Comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging using DANTE-SPACE, PETRA, and MPRAGE: a clinical evaluation of brain tumors at 3 Tesla

We aimed to compare the performance of three contrast-enhanced T1-weighted three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) sequences to detect brain tumors at 3 Tesla. The three sequences were: (I) delay alternating with nutation for tailored excitation sampling perfection with application-optimized...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery 2022-01, Vol.12 (1), p.592-607
Hauptverfasser: Fu, Qing, Cheng, Qi-Guang, Kong, Xiang-Chuang, Liu, Ding-Xi, Guo, Yi-Hao, Grinstead, John, Zhang, Xiao-Yong, Lei, Zi-Qiao, Zheng, Chuan-Sheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 607
container_issue 1
container_start_page 592
container_title Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery
container_volume 12
creator Fu, Qing
Cheng, Qi-Guang
Kong, Xiang-Chuang
Liu, Ding-Xi
Guo, Yi-Hao
Grinstead, John
Zhang, Xiao-Yong
Lei, Zi-Qiao
Zheng, Chuan-Sheng
description We aimed to compare the performance of three contrast-enhanced T1-weighted three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) sequences to detect brain tumors at 3 Tesla. The three sequences were: (I) delay alternating with nutation for tailored excitation sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution (DANTE-SPACE), (II) pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA), and (III) magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE). This study involved 77 consecutive patients, including 34 patients with known primary brain tumors and 43 patients suspected of intracranial metastases. All patients underwent each of the three sequences with comparable spatial resolution and acquisition time post-injection. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) for lesion/GM, lesion/WM, and GM/WM were quantitatively compared. Two radiologists determined the total number of enhancing lesions by consensus. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the two radiologists for metastases presence, qualitative ratings for image quality, and acoustic noise level of each sequence were assessed. Among the three sequences, SNRs and CNRs between lesions and surrounding parenchyma were highest using DANTE-SPACE, but CNR was the lowest with DANTE-SPACE. SNRs for PETRA images were significantly higher than those for MPRAGE (P0.05). Significantly more brain metastases were detected with DANTE-SPACE (n=94) compared with MPRAGE (n=71) and PETRA (n=72). The ICCs were 0.964 for MPRAGE, 0.975 for PETRA, and 0.973 for DANTE-SPACE. Qualitative scores for lesion imaging using DANTE-SPACE were significantly higher than those obtained with PETRA and MPRAGE (P=0.002 and P=0.004, respectively). The acoustic noise level for PETRA (64.45 dB) was significantly lower than that for MPRAGE (78.27 dB, P
doi_str_mv 10.21037/qims-21-107
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8666782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2618231601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-7f64c58929ab475e62f3a05cee7141f75ce162b601f45b1bfa8e86cc92ec04fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUFv1DAQhSMEolXpjTPykcOa2o5jJxyQom1oK7WwKuFsTbz2rlFib-OkiL_Ar8bbbSvqg_00_vRmRi_L3lPyiVGSy7M7N0TMKKZEvsqOGWM55jkRr580q9hRdhrjL5KOLKmk5G12lPOqyinhx9nfZRh2MLoYPAoW6eCnEeKEjd-C12aNWop_G7fZTkm7ATbOb9Ac9_d5_a1t8I9VvWwWaNW0t_UCgV-jm9VtfdF8RoB077zT0CNzD_0Mkzs06UZwHk3zEMaIYEI5ak3s4V32xkIfzenje5L9_Nq0y0t8_f3iallfY80LMmFpBddFWbEKOi4LI5jNgRTaGEk5tTIpKlgnCLW86GhnoTSl0LpiRhNuIT_Jvhx8d3M3mLU2-5V7tRvTeuMfFcCplz_ebdUm3KtSCCFLlgw-PhqM4W42cVKDi9r0PXgT5qiYoImiaYKELg6oHkOMo7HPbShRDwmqfYJJpoJM-If_R3uGn_LK_wHgdZc3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2618231601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging using DANTE-SPACE, PETRA, and MPRAGE: a clinical evaluation of brain tumors at 3 Tesla</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Fu, Qing ; Cheng, Qi-Guang ; Kong, Xiang-Chuang ; Liu, Ding-Xi ; Guo, Yi-Hao ; Grinstead, John ; Zhang, Xiao-Yong ; Lei, Zi-Qiao ; Zheng, Chuan-Sheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Fu, Qing ; Cheng, Qi-Guang ; Kong, Xiang-Chuang ; Liu, Ding-Xi ; Guo, Yi-Hao ; Grinstead, John ; Zhang, Xiao-Yong ; Lei, Zi-Qiao ; Zheng, Chuan-Sheng</creatorcontrib><description>We aimed to compare the performance of three contrast-enhanced T1-weighted three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) sequences to detect brain tumors at 3 Tesla. The three sequences were: (I) delay alternating with nutation for tailored excitation sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution (DANTE-SPACE), (II) pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA), and (III) magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE). This study involved 77 consecutive patients, including 34 patients with known primary brain tumors and 43 patients suspected of intracranial metastases. All patients underwent each of the three sequences with comparable spatial resolution and acquisition time post-injection. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) for lesion/GM, lesion/WM, and GM/WM were quantitatively compared. Two radiologists determined the total number of enhancing lesions by consensus. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the two radiologists for metastases presence, qualitative ratings for image quality, and acoustic noise level of each sequence were assessed. Among the three sequences, SNRs and CNRs between lesions and surrounding parenchyma were highest using DANTE-SPACE, but CNR was the lowest with DANTE-SPACE. SNRs for PETRA images were significantly higher than those for MPRAGE (P&lt;0.001). CNRs between lesions and surrounding parenchyma were similar for PETRA and MPRAGE (P&gt;0.05). Significantly more brain metastases were detected with DANTE-SPACE (n=94) compared with MPRAGE (n=71) and PETRA (n=72). The ICCs were 0.964 for MPRAGE, 0.975 for PETRA, and 0.973 for DANTE-SPACE. Qualitative scores for lesion imaging using DANTE-SPACE were significantly higher than those obtained with PETRA and MPRAGE (P=0.002 and P=0.004, respectively). The acoustic noise level for PETRA (64.45 dB) was significantly lower than that for MPRAGE (78.27 dB, P&lt;0.01) and DANTE-SPACE (80.18 dB, P&lt;0.01). PETRA achieves comparable detection of brain tumors with MPRAGE and is preferred for depicting osseous metastases and meningeal enhancement. DANTE-SPACE with blood vessel suppression showed improved detection of cerebral metastases compared with MPRAGE and PETRA, which could be helpful for the differential diagnosis of tumors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2223-4292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2223-4306</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34993104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China: AME Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022-01, Vol.12 (1), p.592-607</ispartof><rights>2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-7f64c58929ab475e62f3a05cee7141f75ce162b601f45b1bfa8e86cc92ec04fa3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666782/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666782/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34993104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fu, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Qi-Guang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Xiang-Chuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ding-Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yi-Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grinstead, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Zi-Qiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Chuan-Sheng</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging using DANTE-SPACE, PETRA, and MPRAGE: a clinical evaluation of brain tumors at 3 Tesla</title><title>Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery</title><addtitle>Quant Imaging Med Surg</addtitle><description>We aimed to compare the performance of three contrast-enhanced T1-weighted three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) sequences to detect brain tumors at 3 Tesla. The three sequences were: (I) delay alternating with nutation for tailored excitation sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution (DANTE-SPACE), (II) pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA), and (III) magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE). This study involved 77 consecutive patients, including 34 patients with known primary brain tumors and 43 patients suspected of intracranial metastases. All patients underwent each of the three sequences with comparable spatial resolution and acquisition time post-injection. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) for lesion/GM, lesion/WM, and GM/WM were quantitatively compared. Two radiologists determined the total number of enhancing lesions by consensus. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the two radiologists for metastases presence, qualitative ratings for image quality, and acoustic noise level of each sequence were assessed. Among the three sequences, SNRs and CNRs between lesions and surrounding parenchyma were highest using DANTE-SPACE, but CNR was the lowest with DANTE-SPACE. SNRs for PETRA images were significantly higher than those for MPRAGE (P&lt;0.001). CNRs between lesions and surrounding parenchyma were similar for PETRA and MPRAGE (P&gt;0.05). Significantly more brain metastases were detected with DANTE-SPACE (n=94) compared with MPRAGE (n=71) and PETRA (n=72). The ICCs were 0.964 for MPRAGE, 0.975 for PETRA, and 0.973 for DANTE-SPACE. Qualitative scores for lesion imaging using DANTE-SPACE were significantly higher than those obtained with PETRA and MPRAGE (P=0.002 and P=0.004, respectively). The acoustic noise level for PETRA (64.45 dB) was significantly lower than that for MPRAGE (78.27 dB, P&lt;0.01) and DANTE-SPACE (80.18 dB, P&lt;0.01). PETRA achieves comparable detection of brain tumors with MPRAGE and is preferred for depicting osseous metastases and meningeal enhancement. DANTE-SPACE with blood vessel suppression showed improved detection of cerebral metastases compared with MPRAGE and PETRA, which could be helpful for the differential diagnosis of tumors.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2223-4292</issn><issn>2223-4306</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUFv1DAQhSMEolXpjTPykcOa2o5jJxyQom1oK7WwKuFsTbz2rlFib-OkiL_Ar8bbbSvqg_00_vRmRi_L3lPyiVGSy7M7N0TMKKZEvsqOGWM55jkRr580q9hRdhrjL5KOLKmk5G12lPOqyinhx9nfZRh2MLoYPAoW6eCnEeKEjd-C12aNWop_G7fZTkm7ATbOb9Ac9_d5_a1t8I9VvWwWaNW0t_UCgV-jm9VtfdF8RoB077zT0CNzD_0Mkzs06UZwHk3zEMaIYEI5ak3s4V32xkIfzenje5L9_Nq0y0t8_f3iallfY80LMmFpBddFWbEKOi4LI5jNgRTaGEk5tTIpKlgnCLW86GhnoTSl0LpiRhNuIT_Jvhx8d3M3mLU2-5V7tRvTeuMfFcCplz_ebdUm3KtSCCFLlgw-PhqM4W42cVKDi9r0PXgT5qiYoImiaYKELg6oHkOMo7HPbShRDwmqfYJJpoJM-If_R3uGn_LK_wHgdZc3</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Fu, Qing</creator><creator>Cheng, Qi-Guang</creator><creator>Kong, Xiang-Chuang</creator><creator>Liu, Ding-Xi</creator><creator>Guo, Yi-Hao</creator><creator>Grinstead, John</creator><creator>Zhang, Xiao-Yong</creator><creator>Lei, Zi-Qiao</creator><creator>Zheng, Chuan-Sheng</creator><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging using DANTE-SPACE, PETRA, and MPRAGE: a clinical evaluation of brain tumors at 3 Tesla</title><author>Fu, Qing ; Cheng, Qi-Guang ; Kong, Xiang-Chuang ; Liu, Ding-Xi ; Guo, Yi-Hao ; Grinstead, John ; Zhang, Xiao-Yong ; Lei, Zi-Qiao ; Zheng, Chuan-Sheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-7f64c58929ab475e62f3a05cee7141f75ce162b601f45b1bfa8e86cc92ec04fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fu, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Qi-Guang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Xiang-Chuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ding-Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yi-Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grinstead, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Zi-Qiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Chuan-Sheng</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fu, Qing</au><au>Cheng, Qi-Guang</au><au>Kong, Xiang-Chuang</au><au>Liu, Ding-Xi</au><au>Guo, Yi-Hao</au><au>Grinstead, John</au><au>Zhang, Xiao-Yong</au><au>Lei, Zi-Qiao</au><au>Zheng, Chuan-Sheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging using DANTE-SPACE, PETRA, and MPRAGE: a clinical evaluation of brain tumors at 3 Tesla</atitle><jtitle>Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Quant Imaging Med Surg</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>592</spage><epage>607</epage><pages>592-607</pages><issn>2223-4292</issn><eissn>2223-4306</eissn><abstract>We aimed to compare the performance of three contrast-enhanced T1-weighted three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) sequences to detect brain tumors at 3 Tesla. The three sequences were: (I) delay alternating with nutation for tailored excitation sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution (DANTE-SPACE), (II) pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA), and (III) magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE). This study involved 77 consecutive patients, including 34 patients with known primary brain tumors and 43 patients suspected of intracranial metastases. All patients underwent each of the three sequences with comparable spatial resolution and acquisition time post-injection. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) for lesion/GM, lesion/WM, and GM/WM were quantitatively compared. Two radiologists determined the total number of enhancing lesions by consensus. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the two radiologists for metastases presence, qualitative ratings for image quality, and acoustic noise level of each sequence were assessed. Among the three sequences, SNRs and CNRs between lesions and surrounding parenchyma were highest using DANTE-SPACE, but CNR was the lowest with DANTE-SPACE. SNRs for PETRA images were significantly higher than those for MPRAGE (P&lt;0.001). CNRs between lesions and surrounding parenchyma were similar for PETRA and MPRAGE (P&gt;0.05). Significantly more brain metastases were detected with DANTE-SPACE (n=94) compared with MPRAGE (n=71) and PETRA (n=72). The ICCs were 0.964 for MPRAGE, 0.975 for PETRA, and 0.973 for DANTE-SPACE. Qualitative scores for lesion imaging using DANTE-SPACE were significantly higher than those obtained with PETRA and MPRAGE (P=0.002 and P=0.004, respectively). The acoustic noise level for PETRA (64.45 dB) was significantly lower than that for MPRAGE (78.27 dB, P&lt;0.01) and DANTE-SPACE (80.18 dB, P&lt;0.01). PETRA achieves comparable detection of brain tumors with MPRAGE and is preferred for depicting osseous metastases and meningeal enhancement. DANTE-SPACE with blood vessel suppression showed improved detection of cerebral metastases compared with MPRAGE and PETRA, which could be helpful for the differential diagnosis of tumors.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pub>AME Publishing Company</pub><pmid>34993104</pmid><doi>10.21037/qims-21-107</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2223-4292
ispartof Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022-01, Vol.12 (1), p.592-607
issn 2223-4292
2223-4306
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8666782
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging using DANTE-SPACE, PETRA, and MPRAGE: a clinical evaluation of brain tumors at 3 Tesla
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T05%3A14%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20contrast-enhanced%20T1-weighted%20imaging%20using%20DANTE-SPACE,%20PETRA,%20and%20MPRAGE:%20a%20clinical%20evaluation%20of%20brain%20tumors%20at%203%20Tesla&rft.jtitle=Quantitative%20imaging%20in%20medicine%20and%20surgery&rft.au=Fu,%20Qing&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=592&rft.epage=607&rft.pages=592-607&rft.issn=2223-4292&rft.eissn=2223-4306&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/qims-21-107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2618231601%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2618231601&rft_id=info:pmid/34993104&rfr_iscdi=true