I Think, Therefore I Act: The Influence of Critical Reasoning Ability on Trust and Behavior During the COVID‐19 Pandemic
Actively open‐minded thinking (AOT) operates in three dimensions: it serves as a norm accounting for how one should search for and use information in judgment and decision making; it is a thinking style that one may adopt in accordance with the norm; and it sets standards for evaluating the thinking...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Risk analysis 2022-05, Vol.42 (5), p.1073-1085 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1085 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1073 |
container_title | Risk analysis |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Cohen, Alex Segrè Lutzke, Lauren Otten, Caitlin Drummond Árvai, Joseph |
description | Actively open‐minded thinking (AOT) operates in three dimensions: it serves as a norm accounting for how one should search for and use information in judgment and decision making; it is a thinking style that one may adopt in accordance with the norm; and it sets standards for evaluating the thinking of others, particularly the trustworthiness of sources that claim authority. With the first and third dimensions in mind, we explore how AOT influences trust in public health experts, risk perceptions, and compliance with recommended behaviors aimed at slowing the spread and severity of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Using survey data from a nationally representative sample of Americans (N = 857), we tested whether AOT will lead people to place greater trust public health experts (H1). Because these experts have been consistently messaging that COVID‐19 is a real and serious threat to public health, we also hypothesized that trust in experts would be positively associated with high perceived risk (H2), which should have a positive influence on (self‐reported) compliance with CDC recommendations (H3). And because AOT is a self‐directed thinking style, we also expected it to directly influence risk perceptions and, by extension, compliance (H4). Our results support all four hypotheses. We discuss the implications of these results for how risk communication and risk management efforts are designed and practiced. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/risa.13833 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8662233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2579092832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4763-7ff7d61a178360593c136d7088e22e20e948687ab14b57da26a09a679fbe2b9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQxy0EotvChQdAlrigihR_xY57QFq2fESqVFQWrpaTTLouWbvYSdFy4hF4Rp4EL1sq4IAvI3l--mlm_gg9ouSI5vc8umSPKK84v4NmtOS6kJqJu2hGmGKF4Jztof2ULgmhhJTqPtrjQhKqBJ2hrzVerpz_9CwXiNCHCLjG83Y83n7g2vfDBL4FHHq8iG50rR3wOdgUvPMXeN64wY0bHDxeximN2PoOv4SVvXYh4pMpbqExixZnH-uTH9--U43fZQbWrn2A7vV2SPDwph6gD69fLRdvi9OzN_Viflq0QkleqL5XnaSWqopLUmreUi47RaoKGANGQItKVso2VDSl6iyTlmgrle4bYI3u-QF6sfNeTc0auhb8GO1grqJb27gxwTrzd8e7lbkI16aSkjHOs-DpjSCGzxOk0axdamEYrIcwJcNKpYlmFWcZffIPehmm6PN6hklVClFpXWbqcEe1MaSUr347DCVmG6nZRmp-RZrhx3-Of4v-zjADdAd8cQNs_qMy5_X7-U76E6gxq1U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2675448995</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>I Think, Therefore I Act: The Influence of Critical Reasoning Ability on Trust and Behavior During the COVID‐19 Pandemic</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Cohen, Alex Segrè ; Lutzke, Lauren ; Otten, Caitlin Drummond ; Árvai, Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Alex Segrè ; Lutzke, Lauren ; Otten, Caitlin Drummond ; Árvai, Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>Actively open‐minded thinking (AOT) operates in three dimensions: it serves as a norm accounting for how one should search for and use information in judgment and decision making; it is a thinking style that one may adopt in accordance with the norm; and it sets standards for evaluating the thinking of others, particularly the trustworthiness of sources that claim authority. With the first and third dimensions in mind, we explore how AOT influences trust in public health experts, risk perceptions, and compliance with recommended behaviors aimed at slowing the spread and severity of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Using survey data from a nationally representative sample of Americans (N = 857), we tested whether AOT will lead people to place greater trust public health experts (H1). Because these experts have been consistently messaging that COVID‐19 is a real and serious threat to public health, we also hypothesized that trust in experts would be positively associated with high perceived risk (H2), which should have a positive influence on (self‐reported) compliance with CDC recommendations (H3). And because AOT is a self‐directed thinking style, we also expected it to directly influence risk perceptions and, by extension, compliance (H4). Our results support all four hypotheses. We discuss the implications of these results for how risk communication and risk management efforts are designed and practiced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/risa.13833</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34601741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Cognitive style ; Compliance ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Credibility ; critical reasoning ; Decision making ; Experts ; Health problems ; Humans ; Influence ; Original ; Original s ; Pandemics ; Public Health ; Risk assessment ; Risk communication ; Risk management ; Risk perception ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Trust ; Trustworthiness</subject><ispartof>Risk analysis, 2022-05, Vol.42 (5), p.1073-1085</ispartof><rights>2021 Society for Risk Analysis.</rights><rights>2022 Society for Risk Analysis.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4763-7ff7d61a178360593c136d7088e22e20e948687ab14b57da26a09a679fbe2b9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4763-7ff7d61a178360593c136d7088e22e20e948687ab14b57da26a09a679fbe2b9f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6387-2197 ; 0000-0002-5289-8970 ; 0000-0002-6065-0705 ; 0000-0002-6480-170X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frisa.13833$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frisa.13833$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34601741$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Alex Segrè</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutzke, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otten, Caitlin Drummond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Árvai, Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>I Think, Therefore I Act: The Influence of Critical Reasoning Ability on Trust and Behavior During the COVID‐19 Pandemic</title><title>Risk analysis</title><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><description>Actively open‐minded thinking (AOT) operates in three dimensions: it serves as a norm accounting for how one should search for and use information in judgment and decision making; it is a thinking style that one may adopt in accordance with the norm; and it sets standards for evaluating the thinking of others, particularly the trustworthiness of sources that claim authority. With the first and third dimensions in mind, we explore how AOT influences trust in public health experts, risk perceptions, and compliance with recommended behaviors aimed at slowing the spread and severity of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Using survey data from a nationally representative sample of Americans (N = 857), we tested whether AOT will lead people to place greater trust public health experts (H1). Because these experts have been consistently messaging that COVID‐19 is a real and serious threat to public health, we also hypothesized that trust in experts would be positively associated with high perceived risk (H2), which should have a positive influence on (self‐reported) compliance with CDC recommendations (H3). And because AOT is a self‐directed thinking style, we also expected it to directly influence risk perceptions and, by extension, compliance (H4). Our results support all four hypotheses. We discuss the implications of these results for how risk communication and risk management efforts are designed and practiced.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cognitive style</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>critical reasoning</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original s</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk communication</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Trustworthiness</subject><issn>0272-4332</issn><issn>1539-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQxy0EotvChQdAlrigihR_xY57QFq2fESqVFQWrpaTTLouWbvYSdFy4hF4Rp4EL1sq4IAvI3l--mlm_gg9ouSI5vc8umSPKK84v4NmtOS6kJqJu2hGmGKF4Jztof2ULgmhhJTqPtrjQhKqBJ2hrzVerpz_9CwXiNCHCLjG83Y83n7g2vfDBL4FHHq8iG50rR3wOdgUvPMXeN64wY0bHDxeximN2PoOv4SVvXYh4pMpbqExixZnH-uTH9--U43fZQbWrn2A7vV2SPDwph6gD69fLRdvi9OzN_Viflq0QkleqL5XnaSWqopLUmreUi47RaoKGANGQItKVso2VDSl6iyTlmgrle4bYI3u-QF6sfNeTc0auhb8GO1grqJb27gxwTrzd8e7lbkI16aSkjHOs-DpjSCGzxOk0axdamEYrIcwJcNKpYlmFWcZffIPehmm6PN6hklVClFpXWbqcEe1MaSUr347DCVmG6nZRmp-RZrhx3-Of4v-zjADdAd8cQNs_qMy5_X7-U76E6gxq1U</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Cohen, Alex Segrè</creator><creator>Lutzke, Lauren</creator><creator>Otten, Caitlin Drummond</creator><creator>Árvai, Joseph</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6387-2197</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5289-8970</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-0705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6480-170X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>I Think, Therefore I Act: The Influence of Critical Reasoning Ability on Trust and Behavior During the COVID‐19 Pandemic</title><author>Cohen, Alex Segrè ; Lutzke, Lauren ; Otten, Caitlin Drummond ; Árvai, Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4763-7ff7d61a178360593c136d7088e22e20e948687ab14b57da26a09a679fbe2b9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cognitive style</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>critical reasoning</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original s</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk communication</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Trustworthiness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Alex Segrè</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutzke, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otten, Caitlin Drummond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Árvai, Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Alex Segrè</au><au>Lutzke, Lauren</au><au>Otten, Caitlin Drummond</au><au>Árvai, Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>I Think, Therefore I Act: The Influence of Critical Reasoning Ability on Trust and Behavior During the COVID‐19 Pandemic</atitle><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1073</spage><epage>1085</epage><pages>1073-1085</pages><issn>0272-4332</issn><eissn>1539-6924</eissn><abstract>Actively open‐minded thinking (AOT) operates in three dimensions: it serves as a norm accounting for how one should search for and use information in judgment and decision making; it is a thinking style that one may adopt in accordance with the norm; and it sets standards for evaluating the thinking of others, particularly the trustworthiness of sources that claim authority. With the first and third dimensions in mind, we explore how AOT influences trust in public health experts, risk perceptions, and compliance with recommended behaviors aimed at slowing the spread and severity of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Using survey data from a nationally representative sample of Americans (N = 857), we tested whether AOT will lead people to place greater trust public health experts (H1). Because these experts have been consistently messaging that COVID‐19 is a real and serious threat to public health, we also hypothesized that trust in experts would be positively associated with high perceived risk (H2), which should have a positive influence on (self‐reported) compliance with CDC recommendations (H3). And because AOT is a self‐directed thinking style, we also expected it to directly influence risk perceptions and, by extension, compliance (H4). Our results support all four hypotheses. We discuss the implications of these results for how risk communication and risk management efforts are designed and practiced.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>34601741</pmid><doi>10.1111/risa.13833</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6387-2197</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5289-8970</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-0705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6480-170X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-4332 |
ispartof | Risk analysis, 2022-05, Vol.42 (5), p.1073-1085 |
issn | 0272-4332 1539-6924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8662233 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Behavior Cognitive style Compliance COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology Credibility critical reasoning Decision making Experts Health problems Humans Influence Original Original s Pandemics Public Health Risk assessment Risk communication Risk management Risk perception Surveys and Questionnaires Trust Trustworthiness |
title | I Think, Therefore I Act: The Influence of Critical Reasoning Ability on Trust and Behavior During the COVID‐19 Pandemic |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T15%3A46%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=I%20Think,%20Therefore%20I%20Act:%20The%20Influence%20of%20Critical%20Reasoning%20Ability%20on%20Trust%20and%20Behavior%20During%20the%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20Pandemic&rft.jtitle=Risk%20analysis&rft.au=Cohen,%20Alex%20Segr%C3%A8&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1073&rft.epage=1085&rft.pages=1073-1085&rft.issn=0272-4332&rft.eissn=1539-6924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/risa.13833&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2579092832%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2675448995&rft_id=info:pmid/34601741&rfr_iscdi=true |