APP-guided assessment of acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty: a structured approach to a complex situation
Introduction Acetabular defect recognition and classification remains a challenging field of practice for orthopedic surgeons. Recently, the Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) has been introduced to provide a reliable, reproducible and intuitive classification system. In order to improve ease of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2023-03, Vol.143 (3), p.1301-1310 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1310 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1301 |
container_title | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery |
container_volume | 143 |
creator | Jaenisch, Max Wirtz, Dieter Christian Kohlhof, Hendrik Gathen, Martin Kabir, Koroush Koob, Sebastian Jansen, Tom Rainer |
description | Introduction
Acetabular defect recognition and classification remains a challenging field of practice for orthopedic surgeons. Recently, the Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) has been introduced to provide a reliable, reproducible and intuitive classification system. In order to improve ease of use and efficiency of the ADC, a browser-based application has been created. We hypothesized that the ADC application can improve rating performance of non-specialists (medical students) to achieve good inter- and intra-rater agreement and will compare favorable to the results of specialists (experienced surgeons) without the help of the application.
Materials and methods
The ADC is based on the integrity of the acetabular rim and the supporting structures. It consists of four main types of defects ascending in severity. These defects are further subdivided in A–C, narrowing down defect location. 80 randomized radiographs were graded according to ADC by three non-specialists (medical students) with help of the ADC application and by three specialists (orthopedic surgeons) without help of the application to evaluate the difference in inter-rater agreement between groups. To account for intra-rater agreement, the rating process was repeated after a reasonable wash-out period.
Results
Inter-rater and intra-rater agreement within the non-specialist group rated lower when compared to the specialist group while still falling into the good agreement range. The student group presented with
k
values of 0.61 for inter-rater agreement and 0.68 for intra-rater agreement, while the surgeon group displayed
k
values of 0.72 for inter-rater agreement and 0.83 for intra-rater agreement.
Conclusion
The app-guided assessment of acetabular defects offers a promising innovative approach to simplify complex situations. It makes the challenging field of acetabular revision arthroplasty more approachable especially for less experienced surgeons and offers insight and guidance in the planning stage as well as intra-operative setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00402-021-04270-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8630518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2604831911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-deac8420f276506df93ae1aba2cd1819ea4695eec34ddffe8f103c00372da48d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxSMEoqXwD3BAlrhwCYw_NnE4IFUVX1IleoCzNWtPdl1l4-BxVvS_J8uWUjhw8kjvN8_z9KrquYTXEqB9wwAGVA1K1mBUC7V9UJ1Ko02tO9k8vDefVE-YrwGksh08rk60saZZdXBa7c-vrurNHAMFgczEvKOxiNQL9FRwPQ-YRaCefGERR7GNk8i0jxzTKDCXbU7TgFxu3goUXPLsy5wPXtOUE_qtKGkRfNpNA_0QHMuMZVl9Wj3qcWB6dvueVd8-vP968am-_PLx88X5Ze1Na0odCL01CnrVNitoQt9pJIlrVD5IKztC03QrIq9NCH1PtpegPYBuVUBjgz6r3h19p3m9o-CXbBkHN-W4w3zjEkb3tzLGrdukvbONhpW0i8GrW4Ocvs_Exe0iexoGHCnN7FQDxmrZSbmgL_9Br9OcxyWeU23bNdY25kCpI-VzYs7U3x0jwR1qdcda3VKr-1WrO1zx4n6Mu5XfPS6APgK8SOOG8p-__2P7E0VOsO0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2779688641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>APP-guided assessment of acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty: a structured approach to a complex situation</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Jaenisch, Max ; Wirtz, Dieter Christian ; Kohlhof, Hendrik ; Gathen, Martin ; Kabir, Koroush ; Koob, Sebastian ; Jansen, Tom Rainer</creator><creatorcontrib>Jaenisch, Max ; Wirtz, Dieter Christian ; Kohlhof, Hendrik ; Gathen, Martin ; Kabir, Koroush ; Koob, Sebastian ; Jansen, Tom Rainer</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Acetabular defect recognition and classification remains a challenging field of practice for orthopedic surgeons. Recently, the Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) has been introduced to provide a reliable, reproducible and intuitive classification system. In order to improve ease of use and efficiency of the ADC, a browser-based application has been created. We hypothesized that the ADC application can improve rating performance of non-specialists (medical students) to achieve good inter- and intra-rater agreement and will compare favorable to the results of specialists (experienced surgeons) without the help of the application.
Materials and methods
The ADC is based on the integrity of the acetabular rim and the supporting structures. It consists of four main types of defects ascending in severity. These defects are further subdivided in A–C, narrowing down defect location. 80 randomized radiographs were graded according to ADC by three non-specialists (medical students) with help of the ADC application and by three specialists (orthopedic surgeons) without help of the application to evaluate the difference in inter-rater agreement between groups. To account for intra-rater agreement, the rating process was repeated after a reasonable wash-out period.
Results
Inter-rater and intra-rater agreement within the non-specialist group rated lower when compared to the specialist group while still falling into the good agreement range. The student group presented with
k
values of 0.61 for inter-rater agreement and 0.68 for intra-rater agreement, while the surgeon group displayed
k
values of 0.72 for inter-rater agreement and 0.83 for intra-rater agreement.
Conclusion
The app-guided assessment of acetabular defects offers a promising innovative approach to simplify complex situations. It makes the challenging field of acetabular revision arthroplasty more approachable especially for less experienced surgeons and offers insight and guidance in the planning stage as well as intra-operative setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04270-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34846590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Defects ; Joint surgery ; Medical students ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Orthopaedic Surgery ; Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023-03, Vol.143 (3), p.1301-1310</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-deac8420f276506df93ae1aba2cd1819ea4695eec34ddffe8f103c00372da48d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-deac8420f276506df93ae1aba2cd1819ea4695eec34ddffe8f103c00372da48d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5998-0224</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-021-04270-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00402-021-04270-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34846590$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jaenisch, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, Dieter Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohlhof, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gathen, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabir, Koroush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koob, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Tom Rainer</creatorcontrib><title>APP-guided assessment of acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty: a structured approach to a complex situation</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction
Acetabular defect recognition and classification remains a challenging field of practice for orthopedic surgeons. Recently, the Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) has been introduced to provide a reliable, reproducible and intuitive classification system. In order to improve ease of use and efficiency of the ADC, a browser-based application has been created. We hypothesized that the ADC application can improve rating performance of non-specialists (medical students) to achieve good inter- and intra-rater agreement and will compare favorable to the results of specialists (experienced surgeons) without the help of the application.
Materials and methods
The ADC is based on the integrity of the acetabular rim and the supporting structures. It consists of four main types of defects ascending in severity. These defects are further subdivided in A–C, narrowing down defect location. 80 randomized radiographs were graded according to ADC by three non-specialists (medical students) with help of the ADC application and by three specialists (orthopedic surgeons) without help of the application to evaluate the difference in inter-rater agreement between groups. To account for intra-rater agreement, the rating process was repeated after a reasonable wash-out period.
Results
Inter-rater and intra-rater agreement within the non-specialist group rated lower when compared to the specialist group while still falling into the good agreement range. The student group presented with
k
values of 0.61 for inter-rater agreement and 0.68 for intra-rater agreement, while the surgeon group displayed
k
values of 0.72 for inter-rater agreement and 0.83 for intra-rater agreement.
Conclusion
The app-guided assessment of acetabular defects offers a promising innovative approach to simplify complex situations. It makes the challenging field of acetabular revision arthroplasty more approachable especially for less experienced surgeons and offers insight and guidance in the planning stage as well as intra-operative setting.</description><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Orthopaedic Surgery</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><issn>1434-3916</issn><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxSMEoqXwD3BAlrhwCYw_NnE4IFUVX1IleoCzNWtPdl1l4-BxVvS_J8uWUjhw8kjvN8_z9KrquYTXEqB9wwAGVA1K1mBUC7V9UJ1Ko02tO9k8vDefVE-YrwGksh08rk60saZZdXBa7c-vrurNHAMFgczEvKOxiNQL9FRwPQ-YRaCefGERR7GNk8i0jxzTKDCXbU7TgFxu3goUXPLsy5wPXtOUE_qtKGkRfNpNA_0QHMuMZVl9Wj3qcWB6dvueVd8-vP968am-_PLx88X5Ze1Na0odCL01CnrVNitoQt9pJIlrVD5IKztC03QrIq9NCH1PtpegPYBuVUBjgz6r3h19p3m9o-CXbBkHN-W4w3zjEkb3tzLGrdukvbONhpW0i8GrW4Ocvs_Exe0iexoGHCnN7FQDxmrZSbmgL_9Br9OcxyWeU23bNdY25kCpI-VzYs7U3x0jwR1qdcda3VKr-1WrO1zx4n6Mu5XfPS6APgK8SOOG8p-__2P7E0VOsO0</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Jaenisch, Max</creator><creator>Wirtz, Dieter Christian</creator><creator>Kohlhof, Hendrik</creator><creator>Gathen, Martin</creator><creator>Kabir, Koroush</creator><creator>Koob, Sebastian</creator><creator>Jansen, Tom Rainer</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5998-0224</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>APP-guided assessment of acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty: a structured approach to a complex situation</title><author>Jaenisch, Max ; Wirtz, Dieter Christian ; Kohlhof, Hendrik ; Gathen, Martin ; Kabir, Koroush ; Koob, Sebastian ; Jansen, Tom Rainer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-deac8420f276506df93ae1aba2cd1819ea4695eec34ddffe8f103c00372da48d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Orthopaedic Surgery</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jaenisch, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, Dieter Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohlhof, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gathen, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabir, Koroush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koob, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Tom Rainer</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jaenisch, Max</au><au>Wirtz, Dieter Christian</au><au>Kohlhof, Hendrik</au><au>Gathen, Martin</au><au>Kabir, Koroush</au><au>Koob, Sebastian</au><au>Jansen, Tom Rainer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>APP-guided assessment of acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty: a structured approach to a complex situation</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><stitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</stitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1301</spage><epage>1310</epage><pages>1301-1310</pages><issn>1434-3916</issn><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Acetabular defect recognition and classification remains a challenging field of practice for orthopedic surgeons. Recently, the Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) has been introduced to provide a reliable, reproducible and intuitive classification system. In order to improve ease of use and efficiency of the ADC, a browser-based application has been created. We hypothesized that the ADC application can improve rating performance of non-specialists (medical students) to achieve good inter- and intra-rater agreement and will compare favorable to the results of specialists (experienced surgeons) without the help of the application.
Materials and methods
The ADC is based on the integrity of the acetabular rim and the supporting structures. It consists of four main types of defects ascending in severity. These defects are further subdivided in A–C, narrowing down defect location. 80 randomized radiographs were graded according to ADC by three non-specialists (medical students) with help of the ADC application and by three specialists (orthopedic surgeons) without help of the application to evaluate the difference in inter-rater agreement between groups. To account for intra-rater agreement, the rating process was repeated after a reasonable wash-out period.
Results
Inter-rater and intra-rater agreement within the non-specialist group rated lower when compared to the specialist group while still falling into the good agreement range. The student group presented with
k
values of 0.61 for inter-rater agreement and 0.68 for intra-rater agreement, while the surgeon group displayed
k
values of 0.72 for inter-rater agreement and 0.83 for intra-rater agreement.
Conclusion
The app-guided assessment of acetabular defects offers a promising innovative approach to simplify complex situations. It makes the challenging field of acetabular revision arthroplasty more approachable especially for less experienced surgeons and offers insight and guidance in the planning stage as well as intra-operative setting.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34846590</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00402-021-04270-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5998-0224</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1434-3916 |
ispartof | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023-03, Vol.143 (3), p.1301-1310 |
issn | 1434-3916 0936-8051 1434-3916 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8630518 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Defects Joint surgery Medical students Medicine Medicine & Public Health Orthopaedic Surgery Orthopedics |
title | APP-guided assessment of acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty: a structured approach to a complex situation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T11%3A32%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=APP-guided%20assessment%20of%20acetabular%20defects%20in%20hip%20revision%20arthroplasty:%20a%20structured%20approach%20to%20a%20complex%20situation&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=Jaenisch,%20Max&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1301&rft.epage=1310&rft.pages=1301-1310&rft.issn=1434-3916&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00402-021-04270-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2604831911%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2779688641&rft_id=info:pmid/34846590&rfr_iscdi=true |