Evaluating Cannabis Use Risk Reduction as an Alternative Clinical Outcome for Cannabis Use Disorder

Objective: Abstinence is rarely achieved in clinical trials for cannabis use disorder (CUD). Cannabis reduction is associated with functional improvement, but reduction endpoints have not been established, indicating a need to identify and validate clinically meaningful reduction endpoints for asses...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychology of addictive behaviors 2022-08, Vol.36 (5), p.505-514
Hauptverfasser: Sherman, Brian J., Sofis, Michael J., Borodovsky, Jacob T., Gray, Kevin M., McRae-Clark, Aimee L., Budney, Alan J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: Abstinence is rarely achieved in clinical trials for cannabis use disorder (CUD). Cannabis reduction is associated with functional improvement, but reduction endpoints have not been established, indicating a need to identify and validate clinically meaningful reduction endpoints for assessing treatment efficacy. Method: Data from a 12-week double-blind randomized placebo-controlled medication trial for cannabis cessation (NCT01675661) were analyzed. Participants (N = 225) were treatment-seeking adults, M = 30.6 (8.9) years old, 70.2% male, and 42.2% Non-White, with CUD who completed 12 weeks of treatment. Frequency (days of use per week) and quantity (grams per using day) were used to define high-, medium-, and low-risk levels. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and cannabis-related problems were assessed using the Marijuana Problems Scale. General linear models for repeated measures tested associations between the magnitude of risk reduction and functional outcomes from baseline (BL) to end-of-treatment (EOT). Results: Cannabis risk levels were sensitive to reductions in use from BL to EOT for frequency- (χ2 = 19.35, p = .004) and quantity-based (χ2 = 52.06, p < .001) metrics. Magnitude reduction in frequency-based risk level was associated with magnitude decrease in depression (F = 2.76, p = .043, ηp2 = .04), anxiety (F = 3.70, p = .013, ηp2 = .05), and cannabis-related problems (F = 8.95, p < .001, ηp2 = .12). Magnitude reduction in quantity-based risk level was associated with magnitude decrease in anxiety (F = 3.02, p = .031, ηp2 = .04) and cannabis-related problems (F = 3.24, p = .023, ηp2 = .05). Conclusions: Cannabis use risk levels, as operationalized in this study, captured reductions in use during a clinical trial. Risk level reduction was associated with functional improvement suggesting that identifying risk levels and measuring the change in levels over time may be a viable and clinically meaningful endpoint for determining treatment efficacy. Public Health Significance Statement Cannabis use risk levels are measurable, and reduction in risk level is associated with functional improvement during treatment. Given increasing access to cannabis worldwide, risk reduction approaches may be critical to reduce the public health burden of cannabis use disorder (CUD).
ISSN:0893-164X
1939-1501
DOI:10.1037/adb0000760