Utility of the iPad NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in a clinical trial of older adults

Background To demonstrate feasibility and utility of the iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB‐CB) in a clinical trial of older adults. Methods Fifty‐one adults, aged 55 and older without dementia were tested twice on NIHTB‐CB and more traditional paper‐and‐pencil neuropsychologic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2021-12, Vol.69 (12), p.3519-3528
Hauptverfasser: Parsey, Carolyn M., Bagger, Justina E., Trittschuh, Emily H., Hanson, Angela J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3528
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3519
container_title Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)
container_volume 69
creator Parsey, Carolyn M.
Bagger, Justina E.
Trittschuh, Emily H.
Hanson, Angela J.
description Background To demonstrate feasibility and utility of the iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB‐CB) in a clinical trial of older adults. Methods Fifty‐one adults, aged 55 and older without dementia were tested twice on NIHTB‐CB and more traditional paper‐and‐pencil neuropsychological measures after meal ingestion, with approximately a 4‐week interval. We also compared performances at Time 1 and Time 2 for significant change. We also extracted the response times and errors for available NIHTB‐CB subtests to determine subtle changes in performance. Results Over the interval, improvement in fluid cognitive measures was noted at Time 2 (t = −3.07, p = 0.004), whereas crystallized measures were unchanged. Tests of fluid cognition negatively correlated with age, particularly for the second visit. Analysis of the average speed per item showed that, for two of the tests, speed increased at Time 2. Traditional neuropsychological tests correlated with many of the NIHTB‐CB measures. Response times for all five timed tests decreased at Time 2, although only statistically significant for Picture Sequence and Picture Vocabulary. Conclusions The iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery appears to be an adequate measure to assess cognitive functioning in a clinical trial of older adults. Psychometric analyses suggest stability in measures of crystallized functioning, whereas measures of fluid abilities revealed improvements over the short time frame of the study. Response times and errors for individual tests revealed intriguing relationships that should be further evaluated to determine the utility in clinical sample analysis, as this could aid identification of subtle cognitive change over short periods. Additional studies with larger sample sizes will be helpful to understanding the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the NIHTB‐CB sub‐scores in older adults. In addition, further evaluations with clinical populations, including individuals with cognitive impairment, are warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jgs.17382
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8648969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2606918996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-69f86bff1b0e9f53ebc394502e13ffaa7bbd022c8d3bf60d4c71bc8b59a597e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1vVCEUhomxsWN14R8wJG50MS2f98LGRCfajzRqYmdNgAtTJsylBa7t_Hup0zbWRBaw4DlP3pMXgDcYHeJ2jtarcoh7KsgzMMOckjlnmD8HM4QQmYsOs33wspQ1QpggIV6AfcooI6KXM7Bc1hBD3cLkYb10MPzQA_x2egIvUoom3cJFWo2hhjTCz7pWl7cwjFBDG8MYrI6w5tDuNp3i4DLUwxRreQX2vI7Fvb5_D8Dy65eLxcn8_Pvx6eLT-dwy1mJ20ovOeI8NctJz6oylknFEHKbea90bMyBCrBio8R0amO2xscJwqbnsXUcPwMed92oyGzdYN9aso7rKYaPzViUd1NOfMVyqVfqlRMeE7GQTvL8X5HQ9uVLVJhTrYtSjS1NRhPOeU0kQbui7f9B1mvLY1lOkQ53EQsq7RB92lM2plOz8YxiM1F1ZqpWl_pTV2Ld_p38kH9ppwNEOuAnRbf9vUmfHP3fK3_rWnrI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2606918996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of the iPad NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in a clinical trial of older adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Parsey, Carolyn M. ; Bagger, Justina E. ; Trittschuh, Emily H. ; Hanson, Angela J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Parsey, Carolyn M. ; Bagger, Justina E. ; Trittschuh, Emily H. ; Hanson, Angela J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background To demonstrate feasibility and utility of the iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB‐CB) in a clinical trial of older adults. Methods Fifty‐one adults, aged 55 and older without dementia were tested twice on NIHTB‐CB and more traditional paper‐and‐pencil neuropsychological measures after meal ingestion, with approximately a 4‐week interval. We also compared performances at Time 1 and Time 2 for significant change. We also extracted the response times and errors for available NIHTB‐CB subtests to determine subtle changes in performance. Results Over the interval, improvement in fluid cognitive measures was noted at Time 2 (t = −3.07, p = 0.004), whereas crystallized measures were unchanged. Tests of fluid cognition negatively correlated with age, particularly for the second visit. Analysis of the average speed per item showed that, for two of the tests, speed increased at Time 2. Traditional neuropsychological tests correlated with many of the NIHTB‐CB measures. Response times for all five timed tests decreased at Time 2, although only statistically significant for Picture Sequence and Picture Vocabulary. Conclusions The iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery appears to be an adequate measure to assess cognitive functioning in a clinical trial of older adults. Psychometric analyses suggest stability in measures of crystallized functioning, whereas measures of fluid abilities revealed improvements over the short time frame of the study. Response times and errors for individual tests revealed intriguing relationships that should be further evaluated to determine the utility in clinical sample analysis, as this could aid identification of subtle cognitive change over short periods. Additional studies with larger sample sizes will be helpful to understanding the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the NIHTB‐CB sub‐scores in older adults. In addition, further evaluations with clinical populations, including individuals with cognitive impairment, are warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17382</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34342879</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; aging ; clinical trial ; Clinical trials ; cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Cognitive ability ; Computers, Handheld ; Dementia disorders ; Female ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Neuropsychology ; Older people ; psychometrics ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Reaction Time ; Reproducibility of Results ; Statistical analysis ; User-Computer Interface</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2021-12, Vol.69 (12), p.3519-3528</ispartof><rights>2021 The American Geriatrics Society</rights><rights>2021 The American Geriatrics Society.</rights><rights>2021 American Geriatrics Society and Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-69f86bff1b0e9f53ebc394502e13ffaa7bbd022c8d3bf60d4c71bc8b59a597e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-69f86bff1b0e9f53ebc394502e13ffaa7bbd022c8d3bf60d4c71bc8b59a597e63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8555-6512</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjgs.17382$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjgs.17382$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34342879$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parsey, Carolyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagger, Justina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trittschuh, Emily H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Angela J.</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of the iPad NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in a clinical trial of older adults</title><title>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</title><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><description>Background To demonstrate feasibility and utility of the iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB‐CB) in a clinical trial of older adults. Methods Fifty‐one adults, aged 55 and older without dementia were tested twice on NIHTB‐CB and more traditional paper‐and‐pencil neuropsychological measures after meal ingestion, with approximately a 4‐week interval. We also compared performances at Time 1 and Time 2 for significant change. We also extracted the response times and errors for available NIHTB‐CB subtests to determine subtle changes in performance. Results Over the interval, improvement in fluid cognitive measures was noted at Time 2 (t = −3.07, p = 0.004), whereas crystallized measures were unchanged. Tests of fluid cognition negatively correlated with age, particularly for the second visit. Analysis of the average speed per item showed that, for two of the tests, speed increased at Time 2. Traditional neuropsychological tests correlated with many of the NIHTB‐CB measures. Response times for all five timed tests decreased at Time 2, although only statistically significant for Picture Sequence and Picture Vocabulary. Conclusions The iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery appears to be an adequate measure to assess cognitive functioning in a clinical trial of older adults. Psychometric analyses suggest stability in measures of crystallized functioning, whereas measures of fluid abilities revealed improvements over the short time frame of the study. Response times and errors for individual tests revealed intriguing relationships that should be further evaluated to determine the utility in clinical sample analysis, as this could aid identification of subtle cognitive change over short periods. Additional studies with larger sample sizes will be helpful to understanding the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the NIHTB‐CB sub‐scores in older adults. In addition, further evaluations with clinical populations, including individuals with cognitive impairment, are warranted.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>aging</subject><subject>clinical trial</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Computers, Handheld</subject><subject>Dementia disorders</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><issn>0002-8614</issn><issn>1532-5415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1vVCEUhomxsWN14R8wJG50MS2f98LGRCfajzRqYmdNgAtTJsylBa7t_Hup0zbWRBaw4DlP3pMXgDcYHeJ2jtarcoh7KsgzMMOckjlnmD8HM4QQmYsOs33wspQ1QpggIV6AfcooI6KXM7Bc1hBD3cLkYb10MPzQA_x2egIvUoom3cJFWo2hhjTCz7pWl7cwjFBDG8MYrI6w5tDuNp3i4DLUwxRreQX2vI7Fvb5_D8Dy65eLxcn8_Pvx6eLT-dwy1mJ20ovOeI8NctJz6oylknFEHKbea90bMyBCrBio8R0amO2xscJwqbnsXUcPwMed92oyGzdYN9aso7rKYaPzViUd1NOfMVyqVfqlRMeE7GQTvL8X5HQ9uVLVJhTrYtSjS1NRhPOeU0kQbui7f9B1mvLY1lOkQ53EQsq7RB92lM2plOz8YxiM1F1ZqpWl_pTV2Ld_p38kH9ppwNEOuAnRbf9vUmfHP3fK3_rWnrI</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Parsey, Carolyn M.</creator><creator>Bagger, Justina E.</creator><creator>Trittschuh, Emily H.</creator><creator>Hanson, Angela J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8555-6512</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Utility of the iPad NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in a clinical trial of older adults</title><author>Parsey, Carolyn M. ; Bagger, Justina E. ; Trittschuh, Emily H. ; Hanson, Angela J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-69f86bff1b0e9f53ebc394502e13ffaa7bbd022c8d3bf60d4c71bc8b59a597e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>aging</topic><topic>clinical trial</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Computers, Handheld</topic><topic>Dementia disorders</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parsey, Carolyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagger, Justina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trittschuh, Emily H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Angela J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parsey, Carolyn M.</au><au>Bagger, Justina E.</au><au>Trittschuh, Emily H.</au><au>Hanson, Angela J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of the iPad NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in a clinical trial of older adults</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3519</spage><epage>3528</epage><pages>3519-3528</pages><issn>0002-8614</issn><eissn>1532-5415</eissn><abstract>Background To demonstrate feasibility and utility of the iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB‐CB) in a clinical trial of older adults. Methods Fifty‐one adults, aged 55 and older without dementia were tested twice on NIHTB‐CB and more traditional paper‐and‐pencil neuropsychological measures after meal ingestion, with approximately a 4‐week interval. We also compared performances at Time 1 and Time 2 for significant change. We also extracted the response times and errors for available NIHTB‐CB subtests to determine subtle changes in performance. Results Over the interval, improvement in fluid cognitive measures was noted at Time 2 (t = −3.07, p = 0.004), whereas crystallized measures were unchanged. Tests of fluid cognition negatively correlated with age, particularly for the second visit. Analysis of the average speed per item showed that, for two of the tests, speed increased at Time 2. Traditional neuropsychological tests correlated with many of the NIHTB‐CB measures. Response times for all five timed tests decreased at Time 2, although only statistically significant for Picture Sequence and Picture Vocabulary. Conclusions The iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery appears to be an adequate measure to assess cognitive functioning in a clinical trial of older adults. Psychometric analyses suggest stability in measures of crystallized functioning, whereas measures of fluid abilities revealed improvements over the short time frame of the study. Response times and errors for individual tests revealed intriguing relationships that should be further evaluated to determine the utility in clinical sample analysis, as this could aid identification of subtle cognitive change over short periods. Additional studies with larger sample sizes will be helpful to understanding the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the NIHTB‐CB sub‐scores in older adults. In addition, further evaluations with clinical populations, including individuals with cognitive impairment, are warranted.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34342879</pmid><doi>10.1111/jgs.17382</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8555-6512</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-8614
ispartof Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2021-12, Vol.69 (12), p.3519-3528
issn 0002-8614
1532-5415
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8648969
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Aged
aging
clinical trial
Clinical trials
cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognition Disorders - diagnosis
Cognitive ability
Computers, Handheld
Dementia disorders
Female
Geriatric Assessment - methods
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neuropsychological Tests
Neuropsychology
Older people
psychometrics
Psychometrics - instrumentation
Reaction Time
Reproducibility of Results
Statistical analysis
User-Computer Interface
title Utility of the iPad NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in a clinical trial of older adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T16%3A37%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%20the%20iPad%20NIH%20Toolbox%20Cognition%20Battery%20in%20a%20clinical%20trial%20of%20older%20adults&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Geriatrics%20Society%20(JAGS)&rft.au=Parsey,%20Carolyn%20M.&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3519&rft.epage=3528&rft.pages=3519-3528&rft.issn=0002-8614&rft.eissn=1532-5415&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jgs.17382&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2606918996%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2606918996&rft_id=info:pmid/34342879&rfr_iscdi=true