Interinstitutional beam model portability study in a mixed vendor environment
A 6 MV flattened beam model for a Varian TrueBeamSTx c‐arm treatment delivery system in RayStation, developed and validated at one institution, was implemented and validated at another institution. The only parameter value adjustments were to accommodate machine output at the second institution. Val...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2021-12, Vol.22 (12), p.37-50 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 50 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 37 |
| container_title | Journal of applied clinical medical physics |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Frigo, Sean P. Ohrt, Jared Suh, Yelin Balter, Peter |
| description | A 6 MV flattened beam model for a Varian TrueBeamSTx c‐arm treatment delivery system in RayStation, developed and validated at one institution, was implemented and validated at another institution. The only parameter value adjustments were to accommodate machine output at the second institution. Validation followed MPPG 5.a. recommendations, with particular attention paid to IMRT and VMAT deliveries. With this minimal adjustment, the model passed validation across a broad spectrum of treatment plans, measurement devices, and staff who created the test plans and executed the measurements. This work demonstrates the possibility of using a single template model in the same treatment planning system with matched machines in a mixed vendor environment. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acm2.13445 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8664150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2581824872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4075-8a2b87848c61f43ea6b40e6dd581cc5ce658fb88feb0ad0a66aaa95c218484323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1qGzEURkVoyP-mD1AE3YSAHUmjkeVNIZgkDSRk067FHc2dVmFGciWNW7995Tg1aRZZSaCjcz_uR8hHzqacMXEJdhBTXklZ75EjXgs1mc-5_PDqfkiOU3pijHNd6QNyWEklq0pUR-ThzmeMzqfs8phd8NDTBmGgQ2ixp8sQMzSud3lNUx7bNXWeAh3cH2zpCn0bIkW_cjH4AX0-Jfsd9AnPXs4T8v3m-tvi6-T-8fZucXU_sZLN6okG0eiZltoq3skKQTWSoWrbWnNra4uq1l2jdYcNg5aBUgAwr63g5Y8suU_Il613OTYDtraMjtCbZXQDxLUJ4Mz_L979ND_CymilJK9ZEZy_CGL4NWLKZnDJYt-DxzAmI0oSLaSebWZ9foM-hTGWPRVKMS3VbM50oS62lI0hpYjdLgxnZtOS2bRknlsq8KfX8Xfov1oKwLfAb9fj-h2VuVo8iK30L1FHnbs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2608467908</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interinstitutional beam model portability study in a mixed vendor environment</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Frigo, Sean P. ; Ohrt, Jared ; Suh, Yelin ; Balter, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Frigo, Sean P. ; Ohrt, Jared ; Suh, Yelin ; Balter, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>A 6 MV flattened beam model for a Varian TrueBeamSTx c‐arm treatment delivery system in RayStation, developed and validated at one institution, was implemented and validated at another institution. The only parameter value adjustments were to accommodate machine output at the second institution. Validation followed MPPG 5.a. recommendations, with particular attention paid to IMRT and VMAT deliveries. With this minimal adjustment, the model passed validation across a broad spectrum of treatment plans, measurement devices, and staff who created the test plans and executed the measurements. This work demonstrates the possibility of using a single template model in the same treatment planning system with matched machines in a mixed vendor environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13445</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34643323</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>beam model ; commissioning ; Health physics ; Humans ; parameter value optimization ; Physicists ; Planning ; portability ; Radiation Oncology Physics ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ; RayStation ; Software ; TrueBeam ; validation</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2021-12, Vol.22 (12), p.37-50</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4075-8a2b87848c61f43ea6b40e6dd581cc5ce658fb88feb0ad0a66aaa95c218484323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8664150/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8664150/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643323$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frigo, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohrt, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suh, Yelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balter, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Interinstitutional beam model portability study in a mixed vendor environment</title><title>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>A 6 MV flattened beam model for a Varian TrueBeamSTx c‐arm treatment delivery system in RayStation, developed and validated at one institution, was implemented and validated at another institution. The only parameter value adjustments were to accommodate machine output at the second institution. Validation followed MPPG 5.a. recommendations, with particular attention paid to IMRT and VMAT deliveries. With this minimal adjustment, the model passed validation across a broad spectrum of treatment plans, measurement devices, and staff who created the test plans and executed the measurements. This work demonstrates the possibility of using a single template model in the same treatment planning system with matched machines in a mixed vendor environment.</description><subject>beam model</subject><subject>commissioning</subject><subject>Health physics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>parameter value optimization</subject><subject>Physicists</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>portability</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology Physics</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated</subject><subject>RayStation</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>TrueBeam</subject><subject>validation</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1qGzEURkVoyP-mD1AE3YSAHUmjkeVNIZgkDSRk067FHc2dVmFGciWNW7995Tg1aRZZSaCjcz_uR8hHzqacMXEJdhBTXklZ75EjXgs1mc-5_PDqfkiOU3pijHNd6QNyWEklq0pUR-ThzmeMzqfs8phd8NDTBmGgQ2ixp8sQMzSud3lNUx7bNXWeAh3cH2zpCn0bIkW_cjH4AX0-Jfsd9AnPXs4T8v3m-tvi6-T-8fZucXU_sZLN6okG0eiZltoq3skKQTWSoWrbWnNra4uq1l2jdYcNg5aBUgAwr63g5Y8suU_Il613OTYDtraMjtCbZXQDxLUJ4Mz_L979ND_CymilJK9ZEZy_CGL4NWLKZnDJYt-DxzAmI0oSLaSebWZ9foM-hTGWPRVKMS3VbM50oS62lI0hpYjdLgxnZtOS2bRknlsq8KfX8Xfov1oKwLfAb9fj-h2VuVo8iK30L1FHnbs</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Frigo, Sean P.</creator><creator>Ohrt, Jared</creator><creator>Suh, Yelin</creator><creator>Balter, Peter</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Interinstitutional beam model portability study in a mixed vendor environment</title><author>Frigo, Sean P. ; Ohrt, Jared ; Suh, Yelin ; Balter, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4075-8a2b87848c61f43ea6b40e6dd581cc5ce658fb88feb0ad0a66aaa95c218484323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>beam model</topic><topic>commissioning</topic><topic>Health physics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>parameter value optimization</topic><topic>Physicists</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>portability</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology Physics</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated</topic><topic>RayStation</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>TrueBeam</topic><topic>validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frigo, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohrt, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suh, Yelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balter, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frigo, Sean P.</au><au>Ohrt, Jared</au><au>Suh, Yelin</au><au>Balter, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interinstitutional beam model portability study in a mixed vendor environment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>37-50</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>A 6 MV flattened beam model for a Varian TrueBeamSTx c‐arm treatment delivery system in RayStation, developed and validated at one institution, was implemented and validated at another institution. The only parameter value adjustments were to accommodate machine output at the second institution. Validation followed MPPG 5.a. recommendations, with particular attention paid to IMRT and VMAT deliveries. With this minimal adjustment, the model passed validation across a broad spectrum of treatment plans, measurement devices, and staff who created the test plans and executed the measurements. This work demonstrates the possibility of using a single template model in the same treatment planning system with matched machines in a mixed vendor environment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34643323</pmid><doi>10.1002/acm2.13445</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1526-9914 |
| ispartof | Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2021-12, Vol.22 (12), p.37-50 |
| issn | 1526-9914 1526-9914 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8664150 |
| source | PubMed Central Free; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | beam model commissioning Health physics Humans parameter value optimization Physicists Planning portability Radiation Oncology Physics Radiation therapy Radiotherapy Dosage Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated RayStation Software TrueBeam validation |
| title | Interinstitutional beam model portability study in a mixed vendor environment |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T18%3A24%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interinstitutional%20beam%20model%20portability%20study%20in%20a%20mixed%20vendor%20environment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20clinical%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Frigo,%20Sean%20P.&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=37-50&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acm2.13445&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2581824872%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2608467908&rft_id=info:pmid/34643323&rfr_iscdi=true |