What Affects Adoption of Specialty Palliative Care in Intensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study
Although many patients with critical illness may benefit from involvement of palliative care specialists, adoption of these services in the intensive care unit (ICU) is variable. To characterize reasons for variable buy-in for specialty palliative care in the ICU, and identify factors associated wit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pain and symptom management 2021-12, Vol.62 (6), p.1273-1282 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1282 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1273 |
container_title | Journal of pain and symptom management |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Hua, May Fonseca, Laura D. Morrison, R. Sean Wunsch, Hannah Fullilove, Robert White, Douglas B. |
description | Although many patients with critical illness may benefit from involvement of palliative care specialists, adoption of these services in the intensive care unit (ICU) is variable.
To characterize reasons for variable buy-in for specialty palliative care in the ICU, and identify factors associated with routine involvement of specialists in appropriate cases.
Qualitative study using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with ICU attendings, nurses, and palliative care clinicians, purposively sampled from eight ICUs (medical, surgical, cardiothoracic, neurological) with variable use of palliative care services within two urban, academic medical centers. Interviews were transcribed and coded using an iterative and inductive approach with constant comparison.
We identified three types of specialty palliative care adoption in ICUs, representing different phases of buy-in. The “nascent” phase was characterized by the need for education about palliative care services and clarification of which patients may be appropriate for involvement. During the key “transitional” phase, use of specialists depended on development of “comfort and trust”, which centered on four aspects of the ICU-palliative care clinician relationship: 1) increasing familiarity between clinicians; 2) navigating shared responsibility with primary clinicians; 3) having a collaborative approach to care; and 4) having successful experiences. In the “mature” phase, ICU and palliative care clinicians worked to strengthen their existing collaboration, but further adoption was limited by the availability and resources of the palliative care team.
This conceptual framework identifying distinct phases of adoption may assist institutions aiming to foster sustained adoption of specialty palliative care in an ICU setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.06.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8648909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0885392421003973</els_id><sourcerecordid>2620963324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-5c516fcdd52df75073c4a71f810261c44b9719888e683582186f2e9d5f57b4443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUuLFDEURoMoTjv6FyTixk2VeVfKhdA0PgYGVMbBZUinEidFdVImqYb-96bpsRlduQok59589x4AXmHUYoTF27EdZ-1DPux2OrQEEdwi0SLMH4EVlh1tBMf0MVghKXlDe8IuwLOcR4QQp4I-BReUYUkwIiugftzpAtfOWVMyXA9xLj4GGB28ma3xeioH-FVPk9fF7y3c6GShD_AqFBvy-eY2-JLfwTX8tujJlxN7U5bh8Bw8cXrK9sX9eQluP374vvncXH_5dLVZXzeGd11puOFYODMMnAyu46ijhukOO1lDCmwY2_Yd7qWUVkjKa3YpHLH9wB3vtowxegnen_rOy3ZnB2NDSXpSc_I7nQ4qaq_-fgn-Tv2MeyUFkz3qa4M39w1S_LXYXNTOZ2OnSQcbl6wIZ0Iggjiq6Ot_0DEuKdTxFBEE9YJSckzUnyiTYs7JunMYjNRRoxrVA43qqFEhoarGWvvy4TTnyj_eKrA5AbbudO9tUtl4G4wdfKom1RD9f3zzG4-ltCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2620963324</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Affects Adoption of Specialty Palliative Care in Intensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hua, May ; Fonseca, Laura D. ; Morrison, R. Sean ; Wunsch, Hannah ; Fullilove, Robert ; White, Douglas B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hua, May ; Fonseca, Laura D. ; Morrison, R. Sean ; Wunsch, Hannah ; Fullilove, Robert ; White, Douglas B.</creatorcontrib><description>Although many patients with critical illness may benefit from involvement of palliative care specialists, adoption of these services in the intensive care unit (ICU) is variable.
To characterize reasons for variable buy-in for specialty palliative care in the ICU, and identify factors associated with routine involvement of specialists in appropriate cases.
Qualitative study using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with ICU attendings, nurses, and palliative care clinicians, purposively sampled from eight ICUs (medical, surgical, cardiothoracic, neurological) with variable use of palliative care services within two urban, academic medical centers. Interviews were transcribed and coded using an iterative and inductive approach with constant comparison.
We identified three types of specialty palliative care adoption in ICUs, representing different phases of buy-in. The “nascent” phase was characterized by the need for education about palliative care services and clarification of which patients may be appropriate for involvement. During the key “transitional” phase, use of specialists depended on development of “comfort and trust”, which centered on four aspects of the ICU-palliative care clinician relationship: 1) increasing familiarity between clinicians; 2) navigating shared responsibility with primary clinicians; 3) having a collaborative approach to care; and 4) having successful experiences. In the “mature” phase, ICU and palliative care clinicians worked to strengthen their existing collaboration, but further adoption was limited by the availability and resources of the palliative care team.
This conceptual framework identifying distinct phases of adoption may assist institutions aiming to foster sustained adoption of specialty palliative care in an ICU setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.06.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34182102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiothoracics ; Collaboration ; Collaborative approach ; Critical Illness ; Familiarity ; Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing ; Humans ; Intensive care ; Intensive Care Units ; Interviews ; Nurses ; Palliative Care ; Qualitative Research ; Specialists ; Teams ; trust</subject><ispartof>Journal of pain and symptom management, 2021-12, Vol.62 (6), p.1273-1282</ispartof><rights>2021 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Dec 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-5c516fcdd52df75073c4a71f810261c44b9719888e683582186f2e9d5f57b4443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-5c516fcdd52df75073c4a71f810261c44b9719888e683582186f2e9d5f57b4443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392421003973$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34182102$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hua, May</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Laura D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, R. Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunsch, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullilove, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Douglas B.</creatorcontrib><title>What Affects Adoption of Specialty Palliative Care in Intensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study</title><title>Journal of pain and symptom management</title><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><description>Although many patients with critical illness may benefit from involvement of palliative care specialists, adoption of these services in the intensive care unit (ICU) is variable.
To characterize reasons for variable buy-in for specialty palliative care in the ICU, and identify factors associated with routine involvement of specialists in appropriate cases.
Qualitative study using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with ICU attendings, nurses, and palliative care clinicians, purposively sampled from eight ICUs (medical, surgical, cardiothoracic, neurological) with variable use of palliative care services within two urban, academic medical centers. Interviews were transcribed and coded using an iterative and inductive approach with constant comparison.
We identified three types of specialty palliative care adoption in ICUs, representing different phases of buy-in. The “nascent” phase was characterized by the need for education about palliative care services and clarification of which patients may be appropriate for involvement. During the key “transitional” phase, use of specialists depended on development of “comfort and trust”, which centered on four aspects of the ICU-palliative care clinician relationship: 1) increasing familiarity between clinicians; 2) navigating shared responsibility with primary clinicians; 3) having a collaborative approach to care; and 4) having successful experiences. In the “mature” phase, ICU and palliative care clinicians worked to strengthen their existing collaboration, but further adoption was limited by the availability and resources of the palliative care team.
This conceptual framework identifying distinct phases of adoption may assist institutions aiming to foster sustained adoption of specialty palliative care in an ICU setting.</description><subject>Cardiothoracics</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Collaborative approach</subject><subject>Critical Illness</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Palliative Care</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Specialists</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>trust</subject><issn>0885-3924</issn><issn>1873-6513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUuLFDEURoMoTjv6FyTixk2VeVfKhdA0PgYGVMbBZUinEidFdVImqYb-96bpsRlduQok59589x4AXmHUYoTF27EdZ-1DPux2OrQEEdwi0SLMH4EVlh1tBMf0MVghKXlDe8IuwLOcR4QQp4I-BReUYUkwIiugftzpAtfOWVMyXA9xLj4GGB28ma3xeioH-FVPk9fF7y3c6GShD_AqFBvy-eY2-JLfwTX8tujJlxN7U5bh8Bw8cXrK9sX9eQluP374vvncXH_5dLVZXzeGd11puOFYODMMnAyu46ijhukOO1lDCmwY2_Yd7qWUVkjKa3YpHLH9wB3vtowxegnen_rOy3ZnB2NDSXpSc_I7nQ4qaq_-fgn-Tv2MeyUFkz3qa4M39w1S_LXYXNTOZ2OnSQcbl6wIZ0Iggjiq6Ot_0DEuKdTxFBEE9YJSckzUnyiTYs7JunMYjNRRoxrVA43qqFEhoarGWvvy4TTnyj_eKrA5AbbudO9tUtl4G4wdfKom1RD9f3zzG4-ltCg</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Hua, May</creator><creator>Fonseca, Laura D.</creator><creator>Morrison, R. Sean</creator><creator>Wunsch, Hannah</creator><creator>Fullilove, Robert</creator><creator>White, Douglas B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>What Affects Adoption of Specialty Palliative Care in Intensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study</title><author>Hua, May ; Fonseca, Laura D. ; Morrison, R. Sean ; Wunsch, Hannah ; Fullilove, Robert ; White, Douglas B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-5c516fcdd52df75073c4a71f810261c44b9719888e683582186f2e9d5f57b4443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cardiothoracics</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Collaborative approach</topic><topic>Critical Illness</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Palliative Care</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Specialists</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hua, May</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Laura D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, R. Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunsch, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullilove, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Douglas B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hua, May</au><au>Fonseca, Laura D.</au><au>Morrison, R. Sean</au><au>Wunsch, Hannah</au><au>Fullilove, Robert</au><au>White, Douglas B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Affects Adoption of Specialty Palliative Care in Intensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1273</spage><epage>1282</epage><pages>1273-1282</pages><issn>0885-3924</issn><eissn>1873-6513</eissn><abstract>Although many patients with critical illness may benefit from involvement of palliative care specialists, adoption of these services in the intensive care unit (ICU) is variable.
To characterize reasons for variable buy-in for specialty palliative care in the ICU, and identify factors associated with routine involvement of specialists in appropriate cases.
Qualitative study using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with ICU attendings, nurses, and palliative care clinicians, purposively sampled from eight ICUs (medical, surgical, cardiothoracic, neurological) with variable use of palliative care services within two urban, academic medical centers. Interviews were transcribed and coded using an iterative and inductive approach with constant comparison.
We identified three types of specialty palliative care adoption in ICUs, representing different phases of buy-in. The “nascent” phase was characterized by the need for education about palliative care services and clarification of which patients may be appropriate for involvement. During the key “transitional” phase, use of specialists depended on development of “comfort and trust”, which centered on four aspects of the ICU-palliative care clinician relationship: 1) increasing familiarity between clinicians; 2) navigating shared responsibility with primary clinicians; 3) having a collaborative approach to care; and 4) having successful experiences. In the “mature” phase, ICU and palliative care clinicians worked to strengthen their existing collaboration, but further adoption was limited by the availability and resources of the palliative care team.
This conceptual framework identifying distinct phases of adoption may assist institutions aiming to foster sustained adoption of specialty palliative care in an ICU setting.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34182102</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.06.015</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-3924 |
ispartof | Journal of pain and symptom management, 2021-12, Vol.62 (6), p.1273-1282 |
issn | 0885-3924 1873-6513 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8648909 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Cardiothoracics Collaboration Collaborative approach Critical Illness Familiarity Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing Humans Intensive care Intensive Care Units Interviews Nurses Palliative Care Qualitative Research Specialists Teams trust |
title | What Affects Adoption of Specialty Palliative Care in Intensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T21%3A02%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Affects%20Adoption%20of%20Specialty%20Palliative%20Care%20in%20Intensive%20Care%20Units:%20A%20Qualitative%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pain%20and%20symptom%20management&rft.au=Hua,%20May&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1273&rft.epage=1282&rft.pages=1273-1282&rft.issn=0885-3924&rft.eissn=1873-6513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.06.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2620963324%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2620963324&rft_id=info:pmid/34182102&rft_els_id=S0885392421003973&rfr_iscdi=true |