Results of a Global Survey of Experts to Categorize the Suitability of Interventions for Inclusion in School Health Services
This global survey of experts assessed the suitability of different health-related interventions for inclusion in school health services (SHSs) to inform development of the World Health Organization global guideline on SHSs. A review of 138 global World Health Organization publications identified 40...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of adolescent health 2021-12, Vol.69 (6), p.948-956 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 956 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 948 |
| container_title | Journal of adolescent health |
| container_volume | 69 |
| creator | Plummer, Mary Louisa Chan, Ace Kohl, Kid Taylor, Ashley B. Baltag, Valentina Saewyc, Elizabeth Ross, David Anthony |
| description | This global survey of experts assessed the suitability of different health-related interventions for inclusion in school health services (SHSs) to inform development of the World Health Organization global guideline on SHSs.
A review of 138 global World Health Organization publications identified 406 health service interventions for 5- to 19-year-old individuals. These were consolidated, pretested, and pilot-tested in a questionnaire as 86 promotion, prevention, care, or treatment interventions. A total of 1,293 experts were identified through purposive sampling of journal databases and professional networks. In July 2019, experts were invited to complete the questionnaire online in Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, or Spanish. Respondents categorized each intervention as essential, highly suitable, suitable, or unsuitable in SHSs (everywhere or in certain geographic areas only). They could also suggest interventions.
Interventions categorized most often as “Essential in SHSs everywhere” (70%–80%) are related to health promotion and health education. Clinical interventions categorized most often in this way (60%–68%) are related to immunization, screening, assessment, and general care. Interventions categorized most often as “Essential in SHSs in certain geographic areas only” (27%–49%) are related to immunization, mass drug administration, and health promotion. Interventions categorized most often as “Unsuitable in SHSs anywhere” (12%–14%) are related to screening of noncommunicable conditions. There were no important regional differences. Of 439 respondents from 81 countries, 188 suggested 378 additional interventions. Question order effect and/or purposive sampling biases may have influenced both quantitative and qualitative results for different types of intervention.
Favorable responses to almost all interventions supported their World Health Organization guideline inclusion but provided little guidance for intervention prioritization. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.05.008 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8631416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1054139X21002408</els_id><sourcerecordid>2545609318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-8f78e73631aa63849b2f480af9d792c1ffb01ae9bcde7c0473069d494fba49b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhiMEoqXwCsgSGzYJdq72BglGpa1UCYkBiZ3lOMeNI0882M6oRX34numUctmwsn38_ef2ZxlhtGCUte-mYlKDH0G5NBYlLVlBm4JS_iQ7ZrwTORNd-RTvtKlzVonvR9mLGCeK0pbR59lRVbO247w8zm6_QFxcisQbosiZ871yZL2EHdzsQ6fXWwj4mzxZqQRXPtifQNIIyNikeutsugcv5gQompP1cyTGB4xot0R8EjuTtR69d-T8vmOyRtRqiC-zZ0a5CK8ezpPs26fTr6vz_PLz2cXqw2WuG9qlnJuOQ1e1FVOqrXgt-tLUnCojhk6UmhnTU6ZA9HqATtO6q2grhlrUplcI8-oke3_Iu136DQwa2wzKyW2wGxVupFdW_v0z21Fe-Z3kWBNXhQnePiQI_scCMcmNjRqcUzP4JcqyqZuWiorta735B538EmYcT5a4fMZwpBIpfqB08DEGMI_NMCr3FstJ_rZY7i2WtJFoMUpf_znMo_CXpwh8PACAK91ZCDJqC7OGwQbQSQ7e_r_KHf5Mv4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610115072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Results of a Global Survey of Experts to Categorize the Suitability of Interventions for Inclusion in School Health Services</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Plummer, Mary Louisa ; Chan, Ace ; Kohl, Kid ; Taylor, Ashley B. ; Baltag, Valentina ; Saewyc, Elizabeth ; Ross, David Anthony</creator><creatorcontrib>Plummer, Mary Louisa ; Chan, Ace ; Kohl, Kid ; Taylor, Ashley B. ; Baltag, Valentina ; Saewyc, Elizabeth ; Ross, David Anthony</creatorcontrib><description>This global survey of experts assessed the suitability of different health-related interventions for inclusion in school health services (SHSs) to inform development of the World Health Organization global guideline on SHSs.
A review of 138 global World Health Organization publications identified 406 health service interventions for 5- to 19-year-old individuals. These were consolidated, pretested, and pilot-tested in a questionnaire as 86 promotion, prevention, care, or treatment interventions. A total of 1,293 experts were identified through purposive sampling of journal databases and professional networks. In July 2019, experts were invited to complete the questionnaire online in Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, or Spanish. Respondents categorized each intervention as essential, highly suitable, suitable, or unsuitable in SHSs (everywhere or in certain geographic areas only). They could also suggest interventions.
Interventions categorized most often as “Essential in SHSs everywhere” (70%–80%) are related to health promotion and health education. Clinical interventions categorized most often in this way (60%–68%) are related to immunization, screening, assessment, and general care. Interventions categorized most often as “Essential in SHSs in certain geographic areas only” (27%–49%) are related to immunization, mass drug administration, and health promotion. Interventions categorized most often as “Unsuitable in SHSs anywhere” (12%–14%) are related to screening of noncommunicable conditions. There were no important regional differences. Of 439 respondents from 81 countries, 188 suggested 378 additional interventions. Question order effect and/or purposive sampling biases may have influenced both quantitative and qualitative results for different types of intervention.
Favorable responses to almost all interventions supported their World Health Organization guideline inclusion but provided little guidance for intervention prioritization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-139X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1972</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.05.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34167882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescent health ; Adult ; Appropriateness ; Child ; Child health ; Child, Preschool ; Classification ; Experts ; Global survey ; Health care ; Health education ; Health Promotion ; Health services ; Health-promoting schools ; Humans ; Immunization ; Intervention ; Medical screening ; Online survey ; Original ; Polls & surveys ; Prevention programs ; Questionnaires ; Regional variations ; Sampling ; School health ; School Health Services ; Suitability ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Sustainability ; World Health Organization ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of adolescent health, 2021-12, Vol.69 (6), p.948-956</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Dec 2021</rights><rights>2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-8f78e73631aa63849b2f480af9d792c1ffb01ae9bcde7c0473069d494fba49b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-8f78e73631aa63849b2f480af9d792c1ffb01ae9bcde7c0473069d494fba49b83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5140-4580 ; 0000-0002-1625-9506 ; 0000-0002-7310-552X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X21002408$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34167882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plummer, Mary Louisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohl, Kid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Ashley B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baltag, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saewyc, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, David Anthony</creatorcontrib><title>Results of a Global Survey of Experts to Categorize the Suitability of Interventions for Inclusion in School Health Services</title><title>Journal of adolescent health</title><addtitle>J Adolesc Health</addtitle><description>This global survey of experts assessed the suitability of different health-related interventions for inclusion in school health services (SHSs) to inform development of the World Health Organization global guideline on SHSs.
A review of 138 global World Health Organization publications identified 406 health service interventions for 5- to 19-year-old individuals. These were consolidated, pretested, and pilot-tested in a questionnaire as 86 promotion, prevention, care, or treatment interventions. A total of 1,293 experts were identified through purposive sampling of journal databases and professional networks. In July 2019, experts were invited to complete the questionnaire online in Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, or Spanish. Respondents categorized each intervention as essential, highly suitable, suitable, or unsuitable in SHSs (everywhere or in certain geographic areas only). They could also suggest interventions.
Interventions categorized most often as “Essential in SHSs everywhere” (70%–80%) are related to health promotion and health education. Clinical interventions categorized most often in this way (60%–68%) are related to immunization, screening, assessment, and general care. Interventions categorized most often as “Essential in SHSs in certain geographic areas only” (27%–49%) are related to immunization, mass drug administration, and health promotion. Interventions categorized most often as “Unsuitable in SHSs anywhere” (12%–14%) are related to screening of noncommunicable conditions. There were no important regional differences. Of 439 respondents from 81 countries, 188 suggested 378 additional interventions. Question order effect and/or purposive sampling biases may have influenced both quantitative and qualitative results for different types of intervention.
Favorable responses to almost all interventions supported their World Health Organization guideline inclusion but provided little guidance for intervention prioritization.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescent health</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Appropriateness</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child health</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Global survey</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health Promotion</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health-promoting schools</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Online survey</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regional variations</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>School health</subject><subject>School Health Services</subject><subject>Suitability</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>World Health Organization</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1054-139X</issn><issn>1879-1972</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhiMEoqXwCsgSGzYJdq72BglGpa1UCYkBiZ3lOMeNI0882M6oRX34numUctmwsn38_ef2ZxlhtGCUte-mYlKDH0G5NBYlLVlBm4JS_iQ7ZrwTORNd-RTvtKlzVonvR9mLGCeK0pbR59lRVbO247w8zm6_QFxcisQbosiZ871yZL2EHdzsQ6fXWwj4mzxZqQRXPtifQNIIyNikeutsugcv5gQompP1cyTGB4xot0R8EjuTtR69d-T8vmOyRtRqiC-zZ0a5CK8ezpPs26fTr6vz_PLz2cXqw2WuG9qlnJuOQ1e1FVOqrXgt-tLUnCojhk6UmhnTU6ZA9HqATtO6q2grhlrUplcI8-oke3_Iu136DQwa2wzKyW2wGxVupFdW_v0z21Fe-Z3kWBNXhQnePiQI_scCMcmNjRqcUzP4JcqyqZuWiorta735B538EmYcT5a4fMZwpBIpfqB08DEGMI_NMCr3FstJ_rZY7i2WtJFoMUpf_znMo_CXpwh8PACAK91ZCDJqC7OGwQbQSQ7e_r_KHf5Mv4A</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Plummer, Mary Louisa</creator><creator>Chan, Ace</creator><creator>Kohl, Kid</creator><creator>Taylor, Ashley B.</creator><creator>Baltag, Valentina</creator><creator>Saewyc, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Ross, David Anthony</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5140-4580</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-9506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7310-552X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Results of a Global Survey of Experts to Categorize the Suitability of Interventions for Inclusion in School Health Services</title><author>Plummer, Mary Louisa ; Chan, Ace ; Kohl, Kid ; Taylor, Ashley B. ; Baltag, Valentina ; Saewyc, Elizabeth ; Ross, David Anthony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-8f78e73631aa63849b2f480af9d792c1ffb01ae9bcde7c0473069d494fba49b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescent health</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Appropriateness</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child health</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Global survey</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health Promotion</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health-promoting schools</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Online survey</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regional variations</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>School health</topic><topic>School Health Services</topic><topic>Suitability</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>World Health Organization</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plummer, Mary Louisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohl, Kid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Ashley B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baltag, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saewyc, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, David Anthony</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of adolescent health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plummer, Mary Louisa</au><au>Chan, Ace</au><au>Kohl, Kid</au><au>Taylor, Ashley B.</au><au>Baltag, Valentina</au><au>Saewyc, Elizabeth</au><au>Ross, David Anthony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Results of a Global Survey of Experts to Categorize the Suitability of Interventions for Inclusion in School Health Services</atitle><jtitle>Journal of adolescent health</jtitle><addtitle>J Adolesc Health</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>948</spage><epage>956</epage><pages>948-956</pages><issn>1054-139X</issn><eissn>1879-1972</eissn><abstract>This global survey of experts assessed the suitability of different health-related interventions for inclusion in school health services (SHSs) to inform development of the World Health Organization global guideline on SHSs.
A review of 138 global World Health Organization publications identified 406 health service interventions for 5- to 19-year-old individuals. These were consolidated, pretested, and pilot-tested in a questionnaire as 86 promotion, prevention, care, or treatment interventions. A total of 1,293 experts were identified through purposive sampling of journal databases and professional networks. In July 2019, experts were invited to complete the questionnaire online in Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, or Spanish. Respondents categorized each intervention as essential, highly suitable, suitable, or unsuitable in SHSs (everywhere or in certain geographic areas only). They could also suggest interventions.
Interventions categorized most often as “Essential in SHSs everywhere” (70%–80%) are related to health promotion and health education. Clinical interventions categorized most often in this way (60%–68%) are related to immunization, screening, assessment, and general care. Interventions categorized most often as “Essential in SHSs in certain geographic areas only” (27%–49%) are related to immunization, mass drug administration, and health promotion. Interventions categorized most often as “Unsuitable in SHSs anywhere” (12%–14%) are related to screening of noncommunicable conditions. There were no important regional differences. Of 439 respondents from 81 countries, 188 suggested 378 additional interventions. Question order effect and/or purposive sampling biases may have influenced both quantitative and qualitative results for different types of intervention.
Favorable responses to almost all interventions supported their World Health Organization guideline inclusion but provided little guidance for intervention prioritization.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34167882</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.05.008</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5140-4580</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-9506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7310-552X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1054-139X |
| ispartof | Journal of adolescent health, 2021-12, Vol.69 (6), p.948-956 |
| issn | 1054-139X 1879-1972 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8631416 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adolescent Adolescent health Adult Appropriateness Child Child health Child, Preschool Classification Experts Global survey Health care Health education Health Promotion Health services Health-promoting schools Humans Immunization Intervention Medical screening Online survey Original Polls & surveys Prevention programs Questionnaires Regional variations Sampling School health School Health Services Suitability Surveys and Questionnaires Sustainability World Health Organization Young Adult |
| title | Results of a Global Survey of Experts to Categorize the Suitability of Interventions for Inclusion in School Health Services |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T08%3A35%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Results%20of%20a%20Global%20Survey%20of%20Experts%20to%20Categorize%20the%20Suitability%20of%20Interventions%20for%20Inclusion%20in%20School%20Health%20Services&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20adolescent%20health&rft.au=Plummer,%20Mary%20Louisa&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=948&rft.epage=956&rft.pages=948-956&rft.issn=1054-139X&rft.eissn=1879-1972&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.05.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2545609318%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610115072&rft_id=info:pmid/34167882&rft_els_id=S1054139X21002408&rfr_iscdi=true |