Evaluation of the correlation between the access SARS‐CoV‐2 IgM and IgG II antibody tests with the SARS‐CoV‐2 surrogate virus neutralization test

Fully automated immunoassays for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) antibodies that are strongly correlated with neutralization antibodies (nAbs) are clinically important because they enable the assessment of humoral immunity after infection and vaccination. Acces...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical virology 2022-01, Vol.94 (1), p.335-341
Hauptverfasser: Kitagawa, Yutaro, Imai, Kazuo, Matsuoka, Masaru, Fukada, Ai, Kubota, Katsumi, Sato, Momoko, Takada, Tomohito, Noguchi, Sakiko, Tarumoto, Norihito, Maesaki, Shigefumi, Takeuchi, Shinichi, Maeda, Takuya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Fully automated immunoassays for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) antibodies that are strongly correlated with neutralization antibodies (nAbs) are clinically important because they enable the assessment of humoral immunity after infection and vaccination. Access SARS‐CoV‐2 immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) II antibody tests are semi‐quantitative, fully automated immunoassays that detect anti‐receptor‐binding domain (RBD) antibodies and might reflect nAb levels in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). However, no studies have investigated the clinical utility of these tests in association with nAbs to date. To evaluate the clinical utility of Access SARS‐CoV‐2 IgM and IgG II antibody tests and their correlation with the SARS‐CoV‐2 surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) that measures nAbs in patients with COVID‐19, we analyzed 54 convalescent serum samples from COVID‐19 patients and 89 serum samples from non‐COVID‐19 patients. The presence of anti‐RBD antibodies was detected using Access SARS‐CoV‐2 IgM and IgG II antibody tests, while nAbs were measured by sVNT. The sensitivity and specificity of sVNT were 94.4% and 98.9%, respectively. There were strong positive correlations between the inhibition values of sVNT and the results of the Access SARS‐CoV‐2 IgM (R = 0.95, R2 = 0.90, p 
ISSN:0146-6615
1096-9071
DOI:10.1002/jmv.27338