SfM‐3DULC: Reliability of a new 3D wound measurement procedure and its accuracy in projected area
Three‐dimensional (3D) wound measurement lacks a gold standard to test accuracy. It is useful to develop procedures to scan wounds and reconstruct their 3D model with low‐cost techniques. We present a new procedure (Structure from Motion [SfM]‐3DULC) that uses photographs for measuring nine wound va...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International wound journal 2022-01, Vol.19 (1), p.44-51 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 51 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 44 |
container_title | International wound journal |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Sánchez‐Jiménez, David Buchón‐Moragues, Fernando F. Escutia‐Muñoz, Begoña Botella‐Estrada, Rafael |
description | Three‐dimensional (3D) wound measurement lacks a gold standard to test accuracy. It is useful to develop procedures to scan wounds and reconstruct their 3D model with low‐cost techniques. We present a new procedure (Structure from Motion [SfM]‐3DULC) that uses photographs for measuring nine wound variables. We also propose a new variant of ImageJ in which an orthophoto is used to measure the projected area (Ortho‐ImageJ). In addition, we compare the wound measurements made by dermatologists and non‐experts. A group of five experts in dermatology and five non‐specialists measured 33 leg wounds five times per procedure. Intra‐rater and inter‐rater reliability scores of SfM‐3DULC were evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2,1). The accuracy of the two new procedures (SfM‐3DULC and Ortho‐ImageJ) in the measurement of projected area was assessed by comparing their values with those obtained using ImageJ, with the Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed rank test (α = 0.05). This test was also used to analyse the differences between the measurements made by dermatologists and non‐experts. All the variables measured by dermatologists using SfM‐3DULC showed excellent scores of intra‐rater reliability (ICC > 0.99) and inter‐rater reliability (ICC > 0.98). No significant differences between the three procedures were found when comparing their projected area values. Significant differences between the measurements of dermatologists and non‐experts were found in most of the variables: circularity coefficient, perimeter, projected area, surface area, and reference surface area. The wound measurement procedure SfM‐3DULC has an excellent reliability, is accurate for the measurement of projected area, and can be used by dermatologists for wound monitoring in everyday clinical practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/iwj.13595 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8684855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528816139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-4c05aa89b279d5034a0fcb0edf17649708801c021b2f3807ca1f76310488587f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9qFDEUxoNYbK1e-AIS8EYvts3fScaLgmzVVlYEtehdyGRONMvMZE1mXPbOR_AZfZJmu3VRwdzkHL4fH9_hQ-gRJSe0vNOwXp5QLmt5Bx1RJdhMaPr57n4m9BDdz3lJCKulVPfQIRfbmckj5D74t79-_OTnV4v5c_weumCb0IVxg6PHFg-wxvwcr-M0tLgHm6cEPQwjXqXooC0btkUJY8bWuSlZt8Fh2KpLcCO02CawD9CBt12Gh7f_Mbp69fLj_GK2ePf6cv5iMXNCcDkTjkhrdd0wVbeScGGJdw2B1lNViVoRXS5xhNGGea6JcpZ6VXFKhNZSK8-P0dnOdzU1PbSu5Ey2M6sUeps2Jtpg_laG8NV8id-NrrTQUhaDp7cGKX6bII-mD9lB19kB4pQNk0xrWlFeF_TJP-gyTmko5xlOalIRVUtWqGc7yqWYcwK_D0OJ2VZnSnXmprrCPv4z_Z783VUBTnfAOnSw-b-Tufz0Zmd5DUaYork</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090607952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SfM‐3DULC: Reliability of a new 3D wound measurement procedure and its accuracy in projected area</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sánchez‐Jiménez, David ; Buchón‐Moragues, Fernando F. ; Escutia‐Muñoz, Begoña ; Botella‐Estrada, Rafael</creator><creatorcontrib>Sánchez‐Jiménez, David ; Buchón‐Moragues, Fernando F. ; Escutia‐Muñoz, Begoña ; Botella‐Estrada, Rafael</creatorcontrib><description>Three‐dimensional (3D) wound measurement lacks a gold standard to test accuracy. It is useful to develop procedures to scan wounds and reconstruct their 3D model with low‐cost techniques. We present a new procedure (Structure from Motion [SfM]‐3DULC) that uses photographs for measuring nine wound variables. We also propose a new variant of ImageJ in which an orthophoto is used to measure the projected area (Ortho‐ImageJ). In addition, we compare the wound measurements made by dermatologists and non‐experts. A group of five experts in dermatology and five non‐specialists measured 33 leg wounds five times per procedure. Intra‐rater and inter‐rater reliability scores of SfM‐3DULC were evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2,1). The accuracy of the two new procedures (SfM‐3DULC and Ortho‐ImageJ) in the measurement of projected area was assessed by comparing their values with those obtained using ImageJ, with the Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed rank test (α = 0.05). This test was also used to analyse the differences between the measurements made by dermatologists and non‐experts. All the variables measured by dermatologists using SfM‐3DULC showed excellent scores of intra‐rater reliability (ICC > 0.99) and inter‐rater reliability (ICC > 0.98). No significant differences between the three procedures were found when comparing their projected area values. Significant differences between the measurements of dermatologists and non‐experts were found in most of the variables: circularity coefficient, perimeter, projected area, surface area, and reference surface area. The wound measurement procedure SfM‐3DULC has an excellent reliability, is accurate for the measurement of projected area, and can be used by dermatologists for wound monitoring in everyday clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-4801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-481X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13595</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34002925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>3DULC ; Accuracy ; Clinical medicine ; Dermatology ; Digital cameras ; Humans ; ImageJ ; measurement ; Original ; Patients ; Pilot projects ; Reproducibility of Results ; SfM ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; wound ; Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>International wound journal, 2022-01, Vol.19 (1), p.44-51</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-4c05aa89b279d5034a0fcb0edf17649708801c021b2f3807ca1f76310488587f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-4c05aa89b279d5034a0fcb0edf17649708801c021b2f3807ca1f76310488587f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3849-7473</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684855/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8684855/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34002925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sánchez‐Jiménez, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchón‐Moragues, Fernando F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escutia‐Muñoz, Begoña</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botella‐Estrada, Rafael</creatorcontrib><title>SfM‐3DULC: Reliability of a new 3D wound measurement procedure and its accuracy in projected area</title><title>International wound journal</title><addtitle>Int Wound J</addtitle><description>Three‐dimensional (3D) wound measurement lacks a gold standard to test accuracy. It is useful to develop procedures to scan wounds and reconstruct their 3D model with low‐cost techniques. We present a new procedure (Structure from Motion [SfM]‐3DULC) that uses photographs for measuring nine wound variables. We also propose a new variant of ImageJ in which an orthophoto is used to measure the projected area (Ortho‐ImageJ). In addition, we compare the wound measurements made by dermatologists and non‐experts. A group of five experts in dermatology and five non‐specialists measured 33 leg wounds five times per procedure. Intra‐rater and inter‐rater reliability scores of SfM‐3DULC were evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2,1). The accuracy of the two new procedures (SfM‐3DULC and Ortho‐ImageJ) in the measurement of projected area was assessed by comparing their values with those obtained using ImageJ, with the Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed rank test (α = 0.05). This test was also used to analyse the differences between the measurements made by dermatologists and non‐experts. All the variables measured by dermatologists using SfM‐3DULC showed excellent scores of intra‐rater reliability (ICC > 0.99) and inter‐rater reliability (ICC > 0.98). No significant differences between the three procedures were found when comparing their projected area values. Significant differences between the measurements of dermatologists and non‐experts were found in most of the variables: circularity coefficient, perimeter, projected area, surface area, and reference surface area. The wound measurement procedure SfM‐3DULC has an excellent reliability, is accurate for the measurement of projected area, and can be used by dermatologists for wound monitoring in everyday clinical practice.</description><subject>3DULC</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Digital cameras</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ImageJ</subject><subject>measurement</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pilot projects</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>SfM</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>wound</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>1742-4801</issn><issn>1742-481X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd9qFDEUxoNYbK1e-AIS8EYvts3fScaLgmzVVlYEtehdyGRONMvMZE1mXPbOR_AZfZJmu3VRwdzkHL4fH9_hQ-gRJSe0vNOwXp5QLmt5Bx1RJdhMaPr57n4m9BDdz3lJCKulVPfQIRfbmckj5D74t79-_OTnV4v5c_weumCb0IVxg6PHFg-wxvwcr-M0tLgHm6cEPQwjXqXooC0btkUJY8bWuSlZt8Fh2KpLcCO02CawD9CBt12Gh7f_Mbp69fLj_GK2ePf6cv5iMXNCcDkTjkhrdd0wVbeScGGJdw2B1lNViVoRXS5xhNGGea6JcpZ6VXFKhNZSK8-P0dnOdzU1PbSu5Ey2M6sUeps2Jtpg_laG8NV8id-NrrTQUhaDp7cGKX6bII-mD9lB19kB4pQNk0xrWlFeF_TJP-gyTmko5xlOalIRVUtWqGc7yqWYcwK_D0OJ2VZnSnXmprrCPv4z_Z783VUBTnfAOnSw-b-Tufz0Zmd5DUaYork</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Sánchez‐Jiménez, David</creator><creator>Buchón‐Moragues, Fernando F.</creator><creator>Escutia‐Muñoz, Begoña</creator><creator>Botella‐Estrada, Rafael</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3849-7473</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>SfM‐3DULC: Reliability of a new 3D wound measurement procedure and its accuracy in projected area</title><author>Sánchez‐Jiménez, David ; Buchón‐Moragues, Fernando F. ; Escutia‐Muñoz, Begoña ; Botella‐Estrada, Rafael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-4c05aa89b279d5034a0fcb0edf17649708801c021b2f3807ca1f76310488587f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>3DULC</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Digital cameras</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ImageJ</topic><topic>measurement</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pilot projects</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>SfM</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>wound</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sánchez‐Jiménez, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchón‐Moragues, Fernando F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escutia‐Muñoz, Begoña</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botella‐Estrada, Rafael</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International wound journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sánchez‐Jiménez, David</au><au>Buchón‐Moragues, Fernando F.</au><au>Escutia‐Muñoz, Begoña</au><au>Botella‐Estrada, Rafael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SfM‐3DULC: Reliability of a new 3D wound measurement procedure and its accuracy in projected area</atitle><jtitle>International wound journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Wound J</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>44</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>44-51</pages><issn>1742-4801</issn><eissn>1742-481X</eissn><abstract>Three‐dimensional (3D) wound measurement lacks a gold standard to test accuracy. It is useful to develop procedures to scan wounds and reconstruct their 3D model with low‐cost techniques. We present a new procedure (Structure from Motion [SfM]‐3DULC) that uses photographs for measuring nine wound variables. We also propose a new variant of ImageJ in which an orthophoto is used to measure the projected area (Ortho‐ImageJ). In addition, we compare the wound measurements made by dermatologists and non‐experts. A group of five experts in dermatology and five non‐specialists measured 33 leg wounds five times per procedure. Intra‐rater and inter‐rater reliability scores of SfM‐3DULC were evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2,1). The accuracy of the two new procedures (SfM‐3DULC and Ortho‐ImageJ) in the measurement of projected area was assessed by comparing their values with those obtained using ImageJ, with the Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed rank test (α = 0.05). This test was also used to analyse the differences between the measurements made by dermatologists and non‐experts. All the variables measured by dermatologists using SfM‐3DULC showed excellent scores of intra‐rater reliability (ICC > 0.99) and inter‐rater reliability (ICC > 0.98). No significant differences between the three procedures were found when comparing their projected area values. Significant differences between the measurements of dermatologists and non‐experts were found in most of the variables: circularity coefficient, perimeter, projected area, surface area, and reference surface area. The wound measurement procedure SfM‐3DULC has an excellent reliability, is accurate for the measurement of projected area, and can be used by dermatologists for wound monitoring in everyday clinical practice.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>34002925</pmid><doi>10.1111/iwj.13595</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3849-7473</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-4801 |
ispartof | International wound journal, 2022-01, Vol.19 (1), p.44-51 |
issn | 1742-4801 1742-481X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8684855 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | 3DULC Accuracy Clinical medicine Dermatology Digital cameras Humans ImageJ measurement Original Patients Pilot projects Reproducibility of Results SfM Software Statistical analysis wound Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging |
title | SfM‐3DULC: Reliability of a new 3D wound measurement procedure and its accuracy in projected area |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T00%3A35%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SfM%E2%80%903DULC:%20Reliability%20of%20a%20new%203D%20wound%20measurement%20procedure%20and%20its%20accuracy%20in%20projected%20area&rft.jtitle=International%20wound%20journal&rft.au=S%C3%A1nchez%E2%80%90Jim%C3%A9nez,%20David&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=44-51&rft.issn=1742-4801&rft.eissn=1742-481X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iwj.13595&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2528816139%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090607952&rft_id=info:pmid/34002925&rfr_iscdi=true |