Stable individual differences in strategies within, but not between, visual search tasks
A striking range of individual differences has recently been reported in three different visual search tasks. These differences in performance can be attributed to strategy, that is, the efficiency with which participants control their search to complete the task quickly and accurately. Here, we ask...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2022-02, Vol.75 (2), p.289-296 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 296 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 289 |
| container_title | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) |
| container_volume | 75 |
| creator | Clarke, Alasdair DF Irons, Jessica L James, Warren Leber, Andrew B Hunt, Amelia R |
| description | A striking range of individual differences has recently been reported in three different visual search tasks. These differences in performance can be attributed to strategy, that is, the efficiency with which participants control their search to complete the task quickly and accurately. Here, we ask whether an individual’s strategy and performance in one search task is correlated with how they perform in the other two. We tested 64 observers and found that even though the test–retest reliability of the tasks was high, an observer’s performance and strategy in one task was not predictive of their behaviour in the other two. These results suggest search strategies are stable over time, but context-specific. To understand visual search, we therefore need to account not only for differences between individuals but also how individuals interact with the search task and context. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1747021820929190 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8721546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1747021820929190</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2615717318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1c5363906510d9a505096a224de260a0cd8c80b63be76e8478128979997b36cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxa0KREvhzglF4tJDU8YTxx8XpKpqAakSB0DiZjnO7K5LNim2sxX_PV5t2dJKnGw__-bNjB5jbzicca7Ue66EAuQawaDhBg7Y0VaqAVE-29-5PmQvU7oBEI2S6gU7bFAKAVwesR9fs-sGqsLYh03oZzdUfVgsKNLoKRW5Sjm6TMtQXnchr8J4WnVzrsYpVx3lO6IibELaViZy0a-q7NLP9Io9X7gh0ev785h9v7r8dvGpvv7y8fPF-XXthcRcc982sjEgWw69cS20YKRDFD2hBAe-115DJ5uOlCQtlOaojTLGqK6R3jfH7MPO93bu1tR7Gsu8g72NYe3ibzu5YB__jGFll9PGaoW8FbIYnNwbxOnXTCnbdUiehsGNNM3JokAE0C3ygr57gt5McxzLehYlbxVXDdeFgh3l45RSpMV-GA52G5t9GlspefvvEvuCvzkVoN4ByS3poet_Df8AZf6evA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2615717318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stable individual differences in strategies within, but not between, visual search tasks</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Clarke, Alasdair DF ; Irons, Jessica L ; James, Warren ; Leber, Andrew B ; Hunt, Amelia R</creator><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Alasdair DF ; Irons, Jessica L ; James, Warren ; Leber, Andrew B ; Hunt, Amelia R</creatorcontrib><description>A striking range of individual differences has recently been reported in three different visual search tasks. These differences in performance can be attributed to strategy, that is, the efficiency with which participants control their search to complete the task quickly and accurately. Here, we ask whether an individual’s strategy and performance in one search task is correlated with how they perform in the other two. We tested 64 observers and found that even though the test–retest reliability of the tasks was high, an observer’s performance and strategy in one task was not predictive of their behaviour in the other two. These results suggest search strategies are stable over time, but context-specific. To understand visual search, we therefore need to account not only for differences between individuals but also how individuals interact with the search task and context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1747021820929190</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32644016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Eye Movements ; Humans ; Individuality ; Reproducibility of Results ; Special Issue ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2022-02, Vol.75 (2), p.289-296</ispartof><rights>Experimental Psychology Society 2020</rights><rights>Experimental Psychology Society 2020 2020 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1c5363906510d9a505096a224de260a0cd8c80b63be76e8478128979997b36cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1c5363906510d9a505096a224de260a0cd8c80b63be76e8478128979997b36cc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7368-2351</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1747021820929190$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1747021820929190$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32644016$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Alasdair DF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irons, Jessica L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Warren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leber, Andrew B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Amelia R</creatorcontrib><title>Stable individual differences in strategies within, but not between, visual search tasks</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>A striking range of individual differences has recently been reported in three different visual search tasks. These differences in performance can be attributed to strategy, that is, the efficiency with which participants control their search to complete the task quickly and accurately. Here, we ask whether an individual’s strategy and performance in one search task is correlated with how they perform in the other two. We tested 64 observers and found that even though the test–retest reliability of the tasks was high, an observer’s performance and strategy in one task was not predictive of their behaviour in the other two. These results suggest search strategies are stable over time, but context-specific. To understand visual search, we therefore need to account not only for differences between individuals but also how individuals interact with the search task and context.</description><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Special Issue</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxa0KREvhzglF4tJDU8YTxx8XpKpqAakSB0DiZjnO7K5LNim2sxX_PV5t2dJKnGw__-bNjB5jbzicca7Ue66EAuQawaDhBg7Y0VaqAVE-29-5PmQvU7oBEI2S6gU7bFAKAVwesR9fs-sGqsLYh03oZzdUfVgsKNLoKRW5Sjm6TMtQXnchr8J4WnVzrsYpVx3lO6IibELaViZy0a-q7NLP9Io9X7gh0ev785h9v7r8dvGpvv7y8fPF-XXthcRcc982sjEgWw69cS20YKRDFD2hBAe-115DJ5uOlCQtlOaojTLGqK6R3jfH7MPO93bu1tR7Gsu8g72NYe3ibzu5YB__jGFll9PGaoW8FbIYnNwbxOnXTCnbdUiehsGNNM3JokAE0C3ygr57gt5McxzLehYlbxVXDdeFgh3l45RSpMV-GA52G5t9GlspefvvEvuCvzkVoN4ByS3poet_Df8AZf6evA</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Clarke, Alasdair DF</creator><creator>Irons, Jessica L</creator><creator>James, Warren</creator><creator>Leber, Andrew B</creator><creator>Hunt, Amelia R</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7368-2351</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Stable individual differences in strategies within, but not between, visual search tasks</title><author>Clarke, Alasdair DF ; Irons, Jessica L ; James, Warren ; Leber, Andrew B ; Hunt, Amelia R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1c5363906510d9a505096a224de260a0cd8c80b63be76e8478128979997b36cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Special Issue</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Alasdair DF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irons, Jessica L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Warren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leber, Andrew B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Amelia R</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clarke, Alasdair DF</au><au>Irons, Jessica L</au><au>James, Warren</au><au>Leber, Andrew B</au><au>Hunt, Amelia R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stable individual differences in strategies within, but not between, visual search tasks</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>289-296</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>A striking range of individual differences has recently been reported in three different visual search tasks. These differences in performance can be attributed to strategy, that is, the efficiency with which participants control their search to complete the task quickly and accurately. Here, we ask whether an individual’s strategy and performance in one search task is correlated with how they perform in the other two. We tested 64 observers and found that even though the test–retest reliability of the tasks was high, an observer’s performance and strategy in one task was not predictive of their behaviour in the other two. These results suggest search strategies are stable over time, but context-specific. To understand visual search, we therefore need to account not only for differences between individuals but also how individuals interact with the search task and context.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>32644016</pmid><doi>10.1177/1747021820929190</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7368-2351</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1747-0218 |
| ispartof | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2022-02, Vol.75 (2), p.289-296 |
| issn | 1747-0218 1747-0226 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8721546 |
| source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
| subjects | Eye Movements Humans Individuality Reproducibility of Results Special Issue Visual Perception |
| title | Stable individual differences in strategies within, but not between, visual search tasks |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A10%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stable%20individual%20differences%20in%20strategies%20within,%20but%20not%20between,%20visual%20search%20tasks&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Clarke,%20Alasdair%20DF&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=289-296&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1747021820929190&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2615717318%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2615717318&rft_id=info:pmid/32644016&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1747021820929190&rfr_iscdi=true |