Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review & meta-analysis
Background &objectives: Women with gestational diabetes are at an increased risk of being diagnosed as type 2 diabetes, but the postpartum screening rate is low. To provide evidence-based data for health providers and promote postpartum screening, this systematic review and meta-analysis was con...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indian journal of medical research (New Delhi, India : 1994) India : 1994), 2021-07, Vol.154 (1), p.62-77 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 77 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 62 |
container_title | Indian journal of medical research (New Delhi, India : 1994) |
container_volume | 154 |
creator | You, Huaxuan Hu, Juan Liu, Ying Luo, Biru Lei, Anjiang |
description | Background &objectives: Women with gestational diabetes are at an increased risk of being diagnosed as type 2 diabetes, but the postpartum screening rate is low. To provide evidence-based data for health providers and promote postpartum screening, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to access the risks of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) diagnosis after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in different demographic and maternal subgroups.
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched systematically. Unadjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane's Q text and by calculating I2 values. Subgroup analyses were conducted to address the disparities of type 2 diabetes conversion after gestational diabetes in different demographic and maternal subgroups.
Results: 1809 publications were screened and 39 cohort studies including 2,847,596 women were selected. In these studies, 78,893 women were diagnosed as T2DM at six weeks or later after delivery. The unadjusted RRs of women diagnosed T2DM at six weeks or later after delivery ranged from 1.32 (95% CI, 0.46-3.37) to 47.25 (95% CI, 2.95-758.01) with a pooled unadjusted RR of 8.92 (95% CI, 7.84-10.14). Older women, women with a family history of diabetes, Black and non-Hispanic White women and women living in Europe and South-East Asia had a higher risk of developing T2DM after GDM.
Interpretation & conclusions: It is suggested that healthcare providers may focus on older women with GDM and women with GDM and a family history of diabetes. Black and non-Hispanic White women with GDM may receive more attention, and healthcare providers, especially those in Europe and South-East Asia, may pay more attention to preventive measures for postpartum T2DM. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_852_18 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8715678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2598078585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497s-7059f919036c3080b76d76a327e5ce461a5ccec3cc53ce5a593865e95a0194c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFrFDEUh4NYbK3ePUlAEC9Tk8lkkngQSrG1paIUPT-y2Tc1uzOTbZLpsv-9WbctVfGUwPvej_zyEfKKs6OGM_HeL4Z4dH7x5Qq0rIHrJ-SAGSUrw1Xz9PedV9Lwdp88T2nBGDe1Ms_IvmiUrqXgB8Rf-bSkoaN5s0Ja07m3M8yY6IB97_OUqO0yRnqNKdvsw2j7f5kP9JimTco4FMTRiLce1_RtmWdb2bKyST69IHud7RO-vDsPyY_TT99PPleXX8_OT44vK9cYlSrFpOkMN0y0TjDNZqqdq9aKWqF02LTcSufQCeekcCitNEK3Eo20pV3jhDgkH3e5q2k24NzhmKPtYRX9YOMGgvXw52T0P-E63IJWXLZKl4B3dwEx3EylNww-uVLVjhimBLU0mikttSzom7_QRZhiKVyotnx3LaVRhWI7ysWQUsTu4TGcwdYjbD3CI49l5fXjEg8L9-IK8G0HrENf_KRlP60xQmGXY1j_NxjaGrbGIXSwNQ413NsUvwApdbiz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2600125597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review & meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>You, Huaxuan ; Hu, Juan ; Liu, Ying ; Luo, Biru ; Lei, Anjiang</creator><creatorcontrib>You, Huaxuan ; Hu, Juan ; Liu, Ying ; Luo, Biru ; Lei, Anjiang</creatorcontrib><description>Background &objectives: Women with gestational diabetes are at an increased risk of being diagnosed as type 2 diabetes, but the postpartum screening rate is low. To provide evidence-based data for health providers and promote postpartum screening, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to access the risks of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) diagnosis after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in different demographic and maternal subgroups.
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched systematically. Unadjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane's Q text and by calculating I2 values. Subgroup analyses were conducted to address the disparities of type 2 diabetes conversion after gestational diabetes in different demographic and maternal subgroups.
Results: 1809 publications were screened and 39 cohort studies including 2,847,596 women were selected. In these studies, 78,893 women were diagnosed as T2DM at six weeks or later after delivery. The unadjusted RRs of women diagnosed T2DM at six weeks or later after delivery ranged from 1.32 (95% CI, 0.46-3.37) to 47.25 (95% CI, 2.95-758.01) with a pooled unadjusted RR of 8.92 (95% CI, 7.84-10.14). Older women, women with a family history of diabetes, Black and non-Hispanic White women and women living in Europe and South-East Asia had a higher risk of developing T2DM after GDM.
Interpretation & conclusions: It is suggested that healthcare providers may focus on older women with GDM and women with GDM and a family history of diabetes. Black and non-Hispanic White women with GDM may receive more attention, and healthcare providers, especially those in Europe and South-East Asia, may pay more attention to preventive measures for postpartum T2DM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0971-5916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0975-9174</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_852_18</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34782531</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology ; Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology ; Female ; Gestational diabetes ; Humans ; Mass Screening ; Meta-analysis ; Postpartum Period ; Pregnancy ; Risk ; Systematic Review</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of medical research (New Delhi, India : 1994), 2021-07, Vol.154 (1), p.62-77</ispartof><rights>2021. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Medical Research 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497s-7059f919036c3080b76d76a327e5ce461a5ccec3cc53ce5a593865e95a0194c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497s-7059f919036c3080b76d76a327e5ce461a5ccec3cc53ce5a593865e95a0194c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715678/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715678/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34782531$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>You, Huaxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Biru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Anjiang</creatorcontrib><title>Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review & meta-analysis</title><title>Indian journal of medical research (New Delhi, India : 1994)</title><addtitle>Indian J Med Res</addtitle><description>Background &objectives: Women with gestational diabetes are at an increased risk of being diagnosed as type 2 diabetes, but the postpartum screening rate is low. To provide evidence-based data for health providers and promote postpartum screening, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to access the risks of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) diagnosis after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in different demographic and maternal subgroups.
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched systematically. Unadjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane's Q text and by calculating I2 values. Subgroup analyses were conducted to address the disparities of type 2 diabetes conversion after gestational diabetes in different demographic and maternal subgroups.
Results: 1809 publications were screened and 39 cohort studies including 2,847,596 women were selected. In these studies, 78,893 women were diagnosed as T2DM at six weeks or later after delivery. The unadjusted RRs of women diagnosed T2DM at six weeks or later after delivery ranged from 1.32 (95% CI, 0.46-3.37) to 47.25 (95% CI, 2.95-758.01) with a pooled unadjusted RR of 8.92 (95% CI, 7.84-10.14). Older women, women with a family history of diabetes, Black and non-Hispanic White women and women living in Europe and South-East Asia had a higher risk of developing T2DM after GDM.
Interpretation & conclusions: It is suggested that healthcare providers may focus on older women with GDM and women with GDM and a family history of diabetes. Black and non-Hispanic White women with GDM may receive more attention, and healthcare providers, especially those in Europe and South-East Asia, may pay more attention to preventive measures for postpartum T2DM.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational diabetes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Postpartum Period</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Systematic Review</subject><issn>0971-5916</issn><issn>0975-9174</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFrFDEUh4NYbK3ePUlAEC9Tk8lkkngQSrG1paIUPT-y2Tc1uzOTbZLpsv-9WbctVfGUwPvej_zyEfKKs6OGM_HeL4Z4dH7x5Qq0rIHrJ-SAGSUrw1Xz9PedV9Lwdp88T2nBGDe1Ms_IvmiUrqXgB8Rf-bSkoaN5s0Ja07m3M8yY6IB97_OUqO0yRnqNKdvsw2j7f5kP9JimTco4FMTRiLce1_RtmWdb2bKyST69IHud7RO-vDsPyY_TT99PPleXX8_OT44vK9cYlSrFpOkMN0y0TjDNZqqdq9aKWqF02LTcSufQCeekcCitNEK3Eo20pV3jhDgkH3e5q2k24NzhmKPtYRX9YOMGgvXw52T0P-E63IJWXLZKl4B3dwEx3EylNww-uVLVjhimBLU0mikttSzom7_QRZhiKVyotnx3LaVRhWI7ysWQUsTu4TGcwdYjbD3CI49l5fXjEg8L9-IK8G0HrENf_KRlP60xQmGXY1j_NxjaGrbGIXSwNQ413NsUvwApdbiz</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>You, Huaxuan</creator><creator>Hu, Juan</creator><creator>Liu, Ying</creator><creator>Luo, Biru</creator><creator>Lei, Anjiang</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Scientific Scholar</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review & meta-analysis</title><author>You, Huaxuan ; Hu, Juan ; Liu, Ying ; Luo, Biru ; Lei, Anjiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497s-7059f919036c3080b76d76a327e5ce461a5ccec3cc53ce5a593865e95a0194c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational diabetes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Postpartum Period</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Systematic Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>You, Huaxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Biru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Anjiang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of medical research (New Delhi, India : 1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>You, Huaxuan</au><au>Hu, Juan</au><au>Liu, Ying</au><au>Luo, Biru</au><au>Lei, Anjiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review & meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of medical research (New Delhi, India : 1994)</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Med Res</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>154</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>62-77</pages><issn>0971-5916</issn><eissn>0975-9174</eissn><abstract>Background &objectives: Women with gestational diabetes are at an increased risk of being diagnosed as type 2 diabetes, but the postpartum screening rate is low. To provide evidence-based data for health providers and promote postpartum screening, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to access the risks of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) diagnosis after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in different demographic and maternal subgroups.
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched systematically. Unadjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane's Q text and by calculating I2 values. Subgroup analyses were conducted to address the disparities of type 2 diabetes conversion after gestational diabetes in different demographic and maternal subgroups.
Results: 1809 publications were screened and 39 cohort studies including 2,847,596 women were selected. In these studies, 78,893 women were diagnosed as T2DM at six weeks or later after delivery. The unadjusted RRs of women diagnosed T2DM at six weeks or later after delivery ranged from 1.32 (95% CI, 0.46-3.37) to 47.25 (95% CI, 2.95-758.01) with a pooled unadjusted RR of 8.92 (95% CI, 7.84-10.14). Older women, women with a family history of diabetes, Black and non-Hispanic White women and women living in Europe and South-East Asia had a higher risk of developing T2DM after GDM.
Interpretation & conclusions: It is suggested that healthcare providers may focus on older women with GDM and women with GDM and a family history of diabetes. Black and non-Hispanic White women with GDM may receive more attention, and healthcare providers, especially those in Europe and South-East Asia, may pay more attention to preventive measures for postpartum T2DM.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>34782531</pmid><doi>10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_852_18</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0971-5916 |
ispartof | Indian journal of medical research (New Delhi, India : 1994), 2021-07, Vol.154 (1), p.62-77 |
issn | 0971-5916 0975-9174 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8715678 |
source | MEDLINE; Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Aged Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology Female Gestational diabetes Humans Mass Screening Meta-analysis Postpartum Period Pregnancy Risk Systematic Review |
title | Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review & meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T21%3A47%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20of%20type%202%20diabetes%20mellitus%20after%20gestational%20diabetes%20mellitus:%20A%20systematic%20review%20&%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20medical%20research%20(New%20Delhi,%20India%20:%201994)&rft.au=You,%20Huaxuan&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=154&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=62-77&rft.issn=0971-5916&rft.eissn=0975-9174&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_852_18&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2598078585%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2600125597&rft_id=info:pmid/34782531&rfr_iscdi=true |