Comparing Vocabulary Knowledge Conceptualizations among Spanish-English Dual Language Learners in a New Destination State

Purpose: Despite the unprecedented growth of Spanish-English dual language learners (DLLs) in new destination states--where DLLs have not been historically served--empirical understanding of their language and literacy skills is scant. Drawing on scientific understandings of bilingual language acqui...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Language, speech & hearing services in schools speech & hearing services in schools, 2021-01, Vol.52 (1), p.369-382
Hauptverfasser: Oh, Min Hyun, Mancilla-Martinez, Jeannette
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 382
container_issue 1
container_start_page 369
container_title Language, speech & hearing services in schools
container_volume 52
creator Oh, Min Hyun
Mancilla-Martinez, Jeannette
description Purpose: Despite the unprecedented growth of Spanish-English dual language learners (DLLs) in new destination states--where DLLs have not been historically served--empirical understanding of their language and literacy skills is scant. Drawing on scientific understandings of bilingual language acquisition, we compare monolingually scored and bilingually scored vocabulary knowledge of Spanish-English DLLs in a new destination state. Method: Participants included second- and fourth-grade Spanish-English DLLs (N = 60) in a large urban school district in a new destination state. Students were considered DLLs if their parents indicated that Spanish was spoken at home to some extent. We utilized monolingually scored (Spanish-only and English-only) and bilingually scored (conceptual and total) conceptualizations of vocabulary knowledge. Descriptive analysis and Bonferroni-adjusted multiple comparisons were used to compare vocabulary knowledge by assessment approach (i.e., monolingual or bilingual), grade (i.e., second and fourth), and English proficiency status (i.e., limited English proficient and English proficient). Results: Findings revealed that: (1) DLLs, across grade levels and English proficiency status, demonstrated higher bilingual vocabulary scores compared to monolingual scores and stronger receptive vocabulary performance than expressive vocabulary performance; and (2) DLLs' response patterns varied depending on the bilingual assessment approach used, with DLLs in limited English-proficient and English-proficient groups evidencing similar response patterns. Conclusions: Bilingual scoring of vocabulary knowledge provides a more holistic understanding of elementary-aged DLLs' language skills. Results represent an important step toward shifting school-based assessment practices to incorporate comprehensive and equitable ways to conceptualize and measure elementary-aged Spanish-English DLLs' vocabulary knowledge.
doi_str_mv 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8711708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A651251803</galeid><ericid>EJ1283427</ericid><sourcerecordid>A651251803</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-782d5765f6f1be5f036c64c7baacae453c0935bf1aa59c19768610431f6451453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1vEzEQhlcIREPhFyCQJSTEZYu_d_eCVKWBAhEcAlytiePduPLawd6lan993aSkDUI-jOV53tee8RTFS4JPCOb8PcUUq_nifLEoKS4xxow8KiZEiLpsCG0eFxNMJCkJl-SoeJbSRUYwZ-xpccQYZVXN6aS4moZ-A9H6Dv0KGpajg3iFvvpw6cyqM2gavDabYQRnr2GwwScEfcj0YgPepnU5853LEZ1lBM3BdyNk2dxA9CYmZD0C9M1cojOTBuu3FmgxwGCeF09acMm8uIvHxc-Psx_T83L-_dPn6em81EKwoaxquhKVFK1sydKIFjOpJdfVEkCD4YJp3DCxbAmAaDRpKlnL3B5GWskFyfnj4sPOdzMue7PSxg8RnNpE2-dSVQCrDjPerlUX_qi6IqTCdTZ4d2cQw-8xl6F6m7RxDrwJY1KUSy6xrATJ6Jt_0IswRp_Ly1RDq_zURtxTHTijrG9DvlffmqpTKQgVpMYsUyf_ofJamd7q4E1r8_mB4O0DwdqAG9YpuHH7a4cg24E6hpSiaffNIFjdjpa6H628VdvRyqrXD_u41_ydpQy82gEmWr1Pz74QWjNOK3YD3C7SmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2492709395</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Vocabulary Knowledge Conceptualizations among Spanish-English Dual Language Learners in a New Destination State</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source - EBSCO</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Oh, Min Hyun ; Mancilla-Martinez, Jeannette</creator><creatorcontrib>Oh, Min Hyun ; Mancilla-Martinez, Jeannette</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Despite the unprecedented growth of Spanish-English dual language learners (DLLs) in new destination states--where DLLs have not been historically served--empirical understanding of their language and literacy skills is scant. Drawing on scientific understandings of bilingual language acquisition, we compare monolingually scored and bilingually scored vocabulary knowledge of Spanish-English DLLs in a new destination state. Method: Participants included second- and fourth-grade Spanish-English DLLs (N = 60) in a large urban school district in a new destination state. Students were considered DLLs if their parents indicated that Spanish was spoken at home to some extent. We utilized monolingually scored (Spanish-only and English-only) and bilingually scored (conceptual and total) conceptualizations of vocabulary knowledge. Descriptive analysis and Bonferroni-adjusted multiple comparisons were used to compare vocabulary knowledge by assessment approach (i.e., monolingual or bilingual), grade (i.e., second and fourth), and English proficiency status (i.e., limited English proficient and English proficient). Results: Findings revealed that: (1) DLLs, across grade levels and English proficiency status, demonstrated higher bilingual vocabulary scores compared to monolingual scores and stronger receptive vocabulary performance than expressive vocabulary performance; and (2) DLLs' response patterns varied depending on the bilingual assessment approach used, with DLLs in limited English-proficient and English-proficient groups evidencing similar response patterns. Conclusions: Bilingual scoring of vocabulary knowledge provides a more holistic understanding of elementary-aged DLLs' language skills. Results represent an important step toward shifting school-based assessment practices to incorporate comprehensive and equitable ways to conceptualize and measure elementary-aged Spanish-English DLLs' vocabulary knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-1461</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33237842</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Bilingual education ; Bilingual Students ; Bilingualism ; Child ; Child Language ; Comprehension ; Concept Formation ; Elementary School Students ; Elementary schools ; English (Second Language) ; English as a second language ; English language ; Equal Education ; Expressive Language ; Female ; Grade 1 ; Grade 2 ; Grade 4 ; Hispanic or Latino - education ; Hispanic or Latino - psychology ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Language ; Language acquisition ; Language Proficiency ; Language Skills ; Language Tests ; Learning ; Limited English Speaking ; Linguistics ; Literacy ; Longitudinal Studies ; Low income groups ; Male ; Monolingualism ; Multilingualism ; Preschool Children ; Reading Skills ; Receptive Language ; Responses ; School districts ; Schools ; Scores ; Scoring ; Spanish language ; Spanish Speaking ; Students ; Trends ; Urban Schools ; Vocabulary ; Vocabulary Development ; Vocabulary learning ; Vocabulary Skills</subject><ispartof>Language, speech &amp; hearing services in schools, 2021-01, Vol.52 (1), p.369-382</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Jan 2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-782d5765f6f1be5f036c64c7baacae453c0935bf1aa59c19768610431f6451453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-782d5765f6f1be5f036c64c7baacae453c0935bf1aa59c19768610431f6451453</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6068-9044 ; 0000-0001-7185-7093</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1283427$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33237842$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oh, Min Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancilla-Martinez, Jeannette</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Vocabulary Knowledge Conceptualizations among Spanish-English Dual Language Learners in a New Destination State</title><title>Language, speech &amp; hearing services in schools</title><addtitle>Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch</addtitle><description>Purpose: Despite the unprecedented growth of Spanish-English dual language learners (DLLs) in new destination states--where DLLs have not been historically served--empirical understanding of their language and literacy skills is scant. Drawing on scientific understandings of bilingual language acquisition, we compare monolingually scored and bilingually scored vocabulary knowledge of Spanish-English DLLs in a new destination state. Method: Participants included second- and fourth-grade Spanish-English DLLs (N = 60) in a large urban school district in a new destination state. Students were considered DLLs if their parents indicated that Spanish was spoken at home to some extent. We utilized monolingually scored (Spanish-only and English-only) and bilingually scored (conceptual and total) conceptualizations of vocabulary knowledge. Descriptive analysis and Bonferroni-adjusted multiple comparisons were used to compare vocabulary knowledge by assessment approach (i.e., monolingual or bilingual), grade (i.e., second and fourth), and English proficiency status (i.e., limited English proficient and English proficient). Results: Findings revealed that: (1) DLLs, across grade levels and English proficiency status, demonstrated higher bilingual vocabulary scores compared to monolingual scores and stronger receptive vocabulary performance than expressive vocabulary performance; and (2) DLLs' response patterns varied depending on the bilingual assessment approach used, with DLLs in limited English-proficient and English-proficient groups evidencing similar response patterns. Conclusions: Bilingual scoring of vocabulary knowledge provides a more holistic understanding of elementary-aged DLLs' language skills. Results represent an important step toward shifting school-based assessment practices to incorporate comprehensive and equitable ways to conceptualize and measure elementary-aged Spanish-English DLLs' vocabulary knowledge.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bilingual education</subject><subject>Bilingual Students</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Elementary schools</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English as a second language</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Equal Education</subject><subject>Expressive Language</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Grade 1</subject><subject>Grade 2</subject><subject>Grade 4</subject><subject>Hispanic or Latino - education</subject><subject>Hispanic or Latino - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language acquisition</subject><subject>Language Proficiency</subject><subject>Language Skills</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Limited English Speaking</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monolingualism</subject><subject>Multilingualism</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Reading Skills</subject><subject>Receptive Language</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>School districts</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Scoring</subject><subject>Spanish language</subject><subject>Spanish Speaking</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Urban Schools</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><subject>Vocabulary learning</subject><subject>Vocabulary Skills</subject><issn>0161-1461</issn><issn>1558-9129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1vEzEQhlcIREPhFyCQJSTEZYu_d_eCVKWBAhEcAlytiePduPLawd6lan993aSkDUI-jOV53tee8RTFS4JPCOb8PcUUq_nifLEoKS4xxow8KiZEiLpsCG0eFxNMJCkJl-SoeJbSRUYwZ-xpccQYZVXN6aS4moZ-A9H6Dv0KGpajg3iFvvpw6cyqM2gavDabYQRnr2GwwScEfcj0YgPepnU5853LEZ1lBM3BdyNk2dxA9CYmZD0C9M1cojOTBuu3FmgxwGCeF09acMm8uIvHxc-Psx_T83L-_dPn6em81EKwoaxquhKVFK1sydKIFjOpJdfVEkCD4YJp3DCxbAmAaDRpKlnL3B5GWskFyfnj4sPOdzMue7PSxg8RnNpE2-dSVQCrDjPerlUX_qi6IqTCdTZ4d2cQw-8xl6F6m7RxDrwJY1KUSy6xrATJ6Jt_0IswRp_Ly1RDq_zURtxTHTijrG9DvlffmqpTKQgVpMYsUyf_ofJamd7q4E1r8_mB4O0DwdqAG9YpuHH7a4cg24E6hpSiaffNIFjdjpa6H628VdvRyqrXD_u41_ydpQy82gEmWr1Pz74QWjNOK3YD3C7SmQ</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Oh, Min Hyun</creator><creator>Mancilla-Martinez, Jeannette</creator><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6068-9044</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7185-7093</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Comparing Vocabulary Knowledge Conceptualizations among Spanish-English Dual Language Learners in a New Destination State</title><author>Oh, Min Hyun ; Mancilla-Martinez, Jeannette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-782d5765f6f1be5f036c64c7baacae453c0935bf1aa59c19768610431f6451453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bilingual education</topic><topic>Bilingual Students</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Elementary schools</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English as a second language</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Equal Education</topic><topic>Expressive Language</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Grade 1</topic><topic>Grade 2</topic><topic>Grade 4</topic><topic>Hispanic or Latino - education</topic><topic>Hispanic or Latino - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language acquisition</topic><topic>Language Proficiency</topic><topic>Language Skills</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Limited English Speaking</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monolingualism</topic><topic>Multilingualism</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Reading Skills</topic><topic>Receptive Language</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>School districts</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Scoring</topic><topic>Spanish language</topic><topic>Spanish Speaking</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Urban Schools</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><topic>Vocabulary learning</topic><topic>Vocabulary Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oh, Min Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancilla-Martinez, Jeannette</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Language, speech &amp; hearing services in schools</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oh, Min Hyun</au><au>Mancilla-Martinez, Jeannette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1283427</ericid><atitle>Comparing Vocabulary Knowledge Conceptualizations among Spanish-English Dual Language Learners in a New Destination State</atitle><jtitle>Language, speech &amp; hearing services in schools</jtitle><addtitle>Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>382</epage><pages>369-382</pages><issn>0161-1461</issn><eissn>1558-9129</eissn><abstract>Purpose: Despite the unprecedented growth of Spanish-English dual language learners (DLLs) in new destination states--where DLLs have not been historically served--empirical understanding of their language and literacy skills is scant. Drawing on scientific understandings of bilingual language acquisition, we compare monolingually scored and bilingually scored vocabulary knowledge of Spanish-English DLLs in a new destination state. Method: Participants included second- and fourth-grade Spanish-English DLLs (N = 60) in a large urban school district in a new destination state. Students were considered DLLs if their parents indicated that Spanish was spoken at home to some extent. We utilized monolingually scored (Spanish-only and English-only) and bilingually scored (conceptual and total) conceptualizations of vocabulary knowledge. Descriptive analysis and Bonferroni-adjusted multiple comparisons were used to compare vocabulary knowledge by assessment approach (i.e., monolingual or bilingual), grade (i.e., second and fourth), and English proficiency status (i.e., limited English proficient and English proficient). Results: Findings revealed that: (1) DLLs, across grade levels and English proficiency status, demonstrated higher bilingual vocabulary scores compared to monolingual scores and stronger receptive vocabulary performance than expressive vocabulary performance; and (2) DLLs' response patterns varied depending on the bilingual assessment approach used, with DLLs in limited English-proficient and English-proficient groups evidencing similar response patterns. Conclusions: Bilingual scoring of vocabulary knowledge provides a more holistic understanding of elementary-aged DLLs' language skills. Results represent an important step toward shifting school-based assessment practices to incorporate comprehensive and equitable ways to conceptualize and measure elementary-aged Spanish-English DLLs' vocabulary knowledge.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</pub><pmid>33237842</pmid><doi>10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00031</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6068-9044</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7185-7093</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-1461
ispartof Language, speech & hearing services in schools, 2021-01, Vol.52 (1), p.369-382
issn 0161-1461
1558-9129
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8711708
source MEDLINE; Education Source - EBSCO; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis
Bilingual education
Bilingual Students
Bilingualism
Child
Child Language
Comprehension
Concept Formation
Elementary School Students
Elementary schools
English (Second Language)
English as a second language
English language
Equal Education
Expressive Language
Female
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 4
Hispanic or Latino - education
Hispanic or Latino - psychology
Humans
Knowledge
Language
Language acquisition
Language Proficiency
Language Skills
Language Tests
Learning
Limited English Speaking
Linguistics
Literacy
Longitudinal Studies
Low income groups
Male
Monolingualism
Multilingualism
Preschool Children
Reading Skills
Receptive Language
Responses
School districts
Schools
Scores
Scoring
Spanish language
Spanish Speaking
Students
Trends
Urban Schools
Vocabulary
Vocabulary Development
Vocabulary learning
Vocabulary Skills
title Comparing Vocabulary Knowledge Conceptualizations among Spanish-English Dual Language Learners in a New Destination State
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T15%3A30%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Vocabulary%20Knowledge%20Conceptualizations%20among%20Spanish-English%20Dual%20Language%20Learners%20in%20a%20New%20Destination%20State&rft.jtitle=Language,%20speech%20&%20hearing%20services%20in%20schools&rft.au=Oh,%20Min%20Hyun&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=382&rft.pages=369-382&rft.issn=0161-1461&rft.eissn=1558-9129&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00031&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA651251803%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2492709395&rft_id=info:pmid/33237842&rft_galeid=A651251803&rft_ericid=EJ1283427&rfr_iscdi=true