Cigarette Brand Use and Sexual Orientation: Intersections With Gender and Race or Ethnicity

Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) populations have higher cigarette smoking rates than heterosexual populations. The tobacco industry has leveraged LGB, gender, and racial or ethnic identities to establish cigarette brand preference. We examined cigarette brand use among smokers by sexual orientation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Preventing chronic disease 2021-10, Vol.18, p.E94, Article 210160
Hauptverfasser: Budenz, Alexandra, Grana, Rachel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page E94
container_title Preventing chronic disease
container_volume 18
creator Budenz, Alexandra
Grana, Rachel
description Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) populations have higher cigarette smoking rates than heterosexual populations. The tobacco industry has leveraged LGB, gender, and racial or ethnic identities to establish cigarette brand preference. We examined cigarette brand use among smokers by sexual orientation and the implications of gender and race or ethnicity for brand use. We used the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH; 2015-2017) to conduct weighted bivariate analyses in 2019-2020 of the prevalence of 5 commonly used cigarette brands among adult smokers (N = 24,310) by sexual orientation. We conducted weighted regressions to test relationships between sexual orientation and brand use and interactions between sexual orientation, gender (defined in NSDUH as male or female), and race or ethnicity. LGB smokers were more likely to use Camel (lesbian/gay, OR = 1.7 [95% CI, 1.2-2.3], bisexual, OR = 1.8 [95% CI, 1.5-2.2]) and American Spirit cigarettes (lesbian/gay, OR = 2.8 [95% CI, 1.9-4.1], bisexual, OR = 3.2 [95% CI, 2.5-4.1]) than heterosexual smokers. Lesbian/gay smokers had higher odds of Marlboro cigarette use (OR = 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4) than heterosexual smokers. Bisexual smokers were more likely to smoke Newport cigarettes (OR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.4-2.1) than heterosexual smokers. Interactions between LGB and female identities (vs gay or bisexual male) were positively associated with Camel, Marlboro, and Newport use. The interaction between lesbian/gay and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (vs lesbian/gay White) was also positively associated with Newport use. LGB smokers may be more likely to smoke some commonly used cigarette brands than heterosexual smokers, and gender and race or ethnicity may have implications for brand preference. Future research could examine specific contributors to brand use among LGB smokers (eg, tobacco marketing).
doi_str_mv 10.5888/pcd18.210160
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8588870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>34710347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-9780f58005cd96a23864ed13f6ba99b184b2c1f42651424c2cd23bd7c396eb843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUE1PAjEQbYxGEL15Nv0BLvZrd7seTJQgmpCQqMSDh6bbdqEGuqQtRv69u6AEL_NmMu-9mTwALjHqp5zzm5XSmPcJRjhDR6CLU5YmGKf4-KDvgLMQPhEiOcqzU9ChLMeoKV3wMbAz6U2MBj546TScBgNbfDXfa7mAE2-NizLa2t3CZxeND0a1U4DvNs7hyDht_FbxIpWBtYfDOHdW2bg5ByeVXARz8Ys9MH0cvg2ekvFk9Dy4HyeKchaTIueoSjlCqdJFJgnlGTMa0yorZVGUmLOSKFwxkqWYEaaI0oSWOle0yEzJGe2Bu53val0ujVbNw14uxMrbpfQbUUsr_m-cnYtZ_SV4G2COGoPrnYHydQjeVHstRqLliG3IYhdyQ786vLcn_6VKfwCiAXj2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cigarette Brand Use and Sexual Orientation: Intersections With Gender and Race or Ethnicity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Budenz, Alexandra ; Grana, Rachel</creator><creatorcontrib>Budenz, Alexandra ; Grana, Rachel</creatorcontrib><description>Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) populations have higher cigarette smoking rates than heterosexual populations. The tobacco industry has leveraged LGB, gender, and racial or ethnic identities to establish cigarette brand preference. We examined cigarette brand use among smokers by sexual orientation and the implications of gender and race or ethnicity for brand use. We used the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH; 2015-2017) to conduct weighted bivariate analyses in 2019-2020 of the prevalence of 5 commonly used cigarette brands among adult smokers (N = 24,310) by sexual orientation. We conducted weighted regressions to test relationships between sexual orientation and brand use and interactions between sexual orientation, gender (defined in NSDUH as male or female), and race or ethnicity. LGB smokers were more likely to use Camel (lesbian/gay, OR = 1.7 [95% CI, 1.2-2.3], bisexual, OR = 1.8 [95% CI, 1.5-2.2]) and American Spirit cigarettes (lesbian/gay, OR = 2.8 [95% CI, 1.9-4.1], bisexual, OR = 3.2 [95% CI, 2.5-4.1]) than heterosexual smokers. Lesbian/gay smokers had higher odds of Marlboro cigarette use (OR = 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4) than heterosexual smokers. Bisexual smokers were more likely to smoke Newport cigarettes (OR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.4-2.1) than heterosexual smokers. Interactions between LGB and female identities (vs gay or bisexual male) were positively associated with Camel, Marlboro, and Newport use. The interaction between lesbian/gay and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (vs lesbian/gay White) was also positively associated with Newport use. LGB smokers may be more likely to smoke some commonly used cigarette brands than heterosexual smokers, and gender and race or ethnicity may have implications for brand preference. Future research could examine specific contributors to brand use among LGB smokers (eg, tobacco marketing).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-1151</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1151</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5888/pcd18.210160</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34710347</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</publisher><subject>Bisexuality ; Ethnicity ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Original Research ; Sexual and Gender Minorities ; Sexual Behavior ; Smokers ; Tobacco Products</subject><ispartof>Preventing chronic disease, 2021-10, Vol.18, p.E94, Article 210160</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-9780f58005cd96a23864ed13f6ba99b184b2c1f42651424c2cd23bd7c396eb843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-9780f58005cd96a23864ed13f6ba99b184b2c1f42651424c2cd23bd7c396eb843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8588870/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8588870/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34710347$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Budenz, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grana, Rachel</creatorcontrib><title>Cigarette Brand Use and Sexual Orientation: Intersections With Gender and Race or Ethnicity</title><title>Preventing chronic disease</title><addtitle>Prev Chronic Dis</addtitle><description>Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) populations have higher cigarette smoking rates than heterosexual populations. The tobacco industry has leveraged LGB, gender, and racial or ethnic identities to establish cigarette brand preference. We examined cigarette brand use among smokers by sexual orientation and the implications of gender and race or ethnicity for brand use. We used the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH; 2015-2017) to conduct weighted bivariate analyses in 2019-2020 of the prevalence of 5 commonly used cigarette brands among adult smokers (N = 24,310) by sexual orientation. We conducted weighted regressions to test relationships between sexual orientation and brand use and interactions between sexual orientation, gender (defined in NSDUH as male or female), and race or ethnicity. LGB smokers were more likely to use Camel (lesbian/gay, OR = 1.7 [95% CI, 1.2-2.3], bisexual, OR = 1.8 [95% CI, 1.5-2.2]) and American Spirit cigarettes (lesbian/gay, OR = 2.8 [95% CI, 1.9-4.1], bisexual, OR = 3.2 [95% CI, 2.5-4.1]) than heterosexual smokers. Lesbian/gay smokers had higher odds of Marlboro cigarette use (OR = 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4) than heterosexual smokers. Bisexual smokers were more likely to smoke Newport cigarettes (OR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.4-2.1) than heterosexual smokers. Interactions between LGB and female identities (vs gay or bisexual male) were positively associated with Camel, Marlboro, and Newport use. The interaction between lesbian/gay and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (vs lesbian/gay White) was also positively associated with Newport use. LGB smokers may be more likely to smoke some commonly used cigarette brands than heterosexual smokers, and gender and race or ethnicity may have implications for brand preference. Future research could examine specific contributors to brand use among LGB smokers (eg, tobacco marketing).</description><subject>Bisexuality</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Sexual and Gender Minorities</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Smokers</subject><subject>Tobacco Products</subject><issn>1545-1151</issn><issn>1545-1151</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUE1PAjEQbYxGEL15Nv0BLvZrd7seTJQgmpCQqMSDh6bbdqEGuqQtRv69u6AEL_NmMu-9mTwALjHqp5zzm5XSmPcJRjhDR6CLU5YmGKf4-KDvgLMQPhEiOcqzU9ChLMeoKV3wMbAz6U2MBj546TScBgNbfDXfa7mAE2-NizLa2t3CZxeND0a1U4DvNs7hyDht_FbxIpWBtYfDOHdW2bg5ByeVXARz8Ys9MH0cvg2ekvFk9Dy4HyeKchaTIueoSjlCqdJFJgnlGTMa0yorZVGUmLOSKFwxkqWYEaaI0oSWOle0yEzJGe2Bu53val0ujVbNw14uxMrbpfQbUUsr_m-cnYtZ_SV4G2COGoPrnYHydQjeVHstRqLliG3IYhdyQ786vLcn_6VKfwCiAXj2</recordid><startdate>20211028</startdate><enddate>20211028</enddate><creator>Budenz, Alexandra</creator><creator>Grana, Rachel</creator><general>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211028</creationdate><title>Cigarette Brand Use and Sexual Orientation: Intersections With Gender and Race or Ethnicity</title><author>Budenz, Alexandra ; Grana, Rachel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-9780f58005cd96a23864ed13f6ba99b184b2c1f42651424c2cd23bd7c396eb843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bisexuality</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Sexual and Gender Minorities</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Smokers</topic><topic>Tobacco Products</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Budenz, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grana, Rachel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Preventing chronic disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Budenz, Alexandra</au><au>Grana, Rachel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cigarette Brand Use and Sexual Orientation: Intersections With Gender and Race or Ethnicity</atitle><jtitle>Preventing chronic disease</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Chronic Dis</addtitle><date>2021-10-28</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><spage>E94</spage><pages>E94-</pages><artnum>210160</artnum><issn>1545-1151</issn><eissn>1545-1151</eissn><abstract>Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) populations have higher cigarette smoking rates than heterosexual populations. The tobacco industry has leveraged LGB, gender, and racial or ethnic identities to establish cigarette brand preference. We examined cigarette brand use among smokers by sexual orientation and the implications of gender and race or ethnicity for brand use. We used the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH; 2015-2017) to conduct weighted bivariate analyses in 2019-2020 of the prevalence of 5 commonly used cigarette brands among adult smokers (N = 24,310) by sexual orientation. We conducted weighted regressions to test relationships between sexual orientation and brand use and interactions between sexual orientation, gender (defined in NSDUH as male or female), and race or ethnicity. LGB smokers were more likely to use Camel (lesbian/gay, OR = 1.7 [95% CI, 1.2-2.3], bisexual, OR = 1.8 [95% CI, 1.5-2.2]) and American Spirit cigarettes (lesbian/gay, OR = 2.8 [95% CI, 1.9-4.1], bisexual, OR = 3.2 [95% CI, 2.5-4.1]) than heterosexual smokers. Lesbian/gay smokers had higher odds of Marlboro cigarette use (OR = 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4) than heterosexual smokers. Bisexual smokers were more likely to smoke Newport cigarettes (OR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.4-2.1) than heterosexual smokers. Interactions between LGB and female identities (vs gay or bisexual male) were positively associated with Camel, Marlboro, and Newport use. The interaction between lesbian/gay and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (vs lesbian/gay White) was also positively associated with Newport use. LGB smokers may be more likely to smoke some commonly used cigarette brands than heterosexual smokers, and gender and race or ethnicity may have implications for brand preference. Future research could examine specific contributors to brand use among LGB smokers (eg, tobacco marketing).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</pub><pmid>34710347</pmid><doi>10.5888/pcd18.210160</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1545-1151
ispartof Preventing chronic disease, 2021-10, Vol.18, p.E94, Article 210160
issn 1545-1151
1545-1151
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8588870
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Bisexuality
Ethnicity
Female
Humans
Male
Original Research
Sexual and Gender Minorities
Sexual Behavior
Smokers
Tobacco Products
title Cigarette Brand Use and Sexual Orientation: Intersections With Gender and Race or Ethnicity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A40%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cigarette%20Brand%20Use%20and%20Sexual%20Orientation:%20Intersections%20With%20Gender%20and%20Race%20or%20Ethnicity&rft.jtitle=Preventing%20chronic%20disease&rft.au=Budenz,%20Alexandra&rft.date=2021-10-28&rft.volume=18&rft.spage=E94&rft.pages=E94-&rft.artnum=210160&rft.issn=1545-1151&rft.eissn=1545-1151&rft_id=info:doi/10.5888/pcd18.210160&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E34710347%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/34710347&rfr_iscdi=true