Upper airway assessment using four different maxillary expanders in cleft patients: A cone-beam computed tomography study

To evaluate the anterior and posterior maxillary width, the nasal passage volume, the oropharyngeal minimum axial area, and volume changes in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated with one of the following four expanders: Hyrax, Fan-Type, inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first permane...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Angle orthodontist 2016-07, Vol.86 (4), p.617-624
Hauptverfasser: Mordente, Carolina Morsani, Palomo, Juan Martin, Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello, Souki, Bernardo Quiroga, Oliveira, Dauro Douglas, Andrade, Jr, Ildeu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 624
container_issue 4
container_start_page 617
container_title The Angle orthodontist
container_volume 86
creator Mordente, Carolina Morsani
Palomo, Juan Martin
Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello
Souki, Bernardo Quiroga
Oliveira, Dauro Douglas
Andrade, Jr, Ildeu
description To evaluate the anterior and posterior maxillary width, the nasal passage volume, the oropharyngeal minimum axial area, and volume changes in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated with one of the following four expanders: Hyrax, Fan-Type, inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first permanent molars (iMini-M), or inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first premolars (iMini-B). A total of 40 patients with transverse maxillary deficiency who were submitted for rapid maxillary expansion were divided in four groups according to type of expander used. Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken before and 3 months after expansion. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the differences among the groups, and paired t-tests were used to evaluate the changes in each group. All groups showed a significant increase in the anterior maxillary width, with no intergroup differences. The iMini-B was the only group that did not show a significant increase in the posterior maxillary width. The intergroup comparison demonstrated differences among all groups except between Hyrax and iMini-M, which showed the greatest posterior expansions. The intragroup analysis showed a significant increase in the nasal passage volume in hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar groups, but the intergroup comparison revealed a significant difference only between Fan-Type and inverted mini-hyrax on the molars. None of the expanders caused significant changes in the oropharyngeal measurements. Only the Hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar expanders effectively increased the nasal passage volume, and none of the expanders evaluated in this study modified the oropharyngeal airway.
doi_str_mv 10.2319/032015-174.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8601491</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1800701965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-6c6a8d0a55fa740648a32e03c575d8acd73ea22d71febfaf3c2e070e3b08e2983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1v1TAQtBCIPgo3zshHDqSs7TgfHJCqii-pEhd6tvbZ61ejJA52Upp_j59eqeC0q53R7OwOY68FXEgl-vegJAhdiba-EE_YTvS1rloB6inbAYCqlBT9GXuR808AqXUtn7Mz2eheN7rbse1mnilxDOk3bhxzppxHmha-5jAduI9r4i54T-k4HPE-DAOmjdP9jJOjlHmYuB3IL3zGJRRS_sAvuY0TVXvCsXTjvC7k-BLHeEg43248L6vbXrJnHodMrx7qObv5_OnH1dfq-vuXb1eX15WtNSxVYxvsHKDWHtsamrpDJQmU1a12HVrXKkIpXSs87T16ZQvaAqk9dCT7Tp2zjyfded2P5GyxmHAwcwpjOcREDOZ_ZAq35hDvTNeAqHtRBN4-CKT4a6W8mDFkS-UPE8U1G9FBWSj6RhfquxPVpphzIv-4RoA5pmVOaZmSljkqv_nX2iP5bzzqD2PIk4Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1800701965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Upper airway assessment using four different maxillary expanders in cleft patients: A cone-beam computed tomography study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mordente, Carolina Morsani ; Palomo, Juan Martin ; Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello ; Souki, Bernardo Quiroga ; Oliveira, Dauro Douglas ; Andrade, Jr, Ildeu</creator><creatorcontrib>Mordente, Carolina Morsani ; Palomo, Juan Martin ; Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello ; Souki, Bernardo Quiroga ; Oliveira, Dauro Douglas ; Andrade, Jr, Ildeu</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the anterior and posterior maxillary width, the nasal passage volume, the oropharyngeal minimum axial area, and volume changes in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated with one of the following four expanders: Hyrax, Fan-Type, inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first permanent molars (iMini-M), or inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first premolars (iMini-B). A total of 40 patients with transverse maxillary deficiency who were submitted for rapid maxillary expansion were divided in four groups according to type of expander used. Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken before and 3 months after expansion. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the differences among the groups, and paired t-tests were used to evaluate the changes in each group. All groups showed a significant increase in the anterior maxillary width, with no intergroup differences. The iMini-B was the only group that did not show a significant increase in the posterior maxillary width. The intergroup comparison demonstrated differences among all groups except between Hyrax and iMini-M, which showed the greatest posterior expansions. The intragroup analysis showed a significant increase in the nasal passage volume in hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar groups, but the intergroup comparison revealed a significant difference only between Fan-Type and inverted mini-hyrax on the molars. None of the expanders caused significant changes in the oropharyngeal measurements. Only the Hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar expanders effectively increased the nasal passage volume, and none of the expanders evaluated in this study modified the oropharyngeal airway.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2319/032015-174.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26595658</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Cleft Lip - therapy ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Maxilla - anatomy &amp; histology ; Nose ; Original ; Palatal Expansion Technique</subject><ispartof>The Angle orthodontist, 2016-07, Vol.86 (4), p.617-624</ispartof><rights>2016 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-6c6a8d0a55fa740648a32e03c575d8acd73ea22d71febfaf3c2e070e3b08e2983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-6c6a8d0a55fa740648a32e03c575d8acd73ea22d71febfaf3c2e070e3b08e2983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601491/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601491/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26595658$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mordente, Carolina Morsani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomo, Juan Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souki, Bernardo Quiroga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Dauro Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Jr, Ildeu</creatorcontrib><title>Upper airway assessment using four different maxillary expanders in cleft patients: A cone-beam computed tomography study</title><title>The Angle orthodontist</title><addtitle>Angle Orthod</addtitle><description>To evaluate the anterior and posterior maxillary width, the nasal passage volume, the oropharyngeal minimum axial area, and volume changes in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated with one of the following four expanders: Hyrax, Fan-Type, inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first permanent molars (iMini-M), or inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first premolars (iMini-B). A total of 40 patients with transverse maxillary deficiency who were submitted for rapid maxillary expansion were divided in four groups according to type of expander used. Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken before and 3 months after expansion. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the differences among the groups, and paired t-tests were used to evaluate the changes in each group. All groups showed a significant increase in the anterior maxillary width, with no intergroup differences. The iMini-B was the only group that did not show a significant increase in the posterior maxillary width. The intergroup comparison demonstrated differences among all groups except between Hyrax and iMini-M, which showed the greatest posterior expansions. The intragroup analysis showed a significant increase in the nasal passage volume in hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar groups, but the intergroup comparison revealed a significant difference only between Fan-Type and inverted mini-hyrax on the molars. None of the expanders caused significant changes in the oropharyngeal measurements. Only the Hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar expanders effectively increased the nasal passage volume, and none of the expanders evaluated in this study modified the oropharyngeal airway.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cleft Lip - therapy</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxilla - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Nose</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Palatal Expansion Technique</subject><issn>0003-3219</issn><issn>1945-7103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1v1TAQtBCIPgo3zshHDqSs7TgfHJCqii-pEhd6tvbZ61ejJA52Upp_j59eqeC0q53R7OwOY68FXEgl-vegJAhdiba-EE_YTvS1rloB6inbAYCqlBT9GXuR808AqXUtn7Mz2eheN7rbse1mnilxDOk3bhxzppxHmha-5jAduI9r4i54T-k4HPE-DAOmjdP9jJOjlHmYuB3IL3zGJRRS_sAvuY0TVXvCsXTjvC7k-BLHeEg43248L6vbXrJnHodMrx7qObv5_OnH1dfq-vuXb1eX15WtNSxVYxvsHKDWHtsamrpDJQmU1a12HVrXKkIpXSs87T16ZQvaAqk9dCT7Tp2zjyfded2P5GyxmHAwcwpjOcREDOZ_ZAq35hDvTNeAqHtRBN4-CKT4a6W8mDFkS-UPE8U1G9FBWSj6RhfquxPVpphzIv-4RoA5pmVOaZmSljkqv_nX2iP5bzzqD2PIk4Y</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Mordente, Carolina Morsani</creator><creator>Palomo, Juan Martin</creator><creator>Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello</creator><creator>Souki, Bernardo Quiroga</creator><creator>Oliveira, Dauro Douglas</creator><creator>Andrade, Jr, Ildeu</creator><general>Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Upper airway assessment using four different maxillary expanders in cleft patients: A cone-beam computed tomography study</title><author>Mordente, Carolina Morsani ; Palomo, Juan Martin ; Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello ; Souki, Bernardo Quiroga ; Oliveira, Dauro Douglas ; Andrade, Jr, Ildeu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-6c6a8d0a55fa740648a32e03c575d8acd73ea22d71febfaf3c2e070e3b08e2983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cleft Lip - therapy</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxilla - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Nose</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Palatal Expansion Technique</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mordente, Carolina Morsani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomo, Juan Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souki, Bernardo Quiroga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Dauro Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Jr, Ildeu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mordente, Carolina Morsani</au><au>Palomo, Juan Martin</au><au>Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello</au><au>Souki, Bernardo Quiroga</au><au>Oliveira, Dauro Douglas</au><au>Andrade, Jr, Ildeu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Upper airway assessment using four different maxillary expanders in cleft patients: A cone-beam computed tomography study</atitle><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle><addtitle>Angle Orthod</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>617</spage><epage>624</epage><pages>617-624</pages><issn>0003-3219</issn><eissn>1945-7103</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the anterior and posterior maxillary width, the nasal passage volume, the oropharyngeal minimum axial area, and volume changes in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated with one of the following four expanders: Hyrax, Fan-Type, inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first permanent molars (iMini-M), or inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first premolars (iMini-B). A total of 40 patients with transverse maxillary deficiency who were submitted for rapid maxillary expansion were divided in four groups according to type of expander used. Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken before and 3 months after expansion. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the differences among the groups, and paired t-tests were used to evaluate the changes in each group. All groups showed a significant increase in the anterior maxillary width, with no intergroup differences. The iMini-B was the only group that did not show a significant increase in the posterior maxillary width. The intergroup comparison demonstrated differences among all groups except between Hyrax and iMini-M, which showed the greatest posterior expansions. The intragroup analysis showed a significant increase in the nasal passage volume in hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar groups, but the intergroup comparison revealed a significant difference only between Fan-Type and inverted mini-hyrax on the molars. None of the expanders caused significant changes in the oropharyngeal measurements. Only the Hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar expanders effectively increased the nasal passage volume, and none of the expanders evaluated in this study modified the oropharyngeal airway.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists</pub><pmid>26595658</pmid><doi>10.2319/032015-174.1</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3219
ispartof The Angle orthodontist, 2016-07, Vol.86 (4), p.617-624
issn 0003-3219
1945-7103
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8601491
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adolescent
Child
Cleft Lip - therapy
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Dentistry
Female
Humans
Male
Maxilla - anatomy & histology
Nose
Original
Palatal Expansion Technique
title Upper airway assessment using four different maxillary expanders in cleft patients: A cone-beam computed tomography study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T05%3A46%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Upper%20airway%20assessment%20using%20four%20different%20maxillary%20expanders%20in%20cleft%20patients:%20A%20cone-beam%20computed%20tomography%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20Angle%20orthodontist&rft.au=Mordente,%20Carolina%20Morsani&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=617&rft.epage=624&rft.pages=617-624&rft.issn=0003-3219&rft.eissn=1945-7103&rft_id=info:doi/10.2319/032015-174.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1800701965%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1800701965&rft_id=info:pmid/26595658&rfr_iscdi=true