Improving Constraints on Planetary Interiors With PPs Receiver Functions
Seismological constraints obtained from receiver function (RF) analysis provide important information about the crust and mantle structure. Here, we explore the utility of the free‐surface multiple of the P‐wave (PP) and the corresponding conversions in RF analysis. Using earthquake records, we demo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Planets 2021-11, Vol.126 (11), p.e2021JE006983-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e2021JE006983 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Planets |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Kim, D. Lekić, V. Irving, J. C. E. Schmerr, N. Knapmeyer‐Endrun, B. Joshi, R. Panning, M. P. Tauzin, B. Karakostas, F. Maguire, R. Huang, Q. Ceylan, S. Khan, A. Giardini, D. Wieczorek, M. A. Lognonné, P. Banerdt, W. B. |
description | Seismological constraints obtained from receiver function (RF) analysis provide important information about the crust and mantle structure. Here, we explore the utility of the free‐surface multiple of the P‐wave (PP) and the corresponding conversions in RF analysis. Using earthquake records, we demonstrate the efficacy of PPs‐RFs before illustrating how they become especially useful when limited data is available in typical planetary missions. Using a transdimensional hierarchical Bayesian deconvolution approach, we compute robust P‐to‐S (Ps)‐ and PPs‐RFs with InSight recordings of five marsquakes. Our Ps‐RF results verify the direct Ps converted phases reported by previous RF analyses with increased coherence and reveal other phases including the primary multiple reverberating within the uppermost layer of the Martian crust. Unlike the Ps‐RFs, our PPs‐RFs lack an arrival at 7.2 s lag time. Whereas Ps‐RFs on Mars could be equally well fit by a two‐ or three‐layer crust, synthetic modeling shows that the disappearance of the 7.2 s phase requires a three‐layer crust, and is highly sensitive to velocity and thickness of intra‐crustal layers. We show that a three‐layer crust is also preferred by S‐to‐P (Sp)‐RFs. While the deepest interface of the three‐layer crust represents the crust‐mantle interface beneath the InSight landing site, the other two interfaces at shallower depths could represent a sharp transition between either fractured and unfractured materials or thick basaltic flows and pre‐existing crustal materials. PPs‐RFs can provide complementary constraints and maximize the extraction of information about crustal structure in data‐constrained circumstances such as planetary missions.
Plain Language Summary
Most of our geophysical understanding about the interior of other planets and moons comes from indirect, remote measurements. Other than Earth, only the Moon and Mars have been directly investigated with seismometers, by the Apollo and InSight missions, respectively. The ground vibration measurements on Mars have revealed much of the interior structure and dynamics of the red planet. A widely used tool for analyzing ground vibrations is the so‐called receiver function technique, which allows us to extract constraints on subsurface structure directly beneath the seismometer. Already, receiver functions have constrained the overall crustal structure of Mars. Our study explores the utility of one of many underused seismic phases from a seismic source, |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2021JE006983 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8597591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2600834138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5144-33d120ccca3c02d24007623af0483f75e39488dc4afdfb96f704446979653dd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9LIzEUx8Oyyypdb55lwMsidvflx2SSiyCl2kphi-ziMcRMxkamSU1mKv73ZqiKethcEpLP--b73hehQwy_MBD5mwDBV1MALgX9gvYJ5nIsMcDX1zPIag8dpHQPeYl8hel3tEeZIExyvo9m8_Umhq3zd8Uk-NRF7XyXiuCLZau97XR8Kua-s9GFmIob162K5TIV19ZYt7WxuOi96Vyu_IG-NbpN9uBlH6F_F9O_k9l48edyPjlfjHWJGRtTWmMCxhhNDZCaMICKE6obYII2VWmpZELUhummbm4lbypgjHFZSV7SuhZ0hM52upv-dm1rY3323KpNdOvsVQXt1McX71bqLmyVKGVV5vZH6GQnsPpUNjtfKOdTr4CWQlYCbwf458tvMTz0NnVq7ZKx7TCb0CdFODDAkjCW0eNP6H3oo8-zGCgQlGE62D_dUSaGlKJt3ixgUEOk6n2kGT963-0b_BpgBugOeHStffqvmLq6vJ4SXHFGnwHnlKjP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2600834138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Constraints on Planetary Interiors With PPs Receiver Functions</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kim, D. ; Lekić, V. ; Irving, J. C. E. ; Schmerr, N. ; Knapmeyer‐Endrun, B. ; Joshi, R. ; Panning, M. P. ; Tauzin, B. ; Karakostas, F. ; Maguire, R. ; Huang, Q. ; Ceylan, S. ; Khan, A. ; Giardini, D. ; Wieczorek, M. A. ; Lognonné, P. ; Banerdt, W. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, D. ; Lekić, V. ; Irving, J. C. E. ; Schmerr, N. ; Knapmeyer‐Endrun, B. ; Joshi, R. ; Panning, M. P. ; Tauzin, B. ; Karakostas, F. ; Maguire, R. ; Huang, Q. ; Ceylan, S. ; Khan, A. ; Giardini, D. ; Wieczorek, M. A. ; Lognonné, P. ; Banerdt, W. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Seismological constraints obtained from receiver function (RF) analysis provide important information about the crust and mantle structure. Here, we explore the utility of the free‐surface multiple of the P‐wave (PP) and the corresponding conversions in RF analysis. Using earthquake records, we demonstrate the efficacy of PPs‐RFs before illustrating how they become especially useful when limited data is available in typical planetary missions. Using a transdimensional hierarchical Bayesian deconvolution approach, we compute robust P‐to‐S (Ps)‐ and PPs‐RFs with InSight recordings of five marsquakes. Our Ps‐RF results verify the direct Ps converted phases reported by previous RF analyses with increased coherence and reveal other phases including the primary multiple reverberating within the uppermost layer of the Martian crust. Unlike the Ps‐RFs, our PPs‐RFs lack an arrival at 7.2 s lag time. Whereas Ps‐RFs on Mars could be equally well fit by a two‐ or three‐layer crust, synthetic modeling shows that the disappearance of the 7.2 s phase requires a three‐layer crust, and is highly sensitive to velocity and thickness of intra‐crustal layers. We show that a three‐layer crust is also preferred by S‐to‐P (Sp)‐RFs. While the deepest interface of the three‐layer crust represents the crust‐mantle interface beneath the InSight landing site, the other two interfaces at shallower depths could represent a sharp transition between either fractured and unfractured materials or thick basaltic flows and pre‐existing crustal materials. PPs‐RFs can provide complementary constraints and maximize the extraction of information about crustal structure in data‐constrained circumstances such as planetary missions.
Plain Language Summary
Most of our geophysical understanding about the interior of other planets and moons comes from indirect, remote measurements. Other than Earth, only the Moon and Mars have been directly investigated with seismometers, by the Apollo and InSight missions, respectively. The ground vibration measurements on Mars have revealed much of the interior structure and dynamics of the red planet. A widely used tool for analyzing ground vibrations is the so‐called receiver function technique, which allows us to extract constraints on subsurface structure directly beneath the seismometer. Already, receiver functions have constrained the overall crustal structure of Mars. Our study explores the utility of one of many underused seismic phases from a seismic source, the P‐wave bouncing off the planet's surface (called PP), when studying planetary crustal structures with receiver functions. We show that using PP waves to compute receiver functions provides complementary information, to more commonly used direct P and S seismic arrivals and maximizes the amount of information extracted from limited data, which is particularly helpful in the context of planetary missions. Using data from the five best‐quality marsquakes, we find Mars' crust beneath the InSight lander in Elysium Planitia likely consists of three distinct layers.
Key Points
We compute robust P‐to‐S (Ps)‐, P‐waves (PPs)‐, and S‐to‐P (Sp)‐receiver functions (RFs) to infer properties of the crustal layers beneath the InSight lander in Elysium Planitia
Sp‐RFs as well as observed variability of the 7.2 s phase between Ps‐ and PPs‐RFs require a three‐layer crust
PPs‐RFs can provide complementary constraints for crustal imaging on Earth and other planetary bodies</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9100</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021JE006983</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34824966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Body Waves ; Constraints ; Continental Margins: Divergent ; Core ; Core Processes ; Crustal structure ; Dynamics of Lithosphere and Mantle: General ; Earth's Interior: Composition and State ; Earth's Interior: Dynamics ; Earthquakes ; Geodesy and Gravity ; Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism ; Ground motion ; InSight ; Interiors ; Lag time ; Mantle ; Mars ; Mars missions ; Mars satellites ; Martian crust ; Moon ; Phases ; Plains ; Planetary Interiors ; Planetary mantles ; Planetary Sciences: Comets and Small Bodies ; Planetary Sciences: Fluid Planets ; Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects ; Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets ; Planets ; Receiver function ; Sciences of the Universe ; Seismic activity ; Seismographs ; Seismology ; Seismometers ; Space missions ; Tectonophysics ; Thickness ; Transdimensional hierarchical Bayesian ; Vibration measurement</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Planets, 2021-11, Vol.126 (11), p.e2021JE006983-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021. The Authors.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5144-33d120ccca3c02d24007623af0483f75e39488dc4afdfb96f704446979653dd83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5144-33d120ccca3c02d24007623af0483f75e39488dc4afdfb96f704446979653dd83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0434-4199 ; 0000-0002-3256-1262 ; 0000-0002-0866-8246 ; 0000-0003-4594-2336 ; 0000-0003-3309-6785 ; 0000-0002-0822-8849 ; 0000-0002-2041-3190 ; 0000-0001-5751-5900 ; 0000-0003-4462-3173 ; 0000-0001-7007-4222 ; 0000-0003-3125-1542 ; 0000-0002-9589-4304 ; 0000-0002-5681-5159 ; 0000-0002-5573-7638 ; 0000-0002-6552-6850 ; 0000-0002-1014-920X ; 0000-0002-3548-272X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021JE006983$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021JE006983$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34824966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://insu.hal.science/insu-03589781$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekić, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irving, J. C. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmerr, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapmeyer‐Endrun, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panning, M. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tauzin, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakostas, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceylan, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giardini, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieczorek, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lognonné, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerdt, W. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Constraints on Planetary Interiors With PPs Receiver Functions</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Planets</title><addtitle>J Geophys Res Planets</addtitle><description>Seismological constraints obtained from receiver function (RF) analysis provide important information about the crust and mantle structure. Here, we explore the utility of the free‐surface multiple of the P‐wave (PP) and the corresponding conversions in RF analysis. Using earthquake records, we demonstrate the efficacy of PPs‐RFs before illustrating how they become especially useful when limited data is available in typical planetary missions. Using a transdimensional hierarchical Bayesian deconvolution approach, we compute robust P‐to‐S (Ps)‐ and PPs‐RFs with InSight recordings of five marsquakes. Our Ps‐RF results verify the direct Ps converted phases reported by previous RF analyses with increased coherence and reveal other phases including the primary multiple reverberating within the uppermost layer of the Martian crust. Unlike the Ps‐RFs, our PPs‐RFs lack an arrival at 7.2 s lag time. Whereas Ps‐RFs on Mars could be equally well fit by a two‐ or three‐layer crust, synthetic modeling shows that the disappearance of the 7.2 s phase requires a three‐layer crust, and is highly sensitive to velocity and thickness of intra‐crustal layers. We show that a three‐layer crust is also preferred by S‐to‐P (Sp)‐RFs. While the deepest interface of the three‐layer crust represents the crust‐mantle interface beneath the InSight landing site, the other two interfaces at shallower depths could represent a sharp transition between either fractured and unfractured materials or thick basaltic flows and pre‐existing crustal materials. PPs‐RFs can provide complementary constraints and maximize the extraction of information about crustal structure in data‐constrained circumstances such as planetary missions.
Plain Language Summary
Most of our geophysical understanding about the interior of other planets and moons comes from indirect, remote measurements. Other than Earth, only the Moon and Mars have been directly investigated with seismometers, by the Apollo and InSight missions, respectively. The ground vibration measurements on Mars have revealed much of the interior structure and dynamics of the red planet. A widely used tool for analyzing ground vibrations is the so‐called receiver function technique, which allows us to extract constraints on subsurface structure directly beneath the seismometer. Already, receiver functions have constrained the overall crustal structure of Mars. Our study explores the utility of one of many underused seismic phases from a seismic source, the P‐wave bouncing off the planet's surface (called PP), when studying planetary crustal structures with receiver functions. We show that using PP waves to compute receiver functions provides complementary information, to more commonly used direct P and S seismic arrivals and maximizes the amount of information extracted from limited data, which is particularly helpful in the context of planetary missions. Using data from the five best‐quality marsquakes, we find Mars' crust beneath the InSight lander in Elysium Planitia likely consists of three distinct layers.
Key Points
We compute robust P‐to‐S (Ps)‐, P‐waves (PPs)‐, and S‐to‐P (Sp)‐receiver functions (RFs) to infer properties of the crustal layers beneath the InSight lander in Elysium Planitia
Sp‐RFs as well as observed variability of the 7.2 s phase between Ps‐ and PPs‐RFs require a three‐layer crust
PPs‐RFs can provide complementary constraints for crustal imaging on Earth and other planetary bodies</description><subject>Body Waves</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Continental Margins: Divergent</subject><subject>Core</subject><subject>Core Processes</subject><subject>Crustal structure</subject><subject>Dynamics of Lithosphere and Mantle: General</subject><subject>Earth's Interior: Composition and State</subject><subject>Earth's Interior: Dynamics</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Geodesy and Gravity</subject><subject>Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>InSight</subject><subject>Interiors</subject><subject>Lag time</subject><subject>Mantle</subject><subject>Mars</subject><subject>Mars missions</subject><subject>Mars satellites</subject><subject>Martian crust</subject><subject>Moon</subject><subject>Phases</subject><subject>Plains</subject><subject>Planetary Interiors</subject><subject>Planetary mantles</subject><subject>Planetary Sciences: Comets and Small Bodies</subject><subject>Planetary Sciences: Fluid Planets</subject><subject>Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects</subject><subject>Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets</subject><subject>Planets</subject><subject>Receiver function</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismographs</subject><subject>Seismology</subject><subject>Seismometers</subject><subject>Space missions</subject><subject>Tectonophysics</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Transdimensional hierarchical Bayesian</subject><subject>Vibration measurement</subject><issn>2169-9097</issn><issn>2169-9100</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9LIzEUx8Oyyypdb55lwMsidvflx2SSiyCl2kphi-ziMcRMxkamSU1mKv73ZqiKethcEpLP--b73hehQwy_MBD5mwDBV1MALgX9gvYJ5nIsMcDX1zPIag8dpHQPeYl8hel3tEeZIExyvo9m8_Umhq3zd8Uk-NRF7XyXiuCLZau97XR8Kua-s9GFmIob162K5TIV19ZYt7WxuOi96Vyu_IG-NbpN9uBlH6F_F9O_k9l48edyPjlfjHWJGRtTWmMCxhhNDZCaMICKE6obYII2VWmpZELUhummbm4lbypgjHFZSV7SuhZ0hM52upv-dm1rY3323KpNdOvsVQXt1McX71bqLmyVKGVV5vZH6GQnsPpUNjtfKOdTr4CWQlYCbwf458tvMTz0NnVq7ZKx7TCb0CdFODDAkjCW0eNP6H3oo8-zGCgQlGE62D_dUSaGlKJt3ixgUEOk6n2kGT963-0b_BpgBugOeHStffqvmLq6vJ4SXHFGnwHnlKjP</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Kim, D.</creator><creator>Lekić, V.</creator><creator>Irving, J. C. E.</creator><creator>Schmerr, N.</creator><creator>Knapmeyer‐Endrun, B.</creator><creator>Joshi, R.</creator><creator>Panning, M. P.</creator><creator>Tauzin, B.</creator><creator>Karakostas, F.</creator><creator>Maguire, R.</creator><creator>Huang, Q.</creator><creator>Ceylan, S.</creator><creator>Khan, A.</creator><creator>Giardini, D.</creator><creator>Wieczorek, M. A.</creator><creator>Lognonné, P.</creator><creator>Banerdt, W. B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0434-4199</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3256-1262</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0866-8246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4594-2336</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-6785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0822-8849</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2041-3190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5751-5900</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4462-3173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7007-4222</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3125-1542</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9589-4304</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5681-5159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5573-7638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6552-6850</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1014-920X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3548-272X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Improving Constraints on Planetary Interiors With PPs Receiver Functions</title><author>Kim, D. ; Lekić, V. ; Irving, J. C. E. ; Schmerr, N. ; Knapmeyer‐Endrun, B. ; Joshi, R. ; Panning, M. P. ; Tauzin, B. ; Karakostas, F. ; Maguire, R. ; Huang, Q. ; Ceylan, S. ; Khan, A. ; Giardini, D. ; Wieczorek, M. A. ; Lognonné, P. ; Banerdt, W. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5144-33d120ccca3c02d24007623af0483f75e39488dc4afdfb96f704446979653dd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Body Waves</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Continental Margins: Divergent</topic><topic>Core</topic><topic>Core Processes</topic><topic>Crustal structure</topic><topic>Dynamics of Lithosphere and Mantle: General</topic><topic>Earth's Interior: Composition and State</topic><topic>Earth's Interior: Dynamics</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Geodesy and Gravity</topic><topic>Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>InSight</topic><topic>Interiors</topic><topic>Lag time</topic><topic>Mantle</topic><topic>Mars</topic><topic>Mars missions</topic><topic>Mars satellites</topic><topic>Martian crust</topic><topic>Moon</topic><topic>Phases</topic><topic>Plains</topic><topic>Planetary Interiors</topic><topic>Planetary mantles</topic><topic>Planetary Sciences: Comets and Small Bodies</topic><topic>Planetary Sciences: Fluid Planets</topic><topic>Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects</topic><topic>Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets</topic><topic>Planets</topic><topic>Receiver function</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismographs</topic><topic>Seismology</topic><topic>Seismometers</topic><topic>Space missions</topic><topic>Tectonophysics</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Transdimensional hierarchical Bayesian</topic><topic>Vibration measurement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekić, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irving, J. C. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmerr, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapmeyer‐Endrun, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panning, M. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tauzin, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakostas, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceylan, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giardini, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieczorek, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lognonné, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerdt, W. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Planets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, D.</au><au>Lekić, V.</au><au>Irving, J. C. E.</au><au>Schmerr, N.</au><au>Knapmeyer‐Endrun, B.</au><au>Joshi, R.</au><au>Panning, M. P.</au><au>Tauzin, B.</au><au>Karakostas, F.</au><au>Maguire, R.</au><au>Huang, Q.</au><au>Ceylan, S.</au><au>Khan, A.</au><au>Giardini, D.</au><au>Wieczorek, M. A.</au><au>Lognonné, P.</au><au>Banerdt, W. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Constraints on Planetary Interiors With PPs Receiver Functions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Planets</jtitle><addtitle>J Geophys Res Planets</addtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e2021JE006983</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e2021JE006983-n/a</pages><issn>2169-9097</issn><eissn>2169-9100</eissn><abstract>Seismological constraints obtained from receiver function (RF) analysis provide important information about the crust and mantle structure. Here, we explore the utility of the free‐surface multiple of the P‐wave (PP) and the corresponding conversions in RF analysis. Using earthquake records, we demonstrate the efficacy of PPs‐RFs before illustrating how they become especially useful when limited data is available in typical planetary missions. Using a transdimensional hierarchical Bayesian deconvolution approach, we compute robust P‐to‐S (Ps)‐ and PPs‐RFs with InSight recordings of five marsquakes. Our Ps‐RF results verify the direct Ps converted phases reported by previous RF analyses with increased coherence and reveal other phases including the primary multiple reverberating within the uppermost layer of the Martian crust. Unlike the Ps‐RFs, our PPs‐RFs lack an arrival at 7.2 s lag time. Whereas Ps‐RFs on Mars could be equally well fit by a two‐ or three‐layer crust, synthetic modeling shows that the disappearance of the 7.2 s phase requires a three‐layer crust, and is highly sensitive to velocity and thickness of intra‐crustal layers. We show that a three‐layer crust is also preferred by S‐to‐P (Sp)‐RFs. While the deepest interface of the three‐layer crust represents the crust‐mantle interface beneath the InSight landing site, the other two interfaces at shallower depths could represent a sharp transition between either fractured and unfractured materials or thick basaltic flows and pre‐existing crustal materials. PPs‐RFs can provide complementary constraints and maximize the extraction of information about crustal structure in data‐constrained circumstances such as planetary missions.
Plain Language Summary
Most of our geophysical understanding about the interior of other planets and moons comes from indirect, remote measurements. Other than Earth, only the Moon and Mars have been directly investigated with seismometers, by the Apollo and InSight missions, respectively. The ground vibration measurements on Mars have revealed much of the interior structure and dynamics of the red planet. A widely used tool for analyzing ground vibrations is the so‐called receiver function technique, which allows us to extract constraints on subsurface structure directly beneath the seismometer. Already, receiver functions have constrained the overall crustal structure of Mars. Our study explores the utility of one of many underused seismic phases from a seismic source, the P‐wave bouncing off the planet's surface (called PP), when studying planetary crustal structures with receiver functions. We show that using PP waves to compute receiver functions provides complementary information, to more commonly used direct P and S seismic arrivals and maximizes the amount of information extracted from limited data, which is particularly helpful in the context of planetary missions. Using data from the five best‐quality marsquakes, we find Mars' crust beneath the InSight lander in Elysium Planitia likely consists of three distinct layers.
Key Points
We compute robust P‐to‐S (Ps)‐, P‐waves (PPs)‐, and S‐to‐P (Sp)‐receiver functions (RFs) to infer properties of the crustal layers beneath the InSight lander in Elysium Planitia
Sp‐RFs as well as observed variability of the 7.2 s phase between Ps‐ and PPs‐RFs require a three‐layer crust
PPs‐RFs can provide complementary constraints for crustal imaging on Earth and other planetary bodies</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>34824966</pmid><doi>10.1029/2021JE006983</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0434-4199</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3256-1262</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0866-8246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4594-2336</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-6785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0822-8849</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2041-3190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5751-5900</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4462-3173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7007-4222</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3125-1542</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9589-4304</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5681-5159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5573-7638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6552-6850</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1014-920X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3548-272X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9097 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Planets, 2021-11, Vol.126 (11), p.e2021JE006983-n/a |
issn | 2169-9097 2169-9100 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8597591 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Body Waves Constraints Continental Margins: Divergent Core Core Processes Crustal structure Dynamics of Lithosphere and Mantle: General Earth's Interior: Composition and State Earth's Interior: Dynamics Earthquakes Geodesy and Gravity Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Ground motion InSight Interiors Lag time Mantle Mars Mars missions Mars satellites Martian crust Moon Phases Plains Planetary Interiors Planetary mantles Planetary Sciences: Comets and Small Bodies Planetary Sciences: Fluid Planets Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets Planets Receiver function Sciences of the Universe Seismic activity Seismographs Seismology Seismometers Space missions Tectonophysics Thickness Transdimensional hierarchical Bayesian Vibration measurement |
title | Improving Constraints on Planetary Interiors With PPs Receiver Functions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T22%3A06%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Constraints%20on%20Planetary%20Interiors%20With%20PPs%20Receiver%20Functions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Planets&rft.au=Kim,%20D.&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e2021JE006983&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e2021JE006983-n/a&rft.issn=2169-9097&rft.eissn=2169-9100&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021JE006983&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2600834138%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2600834138&rft_id=info:pmid/34824966&rfr_iscdi=true |