APP-guided assessment of acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty: a structured approach to a complex situation

Introduction Acetabular defect recognition and classification remains a challenging field of practice for orthopedic surgeons. Recently, the Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) has been introduced to provide a reliable, reproducible and intuitive classification system. In order to improve ease of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2023-03, Vol.143 (3), p.1301-1310
Hauptverfasser: Jaenisch, Max, Wirtz, Dieter Christian, Kohlhof, Hendrik, Gathen, Martin, Kabir, Koroush, Koob, Sebastian, Jansen, Tom Rainer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1310
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1301
container_title Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
container_volume 143
creator Jaenisch, Max
Wirtz, Dieter Christian
Kohlhof, Hendrik
Gathen, Martin
Kabir, Koroush
Koob, Sebastian
Jansen, Tom Rainer
description Introduction Acetabular defect recognition and classification remains a challenging field of practice for orthopedic surgeons. Recently, the Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) has been introduced to provide a reliable, reproducible and intuitive classification system. In order to improve ease of use and efficiency of the ADC, a browser-based application has been created. We hypothesized that the ADC application can improve rating performance of non-specialists (medical students) to achieve good inter- and intra-rater agreement and will compare favorable to the results of specialists (experienced surgeons) without the help of the application. Materials and methods The ADC is based on the integrity of the acetabular rim and the supporting structures. It consists of four main types of defects ascending in severity. These defects are further subdivided in A–C, narrowing down defect location. 80 randomized radiographs were graded according to ADC by three non-specialists (medical students) with help of the ADC application and by three specialists (orthopedic surgeons) without help of the application to evaluate the difference in inter-rater agreement between groups. To account for intra-rater agreement, the rating process was repeated after a reasonable wash-out period. Results Inter-rater and intra-rater agreement within the non-specialist group rated lower when compared to the specialist group while still falling into the good agreement range. The student group presented with k values of 0.61 for inter-rater agreement and 0.68 for intra-rater agreement, while the surgeon group displayed k values of 0.72 for inter-rater agreement and 0.83 for intra-rater agreement. Conclusion The app-guided assessment of acetabular defects offers a promising innovative approach to simplify complex situations. It makes the challenging field of acetabular revision arthroplasty more approachable especially for less experienced surgeons and offers insight and guidance in the planning stage as well as intra-operative setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00402-021-04270-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8630518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2604831911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-deac8420f276506df93ae1aba2cd1819ea4695eec34ddffe8f103c00372da48d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxSMEoqXwD3BAlrhwCYw_NnE4IFUVX1IleoCzNWtPdl1l4-BxVvS_J8uWUjhw8kjvN8_z9KrquYTXEqB9wwAGVA1K1mBUC7V9UJ1Ko02tO9k8vDefVE-YrwGksh08rk60saZZdXBa7c-vrurNHAMFgczEvKOxiNQL9FRwPQ-YRaCefGERR7GNk8i0jxzTKDCXbU7TgFxu3goUXPLsy5wPXtOUE_qtKGkRfNpNA_0QHMuMZVl9Wj3qcWB6dvueVd8-vP968am-_PLx88X5Ze1Na0odCL01CnrVNitoQt9pJIlrVD5IKztC03QrIq9NCH1PtpegPYBuVUBjgz6r3h19p3m9o-CXbBkHN-W4w3zjEkb3tzLGrdukvbONhpW0i8GrW4Ocvs_Exe0iexoGHCnN7FQDxmrZSbmgL_9Br9OcxyWeU23bNdY25kCpI-VzYs7U3x0jwR1qdcda3VKr-1WrO1zx4n6Mu5XfPS6APgK8SOOG8p-__2P7E0VOsO0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2779688641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>APP-guided assessment of acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty: a structured approach to a complex situation</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Jaenisch, Max ; Wirtz, Dieter Christian ; Kohlhof, Hendrik ; Gathen, Martin ; Kabir, Koroush ; Koob, Sebastian ; Jansen, Tom Rainer</creator><creatorcontrib>Jaenisch, Max ; Wirtz, Dieter Christian ; Kohlhof, Hendrik ; Gathen, Martin ; Kabir, Koroush ; Koob, Sebastian ; Jansen, Tom Rainer</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Acetabular defect recognition and classification remains a challenging field of practice for orthopedic surgeons. Recently, the Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) has been introduced to provide a reliable, reproducible and intuitive classification system. In order to improve ease of use and efficiency of the ADC, a browser-based application has been created. We hypothesized that the ADC application can improve rating performance of non-specialists (medical students) to achieve good inter- and intra-rater agreement and will compare favorable to the results of specialists (experienced surgeons) without the help of the application. Materials and methods The ADC is based on the integrity of the acetabular rim and the supporting structures. It consists of four main types of defects ascending in severity. These defects are further subdivided in A–C, narrowing down defect location. 80 randomized radiographs were graded according to ADC by three non-specialists (medical students) with help of the ADC application and by three specialists (orthopedic surgeons) without help of the application to evaluate the difference in inter-rater agreement between groups. To account for intra-rater agreement, the rating process was repeated after a reasonable wash-out period. Results Inter-rater and intra-rater agreement within the non-specialist group rated lower when compared to the specialist group while still falling into the good agreement range. The student group presented with k values of 0.61 for inter-rater agreement and 0.68 for intra-rater agreement, while the surgeon group displayed k values of 0.72 for inter-rater agreement and 0.83 for intra-rater agreement. Conclusion The app-guided assessment of acetabular defects offers a promising innovative approach to simplify complex situations. It makes the challenging field of acetabular revision arthroplasty more approachable especially for less experienced surgeons and offers insight and guidance in the planning stage as well as intra-operative setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04270-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34846590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Defects ; Joint surgery ; Medical students ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Orthopaedic Surgery ; Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023-03, Vol.143 (3), p.1301-1310</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-deac8420f276506df93ae1aba2cd1819ea4695eec34ddffe8f103c00372da48d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-deac8420f276506df93ae1aba2cd1819ea4695eec34ddffe8f103c00372da48d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5998-0224</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-021-04270-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00402-021-04270-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34846590$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jaenisch, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, Dieter Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohlhof, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gathen, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabir, Koroush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koob, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Tom Rainer</creatorcontrib><title>APP-guided assessment of acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty: a structured approach to a complex situation</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction Acetabular defect recognition and classification remains a challenging field of practice for orthopedic surgeons. Recently, the Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) has been introduced to provide a reliable, reproducible and intuitive classification system. In order to improve ease of use and efficiency of the ADC, a browser-based application has been created. We hypothesized that the ADC application can improve rating performance of non-specialists (medical students) to achieve good inter- and intra-rater agreement and will compare favorable to the results of specialists (experienced surgeons) without the help of the application. Materials and methods The ADC is based on the integrity of the acetabular rim and the supporting structures. It consists of four main types of defects ascending in severity. These defects are further subdivided in A–C, narrowing down defect location. 80 randomized radiographs were graded according to ADC by three non-specialists (medical students) with help of the ADC application and by three specialists (orthopedic surgeons) without help of the application to evaluate the difference in inter-rater agreement between groups. To account for intra-rater agreement, the rating process was repeated after a reasonable wash-out period. Results Inter-rater and intra-rater agreement within the non-specialist group rated lower when compared to the specialist group while still falling into the good agreement range. The student group presented with k values of 0.61 for inter-rater agreement and 0.68 for intra-rater agreement, while the surgeon group displayed k values of 0.72 for inter-rater agreement and 0.83 for intra-rater agreement. Conclusion The app-guided assessment of acetabular defects offers a promising innovative approach to simplify complex situations. It makes the challenging field of acetabular revision arthroplasty more approachable especially for less experienced surgeons and offers insight and guidance in the planning stage as well as intra-operative setting.</description><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Orthopaedic Surgery</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><issn>1434-3916</issn><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxSMEoqXwD3BAlrhwCYw_NnE4IFUVX1IleoCzNWtPdl1l4-BxVvS_J8uWUjhw8kjvN8_z9KrquYTXEqB9wwAGVA1K1mBUC7V9UJ1Ko02tO9k8vDefVE-YrwGksh08rk60saZZdXBa7c-vrurNHAMFgczEvKOxiNQL9FRwPQ-YRaCefGERR7GNk8i0jxzTKDCXbU7TgFxu3goUXPLsy5wPXtOUE_qtKGkRfNpNA_0QHMuMZVl9Wj3qcWB6dvueVd8-vP968am-_PLx88X5Ze1Na0odCL01CnrVNitoQt9pJIlrVD5IKztC03QrIq9NCH1PtpegPYBuVUBjgz6r3h19p3m9o-CXbBkHN-W4w3zjEkb3tzLGrdukvbONhpW0i8GrW4Ocvs_Exe0iexoGHCnN7FQDxmrZSbmgL_9Br9OcxyWeU23bNdY25kCpI-VzYs7U3x0jwR1qdcda3VKr-1WrO1zx4n6Mu5XfPS6APgK8SOOG8p-__2P7E0VOsO0</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Jaenisch, Max</creator><creator>Wirtz, Dieter Christian</creator><creator>Kohlhof, Hendrik</creator><creator>Gathen, Martin</creator><creator>Kabir, Koroush</creator><creator>Koob, Sebastian</creator><creator>Jansen, Tom Rainer</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5998-0224</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>APP-guided assessment of acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty: a structured approach to a complex situation</title><author>Jaenisch, Max ; Wirtz, Dieter Christian ; Kohlhof, Hendrik ; Gathen, Martin ; Kabir, Koroush ; Koob, Sebastian ; Jansen, Tom Rainer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-deac8420f276506df93ae1aba2cd1819ea4695eec34ddffe8f103c00372da48d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Orthopaedic Surgery</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jaenisch, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, Dieter Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohlhof, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gathen, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabir, Koroush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koob, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Tom Rainer</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jaenisch, Max</au><au>Wirtz, Dieter Christian</au><au>Kohlhof, Hendrik</au><au>Gathen, Martin</au><au>Kabir, Koroush</au><au>Koob, Sebastian</au><au>Jansen, Tom Rainer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>APP-guided assessment of acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty: a structured approach to a complex situation</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><stitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</stitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1301</spage><epage>1310</epage><pages>1301-1310</pages><issn>1434-3916</issn><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>Introduction Acetabular defect recognition and classification remains a challenging field of practice for orthopedic surgeons. Recently, the Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) has been introduced to provide a reliable, reproducible and intuitive classification system. In order to improve ease of use and efficiency of the ADC, a browser-based application has been created. We hypothesized that the ADC application can improve rating performance of non-specialists (medical students) to achieve good inter- and intra-rater agreement and will compare favorable to the results of specialists (experienced surgeons) without the help of the application. Materials and methods The ADC is based on the integrity of the acetabular rim and the supporting structures. It consists of four main types of defects ascending in severity. These defects are further subdivided in A–C, narrowing down defect location. 80 randomized radiographs were graded according to ADC by three non-specialists (medical students) with help of the ADC application and by three specialists (orthopedic surgeons) without help of the application to evaluate the difference in inter-rater agreement between groups. To account for intra-rater agreement, the rating process was repeated after a reasonable wash-out period. Results Inter-rater and intra-rater agreement within the non-specialist group rated lower when compared to the specialist group while still falling into the good agreement range. The student group presented with k values of 0.61 for inter-rater agreement and 0.68 for intra-rater agreement, while the surgeon group displayed k values of 0.72 for inter-rater agreement and 0.83 for intra-rater agreement. Conclusion The app-guided assessment of acetabular defects offers a promising innovative approach to simplify complex situations. It makes the challenging field of acetabular revision arthroplasty more approachable especially for less experienced surgeons and offers insight and guidance in the planning stage as well as intra-operative setting.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34846590</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00402-021-04270-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5998-0224</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1434-3916
ispartof Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023-03, Vol.143 (3), p.1301-1310
issn 1434-3916
0936-8051
1434-3916
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8630518
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Defects
Joint surgery
Medical students
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopedics
title APP-guided assessment of acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty: a structured approach to a complex situation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T11%3A32%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=APP-guided%20assessment%20of%20acetabular%20defects%20in%20hip%20revision%20arthroplasty:%20a%20structured%20approach%20to%20a%20complex%20situation&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=Jaenisch,%20Max&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1301&rft.epage=1310&rft.pages=1301-1310&rft.issn=1434-3916&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00402-021-04270-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2604831911%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2779688641&rft_id=info:pmid/34846590&rfr_iscdi=true