Utility of the iPad NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in a clinical trial of older adults
Background To demonstrate feasibility and utility of the iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB‐CB) in a clinical trial of older adults. Methods Fifty‐one adults, aged 55 and older without dementia were tested twice on NIHTB‐CB and more traditional paper‐and‐pencil neuropsychologic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2021-12, Vol.69 (12), p.3519-3528 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3528 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 3519 |
container_title | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Parsey, Carolyn M. Bagger, Justina E. Trittschuh, Emily H. Hanson, Angela J. |
description | Background
To demonstrate feasibility and utility of the iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB‐CB) in a clinical trial of older adults.
Methods
Fifty‐one adults, aged 55 and older without dementia were tested twice on NIHTB‐CB and more traditional paper‐and‐pencil neuropsychological measures after meal ingestion, with approximately a 4‐week interval. We also compared performances at Time 1 and Time 2 for significant change. We also extracted the response times and errors for available NIHTB‐CB subtests to determine subtle changes in performance.
Results
Over the interval, improvement in fluid cognitive measures was noted at Time 2 (t = −3.07, p = 0.004), whereas crystallized measures were unchanged. Tests of fluid cognition negatively correlated with age, particularly for the second visit. Analysis of the average speed per item showed that, for two of the tests, speed increased at Time 2. Traditional neuropsychological tests correlated with many of the NIHTB‐CB measures. Response times for all five timed tests decreased at Time 2, although only statistically significant for Picture Sequence and Picture Vocabulary.
Conclusions
The iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery appears to be an adequate measure to assess cognitive functioning in a clinical trial of older adults. Psychometric analyses suggest stability in measures of crystallized functioning, whereas measures of fluid abilities revealed improvements over the short time frame of the study. Response times and errors for individual tests revealed intriguing relationships that should be further evaluated to determine the utility in clinical sample analysis, as this could aid identification of subtle cognitive change over short periods. Additional studies with larger sample sizes will be helpful to understanding the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the NIHTB‐CB sub‐scores in older adults. In addition, further evaluations with clinical populations, including individuals with cognitive impairment, are warranted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jgs.17382 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8648969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2606918996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-69f86bff1b0e9f53ebc394502e13ffaa7bbd022c8d3bf60d4c71bc8b59a597e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1vVCEUhomxsWN14R8wJG50MS2f98LGRCfajzRqYmdNgAtTJsylBa7t_Hup0zbWRBaw4DlP3pMXgDcYHeJ2jtarcoh7KsgzMMOckjlnmD8HM4QQmYsOs33wspQ1QpggIV6AfcooI6KXM7Bc1hBD3cLkYb10MPzQA_x2egIvUoom3cJFWo2hhjTCz7pWl7cwjFBDG8MYrI6w5tDuNp3i4DLUwxRreQX2vI7Fvb5_D8Dy65eLxcn8_Pvx6eLT-dwy1mJ20ovOeI8NctJz6oylknFEHKbea90bMyBCrBio8R0amO2xscJwqbnsXUcPwMed92oyGzdYN9aso7rKYaPzViUd1NOfMVyqVfqlRMeE7GQTvL8X5HQ9uVLVJhTrYtSjS1NRhPOeU0kQbui7f9B1mvLY1lOkQ53EQsq7RB92lM2plOz8YxiM1F1ZqpWl_pTV2Ld_p38kH9ppwNEOuAnRbf9vUmfHP3fK3_rWnrI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2606918996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of the iPad NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in a clinical trial of older adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Parsey, Carolyn M. ; Bagger, Justina E. ; Trittschuh, Emily H. ; Hanson, Angela J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Parsey, Carolyn M. ; Bagger, Justina E. ; Trittschuh, Emily H. ; Hanson, Angela J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
To demonstrate feasibility and utility of the iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB‐CB) in a clinical trial of older adults.
Methods
Fifty‐one adults, aged 55 and older without dementia were tested twice on NIHTB‐CB and more traditional paper‐and‐pencil neuropsychological measures after meal ingestion, with approximately a 4‐week interval. We also compared performances at Time 1 and Time 2 for significant change. We also extracted the response times and errors for available NIHTB‐CB subtests to determine subtle changes in performance.
Results
Over the interval, improvement in fluid cognitive measures was noted at Time 2 (t = −3.07, p = 0.004), whereas crystallized measures were unchanged. Tests of fluid cognition negatively correlated with age, particularly for the second visit. Analysis of the average speed per item showed that, for two of the tests, speed increased at Time 2. Traditional neuropsychological tests correlated with many of the NIHTB‐CB measures. Response times for all five timed tests decreased at Time 2, although only statistically significant for Picture Sequence and Picture Vocabulary.
Conclusions
The iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery appears to be an adequate measure to assess cognitive functioning in a clinical trial of older adults. Psychometric analyses suggest stability in measures of crystallized functioning, whereas measures of fluid abilities revealed improvements over the short time frame of the study. Response times and errors for individual tests revealed intriguing relationships that should be further evaluated to determine the utility in clinical sample analysis, as this could aid identification of subtle cognitive change over short periods. Additional studies with larger sample sizes will be helpful to understanding the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the NIHTB‐CB sub‐scores in older adults. In addition, further evaluations with clinical populations, including individuals with cognitive impairment, are warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17382</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34342879</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; aging ; clinical trial ; Clinical trials ; cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Cognitive ability ; Computers, Handheld ; Dementia disorders ; Female ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Neuropsychology ; Older people ; psychometrics ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Reaction Time ; Reproducibility of Results ; Statistical analysis ; User-Computer Interface</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2021-12, Vol.69 (12), p.3519-3528</ispartof><rights>2021 The American Geriatrics Society</rights><rights>2021 The American Geriatrics Society.</rights><rights>2021 American Geriatrics Society and Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-69f86bff1b0e9f53ebc394502e13ffaa7bbd022c8d3bf60d4c71bc8b59a597e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-69f86bff1b0e9f53ebc394502e13ffaa7bbd022c8d3bf60d4c71bc8b59a597e63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8555-6512</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjgs.17382$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjgs.17382$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34342879$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parsey, Carolyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagger, Justina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trittschuh, Emily H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Angela J.</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of the iPad NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in a clinical trial of older adults</title><title>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</title><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><description>Background
To demonstrate feasibility and utility of the iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB‐CB) in a clinical trial of older adults.
Methods
Fifty‐one adults, aged 55 and older without dementia were tested twice on NIHTB‐CB and more traditional paper‐and‐pencil neuropsychological measures after meal ingestion, with approximately a 4‐week interval. We also compared performances at Time 1 and Time 2 for significant change. We also extracted the response times and errors for available NIHTB‐CB subtests to determine subtle changes in performance.
Results
Over the interval, improvement in fluid cognitive measures was noted at Time 2 (t = −3.07, p = 0.004), whereas crystallized measures were unchanged. Tests of fluid cognition negatively correlated with age, particularly for the second visit. Analysis of the average speed per item showed that, for two of the tests, speed increased at Time 2. Traditional neuropsychological tests correlated with many of the NIHTB‐CB measures. Response times for all five timed tests decreased at Time 2, although only statistically significant for Picture Sequence and Picture Vocabulary.
Conclusions
The iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery appears to be an adequate measure to assess cognitive functioning in a clinical trial of older adults. Psychometric analyses suggest stability in measures of crystallized functioning, whereas measures of fluid abilities revealed improvements over the short time frame of the study. Response times and errors for individual tests revealed intriguing relationships that should be further evaluated to determine the utility in clinical sample analysis, as this could aid identification of subtle cognitive change over short periods. Additional studies with larger sample sizes will be helpful to understanding the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the NIHTB‐CB sub‐scores in older adults. In addition, further evaluations with clinical populations, including individuals with cognitive impairment, are warranted.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>aging</subject><subject>clinical trial</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Computers, Handheld</subject><subject>Dementia disorders</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><issn>0002-8614</issn><issn>1532-5415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1vVCEUhomxsWN14R8wJG50MS2f98LGRCfajzRqYmdNgAtTJsylBa7t_Hup0zbWRBaw4DlP3pMXgDcYHeJ2jtarcoh7KsgzMMOckjlnmD8HM4QQmYsOs33wspQ1QpggIV6AfcooI6KXM7Bc1hBD3cLkYb10MPzQA_x2egIvUoom3cJFWo2hhjTCz7pWl7cwjFBDG8MYrI6w5tDuNp3i4DLUwxRreQX2vI7Fvb5_D8Dy65eLxcn8_Pvx6eLT-dwy1mJ20ovOeI8NctJz6oylknFEHKbea90bMyBCrBio8R0amO2xscJwqbnsXUcPwMed92oyGzdYN9aso7rKYaPzViUd1NOfMVyqVfqlRMeE7GQTvL8X5HQ9uVLVJhTrYtSjS1NRhPOeU0kQbui7f9B1mvLY1lOkQ53EQsq7RB92lM2plOz8YxiM1F1ZqpWl_pTV2Ld_p38kH9ppwNEOuAnRbf9vUmfHP3fK3_rWnrI</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Parsey, Carolyn M.</creator><creator>Bagger, Justina E.</creator><creator>Trittschuh, Emily H.</creator><creator>Hanson, Angela J.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8555-6512</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Utility of the iPad NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in a clinical trial of older adults</title><author>Parsey, Carolyn M. ; Bagger, Justina E. ; Trittschuh, Emily H. ; Hanson, Angela J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-69f86bff1b0e9f53ebc394502e13ffaa7bbd022c8d3bf60d4c71bc8b59a597e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>aging</topic><topic>clinical trial</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Computers, Handheld</topic><topic>Dementia disorders</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parsey, Carolyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagger, Justina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trittschuh, Emily H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Angela J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parsey, Carolyn M.</au><au>Bagger, Justina E.</au><au>Trittschuh, Emily H.</au><au>Hanson, Angela J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of the iPad NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in a clinical trial of older adults</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3519</spage><epage>3528</epage><pages>3519-3528</pages><issn>0002-8614</issn><eissn>1532-5415</eissn><abstract>Background
To demonstrate feasibility and utility of the iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB‐CB) in a clinical trial of older adults.
Methods
Fifty‐one adults, aged 55 and older without dementia were tested twice on NIHTB‐CB and more traditional paper‐and‐pencil neuropsychological measures after meal ingestion, with approximately a 4‐week interval. We also compared performances at Time 1 and Time 2 for significant change. We also extracted the response times and errors for available NIHTB‐CB subtests to determine subtle changes in performance.
Results
Over the interval, improvement in fluid cognitive measures was noted at Time 2 (t = −3.07, p = 0.004), whereas crystallized measures were unchanged. Tests of fluid cognition negatively correlated with age, particularly for the second visit. Analysis of the average speed per item showed that, for two of the tests, speed increased at Time 2. Traditional neuropsychological tests correlated with many of the NIHTB‐CB measures. Response times for all five timed tests decreased at Time 2, although only statistically significant for Picture Sequence and Picture Vocabulary.
Conclusions
The iPad version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery appears to be an adequate measure to assess cognitive functioning in a clinical trial of older adults. Psychometric analyses suggest stability in measures of crystallized functioning, whereas measures of fluid abilities revealed improvements over the short time frame of the study. Response times and errors for individual tests revealed intriguing relationships that should be further evaluated to determine the utility in clinical sample analysis, as this could aid identification of subtle cognitive change over short periods. Additional studies with larger sample sizes will be helpful to understanding the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the NIHTB‐CB sub‐scores in older adults. In addition, further evaluations with clinical populations, including individuals with cognitive impairment, are warranted.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34342879</pmid><doi>10.1111/jgs.17382</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8555-6512</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8614 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2021-12, Vol.69 (12), p.3519-3528 |
issn | 0002-8614 1532-5415 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8648969 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Aged aging clinical trial Clinical trials cognition Cognition & reasoning Cognition Disorders - diagnosis Cognitive ability Computers, Handheld Dementia disorders Female Geriatric Assessment - methods Humans Male Middle Aged Neuropsychological Tests Neuropsychology Older people psychometrics Psychometrics - instrumentation Reaction Time Reproducibility of Results Statistical analysis User-Computer Interface |
title | Utility of the iPad NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in a clinical trial of older adults |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T16%3A37%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%20the%20iPad%20NIH%20Toolbox%20Cognition%20Battery%20in%20a%20clinical%20trial%20of%20older%20adults&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Geriatrics%20Society%20(JAGS)&rft.au=Parsey,%20Carolyn%20M.&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3519&rft.epage=3528&rft.pages=3519-3528&rft.issn=0002-8614&rft.eissn=1532-5415&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jgs.17382&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2606918996%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2606918996&rft_id=info:pmid/34342879&rfr_iscdi=true |