty?</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2022-01-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e28369</spage><epage>e28369</epage><pages>e28369-e28369</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>The optimal surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITF) to minimize the increased mortality in geriatric patients with high anesthetic risk was investigated by comparing closed external fixation (EF), a minimal invasive and biological osteosynthesis technique, proximal femoral nail (PFN) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) methods.Three different surgical methods were performed to 167 patients who were admitted to our clinic for ITF between 2014 and 2020 and considered at high risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists III - American Society of Anesthesiologists IV) by the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department. Patients with multi-trauma, osteoarthritis, those with malignancies and developmental hip dysplasia were excluded from the study. Group I included patients who underwent closed reduction - external fixation (n = 46), Group II included patients who underwent partial arthroplasty (n = 77), and Group III included those who received PFN (n = 44). All fractures were classified according to the Modified Evans (Kyle) method and divided into 2 categories as type 1-2 (stable) and type 3-4 (unstable).The mean operation duration was 23 minutes and follow-up time was 14 months in Group 1, in which there was no in-hospital mortality. Five patients died due to non-operative reasons within 1 year. The mean operation duration and follow-up time in Group 2 were 40 minutes and 12 months, respectively. Six patients (7.8%) died during the operation or hospitalization, while 17 patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. In Group 3, the mean operation duration and follow-up time were 40 minutes and 13 months, respectively. One patient died during the operation and 1 patient (n = 2, 4.5%), within 24 hours in the postoperative intensive care unit. Seven patients died due to comorbidities within 1 year. Statistical analysis revealed that the mean duration of operation, postoperative hospital stay, overall mortality and blood product transfusion amount were significantly lower in the EF group compared to other treatment methods.Closed EF is the most reliable surgical method that can minimize mortality in geriatric patients compared to other surgical options, due to the short duration of the operation, no evacuation of the fracture hematoma, early mobilization, lack of blood transfusion requirement, and early union.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>35029883</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000028369</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7461-1777</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-7974
ispartof Medicine (Baltimore), 2022-01, Vol.101 (1), p.e28369-e28369
issn 0025-7974
1536-5964
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8735793
source Wolters Kluwer Open Health; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Bone Nails
External Fixators
Female
Femoral Fractures - complications
Femoral Fractures - mortality
Femoral Fractures - surgery
Femur - surgery
Fracture Fixation - adverse effects
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary
Hemiarthroplasty - adverse effects
Hip Fractures - mortality
Hip Fractures - surgery
Humans
Male
Observational Study
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
title Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed external fixation in high-risk geriatric patients: can it be the most reliable method that reduces mortality to minimum compared to proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A39%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20intertrochanteric%20femur%20fracture%20with%20closed%20external%20fixation%20in%20high-risk%20geriatric%20patients:%20can%20it%20be%20the%20most%20reliable%20method%20that%20reduces%20mortality%20to%20minimum%20compared%20to%20proximal%20femoral%20nail%20and%20hemiarthroplasty?&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Bedrettin,%20Akar&rft.date=2022-01-07&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e28369&rft.epage=e28369&rft.pages=e28369-e28369&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000028369&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2620082621%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2620082621&rft_id=info:pmid/35029883&rfr_iscdi=true