Infection Control in Small Residential Care Settings: Insights From a National Survey and Washington State Data
Infection control is a vital issue in long-term care, and the increasing popularity of small residential care facilities (SRCF) raises questions about the effectiveness of this model for preventing facility-acquired infections. In SRCF, care is provided in a residential home to a small number of res...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Innovation in aging 2021-12, Vol.5 (Supplement_1), p.972-972 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 972 |
---|---|
container_issue | Supplement_1 |
container_start_page | 972 |
container_title | Innovation in aging |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Ham, Carolyn Unutzer, Anna |
description | Infection control is a vital issue in long-term care, and the increasing popularity of small residential care facilities (SRCF) raises questions about the effectiveness of this model for preventing facility-acquired infections. In SRCF, care is provided in a residential home to a small number of residents. The setting lacks common terminology, and states license SRCF under various titles including Adult Family Homes, Adult Foster Homes and Family Care Homes. To better inform infection control efforts in this unique setting type, DOH staff conducted a comprehensive search to locate states that license SRCF. A total of 24 states were identified and approached to participate in a qualitative research study; 21 responded, three declined and nine were unable to participate due to staff time constraints. Between March 12th and April 15th, 2021, ten public health and regulatory staff from nine states completed semi-structured telephonic interviews on infection control in SRCF. Infection control licensing requirements and public health oversight for SRCF varied significantly across participating states. Data from these interviews was analyzed and compared with two Washington State Adult Family Home (AFH) sources: 1) online survey of AFH providers 2) Infection Control Assessment and Response evaluations conducted by public health staff. Four themes were identified in all three data sets: access to personal protective equipment, environmental safety, staffing issues and knowledge deficits. SRCF are valued by states that license them. Despite the challenges of implementing infection control in the home-like environment, extraordinary opportunities exist for improving care and preventing infections in this setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/geroni/igab046.3499 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8682438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8682438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1449-fdd7d33047d39122c9d30009d519b78ad7f45fd8d52034f5139826cbf9e499ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkNFKwzAUhoMoOOaewJu8QLekSbfGC0Gq08FQsIqXIW2SLtImI8kGe3szNkRvzjlw_vNx_h-AW4ymGDEy65R31sxMJxpE51NCGbsAo5wwlhUEocs_8zWYhPCNEMIsyWg-Am5ltWqjcRZWzkbvemgsrAfR9_BdBSOVjUb0sBJewVrFaGwX7uDKBtNtYoBL7wYo4Ks4IpKu3vm9OkBhJfwSYZPUMaHrKKKCjyKKG3ClRR_U5NzH4HP59FG9ZOu351X1sM5aTCnLtJQLSQiiqTKc5y2T6X3EZIFZsyiFXGhaaFnKIkeE6gITVubzttFMJftKkzG4P3G3u2ZQsk02vOj51ptB-AN3wvD_G2s2vHN7Xs7LnJIyAcgJ0HoXglf69xYjfsydn3Ln59z5MXfyAwbLe4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Infection Control in Small Residential Care Settings: Insights From a National Survey and Washington State Data</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ham, Carolyn ; Unutzer, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Ham, Carolyn ; Unutzer, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>Infection control is a vital issue in long-term care, and the increasing popularity of small residential care facilities (SRCF) raises questions about the effectiveness of this model for preventing facility-acquired infections. In SRCF, care is provided in a residential home to a small number of residents. The setting lacks common terminology, and states license SRCF under various titles including Adult Family Homes, Adult Foster Homes and Family Care Homes. To better inform infection control efforts in this unique setting type, DOH staff conducted a comprehensive search to locate states that license SRCF. A total of 24 states were identified and approached to participate in a qualitative research study; 21 responded, three declined and nine were unable to participate due to staff time constraints. Between March 12th and April 15th, 2021, ten public health and regulatory staff from nine states completed semi-structured telephonic interviews on infection control in SRCF. Infection control licensing requirements and public health oversight for SRCF varied significantly across participating states. Data from these interviews was analyzed and compared with two Washington State Adult Family Home (AFH) sources: 1) online survey of AFH providers 2) Infection Control Assessment and Response evaluations conducted by public health staff. Four themes were identified in all three data sets: access to personal protective equipment, environmental safety, staffing issues and knowledge deficits. SRCF are valued by states that license them. Despite the challenges of implementing infection control in the home-like environment, extraordinary opportunities exist for improving care and preventing infections in this setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2399-5300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2399-5300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igab046.3499</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abstracts</subject><ispartof>Innovation in aging, 2021-12, Vol.5 (Supplement_1), p.972-972</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8682438/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8682438/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ham, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unutzer, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Infection Control in Small Residential Care Settings: Insights From a National Survey and Washington State Data</title><title>Innovation in aging</title><description>Infection control is a vital issue in long-term care, and the increasing popularity of small residential care facilities (SRCF) raises questions about the effectiveness of this model for preventing facility-acquired infections. In SRCF, care is provided in a residential home to a small number of residents. The setting lacks common terminology, and states license SRCF under various titles including Adult Family Homes, Adult Foster Homes and Family Care Homes. To better inform infection control efforts in this unique setting type, DOH staff conducted a comprehensive search to locate states that license SRCF. A total of 24 states were identified and approached to participate in a qualitative research study; 21 responded, three declined and nine were unable to participate due to staff time constraints. Between March 12th and April 15th, 2021, ten public health and regulatory staff from nine states completed semi-structured telephonic interviews on infection control in SRCF. Infection control licensing requirements and public health oversight for SRCF varied significantly across participating states. Data from these interviews was analyzed and compared with two Washington State Adult Family Home (AFH) sources: 1) online survey of AFH providers 2) Infection Control Assessment and Response evaluations conducted by public health staff. Four themes were identified in all three data sets: access to personal protective equipment, environmental safety, staffing issues and knowledge deficits. SRCF are valued by states that license them. Despite the challenges of implementing infection control in the home-like environment, extraordinary opportunities exist for improving care and preventing infections in this setting.</description><subject>Abstracts</subject><issn>2399-5300</issn><issn>2399-5300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkNFKwzAUhoMoOOaewJu8QLekSbfGC0Gq08FQsIqXIW2SLtImI8kGe3szNkRvzjlw_vNx_h-AW4ymGDEy65R31sxMJxpE51NCGbsAo5wwlhUEocs_8zWYhPCNEMIsyWg-Am5ltWqjcRZWzkbvemgsrAfR9_BdBSOVjUb0sBJewVrFaGwX7uDKBtNtYoBL7wYo4Ks4IpKu3vm9OkBhJfwSYZPUMaHrKKKCjyKKG3ClRR_U5NzH4HP59FG9ZOu351X1sM5aTCnLtJQLSQiiqTKc5y2T6X3EZIFZsyiFXGhaaFnKIkeE6gITVubzttFMJftKkzG4P3G3u2ZQsk02vOj51ptB-AN3wvD_G2s2vHN7Xs7LnJIyAcgJ0HoXglf69xYjfsydn3Ln59z5MXfyAwbLe4E</recordid><startdate>20211217</startdate><enddate>20211217</enddate><creator>Ham, Carolyn</creator><creator>Unutzer, Anna</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211217</creationdate><title>Infection Control in Small Residential Care Settings: Insights From a National Survey and Washington State Data</title><author>Ham, Carolyn ; Unutzer, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1449-fdd7d33047d39122c9d30009d519b78ad7f45fd8d52034f5139826cbf9e499ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abstracts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ham, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unutzer, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Innovation in aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ham, Carolyn</au><au>Unutzer, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Infection Control in Small Residential Care Settings: Insights From a National Survey and Washington State Data</atitle><jtitle>Innovation in aging</jtitle><date>2021-12-17</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>972</spage><epage>972</epage><pages>972-972</pages><issn>2399-5300</issn><eissn>2399-5300</eissn><abstract>Infection control is a vital issue in long-term care, and the increasing popularity of small residential care facilities (SRCF) raises questions about the effectiveness of this model for preventing facility-acquired infections. In SRCF, care is provided in a residential home to a small number of residents. The setting lacks common terminology, and states license SRCF under various titles including Adult Family Homes, Adult Foster Homes and Family Care Homes. To better inform infection control efforts in this unique setting type, DOH staff conducted a comprehensive search to locate states that license SRCF. A total of 24 states were identified and approached to participate in a qualitative research study; 21 responded, three declined and nine were unable to participate due to staff time constraints. Between March 12th and April 15th, 2021, ten public health and regulatory staff from nine states completed semi-structured telephonic interviews on infection control in SRCF. Infection control licensing requirements and public health oversight for SRCF varied significantly across participating states. Data from these interviews was analyzed and compared with two Washington State Adult Family Home (AFH) sources: 1) online survey of AFH providers 2) Infection Control Assessment and Response evaluations conducted by public health staff. Four themes were identified in all three data sets: access to personal protective equipment, environmental safety, staffing issues and knowledge deficits. SRCF are valued by states that license them. Despite the challenges of implementing infection control in the home-like environment, extraordinary opportunities exist for improving care and preventing infections in this setting.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/geroni/igab046.3499</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2399-5300 |
ispartof | Innovation in aging, 2021-12, Vol.5 (Supplement_1), p.972-972 |
issn | 2399-5300 2399-5300 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8682438 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Abstracts |
title | Infection Control in Small Residential Care Settings: Insights From a National Survey and Washington State Data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T04%3A49%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Infection%20Control%20in%20Small%20Residential%20Care%20Settings:%20Insights%20From%20a%20National%20Survey%20and%20Washington%20State%20Data&rft.jtitle=Innovation%20in%20aging&rft.au=Ham,%20Carolyn&rft.date=2021-12-17&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=972&rft.epage=972&rft.pages=972-972&rft.issn=2399-5300&rft.eissn=2399-5300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geroni/igab046.3499&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_cross%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8682438%3C/pubmedcentral_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |