Upper airway assessment using four different maxillary expanders in cleft patients: A cone-beam computed tomography study
To evaluate the anterior and posterior maxillary width, the nasal passage volume, the oropharyngeal minimum axial area, and volume changes in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated with one of the following four expanders: Hyrax, Fan-Type, inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first permane...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Angle orthodontist 2016-07, Vol.86 (4), p.617-624 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 624 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 617 |
container_title | The Angle orthodontist |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Mordente, Carolina Morsani Palomo, Juan Martin Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello Souki, Bernardo Quiroga Oliveira, Dauro Douglas Andrade, Jr, Ildeu |
description | To evaluate the anterior and posterior maxillary width, the nasal passage volume, the oropharyngeal minimum axial area, and volume changes in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated with one of the following four expanders: Hyrax, Fan-Type, inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first permanent molars (iMini-M), or inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first premolars (iMini-B).
A total of 40 patients with transverse maxillary deficiency who were submitted for rapid maxillary expansion were divided in four groups according to type of expander used. Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken before and 3 months after expansion. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the differences among the groups, and paired t-tests were used to evaluate the changes in each group.
All groups showed a significant increase in the anterior maxillary width, with no intergroup differences. The iMini-B was the only group that did not show a significant increase in the posterior maxillary width. The intergroup comparison demonstrated differences among all groups except between Hyrax and iMini-M, which showed the greatest posterior expansions. The intragroup analysis showed a significant increase in the nasal passage volume in hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar groups, but the intergroup comparison revealed a significant difference only between Fan-Type and inverted mini-hyrax on the molars. None of the expanders caused significant changes in the oropharyngeal measurements.
Only the Hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar expanders effectively increased the nasal passage volume, and none of the expanders evaluated in this study modified the oropharyngeal airway. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2319/032015-174.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8601491</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1800701965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-6c6a8d0a55fa740648a32e03c575d8acd73ea22d71febfaf3c2e070e3b08e2983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1v1TAQtBCIPgo3zshHDqSs7TgfHJCqii-pEhd6tvbZ61ejJA52Upp_j59eqeC0q53R7OwOY68FXEgl-vegJAhdiba-EE_YTvS1rloB6inbAYCqlBT9GXuR808AqXUtn7Mz2eheN7rbse1mnilxDOk3bhxzppxHmha-5jAduI9r4i54T-k4HPE-DAOmjdP9jJOjlHmYuB3IL3zGJRRS_sAvuY0TVXvCsXTjvC7k-BLHeEg43248L6vbXrJnHodMrx7qObv5_OnH1dfq-vuXb1eX15WtNSxVYxvsHKDWHtsamrpDJQmU1a12HVrXKkIpXSs87T16ZQvaAqk9dCT7Tp2zjyfded2P5GyxmHAwcwpjOcREDOZ_ZAq35hDvTNeAqHtRBN4-CKT4a6W8mDFkS-UPE8U1G9FBWSj6RhfquxPVpphzIv-4RoA5pmVOaZmSljkqv_nX2iP5bzzqD2PIk4Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1800701965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Upper airway assessment using four different maxillary expanders in cleft patients: A cone-beam computed tomography study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mordente, Carolina Morsani ; Palomo, Juan Martin ; Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello ; Souki, Bernardo Quiroga ; Oliveira, Dauro Douglas ; Andrade, Jr, Ildeu</creator><creatorcontrib>Mordente, Carolina Morsani ; Palomo, Juan Martin ; Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello ; Souki, Bernardo Quiroga ; Oliveira, Dauro Douglas ; Andrade, Jr, Ildeu</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the anterior and posterior maxillary width, the nasal passage volume, the oropharyngeal minimum axial area, and volume changes in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated with one of the following four expanders: Hyrax, Fan-Type, inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first permanent molars (iMini-M), or inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first premolars (iMini-B).
A total of 40 patients with transverse maxillary deficiency who were submitted for rapid maxillary expansion were divided in four groups according to type of expander used. Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken before and 3 months after expansion. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the differences among the groups, and paired t-tests were used to evaluate the changes in each group.
All groups showed a significant increase in the anterior maxillary width, with no intergroup differences. The iMini-B was the only group that did not show a significant increase in the posterior maxillary width. The intergroup comparison demonstrated differences among all groups except between Hyrax and iMini-M, which showed the greatest posterior expansions. The intragroup analysis showed a significant increase in the nasal passage volume in hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar groups, but the intergroup comparison revealed a significant difference only between Fan-Type and inverted mini-hyrax on the molars. None of the expanders caused significant changes in the oropharyngeal measurements.
Only the Hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar expanders effectively increased the nasal passage volume, and none of the expanders evaluated in this study modified the oropharyngeal airway.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2319/032015-174.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26595658</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Cleft Lip - therapy ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Maxilla - anatomy & histology ; Nose ; Original ; Palatal Expansion Technique</subject><ispartof>The Angle orthodontist, 2016-07, Vol.86 (4), p.617-624</ispartof><rights>2016 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-6c6a8d0a55fa740648a32e03c575d8acd73ea22d71febfaf3c2e070e3b08e2983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-6c6a8d0a55fa740648a32e03c575d8acd73ea22d71febfaf3c2e070e3b08e2983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601491/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601491/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26595658$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mordente, Carolina Morsani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomo, Juan Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souki, Bernardo Quiroga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Dauro Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Jr, Ildeu</creatorcontrib><title>Upper airway assessment using four different maxillary expanders in cleft patients: A cone-beam computed tomography study</title><title>The Angle orthodontist</title><addtitle>Angle Orthod</addtitle><description>To evaluate the anterior and posterior maxillary width, the nasal passage volume, the oropharyngeal minimum axial area, and volume changes in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated with one of the following four expanders: Hyrax, Fan-Type, inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first permanent molars (iMini-M), or inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first premolars (iMini-B).
A total of 40 patients with transverse maxillary deficiency who were submitted for rapid maxillary expansion were divided in four groups according to type of expander used. Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken before and 3 months after expansion. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the differences among the groups, and paired t-tests were used to evaluate the changes in each group.
All groups showed a significant increase in the anterior maxillary width, with no intergroup differences. The iMini-B was the only group that did not show a significant increase in the posterior maxillary width. The intergroup comparison demonstrated differences among all groups except between Hyrax and iMini-M, which showed the greatest posterior expansions. The intragroup analysis showed a significant increase in the nasal passage volume in hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar groups, but the intergroup comparison revealed a significant difference only between Fan-Type and inverted mini-hyrax on the molars. None of the expanders caused significant changes in the oropharyngeal measurements.
Only the Hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar expanders effectively increased the nasal passage volume, and none of the expanders evaluated in this study modified the oropharyngeal airway.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cleft Lip - therapy</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxilla - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Nose</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Palatal Expansion Technique</subject><issn>0003-3219</issn><issn>1945-7103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1v1TAQtBCIPgo3zshHDqSs7TgfHJCqii-pEhd6tvbZ61ejJA52Upp_j59eqeC0q53R7OwOY68FXEgl-vegJAhdiba-EE_YTvS1rloB6inbAYCqlBT9GXuR808AqXUtn7Mz2eheN7rbse1mnilxDOk3bhxzppxHmha-5jAduI9r4i54T-k4HPE-DAOmjdP9jJOjlHmYuB3IL3zGJRRS_sAvuY0TVXvCsXTjvC7k-BLHeEg43248L6vbXrJnHodMrx7qObv5_OnH1dfq-vuXb1eX15WtNSxVYxvsHKDWHtsamrpDJQmU1a12HVrXKkIpXSs87T16ZQvaAqk9dCT7Tp2zjyfded2P5GyxmHAwcwpjOcREDOZ_ZAq35hDvTNeAqHtRBN4-CKT4a6W8mDFkS-UPE8U1G9FBWSj6RhfquxPVpphzIv-4RoA5pmVOaZmSljkqv_nX2iP5bzzqD2PIk4Y</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Mordente, Carolina Morsani</creator><creator>Palomo, Juan Martin</creator><creator>Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello</creator><creator>Souki, Bernardo Quiroga</creator><creator>Oliveira, Dauro Douglas</creator><creator>Andrade, Jr, Ildeu</creator><general>Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Upper airway assessment using four different maxillary expanders in cleft patients: A cone-beam computed tomography study</title><author>Mordente, Carolina Morsani ; Palomo, Juan Martin ; Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello ; Souki, Bernardo Quiroga ; Oliveira, Dauro Douglas ; Andrade, Jr, Ildeu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-6c6a8d0a55fa740648a32e03c575d8acd73ea22d71febfaf3c2e070e3b08e2983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cleft Lip - therapy</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxilla - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Nose</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Palatal Expansion Technique</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mordente, Carolina Morsani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomo, Juan Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souki, Bernardo Quiroga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Dauro Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Jr, Ildeu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mordente, Carolina Morsani</au><au>Palomo, Juan Martin</au><au>Horta, Martinho Campolina Rebello</au><au>Souki, Bernardo Quiroga</au><au>Oliveira, Dauro Douglas</au><au>Andrade, Jr, Ildeu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Upper airway assessment using four different maxillary expanders in cleft patients: A cone-beam computed tomography study</atitle><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle><addtitle>Angle Orthod</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>617</spage><epage>624</epage><pages>617-624</pages><issn>0003-3219</issn><eissn>1945-7103</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the anterior and posterior maxillary width, the nasal passage volume, the oropharyngeal minimum axial area, and volume changes in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated with one of the following four expanders: Hyrax, Fan-Type, inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first permanent molars (iMini-M), or inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first premolars (iMini-B).
A total of 40 patients with transverse maxillary deficiency who were submitted for rapid maxillary expansion were divided in four groups according to type of expander used. Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken before and 3 months after expansion. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the differences among the groups, and paired t-tests were used to evaluate the changes in each group.
All groups showed a significant increase in the anterior maxillary width, with no intergroup differences. The iMini-B was the only group that did not show a significant increase in the posterior maxillary width. The intergroup comparison demonstrated differences among all groups except between Hyrax and iMini-M, which showed the greatest posterior expansions. The intragroup analysis showed a significant increase in the nasal passage volume in hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar groups, but the intergroup comparison revealed a significant difference only between Fan-Type and inverted mini-hyrax on the molars. None of the expanders caused significant changes in the oropharyngeal measurements.
Only the Hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar expanders effectively increased the nasal passage volume, and none of the expanders evaluated in this study modified the oropharyngeal airway.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists</pub><pmid>26595658</pmid><doi>10.2319/032015-174.1</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-3219 |
ispartof | The Angle orthodontist, 2016-07, Vol.86 (4), p.617-624 |
issn | 0003-3219 1945-7103 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8601491 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Child Cleft Lip - therapy Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Dentistry Female Humans Male Maxilla - anatomy & histology Nose Original Palatal Expansion Technique |
title | Upper airway assessment using four different maxillary expanders in cleft patients: A cone-beam computed tomography study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T05%3A46%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Upper%20airway%20assessment%20using%20four%20different%20maxillary%20expanders%20in%20cleft%20patients:%20A%20cone-beam%20computed%20tomography%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20Angle%20orthodontist&rft.au=Mordente,%20Carolina%20Morsani&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=617&rft.epage=624&rft.pages=617-624&rft.issn=0003-3219&rft.eissn=1945-7103&rft_id=info:doi/10.2319/032015-174.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1800701965%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1800701965&rft_id=info:pmid/26595658&rfr_iscdi=true |