Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold, One Curve, and Self-Adjusting File systems in severely curved canals: A cone-beam computed tomography study
Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare canal transportation (CT), centering ability (CA), and volumetric changes in severely curved canals prepared using ProTaper Gold (PTG), One Curve (OC), and Self-Adjusting File (SAF) systems via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of conservative dentistry 2021-05, Vol.24 (3), p.271-277 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 277 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 271 |
| container_title | Journal of conservative dentistry |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Singla, Meenu Kumar, Hemanshi Satija, Ritika |
| description | Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare canal transportation (CT), centering ability (CA), and volumetric changes in severely curved canals prepared using ProTaper Gold (PTG), One Curve (OC), and Self-Adjusting File (SAF) systems via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Materials and Methods: Sixty mesiobuccal canals of maxillary molars were selected. Pre- and postinstrumentation CBCT scans were taken in the same position. CT and CA were calculated at 1 mm, 4 mm, and 7 mm from the apex; change in volume for whole canal was measured and analyzed statistically.
Results: SAF showed the least mean CT at all the levels with no statistically significant differences at 1 mm and 4 mm when compared to other groups while statistically significant differences were observed at 7 mm with PTG and OC. Regarding CA, SAF better maintained canal centricity than PTG and OC at all the levels assessed, though the differences were not statistically significant except at 7 mm where statistically significant difference was observed between SAF and OC. SAF removed less volume of dentin followed by PTG and the highest removal was shown by OC.
Conclusion: SAF showed promising behavior with the least CT, most centered preparation, and minimal dentin removal. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4103/jcd.jcd_243_21 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8717848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A686930646</galeid><sourcerecordid>A686930646</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462r-e6b90a7acf693dc6f0f3445f756b0b631e66a3c4edcd2a7108f84b1a6c9de2c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kl-L1DAUxYso7rr66qMEBPFhO6ZNmnZ8EIbBXYWFFWZ9Dml6M5PZNKlJO0M_hN_Z1J39JyshJJDfOZfce5LkbYZnNMPk01Y2s7h5TgnPs2fJMZ6XNC1yTJ7_vecpLnF5lLwKYYsxo3SOXyZHpMCkyApynPxebUSn7RqJWhvdj8gp9MO7K9GBR-fONKfo0gJaDn4Hp0jYBq3AqHTRbIfQT7ozbQCFMfTQBqQtCrADD2ZEcpI0SAorTPiMFkg6C2kNoo23thv6-Ni71q296DYjCv3QjK-TFyrS8OZwniQ_z75eLb-lF5fn35eLi1RSlvsUWD3HohRSsTlpJFNYEUoLVRasxjUjGTAmiKTQyCYXZYYrVdE6E0zOG8hlQU6SLze-3VC3kQLbe2F453Ur_Mid0Pzxi9UbvnY7XpVZWdEqGnw8GHj3a4DQ81YHCcYIC24IPGc5LgtaZVOt9_-gWzf4qSmRiiMk84qxe2otDHBtlYt15WTKF6yK34yzm6jZE1RcDbR66q-K03gs-PBAsAFh-k1wZui1s-FJZ-ldCB7UXTMyzKek8Sll90mLgncPW3iH30YrAqsbYO9MDz5cm2EPnkf22rr9f2x5Xmb8EEl-iCR3it9GkvwBsBvuuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610339866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold, One Curve, and Self-Adjusting File systems in severely curved canals: A cone-beam computed tomography study</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Singla, Meenu ; Kumar, Hemanshi ; Satija, Ritika</creator><creatorcontrib>Singla, Meenu ; Kumar, Hemanshi ; Satija, Ritika</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare canal transportation (CT), centering ability (CA), and volumetric changes in severely curved canals prepared using ProTaper Gold (PTG), One Curve (OC), and Self-Adjusting File (SAF) systems via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Materials and Methods: Sixty mesiobuccal canals of maxillary molars were selected. Pre- and postinstrumentation CBCT scans were taken in the same position. CT and CA were calculated at 1 mm, 4 mm, and 7 mm from the apex; change in volume for whole canal was measured and analyzed statistically.
Results: SAF showed the least mean CT at all the levels with no statistically significant differences at 1 mm and 4 mm when compared to other groups while statistically significant differences were observed at 7 mm with PTG and OC. Regarding CA, SAF better maintained canal centricity than PTG and OC at all the levels assessed, though the differences were not statistically significant except at 7 mm where statistically significant difference was observed between SAF and OC. SAF removed less volume of dentin followed by PTG and the highest removal was shown by OC.
Conclusion: SAF showed promising behavior with the least CT, most centered preparation, and minimal dentin removal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-0707</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-5203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_243_21</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35035153</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Canals (anatomy) ; Computed tomography ; CT imaging ; Dentin ; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ; Molars ; Original ; Statistical analysis ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Journal of conservative dentistry, 2021-05, Vol.24 (3), p.271-277</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Conservative Dentistry.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Conservative Dentistry 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462r-e6b90a7acf693dc6f0f3445f756b0b631e66a3c4edcd2a7108f84b1a6c9de2c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717848/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717848/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035153$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singla, Meenu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Hemanshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satija, Ritika</creatorcontrib><title>Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold, One Curve, and Self-Adjusting File systems in severely curved canals: A cone-beam computed tomography study</title><title>Journal of conservative dentistry</title><addtitle>J Conserv Dent</addtitle><description>Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare canal transportation (CT), centering ability (CA), and volumetric changes in severely curved canals prepared using ProTaper Gold (PTG), One Curve (OC), and Self-Adjusting File (SAF) systems via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Materials and Methods: Sixty mesiobuccal canals of maxillary molars were selected. Pre- and postinstrumentation CBCT scans were taken in the same position. CT and CA were calculated at 1 mm, 4 mm, and 7 mm from the apex; change in volume for whole canal was measured and analyzed statistically.
Results: SAF showed the least mean CT at all the levels with no statistically significant differences at 1 mm and 4 mm when compared to other groups while statistically significant differences were observed at 7 mm with PTG and OC. Regarding CA, SAF better maintained canal centricity than PTG and OC at all the levels assessed, though the differences were not statistically significant except at 7 mm where statistically significant difference was observed between SAF and OC. SAF removed less volume of dentin followed by PTG and the highest removal was shown by OC.
Conclusion: SAF showed promising behavior with the least CT, most centered preparation, and minimal dentin removal.</description><subject>Canals (anatomy)</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>CT imaging</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid</subject><subject>Molars</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>0972-0707</issn><issn>0974-5203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kl-L1DAUxYso7rr66qMEBPFhO6ZNmnZ8EIbBXYWFFWZ9Dml6M5PZNKlJO0M_hN_Z1J39JyshJJDfOZfce5LkbYZnNMPk01Y2s7h5TgnPs2fJMZ6XNC1yTJ7_vecpLnF5lLwKYYsxo3SOXyZHpMCkyApynPxebUSn7RqJWhvdj8gp9MO7K9GBR-fONKfo0gJaDn4Hp0jYBq3AqHTRbIfQT7ozbQCFMfTQBqQtCrADD2ZEcpI0SAorTPiMFkg6C2kNoo23thv6-Ni71q296DYjCv3QjK-TFyrS8OZwniQ_z75eLb-lF5fn35eLi1RSlvsUWD3HohRSsTlpJFNYEUoLVRasxjUjGTAmiKTQyCYXZYYrVdE6E0zOG8hlQU6SLze-3VC3kQLbe2F453Ur_Mid0Pzxi9UbvnY7XpVZWdEqGnw8GHj3a4DQ81YHCcYIC24IPGc5LgtaZVOt9_-gWzf4qSmRiiMk84qxe2otDHBtlYt15WTKF6yK34yzm6jZE1RcDbR66q-K03gs-PBAsAFh-k1wZui1s-FJZ-ldCB7UXTMyzKek8Sll90mLgncPW3iH30YrAqsbYO9MDz5cm2EPnkf22rr9f2x5Xmb8EEl-iCR3it9GkvwBsBvuuA</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Singla, Meenu</creator><creator>Kumar, Hemanshi</creator><creator>Satija, Ritika</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold, One Curve, and Self-Adjusting File systems in severely curved canals: A cone-beam computed tomography study</title><author>Singla, Meenu ; Kumar, Hemanshi ; Satija, Ritika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462r-e6b90a7acf693dc6f0f3445f756b0b631e66a3c4edcd2a7108f84b1a6c9de2c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Canals (anatomy)</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>CT imaging</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid</topic><topic>Molars</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singla, Meenu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Hemanshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satija, Ritika</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of conservative dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singla, Meenu</au><au>Kumar, Hemanshi</au><au>Satija, Ritika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold, One Curve, and Self-Adjusting File systems in severely curved canals: A cone-beam computed tomography study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of conservative dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Conserv Dent</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>271-277</pages><issn>0972-0707</issn><eissn>0974-5203</eissn><abstract>Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare canal transportation (CT), centering ability (CA), and volumetric changes in severely curved canals prepared using ProTaper Gold (PTG), One Curve (OC), and Self-Adjusting File (SAF) systems via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Materials and Methods: Sixty mesiobuccal canals of maxillary molars were selected. Pre- and postinstrumentation CBCT scans were taken in the same position. CT and CA were calculated at 1 mm, 4 mm, and 7 mm from the apex; change in volume for whole canal was measured and analyzed statistically.
Results: SAF showed the least mean CT at all the levels with no statistically significant differences at 1 mm and 4 mm when compared to other groups while statistically significant differences were observed at 7 mm with PTG and OC. Regarding CA, SAF better maintained canal centricity than PTG and OC at all the levels assessed, though the differences were not statistically significant except at 7 mm where statistically significant difference was observed between SAF and OC. SAF removed less volume of dentin followed by PTG and the highest removal was shown by OC.
Conclusion: SAF showed promising behavior with the least CT, most centered preparation, and minimal dentin removal.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>35035153</pmid><doi>10.4103/jcd.jcd_243_21</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0972-0707 |
| ispartof | Journal of conservative dentistry, 2021-05, Vol.24 (3), p.271-277 |
| issn | 0972-0707 0974-5203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8717848 |
| source | PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Canals (anatomy) Computed tomography CT imaging Dentin Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid Molars Original Statistical analysis Tomography |
| title | Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold, One Curve, and Self-Adjusting File systems in severely curved canals: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T18%3A22%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shaping%20ability%20of%20ProTaper%20Gold,%20One%20Curve,%20and%20Self-Adjusting%20File%20systems%20in%20severely%20curved%20canals:%20A%20cone-beam%20computed%20tomography%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20conservative%20dentistry&rft.au=Singla,%20Meenu&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=271-277&rft.issn=0972-0707&rft.eissn=0974-5203&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jcd.jcd_243_21&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA686930646%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610339866&rft_id=info:pmid/35035153&rft_galeid=A686930646&rfr_iscdi=true |