Whole-Genome Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2: Assessment of the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq Panel and Comparison with the Illumina MiSeq ARTIC Protocol

Fast and effective methods are needed for sequencing of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genome to track genetic mutations and to identify new and emerging variants during the ongoing pandemic. The objectives were to assess the performance of the SARS-CoV-2 AmpliSeq r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical microbiology 2021-11, Vol.59 (12), p.e0064921-e0064921
Hauptverfasser: Plitnick, Jonathan, Griesemer, Sara, Lasek-Nesselquist, Erica, Singh, Navjot, Lamson, Daryl M, St. George, Kirsten
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0064921
container_issue 12
container_start_page e0064921
container_title Journal of clinical microbiology
container_volume 59
creator Plitnick, Jonathan
Griesemer, Sara
Lasek-Nesselquist, Erica
Singh, Navjot
Lamson, Daryl M
St. George, Kirsten
description Fast and effective methods are needed for sequencing of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genome to track genetic mutations and to identify new and emerging variants during the ongoing pandemic. The objectives were to assess the performance of the SARS-CoV-2 AmpliSeq research panel and S5 plug-in analysis tools for whole-genome sequencing analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and to compare the results with those obtained with the MiSeq-based ARTIC analysis pipeline, using metrics such as depth, coverage, and concordance of single-nucleotide variant (SNV) calls. A total of 191 clinical specimens and a single cultured isolate were extracted and sequenced with AmpliSeq technology and analysis tools. Of the 191 clinical specimens, 83 (with threshold cycle [CT] values of 15.58 to 32.54) were also sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq-based method with the ARTIC analysis pipeline, for direct comparison. A total of 176 of the 191 clinical specimens sequenced on the S5XL system and prepared using the SARS-CoV-2 research panel had nearly complete coverage (>98%) of the viral genome, with an average depth of 5,031×. Similar coverage levels (>98%) were observed for 81/83 primary specimens that were sequenced with both methods tested. The sample with the lowest viral load (CT value of 32.54) achieved 89% coverage using the MiSeq method and failed to sequence with the AmpliSeq method. Consensus sequences produced by each method were identical for 81/82 samples in areas of equal coverage, with a single difference present in one sample. The AmpliSeq approach is as effective as the Illumina-based method using ARTIC v3 amplification for sequencing SARS-CoV-2 directly from patient specimens across a range of viral loads (CT values of 15.56 to 32.54 [median, 22.18]). The AmpliSeq workflow is very easily automated with the Ion Chef and S5 instruments and requires less training and experience with next-generation sequencing sample preparation than the Illumina workflow.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/JCM.00649-21
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8601232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2575832025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-ed464c3051db91ac37b0821ad8270a6c2d8489b43b6e9b8177000a67bef712f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkdtu1DAQhi0EokvhjgfwJUi4jO0kdrhAiiIoi1pRdZfDneUkTteVYy92AuIReGu83QoJiauRZr755_Aj9JzCGaVMvv7YXp4BVEVNGH2AVhRqSaoKvj1EK4C6JJRycYKepHQLQIuiLB-jE54DSKhW6PfXXXCGnBsfJoM35vtifG_9DQ4j3jTXG9KGL4S9wU1KJqXJ-PlQmXcGr4PH2xDjIdVMe2dzM77S3jis_YDbMO11tClTP-28O7Y4t0zWa3x5BzfX23WLr2KYQx_cU_Ro1C6ZZ_fxFH1-_27bfiAXn87XbXNBNK_LmZihqIqeQ0mHrqa656IDyageJBOgq54NspB1V_CuMnUnqRAAOS86MwrKRsFP0duj7n7pJjP0ef-ondpHO-n4SwVt1b8Vb3fqJvxQsgLKOMsCL-4FYsjvSrOabOqNc_n2sCTFSlFKzoCVGX11RPsYUopm_DuGgjq4p7J76s49xWjGXx5xnSambsMSff7E_9k_RG2YLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2575832025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Whole-Genome Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2: Assessment of the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq Panel and Comparison with the Illumina MiSeq ARTIC Protocol</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Plitnick, Jonathan ; Griesemer, Sara ; Lasek-Nesselquist, Erica ; Singh, Navjot ; Lamson, Daryl M ; St. George, Kirsten</creator><contributor>Dekker, John P ; Dekker, John P.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Plitnick, Jonathan ; Griesemer, Sara ; Lasek-Nesselquist, Erica ; Singh, Navjot ; Lamson, Daryl M ; St. George, Kirsten ; Dekker, John P ; Dekker, John P.</creatorcontrib><description>Fast and effective methods are needed for sequencing of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genome to track genetic mutations and to identify new and emerging variants during the ongoing pandemic. The objectives were to assess the performance of the SARS-CoV-2 AmpliSeq research panel and S5 plug-in analysis tools for whole-genome sequencing analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and to compare the results with those obtained with the MiSeq-based ARTIC analysis pipeline, using metrics such as depth, coverage, and concordance of single-nucleotide variant (SNV) calls. A total of 191 clinical specimens and a single cultured isolate were extracted and sequenced with AmpliSeq technology and analysis tools. Of the 191 clinical specimens, 83 (with threshold cycle [CT] values of 15.58 to 32.54) were also sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq-based method with the ARTIC analysis pipeline, for direct comparison. A total of 176 of the 191 clinical specimens sequenced on the S5XL system and prepared using the SARS-CoV-2 research panel had nearly complete coverage (&gt;98%) of the viral genome, with an average depth of 5,031×. Similar coverage levels (&gt;98%) were observed for 81/83 primary specimens that were sequenced with both methods tested. The sample with the lowest viral load (CT value of 32.54) achieved 89% coverage using the MiSeq method and failed to sequence with the AmpliSeq method. Consensus sequences produced by each method were identical for 81/82 samples in areas of equal coverage, with a single difference present in one sample. The AmpliSeq approach is as effective as the Illumina-based method using ARTIC v3 amplification for sequencing SARS-CoV-2 directly from patient specimens across a range of viral loads (CT values of 15.56 to 32.54 [median, 22.18]). The AmpliSeq workflow is very easily automated with the Ion Chef and S5 instruments and requires less training and experience with next-generation sequencing sample preparation than the Illumina workflow.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00649-21</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34550806</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Virology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021-11, Vol.59 (12), p.e0064921-e0064921</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology. 2021 American Society for Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-ed464c3051db91ac37b0821ad8270a6c2d8489b43b6e9b8177000a67bef712f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-ed464c3051db91ac37b0821ad8270a6c2d8489b43b6e9b8177000a67bef712f73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5168-763X ; 0000-0002-6497-917X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/JCM.00649-21$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasm2$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/JCM.00649-21$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasm2$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3188,27924,27925,52751,52752,52753,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Dekker, John P</contributor><contributor>Dekker, John P.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Plitnick, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griesemer, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasek-Nesselquist, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Navjot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamson, Daryl M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. George, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><title>Whole-Genome Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2: Assessment of the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq Panel and Comparison with the Illumina MiSeq ARTIC Protocol</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>Fast and effective methods are needed for sequencing of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genome to track genetic mutations and to identify new and emerging variants during the ongoing pandemic. The objectives were to assess the performance of the SARS-CoV-2 AmpliSeq research panel and S5 plug-in analysis tools for whole-genome sequencing analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and to compare the results with those obtained with the MiSeq-based ARTIC analysis pipeline, using metrics such as depth, coverage, and concordance of single-nucleotide variant (SNV) calls. A total of 191 clinical specimens and a single cultured isolate were extracted and sequenced with AmpliSeq technology and analysis tools. Of the 191 clinical specimens, 83 (with threshold cycle [CT] values of 15.58 to 32.54) were also sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq-based method with the ARTIC analysis pipeline, for direct comparison. A total of 176 of the 191 clinical specimens sequenced on the S5XL system and prepared using the SARS-CoV-2 research panel had nearly complete coverage (&gt;98%) of the viral genome, with an average depth of 5,031×. Similar coverage levels (&gt;98%) were observed for 81/83 primary specimens that were sequenced with both methods tested. The sample with the lowest viral load (CT value of 32.54) achieved 89% coverage using the MiSeq method and failed to sequence with the AmpliSeq method. Consensus sequences produced by each method were identical for 81/82 samples in areas of equal coverage, with a single difference present in one sample. The AmpliSeq approach is as effective as the Illumina-based method using ARTIC v3 amplification for sequencing SARS-CoV-2 directly from patient specimens across a range of viral loads (CT values of 15.56 to 32.54 [median, 22.18]). The AmpliSeq workflow is very easily automated with the Ion Chef and S5 instruments and requires less training and experience with next-generation sequencing sample preparation than the Illumina workflow.</description><subject>Virology</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkdtu1DAQhi0EokvhjgfwJUi4jO0kdrhAiiIoi1pRdZfDneUkTteVYy92AuIReGu83QoJiauRZr755_Aj9JzCGaVMvv7YXp4BVEVNGH2AVhRqSaoKvj1EK4C6JJRycYKepHQLQIuiLB-jE54DSKhW6PfXXXCGnBsfJoM35vtifG_9DQ4j3jTXG9KGL4S9wU1KJqXJ-PlQmXcGr4PH2xDjIdVMe2dzM77S3jis_YDbMO11tClTP-28O7Y4t0zWa3x5BzfX23WLr2KYQx_cU_Ro1C6ZZ_fxFH1-_27bfiAXn87XbXNBNK_LmZihqIqeQ0mHrqa656IDyageJBOgq54NspB1V_CuMnUnqRAAOS86MwrKRsFP0duj7n7pJjP0ef-ondpHO-n4SwVt1b8Vb3fqJvxQsgLKOMsCL-4FYsjvSrOabOqNc_n2sCTFSlFKzoCVGX11RPsYUopm_DuGgjq4p7J76s49xWjGXx5xnSambsMSff7E_9k_RG2YLg</recordid><startdate>20211118</startdate><enddate>20211118</enddate><creator>Plitnick, Jonathan</creator><creator>Griesemer, Sara</creator><creator>Lasek-Nesselquist, Erica</creator><creator>Singh, Navjot</creator><creator>Lamson, Daryl M</creator><creator>St. George, Kirsten</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5168-763X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6497-917X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211118</creationdate><title>Whole-Genome Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2: Assessment of the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq Panel and Comparison with the Illumina MiSeq ARTIC Protocol</title><author>Plitnick, Jonathan ; Griesemer, Sara ; Lasek-Nesselquist, Erica ; Singh, Navjot ; Lamson, Daryl M ; St. George, Kirsten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-ed464c3051db91ac37b0821ad8270a6c2d8489b43b6e9b8177000a67bef712f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plitnick, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griesemer, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasek-Nesselquist, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Navjot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamson, Daryl M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. George, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plitnick, Jonathan</au><au>Griesemer, Sara</au><au>Lasek-Nesselquist, Erica</au><au>Singh, Navjot</au><au>Lamson, Daryl M</au><au>St. George, Kirsten</au><au>Dekker, John P</au><au>Dekker, John P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Whole-Genome Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2: Assessment of the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq Panel and Comparison with the Illumina MiSeq ARTIC Protocol</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><stitle>J Clin Microbiol</stitle><date>2021-11-18</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0064921</spage><epage>e0064921</epage><pages>e0064921-e0064921</pages><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>Fast and effective methods are needed for sequencing of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genome to track genetic mutations and to identify new and emerging variants during the ongoing pandemic. The objectives were to assess the performance of the SARS-CoV-2 AmpliSeq research panel and S5 plug-in analysis tools for whole-genome sequencing analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and to compare the results with those obtained with the MiSeq-based ARTIC analysis pipeline, using metrics such as depth, coverage, and concordance of single-nucleotide variant (SNV) calls. A total of 191 clinical specimens and a single cultured isolate were extracted and sequenced with AmpliSeq technology and analysis tools. Of the 191 clinical specimens, 83 (with threshold cycle [CT] values of 15.58 to 32.54) were also sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq-based method with the ARTIC analysis pipeline, for direct comparison. A total of 176 of the 191 clinical specimens sequenced on the S5XL system and prepared using the SARS-CoV-2 research panel had nearly complete coverage (&gt;98%) of the viral genome, with an average depth of 5,031×. Similar coverage levels (&gt;98%) were observed for 81/83 primary specimens that were sequenced with both methods tested. The sample with the lowest viral load (CT value of 32.54) achieved 89% coverage using the MiSeq method and failed to sequence with the AmpliSeq method. Consensus sequences produced by each method were identical for 81/82 samples in areas of equal coverage, with a single difference present in one sample. The AmpliSeq approach is as effective as the Illumina-based method using ARTIC v3 amplification for sequencing SARS-CoV-2 directly from patient specimens across a range of viral loads (CT values of 15.56 to 32.54 [median, 22.18]). The AmpliSeq workflow is very easily automated with the Ion Chef and S5 instruments and requires less training and experience with next-generation sequencing sample preparation than the Illumina workflow.</abstract><cop>1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>34550806</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.00649-21</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5168-763X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6497-917X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-1137
ispartof Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021-11, Vol.59 (12), p.e0064921-e0064921
issn 0095-1137
1098-660X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8601232
source American Society for Microbiology; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Virology
title Whole-Genome Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2: Assessment of the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq Panel and Comparison with the Illumina MiSeq ARTIC Protocol
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A17%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Whole-Genome%20Sequencing%20of%20SARS-CoV-2:%20Assessment%20of%20the%20Ion%20Torrent%20AmpliSeq%20Panel%20and%20Comparison%20with%20the%20Illumina%20MiSeq%20ARTIC%20Protocol&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Plitnick,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2021-11-18&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0064921&rft.epage=e0064921&rft.pages=e0064921-e0064921&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.00649-21&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2575832025%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2575832025&rft_id=info:pmid/34550806&rfr_iscdi=true