Conversion of Central Subfield Thickness Measurements of Diabetic Macular Edema Across Cirrus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments
Develop equations to convert Cirrus central subfield thickness (CST) to Spectralis CST equivalents and vice versa in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). The DRCR Retina Network Protocol O data were split randomly to train (70% sample) and validate (30% sample) conversion equations. Data from an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Translational vision science & technology 2021-12, Vol.10 (14), p.34-34 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 34 |
---|---|
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 34 |
container_title | Translational vision science & technology |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Sun, Jennifer K Josic, Kristin Melia, Michele Glassman, Adam R Bailey, Clare Chalam, Kakarla V Chew, Emily Y Cukras, Catherine Grover, Sandeep Jaffe, Glenn J Lee, Richard Nielsen, Jared S Thompson, Darby J S Wiley, Henry E Ferris, 3rd, Frederick L |
description | Develop equations to convert Cirrus central subfield thickness (CST) to Spectralis CST equivalents and vice versa in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).
The DRCR Retina Network Protocol O data were split randomly to train (70% sample) and validate (30% sample) conversion equations. Data from an independent study (CADME) also validated the equations. Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement between predicted and observed values evaluated the equations.
Protocol O included 374 CST scan pairs from 187 eyes (107 participants). The CADME study included 150 scan pairs of 37 eyes (37 participants). Proposed conversion equations are Spectralis = 40.78 + 0.95 × Cirrus and Cirrus = 1.82 + 0.94 × Spectralis regardless of age, sex, or CST. Predicted values were within 10% of observed values in 101 (90%) of Spectralis and 99 (88%) of Cirrus scans in the validation data; and in 136 (91%) of the Spectralis and 148 (99%) of the Cirrus scans in the CADME data. Adjusting for within-eye correlations, 95% of conversions are estimated to be within 17% (95% confidence interval, 14%-21%) of CST on Spectralis and within 22% (95% confidence interval, 18%-28%) of CST on Cirrus.
Conversion equations developed in this study allow the harmonization of CST measurements for eyes with DME using a mix of current Cirrus and Spectralis device images.
The CSTs measured on Cirrus and Spectralis devices are not directly comparable owing to outer boundary segmentation differences. Converting CST values across spectral domain optical coherence tomography instruments should benefit both clinical research and standard care efforts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1167/tvst.10.14.34 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8727314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2615475253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3024-40889388b63c73707f16f11d8c55817fa01334ef739c8b041a867030dec1753c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU9P5CAYh8lGsxr16HXDcS8doVBgLpuY-jfReHA8E0rfOuy20IV2Ej-I39d2Ro1ygTc8PC_wQ-iUkgWlQp4NmzQs5oIvGP-BDnMqeJYXS7r3ZX2ATlL6S6YhVMG5-IkOGF8KqRg_RK9l8BuIyQWPQ4NL8EM0LX4cq8ZBW-PV2tl_HlLC92DSGKGbiDSjF85UMDiL740dWxPxZQ2dwec2hokuXYxjwsbX-LEHO0tdwg_9dGDSl2ENEbwFvApdeI6mX7_gW5-GOG79x2i_MW2Ck_f5CD1dXa7Km-zu4fq2PL_LLCM5zzhRasmUqgSzkkkiGyoaSmtli0JR2RhCGePQSLa0qiKcGiUkYaQGS2XBLDtCf3befqw6qO3u9bqPrjPxRQfj9Pcd79b6OWy0krlklE-C3--CGP6PkAbduWShbY2HMCadC1pwWeQFm9Bsh24_KELz2YYSPaep5zS3BddsVv_6erdP-iM79gbGO553</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2615475253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conversion of Central Subfield Thickness Measurements of Diabetic Macular Edema Across Cirrus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sun, Jennifer K ; Josic, Kristin ; Melia, Michele ; Glassman, Adam R ; Bailey, Clare ; Chalam, Kakarla V ; Chew, Emily Y ; Cukras, Catherine ; Grover, Sandeep ; Jaffe, Glenn J ; Lee, Richard ; Nielsen, Jared S ; Thompson, Darby J S ; Wiley, Henry E ; Ferris, 3rd, Frederick L</creator><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jennifer K ; Josic, Kristin ; Melia, Michele ; Glassman, Adam R ; Bailey, Clare ; Chalam, Kakarla V ; Chew, Emily Y ; Cukras, Catherine ; Grover, Sandeep ; Jaffe, Glenn J ; Lee, Richard ; Nielsen, Jared S ; Thompson, Darby J S ; Wiley, Henry E ; Ferris, 3rd, Frederick L ; DRCR Retina Network ; for the DRCR Retina Network</creatorcontrib><description>Develop equations to convert Cirrus central subfield thickness (CST) to Spectralis CST equivalents and vice versa in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).
The DRCR Retina Network Protocol O data were split randomly to train (70% sample) and validate (30% sample) conversion equations. Data from an independent study (CADME) also validated the equations. Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement between predicted and observed values evaluated the equations.
Protocol O included 374 CST scan pairs from 187 eyes (107 participants). The CADME study included 150 scan pairs of 37 eyes (37 participants). Proposed conversion equations are Spectralis = 40.78 + 0.95 × Cirrus and Cirrus = 1.82 + 0.94 × Spectralis regardless of age, sex, or CST. Predicted values were within 10% of observed values in 101 (90%) of Spectralis and 99 (88%) of Cirrus scans in the validation data; and in 136 (91%) of the Spectralis and 148 (99%) of the Cirrus scans in the CADME data. Adjusting for within-eye correlations, 95% of conversions are estimated to be within 17% (95% confidence interval, 14%-21%) of CST on Spectralis and within 22% (95% confidence interval, 18%-28%) of CST on Cirrus.
Conversion equations developed in this study allow the harmonization of CST measurements for eyes with DME using a mix of current Cirrus and Spectralis device images.
The CSTs measured on Cirrus and Spectralis devices are not directly comparable owing to outer boundary segmentation differences. Converting CST values across spectral domain optical coherence tomography instruments should benefit both clinical research and standard care efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2164-2591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/tvst.10.14.34</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34967834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</publisher><subject>Clinical Trials ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Diabetic Retinopathy - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Macular Edema - diagnostic imaging ; Retina - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><ispartof>Translational vision science & technology, 2021-12, Vol.10 (14), p.34-34</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2021 The Authors 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3024-40889388b63c73707f16f11d8c55817fa01334ef739c8b041a867030dec1753c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3024-40889388b63c73707f16f11d8c55817fa01334ef739c8b041a867030dec1753c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8727314/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8727314/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34967834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jennifer K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josic, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melia, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glassman, Adam R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalam, Kakarla V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Emily Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cukras, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grover, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaffe, Glenn J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Jared S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Darby J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Henry E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, 3rd, Frederick L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRCR Retina Network</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the DRCR Retina Network</creatorcontrib><title>Conversion of Central Subfield Thickness Measurements of Diabetic Macular Edema Across Cirrus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments</title><title>Translational vision science & technology</title><addtitle>Transl Vis Sci Technol</addtitle><description>Develop equations to convert Cirrus central subfield thickness (CST) to Spectralis CST equivalents and vice versa in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).
The DRCR Retina Network Protocol O data were split randomly to train (70% sample) and validate (30% sample) conversion equations. Data from an independent study (CADME) also validated the equations. Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement between predicted and observed values evaluated the equations.
Protocol O included 374 CST scan pairs from 187 eyes (107 participants). The CADME study included 150 scan pairs of 37 eyes (37 participants). Proposed conversion equations are Spectralis = 40.78 + 0.95 × Cirrus and Cirrus = 1.82 + 0.94 × Spectralis regardless of age, sex, or CST. Predicted values were within 10% of observed values in 101 (90%) of Spectralis and 99 (88%) of Cirrus scans in the validation data; and in 136 (91%) of the Spectralis and 148 (99%) of the Cirrus scans in the CADME data. Adjusting for within-eye correlations, 95% of conversions are estimated to be within 17% (95% confidence interval, 14%-21%) of CST on Spectralis and within 22% (95% confidence interval, 18%-28%) of CST on Cirrus.
Conversion equations developed in this study allow the harmonization of CST measurements for eyes with DME using a mix of current Cirrus and Spectralis device images.
The CSTs measured on Cirrus and Spectralis devices are not directly comparable owing to outer boundary segmentation differences. Converting CST values across spectral domain optical coherence tomography instruments should benefit both clinical research and standard care efforts.</description><subject>Clinical Trials</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetic Retinopathy - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Macular Edema - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Retina - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><issn>2164-2591</issn><issn>2164-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU9P5CAYh8lGsxr16HXDcS8doVBgLpuY-jfReHA8E0rfOuy20IV2Ej-I39d2Ro1ygTc8PC_wQ-iUkgWlQp4NmzQs5oIvGP-BDnMqeJYXS7r3ZX2ATlL6S6YhVMG5-IkOGF8KqRg_RK9l8BuIyQWPQ4NL8EM0LX4cq8ZBW-PV2tl_HlLC92DSGKGbiDSjF85UMDiL740dWxPxZQ2dwec2hokuXYxjwsbX-LEHO0tdwg_9dGDSl2ENEbwFvApdeI6mX7_gW5-GOG79x2i_MW2Ck_f5CD1dXa7Km-zu4fq2PL_LLCM5zzhRasmUqgSzkkkiGyoaSmtli0JR2RhCGePQSLa0qiKcGiUkYaQGS2XBLDtCf3befqw6qO3u9bqPrjPxRQfj9Pcd79b6OWy0krlklE-C3--CGP6PkAbduWShbY2HMCadC1pwWeQFm9Bsh24_KELz2YYSPaep5zS3BddsVv_6erdP-iM79gbGO553</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Sun, Jennifer K</creator><creator>Josic, Kristin</creator><creator>Melia, Michele</creator><creator>Glassman, Adam R</creator><creator>Bailey, Clare</creator><creator>Chalam, Kakarla V</creator><creator>Chew, Emily Y</creator><creator>Cukras, Catherine</creator><creator>Grover, Sandeep</creator><creator>Jaffe, Glenn J</creator><creator>Lee, Richard</creator><creator>Nielsen, Jared S</creator><creator>Thompson, Darby J S</creator><creator>Wiley, Henry E</creator><creator>Ferris, 3rd, Frederick L</creator><general>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Conversion of Central Subfield Thickness Measurements of Diabetic Macular Edema Across Cirrus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments</title><author>Sun, Jennifer K ; Josic, Kristin ; Melia, Michele ; Glassman, Adam R ; Bailey, Clare ; Chalam, Kakarla V ; Chew, Emily Y ; Cukras, Catherine ; Grover, Sandeep ; Jaffe, Glenn J ; Lee, Richard ; Nielsen, Jared S ; Thompson, Darby J S ; Wiley, Henry E ; Ferris, 3rd, Frederick L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3024-40889388b63c73707f16f11d8c55817fa01334ef739c8b041a867030dec1753c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinical Trials</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetic Retinopathy - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Macular Edema - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Retina - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jennifer K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josic, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melia, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glassman, Adam R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalam, Kakarla V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Emily Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cukras, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grover, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaffe, Glenn J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Jared S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Darby J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Henry E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, 3rd, Frederick L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRCR Retina Network</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the DRCR Retina Network</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Translational vision science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Jennifer K</au><au>Josic, Kristin</au><au>Melia, Michele</au><au>Glassman, Adam R</au><au>Bailey, Clare</au><au>Chalam, Kakarla V</au><au>Chew, Emily Y</au><au>Cukras, Catherine</au><au>Grover, Sandeep</au><au>Jaffe, Glenn J</au><au>Lee, Richard</au><au>Nielsen, Jared S</au><au>Thompson, Darby J S</au><au>Wiley, Henry E</au><au>Ferris, 3rd, Frederick L</au><aucorp>DRCR Retina Network</aucorp><aucorp>for the DRCR Retina Network</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conversion of Central Subfield Thickness Measurements of Diabetic Macular Edema Across Cirrus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments</atitle><jtitle>Translational vision science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Transl Vis Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>34-34</pages><issn>2164-2591</issn><eissn>2164-2591</eissn><abstract>Develop equations to convert Cirrus central subfield thickness (CST) to Spectralis CST equivalents and vice versa in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).
The DRCR Retina Network Protocol O data were split randomly to train (70% sample) and validate (30% sample) conversion equations. Data from an independent study (CADME) also validated the equations. Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement between predicted and observed values evaluated the equations.
Protocol O included 374 CST scan pairs from 187 eyes (107 participants). The CADME study included 150 scan pairs of 37 eyes (37 participants). Proposed conversion equations are Spectralis = 40.78 + 0.95 × Cirrus and Cirrus = 1.82 + 0.94 × Spectralis regardless of age, sex, or CST. Predicted values were within 10% of observed values in 101 (90%) of Spectralis and 99 (88%) of Cirrus scans in the validation data; and in 136 (91%) of the Spectralis and 148 (99%) of the Cirrus scans in the CADME data. Adjusting for within-eye correlations, 95% of conversions are estimated to be within 17% (95% confidence interval, 14%-21%) of CST on Spectralis and within 22% (95% confidence interval, 18%-28%) of CST on Cirrus.
Conversion equations developed in this study allow the harmonization of CST measurements for eyes with DME using a mix of current Cirrus and Spectralis device images.
The CSTs measured on Cirrus and Spectralis devices are not directly comparable owing to outer boundary segmentation differences. Converting CST values across spectral domain optical coherence tomography instruments should benefit both clinical research and standard care efforts.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</pub><pmid>34967834</pmid><doi>10.1167/tvst.10.14.34</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2164-2591 |
ispartof | Translational vision science & technology, 2021-12, Vol.10 (14), p.34-34 |
issn | 2164-2591 2164-2591 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8727314 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Clinical Trials Diabetes Mellitus Diabetic Retinopathy - diagnostic imaging Humans Macular Edema - diagnostic imaging Retina - diagnostic imaging Tomography, Optical Coherence |
title | Conversion of Central Subfield Thickness Measurements of Diabetic Macular Edema Across Cirrus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T06%3A47%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conversion%20of%20Central%20Subfield%20Thickness%20Measurements%20of%20Diabetic%20Macular%20Edema%20Across%20Cirrus%20and%20Spectralis%20Optical%20Coherence%20Tomography%20Instruments&rft.jtitle=Translational%20vision%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Sun,%20Jennifer%20K&rft.aucorp=DRCR%20Retina%20Network&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=34-34&rft.issn=2164-2591&rft.eissn=2164-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/tvst.10.14.34&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2615475253%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2615475253&rft_id=info:pmid/34967834&rfr_iscdi=true |