Effect of Combining Extended‐Release Carvedilol and Lisinopril in Hypertension: Results of the COSMOS Study
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010;12:678–686. ©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Hypertension treatment commonly requires multiple agents to achieve target blood pressure (BP). β‐Blockers and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are commonly co‐prescribed in clinical practice although few da...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) Conn.), 2010-09, Vol.12 (9), p.678-686 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 686 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 678 |
container_title | The journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Bakris, George L. Iyengar, Malini Lukas, Mary Ann Ordronneau, Paul Weber, Michael A. |
description | J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010;12:678–686. ©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Hypertension treatment commonly requires multiple agents to achieve target blood pressure (BP). β‐Blockers and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are commonly co‐prescribed in clinical practice although few data are available that test their additivity on BP lowering. The efficacy and safety of once‐daily extended‐release carvedilol (carvedilol CR) combined with the ACEI lisinopril in a double‐blind, randomized, factorial design study were studied. Patients (N=656) with stage 1 or 2 hypertension were randomized evenly to 1 of 15 groups for 6 weeks: carvedilol CR monotherapy 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg/d; lisinopril monotherapy 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg/d; or 1 of 9 combinations of carvedilol CR plus lisinopril initiated simultaneously. Primary efficacy measures (assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring [ABPM]) were change from baseline in 24‐hour mean diastolic BP (DBP) and in trough (20–24 hours) DBP. Continuous efficacy variables were assessed using analysis of covariance. Whether any combination dose was superior to its monotherapy components was assessed using the Hung AVE procedure. Despite the presence of additional BP lowering observed with most of the combinations compared with their monotherapy components, the Hung AVE test was not significant for either primary efficacy measures. Post hoc analyses of the high‐dose combination groups (carvedilol CR/lisinopril regimens of 80/10 mg, 80/20 mg, 80/40 mg, 20/40 mg, and 40/40 mg) showed a significant treatment difference compared with both carvedilol CR 80 mg and lisinopril 40 mg for 24‐hour mean DBP but not for trough DBP. With the exception of dizziness, individual adverse events did not increase with ascending doses or combinations. The superiority of initiating combination treatment with carvedilol CR and lisinopril compared with the monotherapy components was not demonstrated with the ABPM measurements. Nonetheless, the post hoc assessment combining all high‐dose groups did produce significant 24‐hour mean BP reduction when compared with the high‐dose monotherapy groups. The tolerability profile of initiating combination therapy was generally comparable to the initiation of treatment with monotherapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00341.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8673069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>756659306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4721-8af49bd4c476c1c496f321e0409b2922d1385d5fc2a2855ff40d75ec299c90413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkdFu0zAUhiMEYmPwCsh3XKXYTpzECCGhqFCmokorXFuufby5cuwSJ6O94xF4Rp4EZx3VdodvfHzO__8-0pdliOAZSeftdkZqRvKa1NWM4tTFuCjJbP8kOz8Nnqaa0TKvUucsexHjFmNWFBw_z84obpqC0vo86-bGgBpQMKgN3cZ666_RfD-A16D__Pp9BQ5kBNTK_ha0dcEh6TVa2mh92PXWIevR4rCDPlmiDf4duoI4uiFOkcNNcq7WX1drtB5GfXiZPTPSRXh1f19k3z_Nv7WLfLn6_KX9uMxVWVOSN9KUfKPL9KoUUSWvTEEJ4BLzDeWUalI0TDOjqKQNY8aUWNcMFOVccVyS4iL7cMzdjZsOtAI_9NKJtG8n-4MI0orHE29vxHW4FU1VF7jiKeDNfUAffowQB9HZqMA56SGMUdSsqhhP0qRsjkrVhxh7MKdfCBYTLLEVExMxMRETLHEHS-yT9fXDLU_Gf3SS4P1R8NM6OPx3sLhsF6ko_gJ8a6Sq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>756659306</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Combining Extended‐Release Carvedilol and Lisinopril in Hypertension: Results of the COSMOS Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bakris, George L. ; Iyengar, Malini ; Lukas, Mary Ann ; Ordronneau, Paul ; Weber, Michael A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bakris, George L. ; Iyengar, Malini ; Lukas, Mary Ann ; Ordronneau, Paul ; Weber, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><description>J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010;12:678–686. ©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Hypertension treatment commonly requires multiple agents to achieve target blood pressure (BP). β‐Blockers and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are commonly co‐prescribed in clinical practice although few data are available that test their additivity on BP lowering. The efficacy and safety of once‐daily extended‐release carvedilol (carvedilol CR) combined with the ACEI lisinopril in a double‐blind, randomized, factorial design study were studied. Patients (N=656) with stage 1 or 2 hypertension were randomized evenly to 1 of 15 groups for 6 weeks: carvedilol CR monotherapy 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg/d; lisinopril monotherapy 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg/d; or 1 of 9 combinations of carvedilol CR plus lisinopril initiated simultaneously. Primary efficacy measures (assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring [ABPM]) were change from baseline in 24‐hour mean diastolic BP (DBP) and in trough (20–24 hours) DBP. Continuous efficacy variables were assessed using analysis of covariance. Whether any combination dose was superior to its monotherapy components was assessed using the Hung AVE procedure. Despite the presence of additional BP lowering observed with most of the combinations compared with their monotherapy components, the Hung AVE test was not significant for either primary efficacy measures. Post hoc analyses of the high‐dose combination groups (carvedilol CR/lisinopril regimens of 80/10 mg, 80/20 mg, 80/40 mg, 20/40 mg, and 40/40 mg) showed a significant treatment difference compared with both carvedilol CR 80 mg and lisinopril 40 mg for 24‐hour mean DBP but not for trough DBP. With the exception of dizziness, individual adverse events did not increase with ascending doses or combinations. The superiority of initiating combination treatment with carvedilol CR and lisinopril compared with the monotherapy components was not demonstrated with the ABPM measurements. Nonetheless, the post hoc assessment combining all high‐dose groups did produce significant 24‐hour mean BP reduction when compared with the high‐dose monotherapy groups. The tolerability profile of initiating combination therapy was generally comparable to the initiation of treatment with monotherapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-6175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-7176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00341.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20883227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antihypertensive Agents - administration & dosage ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Carbazoles - administration & dosage ; Carvedilol ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension - drug therapy ; Lisinopril - administration & dosage ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original Paper ; Original Papers ; Propanolamines - administration & dosage ; Severity of Illness Index ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2010-09, Vol.12 (9), p.678-686</ispartof><rights>2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4721-8af49bd4c476c1c496f321e0409b2922d1385d5fc2a2855ff40d75ec299c90413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4721-8af49bd4c476c1c496f321e0409b2922d1385d5fc2a2855ff40d75ec299c90413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8673069/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8673069/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,1414,1430,27911,27912,45561,45562,46396,46820,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20883227$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bakris, George L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iyengar, Malini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukas, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ordronneau, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Combining Extended‐Release Carvedilol and Lisinopril in Hypertension: Results of the COSMOS Study</title><title>The journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)</title><addtitle>J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)</addtitle><description>J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010;12:678–686. ©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Hypertension treatment commonly requires multiple agents to achieve target blood pressure (BP). β‐Blockers and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are commonly co‐prescribed in clinical practice although few data are available that test their additivity on BP lowering. The efficacy and safety of once‐daily extended‐release carvedilol (carvedilol CR) combined with the ACEI lisinopril in a double‐blind, randomized, factorial design study were studied. Patients (N=656) with stage 1 or 2 hypertension were randomized evenly to 1 of 15 groups for 6 weeks: carvedilol CR monotherapy 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg/d; lisinopril monotherapy 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg/d; or 1 of 9 combinations of carvedilol CR plus lisinopril initiated simultaneously. Primary efficacy measures (assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring [ABPM]) were change from baseline in 24‐hour mean diastolic BP (DBP) and in trough (20–24 hours) DBP. Continuous efficacy variables were assessed using analysis of covariance. Whether any combination dose was superior to its monotherapy components was assessed using the Hung AVE procedure. Despite the presence of additional BP lowering observed with most of the combinations compared with their monotherapy components, the Hung AVE test was not significant for either primary efficacy measures. Post hoc analyses of the high‐dose combination groups (carvedilol CR/lisinopril regimens of 80/10 mg, 80/20 mg, 80/40 mg, 20/40 mg, and 40/40 mg) showed a significant treatment difference compared with both carvedilol CR 80 mg and lisinopril 40 mg for 24‐hour mean DBP but not for trough DBP. With the exception of dizziness, individual adverse events did not increase with ascending doses or combinations. The superiority of initiating combination treatment with carvedilol CR and lisinopril compared with the monotherapy components was not demonstrated with the ABPM measurements. Nonetheless, the post hoc assessment combining all high‐dose groups did produce significant 24‐hour mean BP reduction when compared with the high‐dose monotherapy groups. The tolerability profile of initiating combination therapy was generally comparable to the initiation of treatment with monotherapy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Carbazoles - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Carvedilol</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension - drug therapy</subject><subject>Lisinopril - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Original Papers</subject><subject>Propanolamines - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1524-6175</issn><issn>1751-7176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkdFu0zAUhiMEYmPwCsh3XKXYTpzECCGhqFCmokorXFuufby5cuwSJ6O94xF4Rp4EZx3VdodvfHzO__8-0pdliOAZSeftdkZqRvKa1NWM4tTFuCjJbP8kOz8Nnqaa0TKvUucsexHjFmNWFBw_z84obpqC0vo86-bGgBpQMKgN3cZ666_RfD-A16D__Pp9BQ5kBNTK_ha0dcEh6TVa2mh92PXWIevR4rCDPlmiDf4duoI4uiFOkcNNcq7WX1drtB5GfXiZPTPSRXh1f19k3z_Nv7WLfLn6_KX9uMxVWVOSN9KUfKPL9KoUUSWvTEEJ4BLzDeWUalI0TDOjqKQNY8aUWNcMFOVccVyS4iL7cMzdjZsOtAI_9NKJtG8n-4MI0orHE29vxHW4FU1VF7jiKeDNfUAffowQB9HZqMA56SGMUdSsqhhP0qRsjkrVhxh7MKdfCBYTLLEVExMxMRETLHEHS-yT9fXDLU_Gf3SS4P1R8NM6OPx3sLhsF6ko_gJ8a6Sq</recordid><startdate>201009</startdate><enddate>201009</enddate><creator>Bakris, George L.</creator><creator>Iyengar, Malini</creator><creator>Lukas, Mary Ann</creator><creator>Ordronneau, Paul</creator><creator>Weber, Michael A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201009</creationdate><title>Effect of Combining Extended‐Release Carvedilol and Lisinopril in Hypertension: Results of the COSMOS Study</title><author>Bakris, George L. ; Iyengar, Malini ; Lukas, Mary Ann ; Ordronneau, Paul ; Weber, Michael A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4721-8af49bd4c476c1c496f321e0409b2922d1385d5fc2a2855ff40d75ec299c90413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Carbazoles - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Carvedilol</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension - drug therapy</topic><topic>Lisinopril - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Original Papers</topic><topic>Propanolamines - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bakris, George L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iyengar, Malini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukas, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ordronneau, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bakris, George L.</au><au>Iyengar, Malini</au><au>Lukas, Mary Ann</au><au>Ordronneau, Paul</au><au>Weber, Michael A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Combining Extended‐Release Carvedilol and Lisinopril in Hypertension: Results of the COSMOS Study</atitle><jtitle>The journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)</addtitle><date>2010-09</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>678</spage><epage>686</epage><pages>678-686</pages><issn>1524-6175</issn><eissn>1751-7176</eissn><abstract>J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010;12:678–686. ©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Hypertension treatment commonly requires multiple agents to achieve target blood pressure (BP). β‐Blockers and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are commonly co‐prescribed in clinical practice although few data are available that test their additivity on BP lowering. The efficacy and safety of once‐daily extended‐release carvedilol (carvedilol CR) combined with the ACEI lisinopril in a double‐blind, randomized, factorial design study were studied. Patients (N=656) with stage 1 or 2 hypertension were randomized evenly to 1 of 15 groups for 6 weeks: carvedilol CR monotherapy 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg/d; lisinopril monotherapy 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg/d; or 1 of 9 combinations of carvedilol CR plus lisinopril initiated simultaneously. Primary efficacy measures (assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring [ABPM]) were change from baseline in 24‐hour mean diastolic BP (DBP) and in trough (20–24 hours) DBP. Continuous efficacy variables were assessed using analysis of covariance. Whether any combination dose was superior to its monotherapy components was assessed using the Hung AVE procedure. Despite the presence of additional BP lowering observed with most of the combinations compared with their monotherapy components, the Hung AVE test was not significant for either primary efficacy measures. Post hoc analyses of the high‐dose combination groups (carvedilol CR/lisinopril regimens of 80/10 mg, 80/20 mg, 80/40 mg, 20/40 mg, and 40/40 mg) showed a significant treatment difference compared with both carvedilol CR 80 mg and lisinopril 40 mg for 24‐hour mean DBP but not for trough DBP. With the exception of dizziness, individual adverse events did not increase with ascending doses or combinations. The superiority of initiating combination treatment with carvedilol CR and lisinopril compared with the monotherapy components was not demonstrated with the ABPM measurements. Nonetheless, the post hoc assessment combining all high‐dose groups did produce significant 24‐hour mean BP reduction when compared with the high‐dose monotherapy groups. The tolerability profile of initiating combination therapy was generally comparable to the initiation of treatment with monotherapy.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20883227</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00341.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1524-6175 |
ispartof | The journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2010-09, Vol.12 (9), p.678-686 |
issn | 1524-6175 1751-7176 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8673069 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Antihypertensive Agents - administration & dosage Blood Pressure - drug effects Carbazoles - administration & dosage Carvedilol Double-Blind Method Female Humans Hypertension - drug therapy Lisinopril - administration & dosage Male Middle Aged Original Paper Original Papers Propanolamines - administration & dosage Severity of Illness Index Treatment Outcome |
title | Effect of Combining Extended‐Release Carvedilol and Lisinopril in Hypertension: Results of the COSMOS Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T13%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Combining%20Extended%E2%80%90Release%20Carvedilol%20and%20Lisinopril%20in%20Hypertension:%20Results%20of%20the%20COSMOS%20Study&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20clinical%20hypertension%20(Greenwich,%20Conn.)&rft.au=Bakris,%20George%20L.&rft.date=2010-09&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=678&rft.epage=686&rft.pages=678-686&rft.issn=1524-6175&rft.eissn=1751-7176&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00341.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E756659306%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=756659306&rft_id=info:pmid/20883227&rfr_iscdi=true |