Varenicline as a treatment for cannabis use disorder: A placebo-controlled pilot trial

An efficacious pharmacotherapy for cannabis use disorder (CUD) has yet to be established. This study preliminarily evaluated the safety and efficacy of varenicline for CUD in a proof-of-concept clinical trial. Participants in this 6-week randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial received either var...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug and alcohol dependence 2021-12, Vol.229 (Pt B), p.109111-109111, Article 109111
Hauptverfasser: McRae-Clark, Aimee L., Gray, Kevin M., Baker, Nathaniel L., Sherman, Brian J., Squeglia, Lindsay, Sahlem, Gregory L., Wagner, Amanda, Tomko, Rachel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An efficacious pharmacotherapy for cannabis use disorder (CUD) has yet to be established. This study preliminarily evaluated the safety and efficacy of varenicline for CUD in a proof-of-concept clinical trial. Participants in this 6-week randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial received either varenicline (n = 35) or placebo (n = 37), added to a brief motivational enhancement therapy intervention. Outcomes included cannabis withdrawal, cannabis abstinence, urine cannabinoid levels, percent cannabis use days, and cannabis sessions per day. Both treatment groups noted significant decreases in self-reported cannabis withdrawal, percentage of days used, and use sessions per day during treatment compared to baseline. While this pilot trial was not powered to detect statistically significant between-group differences, participants randomized to varenicline evidenced numerically greater rates of self-reported abstinence at the final study visit [Week 6 intent-to-treat (ITT): Varenicline: 17.1% vs. Placebo: 5.4%; RR = 3.2 (95% CI: 0.7,14.7)]. End-of-treatment urine creatinine corrected cannabinoid levels were numerically lower in the varenicline group and higher in the placebo group compared to baseline [Change from baseline: Varenicline −1.7 ng/mg (95% CI: −4.1,0.8) vs. Placebo: 1.9 ng/mg (95% CI: −0.4,4.3); Δ = 3.5 (95% CI: 0.1,6.9)]. Adverse events related to study treatment did not reveal new safety signals. Findings support the feasibility of conducting clinical trials of varenicline as a candidate pharmacotherapy for CUD, and indicate that a full-scale efficacy trial, powered based on effect sizes and variability yielded in this study, is warranted. •Varenicline was evaluated for cannabis use disorder (CUD) in a placebo-controlled, pilot trial.•Greater reductions in urinary cannabinoids were observed with varenicline vs placebo.•Additional research is warranted to determine if varenicline improves cannabis use outcomes.
ISSN:0376-8716
1879-0046
DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109111