Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) versus whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) for myeloma imaging and staging
Myeloma-associated bone disease (MBD) develops in about 80–90% of patients and severely affects their quality of life, as it accounts for the majority of mortality and morbidity. Imaging in multiple myeloma (MM) and MBD is of utmost importance in order to detect bone and bone marrow lesions as well...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Skeletal radiology 2022-01, Vol.51 (1), p.43-58 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 58 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 43 |
container_title | Skeletal radiology |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Treitl, Karla M. Ricke, Jens Baur-Melnyk, Andrea |
description | Myeloma-associated bone disease (MBD) develops in about 80–90% of patients and severely affects their quality of life, as it accounts for the majority of mortality and morbidity. Imaging in multiple myeloma (MM) and MBD is of utmost importance in order to detect bone and bone marrow lesions as well as extraosseous soft-tissue masses and complications before the initiation of treatment. It is required for determination of the stage of disease and aids in the assessment of treatment response. Whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) is the key modality to establish the initial diagnosis of MM and is now recommended as reference standard procedure for the detection of lytic destruction in MBD. In contrast, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) has higher sensitivity for the detection of focal and diffuse plasma cell infiltration patterns of the bone marrow and identifies them prior to osteolytic destruction. It is recommended for the evaluation of spinal and vertebral lesions, while functional, diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI-MRI) is a promising tool for the assessment of treatment response. This review addresses the current improvements and limitations of WBCT and WBMRI for diagnosis and staging in MM, underlining the fact that both modalities offer complementary information. It further summarizes the corresponding radiological findings and novel technological aspects of both modalities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00256-021-03799-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8626374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2532248479</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-358211c2b7fc3796e10b4c4341280bda41705e1358ccd9ac14cbcd6eb071959a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EotPCH2CBLLFpFwa_YiebSu2oL6kICRV1aTnOnUyqxB7spGj49fV0ypSyYGXL97vH5-gg9IHRz4xS_SVRygtFKGeECl1VRL5CMyYFJ5wp9hrNqFCScCHLPbSf0h2lTOtCvUV7QlLBNC1m6PftMvRA6tCs8WBbD2PncIQUvPUOcJffOt_iw9vTr9-vjvA9xDQl_Ot5yYVhNY3Q4DEMoY12tVxv6PnNEV6EiIc19GGwOyHrG5zGx_s79GZh-wTvn84D9OP87GZ-Sa6_XVzNT66Jk1qORBQlZ8zxWi9cTqmA0Vo6KSTjJa0bKzdBgGXMuaayjklXu0ZBTTWrisqKA3S81V1N9QCNAz9G25tVzJ7i2gTbmZcT3y1NG-5NqbgSWmaBwyeBGH5OkEYzdMlB31sPYUqGF4JzWUpdZfTTP-hdmKLP8QxXlJdK8arMFN9SLoaUIix2Zhg1m2rNtlqTqzWP1ZqNi49_x9it_OkyA2ILpDzyLcTnv_8j-wA2W6-z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2602866298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) versus whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) for myeloma imaging and staging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Treitl, Karla M. ; Ricke, Jens ; Baur-Melnyk, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>Treitl, Karla M. ; Ricke, Jens ; Baur-Melnyk, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>Myeloma-associated bone disease (MBD) develops in about 80–90% of patients and severely affects their quality of life, as it accounts for the majority of mortality and morbidity. Imaging in multiple myeloma (MM) and MBD is of utmost importance in order to detect bone and bone marrow lesions as well as extraosseous soft-tissue masses and complications before the initiation of treatment. It is required for determination of the stage of disease and aids in the assessment of treatment response. Whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) is the key modality to establish the initial diagnosis of MM and is now recommended as reference standard procedure for the detection of lytic destruction in MBD. In contrast, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) has higher sensitivity for the detection of focal and diffuse plasma cell infiltration patterns of the bone marrow and identifies them prior to osteolytic destruction. It is recommended for the evaluation of spinal and vertebral lesions, while functional, diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI-MRI) is a promising tool for the assessment of treatment response. This review addresses the current improvements and limitations of WBCT and WBMRI for diagnosis and staging in MM, underlining the fact that both modalities offer complementary information. It further summarizes the corresponding radiological findings and novel technological aspects of both modalities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-2348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2161</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03799-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34031705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biomedical materials ; Bone diseases ; Bone imaging ; Bone marrow ; Computed tomography ; Destruction ; Diagnosis ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Humans ; Imaging ; Lesions ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Morbidity ; Multiple myeloma ; Multiple Myeloma - diagnostic imaging ; Multiple Myeloma - pathology ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nuclear Medicine ; Orthopedics ; Osteolysis ; Pathology ; Quality of Life ; Radiology ; Review ; Review Article ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Vertebrae ; Whole Body Imaging</subject><ispartof>Skeletal radiology, 2022-01, Vol.51 (1), p.43-58</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-358211c2b7fc3796e10b4c4341280bda41705e1358ccd9ac14cbcd6eb071959a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-358211c2b7fc3796e10b4c4341280bda41705e1358ccd9ac14cbcd6eb071959a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3748-4614</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00256-021-03799-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00256-021-03799-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,27911,27912,41475,42544,51306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34031705$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Treitl, Karla M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricke, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur-Melnyk, Andrea</creatorcontrib><title>Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) versus whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) for myeloma imaging and staging</title><title>Skeletal radiology</title><addtitle>Skeletal Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Skeletal Radiol</addtitle><description>Myeloma-associated bone disease (MBD) develops in about 80–90% of patients and severely affects their quality of life, as it accounts for the majority of mortality and morbidity. Imaging in multiple myeloma (MM) and MBD is of utmost importance in order to detect bone and bone marrow lesions as well as extraosseous soft-tissue masses and complications before the initiation of treatment. It is required for determination of the stage of disease and aids in the assessment of treatment response. Whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) is the key modality to establish the initial diagnosis of MM and is now recommended as reference standard procedure for the detection of lytic destruction in MBD. In contrast, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) has higher sensitivity for the detection of focal and diffuse plasma cell infiltration patterns of the bone marrow and identifies them prior to osteolytic destruction. It is recommended for the evaluation of spinal and vertebral lesions, while functional, diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI-MRI) is a promising tool for the assessment of treatment response. This review addresses the current improvements and limitations of WBCT and WBMRI for diagnosis and staging in MM, underlining the fact that both modalities offer complementary information. It further summarizes the corresponding radiological findings and novel technological aspects of both modalities.</description><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bone diseases</subject><subject>Bone imaging</subject><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Destruction</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Multiple myeloma</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteolysis</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><subject>Whole Body Imaging</subject><issn>0364-2348</issn><issn>1432-2161</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EotPCH2CBLLFpFwa_YiebSu2oL6kICRV1aTnOnUyqxB7spGj49fV0ypSyYGXL97vH5-gg9IHRz4xS_SVRygtFKGeECl1VRL5CMyYFJ5wp9hrNqFCScCHLPbSf0h2lTOtCvUV7QlLBNC1m6PftMvRA6tCs8WBbD2PncIQUvPUOcJffOt_iw9vTr9-vjvA9xDQl_Ot5yYVhNY3Q4DEMoY12tVxv6PnNEV6EiIc19GGwOyHrG5zGx_s79GZh-wTvn84D9OP87GZ-Sa6_XVzNT66Jk1qORBQlZ8zxWi9cTqmA0Vo6KSTjJa0bKzdBgGXMuaayjklXu0ZBTTWrisqKA3S81V1N9QCNAz9G25tVzJ7i2gTbmZcT3y1NG-5NqbgSWmaBwyeBGH5OkEYzdMlB31sPYUqGF4JzWUpdZfTTP-hdmKLP8QxXlJdK8arMFN9SLoaUIix2Zhg1m2rNtlqTqzWP1ZqNi49_x9it_OkyA2ILpDzyLcTnv_8j-wA2W6-z</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Treitl, Karla M.</creator><creator>Ricke, Jens</creator><creator>Baur-Melnyk, Andrea</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3748-4614</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) versus whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) for myeloma imaging and staging</title><author>Treitl, Karla M. ; Ricke, Jens ; Baur-Melnyk, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-358211c2b7fc3796e10b4c4341280bda41705e1358ccd9ac14cbcd6eb071959a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bone diseases</topic><topic>Bone imaging</topic><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Destruction</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Multiple myeloma</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteolysis</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><topic>Whole Body Imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Treitl, Karla M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricke, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur-Melnyk, Andrea</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Skeletal radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Treitl, Karla M.</au><au>Ricke, Jens</au><au>Baur-Melnyk, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) versus whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) for myeloma imaging and staging</atitle><jtitle>Skeletal radiology</jtitle><stitle>Skeletal Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Skeletal Radiol</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>43-58</pages><issn>0364-2348</issn><eissn>1432-2161</eissn><abstract>Myeloma-associated bone disease (MBD) develops in about 80–90% of patients and severely affects their quality of life, as it accounts for the majority of mortality and morbidity. Imaging in multiple myeloma (MM) and MBD is of utmost importance in order to detect bone and bone marrow lesions as well as extraosseous soft-tissue masses and complications before the initiation of treatment. It is required for determination of the stage of disease and aids in the assessment of treatment response. Whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) is the key modality to establish the initial diagnosis of MM and is now recommended as reference standard procedure for the detection of lytic destruction in MBD. In contrast, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) has higher sensitivity for the detection of focal and diffuse plasma cell infiltration patterns of the bone marrow and identifies them prior to osteolytic destruction. It is recommended for the evaluation of spinal and vertebral lesions, while functional, diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI-MRI) is a promising tool for the assessment of treatment response. This review addresses the current improvements and limitations of WBCT and WBMRI for diagnosis and staging in MM, underlining the fact that both modalities offer complementary information. It further summarizes the corresponding radiological findings and novel technological aspects of both modalities.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34031705</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00256-021-03799-4</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3748-4614</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-2348 |
ispartof | Skeletal radiology, 2022-01, Vol.51 (1), p.43-58 |
issn | 0364-2348 1432-2161 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8626374 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Biomedical materials Bone diseases Bone imaging Bone marrow Computed tomography Destruction Diagnosis Functional magnetic resonance imaging Humans Imaging Lesions Magnetic Resonance Imaging Medical imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Morbidity Multiple myeloma Multiple Myeloma - diagnostic imaging Multiple Myeloma - pathology Neoplasm Staging Nuclear Medicine Orthopedics Osteolysis Pathology Quality of Life Radiology Review Review Article Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed Vertebrae Whole Body Imaging |
title | Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) versus whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) for myeloma imaging and staging |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T17%3A19%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Whole-body%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20(WBMRI)%20versus%20whole-body%20computed%20tomography%20(WBCT)%20for%20myeloma%20imaging%20and%20staging&rft.jtitle=Skeletal%20radiology&rft.au=Treitl,%20Karla%20M.&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=43-58&rft.issn=0364-2348&rft.eissn=1432-2161&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00256-021-03799-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2532248479%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2602866298&rft_id=info:pmid/34031705&rfr_iscdi=true |