Patient and Hospital Factors Associated With Unexpected Newborn Complications Among Term Neonates in US Hospitals

Unexpected complications in term newborns have been recently adopted by the Joint Commission as a marker of obstetric care quality. To understand the variation and patient and hospital factors associated with severe unexpected complications in term neonates among hospitals in the United States. This...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA network open 2020-02, Vol.3 (2), p.e1919498-e1919498
Hauptverfasser: Clapp, Mark A, James, Kaitlyn E, Bates, Sara V, Kaimal, Anjali J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e1919498
container_issue 2
container_start_page e1919498
container_title JAMA network open
container_volume 3
creator Clapp, Mark A
James, Kaitlyn E
Bates, Sara V
Kaimal, Anjali J
description Unexpected complications in term newborns have been recently adopted by the Joint Commission as a marker of obstetric care quality. To understand the variation and patient and hospital factors associated with severe unexpected complications in term neonates among hospitals in the United States. This cross-sectional study collected data from all births in US counties with 1 obstetric hospital using county-identified birth certificate data and American Hospital Association annual survey data from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2017. All live-born, term, singleton infants weighing at least 2500 g were included. The data analysis was performed from December 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019. Severe unexpected newborn complication, defined as neonatal death, 5-minute Apgar score of 3 or less, seizure, use of assisted ventilation for at least 6 hours, or transfer to another facility. Between-hospital variation and patient and hospital factors associated with unexpected newborn complications. A total of 1 754 852 births from 576 hospitals were included in the analysis. A wide range of hospital complication rates was found (range, 0.6-89.9 per 1000 births; median, 15.3 per 1000 births [interquartile range, 9.6-22.0 per 1000 births]). Hospitals with high newborn complication rates were more likely to care for younger, white, less educated, and publicly insured women with more medical comorbidities compared with hospitals with low complication rates. In the adjusted models, there was little effect of case mix to explain the observed between-county variation (11.3%; 95% CI, 10.0%-12.6%). Neonatal transfer was the primary factor associated with complication rates, especially among hospitals with the highest rates (66.0% of all complications). The risk for unexpected neonatal complication increased by more than 50% for those neonates born at hospitals without a neonatal intensive care unit compared with those with a neonatal intensive care unit (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.38-1.75). In this study, severe unexpected complication rates among term newborns varied widely. When included in the metric numerator, neonatal transfer was the primary factor associated with complications, especially among hospitals with the highest rates. Transfers were more likely to be necessary when infants were born in hospitals with lower levels of neonatal care. Thus, if this metric is to be used in its current form, it would appear that accreditors, regulatory bodies, and payer
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19498
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8693709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2668323757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a473t-9c6a14a3b077fa3e301b8204805361d06556dd458cce2d0a872c598358f63f693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1PVDEYhRujEYL8BdPoxs2M_f5wYUImAiZESGDisun09kLHe9tL2xH993QAJ8jqbdPnnLynB4APGM0xQvjz2o42-nqX8q80-TgnCOs51kyrV2CfcMlmVCH--tl5DxyWskYINZRqwd-CPUoQ00TpfXB7YWvwsUIbO3iayhSqHeCxdTXlAo9KSS7Y6jv4M9QbuIz-z-Td9v7D361SjnCRxmkIrrmk2ARjitfwyuexASk2ZYEhwuXlzru8A2_6Nvzh0zwAy-NvV4vT2dn5yffF0dnMMknrTDthMbN0haTsLfUU4ZVqa7dAVOAOCc5F1zGunPOkQ1ZJ4rhWlKte0F5oegC-PvpOm9XoO9dCZjuYKYfR5r8m2WD-f4nhxlyn30Y1sURbg09PBjndbnypZgzF-WFo_582xRDKGZaccdbQjy_Qddrk2OIZIoSihEouG_XlkXI5lZJ9v1sGI7Mt17wo12zLNQ_lNvH753F20n9V0nuaNKad</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2668323757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient and Hospital Factors Associated With Unexpected Newborn Complications Among Term Neonates in US Hospitals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Clapp, Mark A ; James, Kaitlyn E ; Bates, Sara V ; Kaimal, Anjali J</creator><creatorcontrib>Clapp, Mark A ; James, Kaitlyn E ; Bates, Sara V ; Kaimal, Anjali J</creatorcontrib><description>Unexpected complications in term newborns have been recently adopted by the Joint Commission as a marker of obstetric care quality. To understand the variation and patient and hospital factors associated with severe unexpected complications in term neonates among hospitals in the United States. This cross-sectional study collected data from all births in US counties with 1 obstetric hospital using county-identified birth certificate data and American Hospital Association annual survey data from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2017. All live-born, term, singleton infants weighing at least 2500 g were included. The data analysis was performed from December 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019. Severe unexpected newborn complication, defined as neonatal death, 5-minute Apgar score of 3 or less, seizure, use of assisted ventilation for at least 6 hours, or transfer to another facility. Between-hospital variation and patient and hospital factors associated with unexpected newborn complications. A total of 1 754 852 births from 576 hospitals were included in the analysis. A wide range of hospital complication rates was found (range, 0.6-89.9 per 1000 births; median, 15.3 per 1000 births [interquartile range, 9.6-22.0 per 1000 births]). Hospitals with high newborn complication rates were more likely to care for younger, white, less educated, and publicly insured women with more medical comorbidities compared with hospitals with low complication rates. In the adjusted models, there was little effect of case mix to explain the observed between-county variation (11.3%; 95% CI, 10.0%-12.6%). Neonatal transfer was the primary factor associated with complication rates, especially among hospitals with the highest rates (66.0% of all complications). The risk for unexpected neonatal complication increased by more than 50% for those neonates born at hospitals without a neonatal intensive care unit compared with those with a neonatal intensive care unit (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.38-1.75). In this study, severe unexpected complication rates among term newborns varied widely. When included in the metric numerator, neonatal transfer was the primary factor associated with complications, especially among hospitals with the highest rates. Transfers were more likely to be necessary when infants were born in hospitals with lower levels of neonatal care. Thus, if this metric is to be used in its current form, it would appear that accreditors, regulatory bodies, and payers should consider adjusting for or stratifying by a hospital's level of neonatal care to avoid disincentivizing against appropriate transfers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19498</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32049289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Apgar Score ; Births ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Delivery, Obstetric - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Hospitals - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Newborn, Diseases - epidemiology ; Infant, Newborn, Diseases - etiology ; Intensive care ; Live Birth ; Male ; Newborn babies ; Obstetrics ; Pregnancy ; Term Birth ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>JAMA network open, 2020-02, Vol.3 (2), p.e1919498-e1919498</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a473t-9c6a14a3b077fa3e301b8204805361d06556dd458cce2d0a872c598358f63f693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a473t-9c6a14a3b077fa3e301b8204805361d06556dd458cce2d0a872c598358f63f693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049289$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clapp, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Kaitlyn E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Sara V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaimal, Anjali J</creatorcontrib><title>Patient and Hospital Factors Associated With Unexpected Newborn Complications Among Term Neonates in US Hospitals</title><title>JAMA network open</title><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><description>Unexpected complications in term newborns have been recently adopted by the Joint Commission as a marker of obstetric care quality. To understand the variation and patient and hospital factors associated with severe unexpected complications in term neonates among hospitals in the United States. This cross-sectional study collected data from all births in US counties with 1 obstetric hospital using county-identified birth certificate data and American Hospital Association annual survey data from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2017. All live-born, term, singleton infants weighing at least 2500 g were included. The data analysis was performed from December 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019. Severe unexpected newborn complication, defined as neonatal death, 5-minute Apgar score of 3 or less, seizure, use of assisted ventilation for at least 6 hours, or transfer to another facility. Between-hospital variation and patient and hospital factors associated with unexpected newborn complications. A total of 1 754 852 births from 576 hospitals were included in the analysis. A wide range of hospital complication rates was found (range, 0.6-89.9 per 1000 births; median, 15.3 per 1000 births [interquartile range, 9.6-22.0 per 1000 births]). Hospitals with high newborn complication rates were more likely to care for younger, white, less educated, and publicly insured women with more medical comorbidities compared with hospitals with low complication rates. In the adjusted models, there was little effect of case mix to explain the observed between-county variation (11.3%; 95% CI, 10.0%-12.6%). Neonatal transfer was the primary factor associated with complication rates, especially among hospitals with the highest rates (66.0% of all complications). The risk for unexpected neonatal complication increased by more than 50% for those neonates born at hospitals without a neonatal intensive care unit compared with those with a neonatal intensive care unit (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.38-1.75). In this study, severe unexpected complication rates among term newborns varied widely. When included in the metric numerator, neonatal transfer was the primary factor associated with complications, especially among hospitals with the highest rates. Transfers were more likely to be necessary when infants were born in hospitals with lower levels of neonatal care. Thus, if this metric is to be used in its current form, it would appear that accreditors, regulatory bodies, and payers should consider adjusting for or stratifying by a hospital's level of neonatal care to avoid disincentivizing against appropriate transfers.</description><subject>Apgar Score</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Live Birth</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Term Birth</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>2574-3805</issn><issn>2574-3805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1PVDEYhRujEYL8BdPoxs2M_f5wYUImAiZESGDisun09kLHe9tL2xH993QAJ8jqbdPnnLynB4APGM0xQvjz2o42-nqX8q80-TgnCOs51kyrV2CfcMlmVCH--tl5DxyWskYINZRqwd-CPUoQ00TpfXB7YWvwsUIbO3iayhSqHeCxdTXlAo9KSS7Y6jv4M9QbuIz-z-Td9v7D361SjnCRxmkIrrmk2ARjitfwyuexASk2ZYEhwuXlzru8A2_6Nvzh0zwAy-NvV4vT2dn5yffF0dnMMknrTDthMbN0haTsLfUU4ZVqa7dAVOAOCc5F1zGunPOkQ1ZJ4rhWlKte0F5oegC-PvpOm9XoO9dCZjuYKYfR5r8m2WD-f4nhxlyn30Y1sURbg09PBjndbnypZgzF-WFo_582xRDKGZaccdbQjy_Qddrk2OIZIoSihEouG_XlkXI5lZJ9v1sGI7Mt17wo12zLNQ_lNvH753F20n9V0nuaNKad</recordid><startdate>20200205</startdate><enddate>20200205</enddate><creator>Clapp, Mark A</creator><creator>James, Kaitlyn E</creator><creator>Bates, Sara V</creator><creator>Kaimal, Anjali J</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200205</creationdate><title>Patient and Hospital Factors Associated With Unexpected Newborn Complications Among Term Neonates in US Hospitals</title><author>Clapp, Mark A ; James, Kaitlyn E ; Bates, Sara V ; Kaimal, Anjali J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a473t-9c6a14a3b077fa3e301b8204805361d06556dd458cce2d0a872c598358f63f693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Apgar Score</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Live Birth</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Term Birth</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clapp, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Kaitlyn E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Sara V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaimal, Anjali J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clapp, Mark A</au><au>James, Kaitlyn E</au><au>Bates, Sara V</au><au>Kaimal, Anjali J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient and Hospital Factors Associated With Unexpected Newborn Complications Among Term Neonates in US Hospitals</atitle><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><date>2020-02-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e1919498</spage><epage>e1919498</epage><pages>e1919498-e1919498</pages><issn>2574-3805</issn><eissn>2574-3805</eissn><abstract>Unexpected complications in term newborns have been recently adopted by the Joint Commission as a marker of obstetric care quality. To understand the variation and patient and hospital factors associated with severe unexpected complications in term neonates among hospitals in the United States. This cross-sectional study collected data from all births in US counties with 1 obstetric hospital using county-identified birth certificate data and American Hospital Association annual survey data from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2017. All live-born, term, singleton infants weighing at least 2500 g were included. The data analysis was performed from December 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019. Severe unexpected newborn complication, defined as neonatal death, 5-minute Apgar score of 3 or less, seizure, use of assisted ventilation for at least 6 hours, or transfer to another facility. Between-hospital variation and patient and hospital factors associated with unexpected newborn complications. A total of 1 754 852 births from 576 hospitals were included in the analysis. A wide range of hospital complication rates was found (range, 0.6-89.9 per 1000 births; median, 15.3 per 1000 births [interquartile range, 9.6-22.0 per 1000 births]). Hospitals with high newborn complication rates were more likely to care for younger, white, less educated, and publicly insured women with more medical comorbidities compared with hospitals with low complication rates. In the adjusted models, there was little effect of case mix to explain the observed between-county variation (11.3%; 95% CI, 10.0%-12.6%). Neonatal transfer was the primary factor associated with complication rates, especially among hospitals with the highest rates (66.0% of all complications). The risk for unexpected neonatal complication increased by more than 50% for those neonates born at hospitals without a neonatal intensive care unit compared with those with a neonatal intensive care unit (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.38-1.75). In this study, severe unexpected complication rates among term newborns varied widely. When included in the metric numerator, neonatal transfer was the primary factor associated with complications, especially among hospitals with the highest rates. Transfers were more likely to be necessary when infants were born in hospitals with lower levels of neonatal care. Thus, if this metric is to be used in its current form, it would appear that accreditors, regulatory bodies, and payers should consider adjusting for or stratifying by a hospital's level of neonatal care to avoid disincentivizing against appropriate transfers.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>32049289</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19498</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2574-3805
ispartof JAMA network open, 2020-02, Vol.3 (2), p.e1919498-e1919498
issn 2574-3805
2574-3805
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8693709
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Apgar Score
Births
Cross-Sectional Studies
Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data
Female
Hospitals - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Newborn, Diseases - epidemiology
Infant, Newborn, Diseases - etiology
Intensive care
Live Birth
Male
Newborn babies
Obstetrics
Pregnancy
Term Birth
United States - epidemiology
title Patient and Hospital Factors Associated With Unexpected Newborn Complications Among Term Neonates in US Hospitals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T23%3A32%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20and%20Hospital%20Factors%20Associated%20With%20Unexpected%20Newborn%20Complications%20Among%20Term%20Neonates%20in%20US%20Hospitals&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20network%20open&rft.au=Clapp,%20Mark%20A&rft.date=2020-02-05&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e1919498&rft.epage=e1919498&rft.pages=e1919498-e1919498&rft.issn=2574-3805&rft.eissn=2574-3805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19498&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2668323757%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2668323757&rft_id=info:pmid/32049289&rfr_iscdi=true