Psychometric Testing of the BRI Unmet Need Instrument: A Comprehensive Measure of Dementia Caregivers' Needs
Compared to non-dementia caregivers, family/friend caregivers of individuals with dementia experience more negative caregiving consequences. One reason is the myriad of negatively impacted life domains including: managing symptoms; family communication; financial and legal matters; and finding and c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Innovation in aging 2021-12, Vol.5 (Supplement_1), p.321-322 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 322 |
---|---|
container_issue | Supplement_1 |
container_start_page | 321 |
container_title | Innovation in aging |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Minyo, Morgan Bass, David McCarthy, Kate Judge, Katherine |
description | Compared to non-dementia caregivers, family/friend caregivers of individuals with dementia experience more negative caregiving consequences. One reason is the myriad of negatively impacted life domains including: managing symptoms; family communication; financial and legal matters; and finding and coordinating services. Few psychometrically tested measures exist for assessing the range of potential unmet needs of dementia caregivers. Such a measure would describe the frequency and correlates of unmet needs and provide a key outcome for intervention research. This study tested the psychometric properties of a comprehensive measure of unmet needs, the BRI Unmet Need Instrument. Data from 192 family/friend dementia caregivers was used to test reliability and four validity types. Results showed total unmet needs, as well as its nine subscales, had good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha .70 - .95). Discriminant validity was confirmed through factor analyses of the 45 unmet needs and items in measures of depression and care-related strain. Unmet need items loaded on separate factors that were deemed acceptable (.72-.38). Predictive validity was assessed by the association with depression, which was significant and an acceptable range (r = .22, p < .01). Convergent validity was confirmed by significant associations with three caregiver strain measures, mastery (r = .40, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/geroni/igab046.1253 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8679369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8679369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1443-4a5132b42e7da22180eea94c1f1d7cb78ab1166c88824c00e44236507d267caa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtqwzAQRUVpoSHNF3SjXVdO9PJDXRRS9xVIH5RkLWR5bKvEdpCcQP6-dhNKu5qBO_cwHISuKZlSIvmsBNc2dmZLnRERTSkL-RkaMS5lEHJCzv_sl2ji_RchhEoupGAjtPnwB1O1NXTOGrwC39mmxG2Buwrw_ecCr5s-w28AOV40vnO7GpruFs9x2tZbBxU03u4Bv4L2OwdD8wGGE6txqh2Ufej8zQ_AX6GLQm88TE5zjNZPj6v0JVi-Py_S-TIwVAgeCB1SzjLBIM41YzQhAFoKQwuaxyaLE51RGkUmSRImDCEgBONRSOKcRbHRmo_R3ZG73WU15KZ_x-mN2jpba3dQrbbqf9LYSpXtXiVRLHkkewA_AoxrvXdQ_HYpUYN0dZSuTtLVIJ1_A9ixeb0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric Testing of the BRI Unmet Need Instrument: A Comprehensive Measure of Dementia Caregivers' Needs</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Minyo, Morgan ; Bass, David ; McCarthy, Kate ; Judge, Katherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Minyo, Morgan ; Bass, David ; McCarthy, Kate ; Judge, Katherine</creatorcontrib><description>Compared to non-dementia caregivers, family/friend caregivers of individuals with dementia experience more negative caregiving consequences. One reason is the myriad of negatively impacted life domains including: managing symptoms; family communication; financial and legal matters; and finding and coordinating services. Few psychometrically tested measures exist for assessing the range of potential unmet needs of dementia caregivers. Such a measure would describe the frequency and correlates of unmet needs and provide a key outcome for intervention research. This study tested the psychometric properties of a comprehensive measure of unmet needs, the BRI Unmet Need Instrument. Data from 192 family/friend dementia caregivers was used to test reliability and four validity types. Results showed total unmet needs, as well as its nine subscales, had good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha .70 - .95). Discriminant validity was confirmed through factor analyses of the 45 unmet needs and items in measures of depression and care-related strain. Unmet need items loaded on separate factors that were deemed acceptable (.72-.38). Predictive validity was assessed by the association with depression, which was significant and an acceptable range (r = .22, p < .01). Convergent validity was confirmed by significant associations with three caregiver strain measures, mastery (r = .40, p <.01), emotional strain (r = .19, p < .01), and relationship strain (r = .15, p <.05). Good structural validity for nine predetermined unmet needs subscales was found using principal component analysis (loadings = .82-.39). Results suggest the BRI Unmet Needs Instrument is a ready-to-use, reliable and valid comprehensive measure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2399-5300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2399-5300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igab046.1253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abstracts</subject><ispartof>Innovation in aging, 2021-12, Vol.5 (Supplement_1), p.321-322</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8679369/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8679369/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Minyo, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bass, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judge, Katherine</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric Testing of the BRI Unmet Need Instrument: A Comprehensive Measure of Dementia Caregivers' Needs</title><title>Innovation in aging</title><description>Compared to non-dementia caregivers, family/friend caregivers of individuals with dementia experience more negative caregiving consequences. One reason is the myriad of negatively impacted life domains including: managing symptoms; family communication; financial and legal matters; and finding and coordinating services. Few psychometrically tested measures exist for assessing the range of potential unmet needs of dementia caregivers. Such a measure would describe the frequency and correlates of unmet needs and provide a key outcome for intervention research. This study tested the psychometric properties of a comprehensive measure of unmet needs, the BRI Unmet Need Instrument. Data from 192 family/friend dementia caregivers was used to test reliability and four validity types. Results showed total unmet needs, as well as its nine subscales, had good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha .70 - .95). Discriminant validity was confirmed through factor analyses of the 45 unmet needs and items in measures of depression and care-related strain. Unmet need items loaded on separate factors that were deemed acceptable (.72-.38). Predictive validity was assessed by the association with depression, which was significant and an acceptable range (r = .22, p < .01). Convergent validity was confirmed by significant associations with three caregiver strain measures, mastery (r = .40, p <.01), emotional strain (r = .19, p < .01), and relationship strain (r = .15, p <.05). Good structural validity for nine predetermined unmet needs subscales was found using principal component analysis (loadings = .82-.39). Results suggest the BRI Unmet Needs Instrument is a ready-to-use, reliable and valid comprehensive measure.</description><subject>Abstracts</subject><issn>2399-5300</issn><issn>2399-5300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkMtqwzAQRUVpoSHNF3SjXVdO9PJDXRRS9xVIH5RkLWR5bKvEdpCcQP6-dhNKu5qBO_cwHISuKZlSIvmsBNc2dmZLnRERTSkL-RkaMS5lEHJCzv_sl2ji_RchhEoupGAjtPnwB1O1NXTOGrwC39mmxG2Buwrw_ecCr5s-w28AOV40vnO7GpruFs9x2tZbBxU03u4Bv4L2OwdD8wGGE6txqh2Ufej8zQ_AX6GLQm88TE5zjNZPj6v0JVi-Py_S-TIwVAgeCB1SzjLBIM41YzQhAFoKQwuaxyaLE51RGkUmSRImDCEgBONRSOKcRbHRmo_R3ZG73WU15KZ_x-mN2jpba3dQrbbqf9LYSpXtXiVRLHkkewA_AoxrvXdQ_HYpUYN0dZSuTtLVIJ1_A9ixeb0</recordid><startdate>20211217</startdate><enddate>20211217</enddate><creator>Minyo, Morgan</creator><creator>Bass, David</creator><creator>McCarthy, Kate</creator><creator>Judge, Katherine</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211217</creationdate><title>Psychometric Testing of the BRI Unmet Need Instrument: A Comprehensive Measure of Dementia Caregivers' Needs</title><author>Minyo, Morgan ; Bass, David ; McCarthy, Kate ; Judge, Katherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1443-4a5132b42e7da22180eea94c1f1d7cb78ab1166c88824c00e44236507d267caa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abstracts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Minyo, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bass, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judge, Katherine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Innovation in aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Minyo, Morgan</au><au>Bass, David</au><au>McCarthy, Kate</au><au>Judge, Katherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric Testing of the BRI Unmet Need Instrument: A Comprehensive Measure of Dementia Caregivers' Needs</atitle><jtitle>Innovation in aging</jtitle><date>2021-12-17</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>321</spage><epage>322</epage><pages>321-322</pages><issn>2399-5300</issn><eissn>2399-5300</eissn><abstract>Compared to non-dementia caregivers, family/friend caregivers of individuals with dementia experience more negative caregiving consequences. One reason is the myriad of negatively impacted life domains including: managing symptoms; family communication; financial and legal matters; and finding and coordinating services. Few psychometrically tested measures exist for assessing the range of potential unmet needs of dementia caregivers. Such a measure would describe the frequency and correlates of unmet needs and provide a key outcome for intervention research. This study tested the psychometric properties of a comprehensive measure of unmet needs, the BRI Unmet Need Instrument. Data from 192 family/friend dementia caregivers was used to test reliability and four validity types. Results showed total unmet needs, as well as its nine subscales, had good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha .70 - .95). Discriminant validity was confirmed through factor analyses of the 45 unmet needs and items in measures of depression and care-related strain. Unmet need items loaded on separate factors that were deemed acceptable (.72-.38). Predictive validity was assessed by the association with depression, which was significant and an acceptable range (r = .22, p < .01). Convergent validity was confirmed by significant associations with three caregiver strain measures, mastery (r = .40, p <.01), emotional strain (r = .19, p < .01), and relationship strain (r = .15, p <.05). Good structural validity for nine predetermined unmet needs subscales was found using principal component analysis (loadings = .82-.39). Results suggest the BRI Unmet Needs Instrument is a ready-to-use, reliable and valid comprehensive measure.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/geroni/igab046.1253</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2399-5300 |
ispartof | Innovation in aging, 2021-12, Vol.5 (Supplement_1), p.321-322 |
issn | 2399-5300 2399-5300 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8679369 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Abstracts |
title | Psychometric Testing of the BRI Unmet Need Instrument: A Comprehensive Measure of Dementia Caregivers' Needs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T21%3A43%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20Testing%20of%20the%20BRI%20Unmet%20Need%20Instrument:%20A%20Comprehensive%20Measure%20of%20Dementia%20Caregivers'%20Needs&rft.jtitle=Innovation%20in%20aging&rft.au=Minyo,%20Morgan&rft.date=2021-12-17&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=321&rft.epage=322&rft.pages=321-322&rft.issn=2399-5300&rft.eissn=2399-5300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1253&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_cross%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8679369%3C/pubmedcentral_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |