Compared hand hygiene compliance among healthcare providers before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review and meta-analysis

•The estimated overall hand hygiene compliance during COVID-19 was higher than that reported in previous studies.•The designated wards, fever clinics, and ICUs have become the focused departments for hand hygiene monitoring.•Standardized hand hygiene monitoring tools as reliable systems were called...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of infection control 2022-05, Vol.50 (5), p.563-571
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Ying, Yang, Jinru, Qiao, Fu, Feng, Bilong, Hu, Fen, Xi, Zi-ang, Wu, Wenwen, Ni, Zi-ling, Liu, Li, Yuan, Yufeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 571
container_issue 5
container_start_page 563
container_title American journal of infection control
container_volume 50
creator Wang, Ying
Yang, Jinru
Qiao, Fu
Feng, Bilong
Hu, Fen
Xi, Zi-ang
Wu, Wenwen
Ni, Zi-ling
Liu, Li
Yuan, Yufeng
description •The estimated overall hand hygiene compliance during COVID-19 was higher than that reported in previous studies.•The designated wards, fever clinics, and ICUs have become the focused departments for hand hygiene monitoring.•Standardized hand hygiene monitoring tools as reliable systems were called for. Hand hygiene (HH) is a cost-effective measure to reduce health care-associated infections. The overall characteristics and changes of hand hygiene compliance (HHC) among health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic provided evidence for targeted HH intervention measures. To systematically review the literature and conduct a meta-analysis of studies investigating the rate of HHC and the characteristics of HH during the COVID-19 pandemic. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and CBM databases were searched. All the original articles with valid HHC data among health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic (from January 1, 2020 to October 1, 2021) were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a DerSimonian and Laird model to yield a point estimate and a 95% CI for the HHC rate. The heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics and a random-effects model was used to contrast between different occupations, the WHO 5-moments of HH and different observation methods. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed. Seven studies with 2,377 health care providers reporting HHC were identified. The estimated overall HHC was 74%, which was higher than that reported in previous studies (5%-89%). Fever clinic has become a new key place for HHC observation. Nurses had the highest HHC (80%; 95% CI:74%-87%) while auxiliary workers (70%; 95%CI:62%-77%) had the lowest. For the WHO 5-moments, the health care providers had the highest HHC after contact with the body fluids of the patients (91%; 95% CI:88%-94%), while before contact with patient's health care providers had the lowest HHC (68%; 95% CI:62%-74%) which was consistent with before the pandemic. There existed great HHC differences among different monitoring methods (automatic monitoring system:53%; 95% CI:44%-63% versus openly and secretly observation: 91%; 95% CI: 90%-91%). During the COVID-19 pandemic, the compliance of health care providers’ HH showed a great improvement. The fever clinics have become the focused departments for HH monitoring. The HHC of auxili
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.11.030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8648372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196655321007926</els_id><sourcerecordid>2608534151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-4f4ce50d8b41f3c69fd658d8eb9014999d4f167911f740c28663355bc1f5a6373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuP0zAUhSMEYsrAH2CBvGST4Bs_EiOENCqvkUaaDbC1HPumdZXEwU476p4fjkuHEWzY2NLxd8617imKl0AroCDf7Cqz87aqaQ0VQEUZfVSsQNRNyWolHxcrCkqWUgh2UTxLaUcpVUyKp8UF423LQNar4uc6jLOJ6MjWTPk4bjxOSGxWB28mi8SMYdqQLZph2dpMkjmGg3cYE-mwD1k4GU2_YCTLFsn69vv1hxIUmbOOo7dvyRWJZvaORDx4vPvNj7iY0kxmOCafnhdPejMkfHF_XxbfPn38uv5S3tx-vl5f3ZSWC7GUvOcWBXVtx6FnVqreSdG6FjtFgSulHO9BNgqgbzi1dSslY0J0FnphJGvYZfH-nDvvuxGdxWmJZtBz9KOJRx2M1_--TH6rN-GgW8lb1tQ54PV9QAw_9pgWPfpkcRjMhGGfdC1pKxgHARmtz6iNIaWI_cMYoPpUn97pU336VJ8G0Lm-bHr19wcfLH_6ysC7M4B5TXmZUSebC7PofES7aBf8__J_AciyrQo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2608534151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compared hand hygiene compliance among healthcare providers before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Wang, Ying ; Yang, Jinru ; Qiao, Fu ; Feng, Bilong ; Hu, Fen ; Xi, Zi-ang ; Wu, Wenwen ; Ni, Zi-ling ; Liu, Li ; Yuan, Yufeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ying ; Yang, Jinru ; Qiao, Fu ; Feng, Bilong ; Hu, Fen ; Xi, Zi-ang ; Wu, Wenwen ; Ni, Zi-ling ; Liu, Li ; Yuan, Yufeng</creatorcontrib><description>•The estimated overall hand hygiene compliance during COVID-19 was higher than that reported in previous studies.•The designated wards, fever clinics, and ICUs have become the focused departments for hand hygiene monitoring.•Standardized hand hygiene monitoring tools as reliable systems were called for. Hand hygiene (HH) is a cost-effective measure to reduce health care-associated infections. The overall characteristics and changes of hand hygiene compliance (HHC) among health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic provided evidence for targeted HH intervention measures. To systematically review the literature and conduct a meta-analysis of studies investigating the rate of HHC and the characteristics of HH during the COVID-19 pandemic. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and CBM databases were searched. All the original articles with valid HHC data among health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic (from January 1, 2020 to October 1, 2021) were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a DerSimonian and Laird model to yield a point estimate and a 95% CI for the HHC rate. The heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics and a random-effects model was used to contrast between different occupations, the WHO 5-moments of HH and different observation methods. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed. Seven studies with 2,377 health care providers reporting HHC were identified. The estimated overall HHC was 74%, which was higher than that reported in previous studies (5%-89%). Fever clinic has become a new key place for HHC observation. Nurses had the highest HHC (80%; 95% CI:74%-87%) while auxiliary workers (70%; 95%CI:62%-77%) had the lowest. For the WHO 5-moments, the health care providers had the highest HHC after contact with the body fluids of the patients (91%; 95% CI:88%-94%), while before contact with patient's health care providers had the lowest HHC (68%; 95% CI:62%-74%) which was consistent with before the pandemic. There existed great HHC differences among different monitoring methods (automatic monitoring system:53%; 95% CI:44%-63% versus openly and secretly observation: 91%; 95% CI: 90%-91%). During the COVID-19 pandemic, the compliance of health care providers’ HH showed a great improvement. The fever clinics have become the focused departments for HH monitoring. The HHC of auxiliary workers and the HH opportunity for “before contact with patients” should be strengthened. In the future, it will be necessary to develop standardized HH monitoring tools for practical work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-6553</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1527-3296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.11.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34883162</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; Cross Infection - epidemiology ; Global ; Guideline Adherence ; Hand Hygiene - methods ; Hand hygiene compliance ; Hand hygiene improvement ; Health care-associated infection control ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Pandemics - prevention &amp; control ; Review</subject><ispartof>American journal of infection control, 2022-05, Vol.50 (5), p.563-571</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-4f4ce50d8b41f3c69fd658d8eb9014999d4f167911f740c28663355bc1f5a6373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-4f4ce50d8b41f3c69fd658d8eb9014999d4f167911f740c28663355bc1f5a6373</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3924-3803</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.11.030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,3554,27933,27934,46004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34883162$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jinru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Fu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Bilong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Fen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xi, Zi-ang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Wenwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Zi-ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Yufeng</creatorcontrib><title>Compared hand hygiene compliance among healthcare providers before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review and meta-analysis</title><title>American journal of infection control</title><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><description>•The estimated overall hand hygiene compliance during COVID-19 was higher than that reported in previous studies.•The designated wards, fever clinics, and ICUs have become the focused departments for hand hygiene monitoring.•Standardized hand hygiene monitoring tools as reliable systems were called for. Hand hygiene (HH) is a cost-effective measure to reduce health care-associated infections. The overall characteristics and changes of hand hygiene compliance (HHC) among health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic provided evidence for targeted HH intervention measures. To systematically review the literature and conduct a meta-analysis of studies investigating the rate of HHC and the characteristics of HH during the COVID-19 pandemic. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and CBM databases were searched. All the original articles with valid HHC data among health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic (from January 1, 2020 to October 1, 2021) were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a DerSimonian and Laird model to yield a point estimate and a 95% CI for the HHC rate. The heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics and a random-effects model was used to contrast between different occupations, the WHO 5-moments of HH and different observation methods. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed. Seven studies with 2,377 health care providers reporting HHC were identified. The estimated overall HHC was 74%, which was higher than that reported in previous studies (5%-89%). Fever clinic has become a new key place for HHC observation. Nurses had the highest HHC (80%; 95% CI:74%-87%) while auxiliary workers (70%; 95%CI:62%-77%) had the lowest. For the WHO 5-moments, the health care providers had the highest HHC after contact with the body fluids of the patients (91%; 95% CI:88%-94%), while before contact with patient's health care providers had the lowest HHC (68%; 95% CI:62%-74%) which was consistent with before the pandemic. There existed great HHC differences among different monitoring methods (automatic monitoring system:53%; 95% CI:44%-63% versus openly and secretly observation: 91%; 95% CI: 90%-91%). During the COVID-19 pandemic, the compliance of health care providers’ HH showed a great improvement. The fever clinics have become the focused departments for HH monitoring. The HHC of auxiliary workers and the HH opportunity for “before contact with patients” should be strengthened. In the future, it will be necessary to develop standardized HH monitoring tools for practical work.</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Cross Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Global</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Hand Hygiene - methods</subject><subject>Hand hygiene compliance</subject><subject>Hand hygiene improvement</subject><subject>Health care-associated infection control</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pandemics - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>0196-6553</issn><issn>1527-3296</issn><issn>1527-3296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuP0zAUhSMEYsrAH2CBvGST4Bs_EiOENCqvkUaaDbC1HPumdZXEwU476p4fjkuHEWzY2NLxd8617imKl0AroCDf7Cqz87aqaQ0VQEUZfVSsQNRNyWolHxcrCkqWUgh2UTxLaUcpVUyKp8UF423LQNar4uc6jLOJ6MjWTPk4bjxOSGxWB28mi8SMYdqQLZph2dpMkjmGg3cYE-mwD1k4GU2_YCTLFsn69vv1hxIUmbOOo7dvyRWJZvaORDx4vPvNj7iY0kxmOCafnhdPejMkfHF_XxbfPn38uv5S3tx-vl5f3ZSWC7GUvOcWBXVtx6FnVqreSdG6FjtFgSulHO9BNgqgbzi1dSslY0J0FnphJGvYZfH-nDvvuxGdxWmJZtBz9KOJRx2M1_--TH6rN-GgW8lb1tQ54PV9QAw_9pgWPfpkcRjMhGGfdC1pKxgHARmtz6iNIaWI_cMYoPpUn97pU336VJ8G0Lm-bHr19wcfLH_6ysC7M4B5TXmZUSebC7PofES7aBf8__J_AciyrQo</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Wang, Ying</creator><creator>Yang, Jinru</creator><creator>Qiao, Fu</creator><creator>Feng, Bilong</creator><creator>Hu, Fen</creator><creator>Xi, Zi-ang</creator><creator>Wu, Wenwen</creator><creator>Ni, Zi-ling</creator><creator>Liu, Li</creator><creator>Yuan, Yufeng</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3924-3803</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Compared hand hygiene compliance among healthcare providers before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review and meta-analysis</title><author>Wang, Ying ; Yang, Jinru ; Qiao, Fu ; Feng, Bilong ; Hu, Fen ; Xi, Zi-ang ; Wu, Wenwen ; Ni, Zi-ling ; Liu, Li ; Yuan, Yufeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-4f4ce50d8b41f3c69fd658d8eb9014999d4f167911f740c28663355bc1f5a6373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Cross Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Global</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Hand Hygiene - methods</topic><topic>Hand hygiene compliance</topic><topic>Hand hygiene improvement</topic><topic>Health care-associated infection control</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pandemics - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jinru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Fu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Bilong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Fen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xi, Zi-ang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Wenwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Zi-ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Yufeng</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Ying</au><au>Yang, Jinru</au><au>Qiao, Fu</au><au>Feng, Bilong</au><au>Hu, Fen</au><au>Xi, Zi-ang</au><au>Wu, Wenwen</au><au>Ni, Zi-ling</au><au>Liu, Li</au><au>Yuan, Yufeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Compared hand hygiene compliance among healthcare providers before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>563</spage><epage>571</epage><pages>563-571</pages><issn>0196-6553</issn><issn>1527-3296</issn><eissn>1527-3296</eissn><abstract>•The estimated overall hand hygiene compliance during COVID-19 was higher than that reported in previous studies.•The designated wards, fever clinics, and ICUs have become the focused departments for hand hygiene monitoring.•Standardized hand hygiene monitoring tools as reliable systems were called for. Hand hygiene (HH) is a cost-effective measure to reduce health care-associated infections. The overall characteristics and changes of hand hygiene compliance (HHC) among health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic provided evidence for targeted HH intervention measures. To systematically review the literature and conduct a meta-analysis of studies investigating the rate of HHC and the characteristics of HH during the COVID-19 pandemic. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and CBM databases were searched. All the original articles with valid HHC data among health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic (from January 1, 2020 to October 1, 2021) were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a DerSimonian and Laird model to yield a point estimate and a 95% CI for the HHC rate. The heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics and a random-effects model was used to contrast between different occupations, the WHO 5-moments of HH and different observation methods. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed. Seven studies with 2,377 health care providers reporting HHC were identified. The estimated overall HHC was 74%, which was higher than that reported in previous studies (5%-89%). Fever clinic has become a new key place for HHC observation. Nurses had the highest HHC (80%; 95% CI:74%-87%) while auxiliary workers (70%; 95%CI:62%-77%) had the lowest. For the WHO 5-moments, the health care providers had the highest HHC after contact with the body fluids of the patients (91%; 95% CI:88%-94%), while before contact with patient's health care providers had the lowest HHC (68%; 95% CI:62%-74%) which was consistent with before the pandemic. There existed great HHC differences among different monitoring methods (automatic monitoring system:53%; 95% CI:44%-63% versus openly and secretly observation: 91%; 95% CI: 90%-91%). During the COVID-19 pandemic, the compliance of health care providers’ HH showed a great improvement. The fever clinics have become the focused departments for HH monitoring. The HHC of auxiliary workers and the HH opportunity for “before contact with patients” should be strengthened. In the future, it will be necessary to develop standardized HH monitoring tools for practical work.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34883162</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajic.2021.11.030</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3924-3803</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-6553
ispartof American journal of infection control, 2022-05, Vol.50 (5), p.563-571
issn 0196-6553
1527-3296
1527-3296
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8648372
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects COVID-19
Cross Infection - epidemiology
Global
Guideline Adherence
Hand Hygiene - methods
Hand hygiene compliance
Hand hygiene improvement
Health care-associated infection control
Health Personnel
Humans
Pandemics - prevention & control
Review
title Compared hand hygiene compliance among healthcare providers before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-01T02%3A38%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compared%20hand%20hygiene%20compliance%20among%20healthcare%20providers%20before%20and%20after%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic:%20A%20rapid%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20infection%20control&rft.au=Wang,%20Ying&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=563&rft.epage=571&rft.pages=563-571&rft.issn=0196-6553&rft.eissn=1527-3296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.11.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2608534151%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2608534151&rft_id=info:pmid/34883162&rft_els_id=S0196655321007926&rfr_iscdi=true