Change in U.S. Small Town Community Capitals, 1980–2010
The county scale has thus far dominated rural demographic research—this descriptive profile of small town America is unique with its place-based lens. Another important extension is the nationwide application of the Community Capitals Framework which builds on the body of research examining capitals...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Population research and policy review 2020-10, Vol.39 (5), p.913-940 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 940 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 913 |
container_title | Population research and policy review |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Hunter, Lori M. Talbot, Catherine B. Connor, Dylan Shane Counterman, Miriam Uhl, Johannes H. Gutmann, Myron P. Leyk, Stefan |
description | The county scale has thus far dominated rural demographic research—this descriptive profile of small town America is unique with its place-based lens. Another important extension is the nationwide application of the Community Capitals Framework which builds on the body of research examining capitals within case studies focused on one or more communities. Here, we examine place-based “community capitals” at the national scale through novel integration of data from a wide variety of sources. The goal is to identify tiny town socioeconomic and demographic patterns of change—or trajectories—over the past several decades—and contrast remote small towns with those proximate to metropolitan areas. Results reveal both commonalities and distinctions. Instead of differences in trends across time, the analyses suggest that what differs are the more general profiles of small places as contrasted with national data. For example, regardless of metro proximity, small town America has lower levels of human and financial capital. Still, distinction also appears in that rural population growth has focused on high-amenity regions, bringing some increases in community capitals but potentially also exacerbating inequalities. In all, the analyses presented here offer an important foundation for necessary work at the place scale to improve understanding of the nuances inherent in population shifts, and their implications, within rural communities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11113-020-09609-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8654086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2471471598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-6ec7d2195c2471240358707aee9a29c247b92289acee91aa8259f17efbb180ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQJDYsSBnbcWxvkFDES6rEgnZtuanTpsqjxAmoO_6BP-RLcEgpjwWWJUt37lzP6CB0jGGIAfiFxe5QHwj4IEOQfrCD-phx6nNB5C7qAw65zyShPXRg7RLAtVG5j3o0EIKHwPpIRgtdzI2XFt5k-Dj0HnOdZd64fCm8qMzzpkjrtRfpVVrrzJ57WAp4f30jLukQ7SVOM0ebd4AmN9fj6M4fPdzeR1cjP2bAaz80MZ8RLFlMAo5JAJQJDlwbIzWRrTiVhAipY6dgrQVhMsHcJNMpFmASOkCXXe6qmeZmFpuirnSmVlWa62qtSp2q35UiXah5-axEyAIQoQs42wRU5VNjbK3y1MYmy3RhysYqEoJglEsmnPX0j3VZNlXh1lPt9O4y2bpI54qr0trKJNthMKiWjOrIKEdGfZJRgWs6-bnGtuULhTPQzmBdySGpvv_-J_YD5leWpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471471598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Change in U.S. Small Town Community Capitals, 1980–2010</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hunter, Lori M. ; Talbot, Catherine B. ; Connor, Dylan Shane ; Counterman, Miriam ; Uhl, Johannes H. ; Gutmann, Myron P. ; Leyk, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Lori M. ; Talbot, Catherine B. ; Connor, Dylan Shane ; Counterman, Miriam ; Uhl, Johannes H. ; Gutmann, Myron P. ; Leyk, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>The county scale has thus far dominated rural demographic research—this descriptive profile of small town America is unique with its place-based lens. Another important extension is the nationwide application of the Community Capitals Framework which builds on the body of research examining capitals within case studies focused on one or more communities. Here, we examine place-based “community capitals” at the national scale through novel integration of data from a wide variety of sources. The goal is to identify tiny town socioeconomic and demographic patterns of change—or trajectories—over the past several decades—and contrast remote small towns with those proximate to metropolitan areas. Results reveal both commonalities and distinctions. Instead of differences in trends across time, the analyses suggest that what differs are the more general profiles of small places as contrasted with national data. For example, regardless of metro proximity, small town America has lower levels of human and financial capital. Still, distinction also appears in that rural population growth has focused on high-amenity regions, bringing some increases in community capitals but potentially also exacerbating inequalities. In all, the analyses presented here offer an important foundation for necessary work at the place scale to improve understanding of the nuances inherent in population shifts, and their implications, within rural communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7829</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11113-020-09609-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34887605</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Capital ; Case studies ; Demographic change ; Demographics ; Demography ; Immediate ; Inequality ; Metropolitan areas ; Original Paper ; Population Economics ; Population growth ; Profiles ; Proximity ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Rural population ; Rural populations ; Social Sciences ; Socioeconomic factors ; Sociology ; Towns</subject><ispartof>Population research and policy review, 2020-10, Vol.39 (5), p.913-940</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-6ec7d2195c2471240358707aee9a29c247b92289acee91aa8259f17efbb180ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-6ec7d2195c2471240358707aee9a29c247b92289acee91aa8259f17efbb180ef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3450-9791</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11113-020-09609-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11113-020-09609-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27325,27847,27905,27906,33755,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34887605$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Lori M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talbot, Catherine B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connor, Dylan Shane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Counterman, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Johannes H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutmann, Myron P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyk, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Change in U.S. Small Town Community Capitals, 1980–2010</title><title>Population research and policy review</title><addtitle>Popul Res Policy Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Popul Res Policy Rev</addtitle><description>The county scale has thus far dominated rural demographic research—this descriptive profile of small town America is unique with its place-based lens. Another important extension is the nationwide application of the Community Capitals Framework which builds on the body of research examining capitals within case studies focused on one or more communities. Here, we examine place-based “community capitals” at the national scale through novel integration of data from a wide variety of sources. The goal is to identify tiny town socioeconomic and demographic patterns of change—or trajectories—over the past several decades—and contrast remote small towns with those proximate to metropolitan areas. Results reveal both commonalities and distinctions. Instead of differences in trends across time, the analyses suggest that what differs are the more general profiles of small places as contrasted with national data. For example, regardless of metro proximity, small town America has lower levels of human and financial capital. Still, distinction also appears in that rural population growth has focused on high-amenity regions, bringing some increases in community capitals but potentially also exacerbating inequalities. In all, the analyses presented here offer an important foundation for necessary work at the place scale to improve understanding of the nuances inherent in population shifts, and their implications, within rural communities.</description><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Demographic change</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Immediate</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Metropolitan areas</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Proximity</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural population</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Towns</subject><issn>0167-5923</issn><issn>1573-7829</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQJDYsSBnbcWxvkFDES6rEgnZtuanTpsqjxAmoO_6BP-RLcEgpjwWWJUt37lzP6CB0jGGIAfiFxe5QHwj4IEOQfrCD-phx6nNB5C7qAw65zyShPXRg7RLAtVG5j3o0EIKHwPpIRgtdzI2XFt5k-Dj0HnOdZd64fCm8qMzzpkjrtRfpVVrrzJ57WAp4f30jLukQ7SVOM0ebd4AmN9fj6M4fPdzeR1cjP2bAaz80MZ8RLFlMAo5JAJQJDlwbIzWRrTiVhAipY6dgrQVhMsHcJNMpFmASOkCXXe6qmeZmFpuirnSmVlWa62qtSp2q35UiXah5-axEyAIQoQs42wRU5VNjbK3y1MYmy3RhysYqEoJglEsmnPX0j3VZNlXh1lPt9O4y2bpI54qr0trKJNthMKiWjOrIKEdGfZJRgWs6-bnGtuULhTPQzmBdySGpvv_-J_YD5leWpg</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Hunter, Lori M.</creator><creator>Talbot, Catherine B.</creator><creator>Connor, Dylan Shane</creator><creator>Counterman, Miriam</creator><creator>Uhl, Johannes H.</creator><creator>Gutmann, Myron P.</creator><creator>Leyk, Stefan</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3450-9791</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Change in U.S. Small Town Community Capitals, 1980–2010</title><author>Hunter, Lori M. ; Talbot, Catherine B. ; Connor, Dylan Shane ; Counterman, Miriam ; Uhl, Johannes H. ; Gutmann, Myron P. ; Leyk, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-6ec7d2195c2471240358707aee9a29c247b92289acee91aa8259f17efbb180ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Demographic change</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Immediate</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Metropolitan areas</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Proximity</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural population</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Towns</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Lori M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talbot, Catherine B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connor, Dylan Shane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Counterman, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Johannes H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutmann, Myron P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyk, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Population research and policy review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hunter, Lori M.</au><au>Talbot, Catherine B.</au><au>Connor, Dylan Shane</au><au>Counterman, Miriam</au><au>Uhl, Johannes H.</au><au>Gutmann, Myron P.</au><au>Leyk, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Change in U.S. Small Town Community Capitals, 1980–2010</atitle><jtitle>Population research and policy review</jtitle><stitle>Popul Res Policy Rev</stitle><addtitle>Popul Res Policy Rev</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>913</spage><epage>940</epage><pages>913-940</pages><issn>0167-5923</issn><eissn>1573-7829</eissn><abstract>The county scale has thus far dominated rural demographic research—this descriptive profile of small town America is unique with its place-based lens. Another important extension is the nationwide application of the Community Capitals Framework which builds on the body of research examining capitals within case studies focused on one or more communities. Here, we examine place-based “community capitals” at the national scale through novel integration of data from a wide variety of sources. The goal is to identify tiny town socioeconomic and demographic patterns of change—or trajectories—over the past several decades—and contrast remote small towns with those proximate to metropolitan areas. Results reveal both commonalities and distinctions. Instead of differences in trends across time, the analyses suggest that what differs are the more general profiles of small places as contrasted with national data. For example, regardless of metro proximity, small town America has lower levels of human and financial capital. Still, distinction also appears in that rural population growth has focused on high-amenity regions, bringing some increases in community capitals but potentially also exacerbating inequalities. In all, the analyses presented here offer an important foundation for necessary work at the place scale to improve understanding of the nuances inherent in population shifts, and their implications, within rural communities.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>34887605</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11113-020-09609-4</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3450-9791</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-5923 |
ispartof | Population research and policy review, 2020-10, Vol.39 (5), p.913-940 |
issn | 0167-5923 1573-7829 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8654086 |
source | PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Capital Case studies Demographic change Demographics Demography Immediate Inequality Metropolitan areas Original Paper Population Economics Population growth Profiles Proximity Rural areas Rural communities Rural population Rural populations Social Sciences Socioeconomic factors Sociology Towns |
title | Change in U.S. Small Town Community Capitals, 1980–2010 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T08%3A00%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Change%20in%20U.S.%20Small%20Town%20Community%20Capitals,%201980%E2%80%932010&rft.jtitle=Population%20research%20and%20policy%20review&rft.au=Hunter,%20Lori%20M.&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=913&rft.epage=940&rft.pages=913-940&rft.issn=0167-5923&rft.eissn=1573-7829&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11113-020-09609-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2471471598%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471471598&rft_id=info:pmid/34887605&rfr_iscdi=true |