High prevalence of long-term olfactory dysfunction confirmed by olfactory testing after a community COVID-19 outbreak
Purpose The prevalence of long-term olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in participants suffering from sudden chemosensory loss due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unknown. Furthermore, evaluations of the reliability of participants’ self-reporting of olfactory function (SOF) and gustatory...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | HNO 2022-03, Vol.70 (3), p.224-231 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 231 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 224 |
container_title | HNO |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Gudziol, Hilmar Kirschstein, Timo Pletz, Mathias W. Weis, Sebastian Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando Bitter, Thomas |
description | Purpose
The prevalence of long-term olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in participants suffering from sudden chemosensory loss due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unknown. Furthermore, evaluations of the reliability of participants’ self-reporting of olfactory function (SOF) and gustatory function (SGF) using extended objective psychophysical testing are missing.
Methods
In this population-based cohort study in a PCR-tested community in Thuringia, Germany, olfactory function was extensively examined 4 months after a COVID-19 outbreak using the “Sniffin Sticks” test battery to determine the TDI
a
score, i.e., the sum of results obtained for threshold, discrimination, and identification scores averaged for both nasal sides. Gustatory function was assessed using the three-drop test resulting in the gustatory composite score (CS
g
). The data were compared with SOF and SGF.
Results
Of 43 adult convalescents (median age: 68 years; 58% female) after SARS-CoV‑2 infection, 18 participants (42%) had olfactory complaints due to SOF, one participant (2%) complained of taste disturbance due to SGF. The TDI
a
was 22.0 ± 5.9. Normosmia, hyposmia, and anosmia were seen in 17, 18, and eight participants, respectively. TDI
a
correlated with SOF (
r
s
= −0.434,
p
= 0.004); CS
g
was 23.5 ± 2.7. Normogeusia and hypogeusia were objectified in 39 and four participants, respectively. The prevalence of long-term olfactory dysfunction and gustatory dysfunction in the study group was 60.5 and 9.3%, respectively.
Conclusion
The SOF was reliable, especially for participants who felt a sudden chemosensory dysfunction during the outbreak. At 4 months after SARS-CoV‑2 infection, a high proportion of participants were dysosmic, whereas nearly all of them had normal taste function. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00106-021-01129-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8697538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2613294288</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-a43867afa0385f6a1b6f5c8a34d85bb506124c183233e5d4a0536d5ec11b48153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uFSEYhonR2GP1BlwYlm6o_A-zMTFHbZs06cZ2SxgGptQZOMLMSeZuvBavTOqpTbvpipD3h-_jAeA9wScE4-ZTwZhgiTAlCBNCW9S8ABvCGUOYC_USbKreIElaegTelHJbr6Kl7DU4YrzluMVsA_ZnYbiBu-z2ZnTROpg8HFMc0OzyBNPojZ1TXmG_Fr9EO4cUoU3Rhzy5HnbrI8vsyhziAI2vWWj-_LZpmpYY5hVuL6_PvyLSwrTMXXbm51vwypuxuHf35zG4-v7tx_YMXVyenm-_XCDLuZyR4UzJxniDmRJeGtJJL6wyjPdKdJ3AklBuiWKUMSd6brBgshfOEtJxRQQ7Bp8PvbulqwNbF-dsRr3LYTJ51ckE_VSJ4UYPaa-VbBvBVC34eF-Q06-lbqinUKwbRxNdWoqmkjDacqrurPRgtTmVkp1_eIZgfQdMH4DpCkz_A6abGvrweMCHyH9C1cAOhlKlOLisb9OSY_2052r_AmMuo-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2613294288</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High prevalence of long-term olfactory dysfunction confirmed by olfactory testing after a community COVID-19 outbreak</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Gudziol, Hilmar ; Kirschstein, Timo ; Pletz, Mathias W. ; Weis, Sebastian ; Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando ; Bitter, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Gudziol, Hilmar ; Kirschstein, Timo ; Pletz, Mathias W. ; Weis, Sebastian ; Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando ; Bitter, Thomas ; CoNAN study group ; the CoNAN study group</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The prevalence of long-term olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in participants suffering from sudden chemosensory loss due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unknown. Furthermore, evaluations of the reliability of participants’ self-reporting of olfactory function (SOF) and gustatory function (SGF) using extended objective psychophysical testing are missing.
Methods
In this population-based cohort study in a PCR-tested community in Thuringia, Germany, olfactory function was extensively examined 4 months after a COVID-19 outbreak using the “Sniffin Sticks” test battery to determine the TDI
a
score, i.e., the sum of results obtained for threshold, discrimination, and identification scores averaged for both nasal sides. Gustatory function was assessed using the three-drop test resulting in the gustatory composite score (CS
g
). The data were compared with SOF and SGF.
Results
Of 43 adult convalescents (median age: 68 years; 58% female) after SARS-CoV‑2 infection, 18 participants (42%) had olfactory complaints due to SOF, one participant (2%) complained of taste disturbance due to SGF. The TDI
a
was 22.0 ± 5.9. Normosmia, hyposmia, and anosmia were seen in 17, 18, and eight participants, respectively. TDI
a
correlated with SOF (
r
s
= −0.434,
p
= 0.004); CS
g
was 23.5 ± 2.7. Normogeusia and hypogeusia were objectified in 39 and four participants, respectively. The prevalence of long-term olfactory dysfunction and gustatory dysfunction in the study group was 60.5 and 9.3%, respectively.
Conclusion
The SOF was reliable, especially for participants who felt a sudden chemosensory dysfunction during the outbreak. At 4 months after SARS-CoV‑2 infection, a high proportion of participants were dysosmic, whereas nearly all of them had normal taste function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-6192</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-0458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00106-021-01129-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34940903</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Medizin</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Allergology ; Cohort Studies ; COVID-19 ; Disease Outbreaks ; Female ; Head and Neck Surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Olfaction Disorders - diagnosis ; Olfaction Disorders - epidemiology ; Originalien ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Plastic Surgery ; Prevalence ; Reproducibility of Results ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Smell</subject><ispartof>HNO, 2022-03, Vol.70 (3), p.224-231</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-a43867afa0385f6a1b6f5c8a34d85bb506124c183233e5d4a0536d5ec11b48153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-a43867afa0385f6a1b6f5c8a34d85bb506124c183233e5d4a0536d5ec11b48153</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9671-0784</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00106-021-01129-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00106-021-01129-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940903$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gudziol, Hilmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirschstein, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pletz, Mathias W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weis, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bitter, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CoNAN study group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the CoNAN study group</creatorcontrib><title>High prevalence of long-term olfactory dysfunction confirmed by olfactory testing after a community COVID-19 outbreak</title><title>HNO</title><addtitle>HNO</addtitle><addtitle>HNO</addtitle><description>Purpose
The prevalence of long-term olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in participants suffering from sudden chemosensory loss due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unknown. Furthermore, evaluations of the reliability of participants’ self-reporting of olfactory function (SOF) and gustatory function (SGF) using extended objective psychophysical testing are missing.
Methods
In this population-based cohort study in a PCR-tested community in Thuringia, Germany, olfactory function was extensively examined 4 months after a COVID-19 outbreak using the “Sniffin Sticks” test battery to determine the TDI
a
score, i.e., the sum of results obtained for threshold, discrimination, and identification scores averaged for both nasal sides. Gustatory function was assessed using the three-drop test resulting in the gustatory composite score (CS
g
). The data were compared with SOF and SGF.
Results
Of 43 adult convalescents (median age: 68 years; 58% female) after SARS-CoV‑2 infection, 18 participants (42%) had olfactory complaints due to SOF, one participant (2%) complained of taste disturbance due to SGF. The TDI
a
was 22.0 ± 5.9. Normosmia, hyposmia, and anosmia were seen in 17, 18, and eight participants, respectively. TDI
a
correlated with SOF (
r
s
= −0.434,
p
= 0.004); CS
g
was 23.5 ± 2.7. Normogeusia and hypogeusia were objectified in 39 and four participants, respectively. The prevalence of long-term olfactory dysfunction and gustatory dysfunction in the study group was 60.5 and 9.3%, respectively.
Conclusion
The SOF was reliable, especially for participants who felt a sudden chemosensory dysfunction during the outbreak. At 4 months after SARS-CoV‑2 infection, a high proportion of participants were dysosmic, whereas nearly all of them had normal taste function.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Allergology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Head and Neck Surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Olfaction Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Olfaction Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Originalien</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Smell</subject><issn>0017-6192</issn><issn>1433-0458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1uFSEYhonR2GP1BlwYlm6o_A-zMTFHbZs06cZ2SxgGptQZOMLMSeZuvBavTOqpTbvpipD3h-_jAeA9wScE4-ZTwZhgiTAlCBNCW9S8ABvCGUOYC_USbKreIElaegTelHJbr6Kl7DU4YrzluMVsA_ZnYbiBu-z2ZnTROpg8HFMc0OzyBNPojZ1TXmG_Fr9EO4cUoU3Rhzy5HnbrI8vsyhziAI2vWWj-_LZpmpYY5hVuL6_PvyLSwrTMXXbm51vwypuxuHf35zG4-v7tx_YMXVyenm-_XCDLuZyR4UzJxniDmRJeGtJJL6wyjPdKdJ3AklBuiWKUMSd6brBgshfOEtJxRQQ7Bp8PvbulqwNbF-dsRr3LYTJ51ckE_VSJ4UYPaa-VbBvBVC34eF-Q06-lbqinUKwbRxNdWoqmkjDacqrurPRgtTmVkp1_eIZgfQdMH4DpCkz_A6abGvrweMCHyH9C1cAOhlKlOLisb9OSY_2052r_AmMuo-c</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Gudziol, Hilmar</creator><creator>Kirschstein, Timo</creator><creator>Pletz, Mathias W.</creator><creator>Weis, Sebastian</creator><creator>Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando</creator><creator>Bitter, Thomas</creator><general>Springer Medizin</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9671-0784</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>High prevalence of long-term olfactory dysfunction confirmed by olfactory testing after a community COVID-19 outbreak</title><author>Gudziol, Hilmar ; Kirschstein, Timo ; Pletz, Mathias W. ; Weis, Sebastian ; Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando ; Bitter, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-a43867afa0385f6a1b6f5c8a34d85bb506124c183233e5d4a0536d5ec11b48153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Allergology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Head and Neck Surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Olfaction Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Olfaction Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Originalien</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Smell</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gudziol, Hilmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirschstein, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pletz, Mathias W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weis, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bitter, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CoNAN study group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the CoNAN study group</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>HNO</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gudziol, Hilmar</au><au>Kirschstein, Timo</au><au>Pletz, Mathias W.</au><au>Weis, Sebastian</au><au>Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando</au><au>Bitter, Thomas</au><aucorp>CoNAN study group</aucorp><aucorp>the CoNAN study group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High prevalence of long-term olfactory dysfunction confirmed by olfactory testing after a community COVID-19 outbreak</atitle><jtitle>HNO</jtitle><stitle>HNO</stitle><addtitle>HNO</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>224</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>224-231</pages><issn>0017-6192</issn><eissn>1433-0458</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The prevalence of long-term olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in participants suffering from sudden chemosensory loss due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unknown. Furthermore, evaluations of the reliability of participants’ self-reporting of olfactory function (SOF) and gustatory function (SGF) using extended objective psychophysical testing are missing.
Methods
In this population-based cohort study in a PCR-tested community in Thuringia, Germany, olfactory function was extensively examined 4 months after a COVID-19 outbreak using the “Sniffin Sticks” test battery to determine the TDI
a
score, i.e., the sum of results obtained for threshold, discrimination, and identification scores averaged for both nasal sides. Gustatory function was assessed using the three-drop test resulting in the gustatory composite score (CS
g
). The data were compared with SOF and SGF.
Results
Of 43 adult convalescents (median age: 68 years; 58% female) after SARS-CoV‑2 infection, 18 participants (42%) had olfactory complaints due to SOF, one participant (2%) complained of taste disturbance due to SGF. The TDI
a
was 22.0 ± 5.9. Normosmia, hyposmia, and anosmia were seen in 17, 18, and eight participants, respectively. TDI
a
correlated with SOF (
r
s
= −0.434,
p
= 0.004); CS
g
was 23.5 ± 2.7. Normogeusia and hypogeusia were objectified in 39 and four participants, respectively. The prevalence of long-term olfactory dysfunction and gustatory dysfunction in the study group was 60.5 and 9.3%, respectively.
Conclusion
The SOF was reliable, especially for participants who felt a sudden chemosensory dysfunction during the outbreak. At 4 months after SARS-CoV‑2 infection, a high proportion of participants were dysosmic, whereas nearly all of them had normal taste function.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Medizin</pub><pmid>34940903</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00106-021-01129-7</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9671-0784</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-6192 |
ispartof | HNO, 2022-03, Vol.70 (3), p.224-231 |
issn | 0017-6192 1433-0458 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8697538 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Allergology Cohort Studies COVID-19 Disease Outbreaks Female Head and Neck Surgery Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Olfaction Disorders - diagnosis Olfaction Disorders - epidemiology Originalien Otorhinolaryngology Plastic Surgery Prevalence Reproducibility of Results SARS-CoV-2 Smell |
title | High prevalence of long-term olfactory dysfunction confirmed by olfactory testing after a community COVID-19 outbreak |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A04%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High%20prevalence%20of%20long-term%20olfactory%20dysfunction%20confirmed%20by%20olfactory%20testing%20after%20a%C2%A0community%20COVID-19%20outbreak&rft.jtitle=HNO&rft.au=Gudziol,%20Hilmar&rft.aucorp=CoNAN%20study%20group&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=224&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=224-231&rft.issn=0017-6192&rft.eissn=1433-0458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00106-021-01129-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2613294288%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2613294288&rft_id=info:pmid/34940903&rfr_iscdi=true |