Changes in thyroid fine needle aspiration practice during the COVID‐19 pandemic
Purpose To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a different sample preparation protocol for fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of thyroid nodules established during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Methods From April 2020, conventional smears during FNAC were ceased according to World Health Organizatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cytopathology (Oxford) 2021-11, Vol.32 (6), p.732-737 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 737 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 732 |
container_title | Cytopathology (Oxford) |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Rossi, Duccio Belotti, Alessia Tonno, Clementina Midolo, Valeria Maffini, Fausto Antonio Nicosia, Luca De Fiori, Elvio Mauri, Giovanni |
description | Purpose
To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a different sample preparation protocol for fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of thyroid nodules established during the COVID‐19 pandemic.
Methods
From April 2020, conventional smears during FNAC were ceased according to World Health Organization recommendations due to the increased infection risk for operators, and a new protocol using only liquid‐based cytology (LBC) was adopted. FNACs performed between April and July 2020 (COVID‐19 group) were retrospectively compared with those from December 2019 through March 2020 (Pre‐COVID‐19 group). The distribution of diagnoses based on SIAPEC‐IAP categories and the concordance between cytological and histological results were compared using the chi‐squared test.
Results
Categories based on FNAC for 90 and 82 thyroid nodules in the Pre‐COVID‐19 and COVID‐19 groups showed no significant difference in distribution (P = .081), with the following respective cases (and percentages): TIR1, 7 (8%) and 8 (10%); TIR1C, 0 (0%) and 6 (7%); TIR2, 59 (66%) and
55 (67%); TIR3A, 8 (9%) and 5 (6%); TIR3B, 1 (1%) and 2 (3%); TIR4, 5 (6%) and 1 (1%); and TIR5, 10 (12%) and 5 (7%). Among patients with potentially malignant lesions, surgery was performed for 12/16 (75%) nodules in the Pre‐COVID‐19 and 7/8 (88%) nodules in the COVID‐19 groups, with no significant differences between cytological and histological diagnoses (P = .931).
Conclusion
The new LBC‐only protocol provided similar diagnostic accuracy in comparison with conventional smears, and can be effectively applied during a viral pandemic improving operator safety.
The aim of this work was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a new sample preparation protocol for FNAC of thyroid nodules established during the COVID‐19 pandemic and to compare it with the diagnostic accuracy of the previously established standard protocol. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cyt.13020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8597111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2542363153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4200-634bae6068d3dc2b6403d764e309a3d9252bfb019e2bcf9f43d823d5e52ae5393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10cFqFTEUBuAgFnutLnyDATe6mPYkZzJ3shFkrFooFKEKrkImOXNvytzMmMy03J2P4DP6JI3eIiiYTRb58pOTn7EXHE55Xmd2P59yBAGP2IpjLUuBgI_ZCpSsSylhfcyepnQDwIUS-IQdY8VxDUqt2Kd2a8KGUuFDMW_3cfSu6H2gIhC5gQqTJh_N7MdQTNHY2Vsq3BJ92GRORXv15eLdz-8_uComExztvH3GjnozJHr-sJ-wz-_Pr9uP5eXVh4v27WVpKwFQ1lh1hmqoG4fOiq6uAN26rghBGXRKSNH1HXBForO96it0jUAnSQpDEhWesDeH3GnpduQshTmaQU_R70zc69F4_fdJ8Fu9GW91I9U6_1oOePUQEMdvC6VZ73yyNAwm0LgkLWQlsEYuMdOX_9CbcYkhj5dVI6BqlISsXh-UjWNKkfo_j-GgfxWlc1H6d1HZnh3snR9o_3-o26_Xhxv3BBiTTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2582048950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes in thyroid fine needle aspiration practice during the COVID‐19 pandemic</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rossi, Duccio ; Belotti, Alessia ; Tonno, Clementina ; Midolo, Valeria ; Maffini, Fausto Antonio ; Nicosia, Luca ; De Fiori, Elvio ; Mauri, Giovanni</creator><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Duccio ; Belotti, Alessia ; Tonno, Clementina ; Midolo, Valeria ; Maffini, Fausto Antonio ; Nicosia, Luca ; De Fiori, Elvio ; Mauri, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a different sample preparation protocol for fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of thyroid nodules established during the COVID‐19 pandemic.
Methods
From April 2020, conventional smears during FNAC were ceased according to World Health Organization recommendations due to the increased infection risk for operators, and a new protocol using only liquid‐based cytology (LBC) was adopted. FNACs performed between April and July 2020 (COVID‐19 group) were retrospectively compared with those from December 2019 through March 2020 (Pre‐COVID‐19 group). The distribution of diagnoses based on SIAPEC‐IAP categories and the concordance between cytological and histological results were compared using the chi‐squared test.
Results
Categories based on FNAC for 90 and 82 thyroid nodules in the Pre‐COVID‐19 and COVID‐19 groups showed no significant difference in distribution (P = .081), with the following respective cases (and percentages): TIR1, 7 (8%) and 8 (10%); TIR1C, 0 (0%) and 6 (7%); TIR2, 59 (66%) and
55 (67%); TIR3A, 8 (9%) and 5 (6%); TIR3B, 1 (1%) and 2 (3%); TIR4, 5 (6%) and 1 (1%); and TIR5, 10 (12%) and 5 (7%). Among patients with potentially malignant lesions, surgery was performed for 12/16 (75%) nodules in the Pre‐COVID‐19 and 7/8 (88%) nodules in the COVID‐19 groups, with no significant differences between cytological and histological diagnoses (P = .931).
Conclusion
The new LBC‐only protocol provided similar diagnostic accuracy in comparison with conventional smears, and can be effectively applied during a viral pandemic improving operator safety.
The aim of this work was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a new sample preparation protocol for FNAC of thyroid nodules established during the COVID‐19 pandemic and to compare it with the diagnostic accuracy of the previously established standard protocol.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-5507</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2303</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cyt.13020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34137099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Cellular biology ; COVID-19 ; Cytology ; fine needle aspiration ; Nodules ; Original ; Pandemics ; surgery ; Thyroid ; Thyroid gland</subject><ispartof>Cytopathology (Oxford), 2021-11, Vol.32 (6), p.732-737</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4200-634bae6068d3dc2b6403d764e309a3d9252bfb019e2bcf9f43d823d5e52ae5393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4200-634bae6068d3dc2b6403d764e309a3d9252bfb019e2bcf9f43d823d5e52ae5393</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6711-8084 ; 0000-0003-4726-2692</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcyt.13020$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcyt.13020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Duccio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belotti, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonno, Clementina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Midolo, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maffini, Fausto Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicosia, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Fiori, Elvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauri, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><title>Changes in thyroid fine needle aspiration practice during the COVID‐19 pandemic</title><title>Cytopathology (Oxford)</title><description>Purpose
To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a different sample preparation protocol for fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of thyroid nodules established during the COVID‐19 pandemic.
Methods
From April 2020, conventional smears during FNAC were ceased according to World Health Organization recommendations due to the increased infection risk for operators, and a new protocol using only liquid‐based cytology (LBC) was adopted. FNACs performed between April and July 2020 (COVID‐19 group) were retrospectively compared with those from December 2019 through March 2020 (Pre‐COVID‐19 group). The distribution of diagnoses based on SIAPEC‐IAP categories and the concordance between cytological and histological results were compared using the chi‐squared test.
Results
Categories based on FNAC for 90 and 82 thyroid nodules in the Pre‐COVID‐19 and COVID‐19 groups showed no significant difference in distribution (P = .081), with the following respective cases (and percentages): TIR1, 7 (8%) and 8 (10%); TIR1C, 0 (0%) and 6 (7%); TIR2, 59 (66%) and
55 (67%); TIR3A, 8 (9%) and 5 (6%); TIR3B, 1 (1%) and 2 (3%); TIR4, 5 (6%) and 1 (1%); and TIR5, 10 (12%) and 5 (7%). Among patients with potentially malignant lesions, surgery was performed for 12/16 (75%) nodules in the Pre‐COVID‐19 and 7/8 (88%) nodules in the COVID‐19 groups, with no significant differences between cytological and histological diagnoses (P = .931).
Conclusion
The new LBC‐only protocol provided similar diagnostic accuracy in comparison with conventional smears, and can be effectively applied during a viral pandemic improving operator safety.
The aim of this work was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a new sample preparation protocol for FNAC of thyroid nodules established during the COVID‐19 pandemic and to compare it with the diagnostic accuracy of the previously established standard protocol.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>fine needle aspiration</subject><subject>Nodules</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>surgery</subject><subject>Thyroid</subject><subject>Thyroid gland</subject><issn>0956-5507</issn><issn>1365-2303</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp10cFqFTEUBuAgFnutLnyDATe6mPYkZzJ3shFkrFooFKEKrkImOXNvytzMmMy03J2P4DP6JI3eIiiYTRb58pOTn7EXHE55Xmd2P59yBAGP2IpjLUuBgI_ZCpSsSylhfcyepnQDwIUS-IQdY8VxDUqt2Kd2a8KGUuFDMW_3cfSu6H2gIhC5gQqTJh_N7MdQTNHY2Vsq3BJ92GRORXv15eLdz-8_uComExztvH3GjnozJHr-sJ-wz-_Pr9uP5eXVh4v27WVpKwFQ1lh1hmqoG4fOiq6uAN26rghBGXRKSNH1HXBForO96it0jUAnSQpDEhWesDeH3GnpduQshTmaQU_R70zc69F4_fdJ8Fu9GW91I9U6_1oOePUQEMdvC6VZ73yyNAwm0LgkLWQlsEYuMdOX_9CbcYkhj5dVI6BqlISsXh-UjWNKkfo_j-GgfxWlc1H6d1HZnh3snR9o_3-o26_Xhxv3BBiTTg</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Rossi, Duccio</creator><creator>Belotti, Alessia</creator><creator>Tonno, Clementina</creator><creator>Midolo, Valeria</creator><creator>Maffini, Fausto Antonio</creator><creator>Nicosia, Luca</creator><creator>De Fiori, Elvio</creator><creator>Mauri, Giovanni</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6711-8084</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4726-2692</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Changes in thyroid fine needle aspiration practice during the COVID‐19 pandemic</title><author>Rossi, Duccio ; Belotti, Alessia ; Tonno, Clementina ; Midolo, Valeria ; Maffini, Fausto Antonio ; Nicosia, Luca ; De Fiori, Elvio ; Mauri, Giovanni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4200-634bae6068d3dc2b6403d764e309a3d9252bfb019e2bcf9f43d823d5e52ae5393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>fine needle aspiration</topic><topic>Nodules</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>surgery</topic><topic>Thyroid</topic><topic>Thyroid gland</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Duccio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belotti, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonno, Clementina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Midolo, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maffini, Fausto Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicosia, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Fiori, Elvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauri, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cytopathology (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rossi, Duccio</au><au>Belotti, Alessia</au><au>Tonno, Clementina</au><au>Midolo, Valeria</au><au>Maffini, Fausto Antonio</au><au>Nicosia, Luca</au><au>De Fiori, Elvio</au><au>Mauri, Giovanni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes in thyroid fine needle aspiration practice during the COVID‐19 pandemic</atitle><jtitle>Cytopathology (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>732</spage><epage>737</epage><pages>732-737</pages><issn>0956-5507</issn><eissn>1365-2303</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a different sample preparation protocol for fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of thyroid nodules established during the COVID‐19 pandemic.
Methods
From April 2020, conventional smears during FNAC were ceased according to World Health Organization recommendations due to the increased infection risk for operators, and a new protocol using only liquid‐based cytology (LBC) was adopted. FNACs performed between April and July 2020 (COVID‐19 group) were retrospectively compared with those from December 2019 through March 2020 (Pre‐COVID‐19 group). The distribution of diagnoses based on SIAPEC‐IAP categories and the concordance between cytological and histological results were compared using the chi‐squared test.
Results
Categories based on FNAC for 90 and 82 thyroid nodules in the Pre‐COVID‐19 and COVID‐19 groups showed no significant difference in distribution (P = .081), with the following respective cases (and percentages): TIR1, 7 (8%) and 8 (10%); TIR1C, 0 (0%) and 6 (7%); TIR2, 59 (66%) and
55 (67%); TIR3A, 8 (9%) and 5 (6%); TIR3B, 1 (1%) and 2 (3%); TIR4, 5 (6%) and 1 (1%); and TIR5, 10 (12%) and 5 (7%). Among patients with potentially malignant lesions, surgery was performed for 12/16 (75%) nodules in the Pre‐COVID‐19 and 7/8 (88%) nodules in the COVID‐19 groups, with no significant differences between cytological and histological diagnoses (P = .931).
Conclusion
The new LBC‐only protocol provided similar diagnostic accuracy in comparison with conventional smears, and can be effectively applied during a viral pandemic improving operator safety.
The aim of this work was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a new sample preparation protocol for FNAC of thyroid nodules established during the COVID‐19 pandemic and to compare it with the diagnostic accuracy of the previously established standard protocol.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34137099</pmid><doi>10.1111/cyt.13020</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6711-8084</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4726-2692</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-5507 |
ispartof | Cytopathology (Oxford), 2021-11, Vol.32 (6), p.732-737 |
issn | 0956-5507 1365-2303 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8597111 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Biopsy Cellular biology COVID-19 Cytology fine needle aspiration Nodules Original Pandemics surgery Thyroid Thyroid gland |
title | Changes in thyroid fine needle aspiration practice during the COVID‐19 pandemic |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T15%3A54%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20in%20thyroid%20fine%20needle%20aspiration%20practice%20during%20the%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20pandemic&rft.jtitle=Cytopathology%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Rossi,%20Duccio&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=732&rft.epage=737&rft.pages=732-737&rft.issn=0956-5507&rft.eissn=1365-2303&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cyt.13020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2542363153%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2582048950&rft_id=info:pmid/34137099&rfr_iscdi=true |