Multireader evaluation of radiologist performance for COVID-19 detection on emergency department chest radiographs
Chest radiographs (CXR) are frequently used as a screening tool for patients with suspected COVID-19 infection pending reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results, despite recommendations against this. We evaluated radiologist performance for COVID-19 diagnosis on CXR at the tim...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical imaging 2022-02, Vol.82, p.77-82 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 82 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 77 |
container_title | Clinical imaging |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Gichoya, Judy W. Sinha, Priyanshu Davis, Melissa Dunkle, Jeffrey W. Hamlin, Scott A. Herr, Keith D. Hoff, Carrie N. Letter, Haley P. McAdams, Christopher R. Puthoff, Gregory D. Smith, Kevin L. Steenburg, Scott D. Banerjee, Imon Trivedi, Hari |
description | Chest radiographs (CXR) are frequently used as a screening tool for patients with suspected COVID-19 infection pending reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results, despite recommendations against this. We evaluated radiologist performance for COVID-19 diagnosis on CXR at the time of patient presentation in the Emergency Department (ED).
We extracted RT-PCR results, clinical history, and CXRs of all patients from a single institution between March and June 2020. 984 RT-PCR positive and 1043 RT-PCR negative radiographs were reviewed by 10 emergency radiologists from 4 academic centers. 100 cases were read by all radiologists and 1927 cases by 2 radiologists. Each radiologist chose the single best label per case: Normal, COVID-19, Other – Infectious, Other – Noninfectious, Non-diagnostic, and Endotracheal Tube. Cases labeled with endotracheal tube (246) or non-diagnostic (54) were excluded. Remaining cases were analyzed for label distribution, clinical history, and inter-reader agreement.
1727 radiographs (732 RT-PCR positive, 995 RT-PCR negative) were included from 1594 patients (51.2% male, 48.8% female, age 59 ± 19 years). For 89 cases read by all readers, there was poor agreement for RT-PCR positive (Fleiss Score 0.36) and negative (Fleiss Score 0.46) exams. Agreement between two readers on 1638 cases was 54.2% (373/688) for RT-PCR positive cases and 71.4% (679/950) for negative cases. Agreement was highest for RT-PCR negative cases labeled as Normal (50.4%, n = 479). Reader performance did not improve with clinical history or time between CXR and RT-PCR result.
At the time of presentation to the emergency department, emergency radiologist performance is non-specific for diagnosing COVID-19.
•Emergency radiologists have non-specific performance for interpreting COVID-19 on CXR with a high rate of disagreement.•Radiologist performance is not improved by provision of clinical history for COVID-19 diagnosis.•Increased time between COVID-19 RT-PCR test and CXR did not improve performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.10.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8585957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S089970712100423X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2617268604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-3f53100475e153871cccace9cc58ca952781e89c160c6544990421a012a6bb383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1v1DAUtBCILoW_UEXiwiWLnfjzgkBbCpWKegGulvflJetVEgc7Wan_Hm-3rYALJ1vjmfGbN4RcMLpmlMn3-zX0fvSD69YVrVgG15TpZ2TFtKpLzo15TlZUG1MqqtgZeZXSnmah4eolOau5MlrIakXit6WffUTXYCzw4PrFzT6MRWiL6Bof-tD5NBcTxjbEwY2ARb4Um9uf15clM0WDM8JJMRY4YOxwhLsMTy7OA45zATvMBvdmXXTTLr0mL1rXJ3zzcJ6TH1efv2--lje3X643n25K4FzOZd2KmlHKlUAmaq0YADhAAyA0OCMqpRlqA0xSkOKYmPKKOcoqJ7fbWtfn5MPJd1q2AzaQh4mut1PMW4t3Njhv_34Z_c524WC10MIIlQ3ePRjE8GvJKezgE2DfuxHDkmwlKa00l0Zk6tt_qPuwxDHHyyymKqkl5ZklTyyIIaWI7dMwjNpjrXZvH2u1x1qPeK41Cy_-jPIke-wxEz6eCJgXevAYbQKfm8AmdwuzbYL_3x-_ATCHuLk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2617268604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multireader evaluation of radiologist performance for COVID-19 detection on emergency department chest radiographs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gichoya, Judy W. ; Sinha, Priyanshu ; Davis, Melissa ; Dunkle, Jeffrey W. ; Hamlin, Scott A. ; Herr, Keith D. ; Hoff, Carrie N. ; Letter, Haley P. ; McAdams, Christopher R. ; Puthoff, Gregory D. ; Smith, Kevin L. ; Steenburg, Scott D. ; Banerjee, Imon ; Trivedi, Hari</creator><creatorcontrib>Gichoya, Judy W. ; Sinha, Priyanshu ; Davis, Melissa ; Dunkle, Jeffrey W. ; Hamlin, Scott A. ; Herr, Keith D. ; Hoff, Carrie N. ; Letter, Haley P. ; McAdams, Christopher R. ; Puthoff, Gregory D. ; Smith, Kevin L. ; Steenburg, Scott D. ; Banerjee, Imon ; Trivedi, Hari</creatorcontrib><description>Chest radiographs (CXR) are frequently used as a screening tool for patients with suspected COVID-19 infection pending reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results, despite recommendations against this. We evaluated radiologist performance for COVID-19 diagnosis on CXR at the time of patient presentation in the Emergency Department (ED).
We extracted RT-PCR results, clinical history, and CXRs of all patients from a single institution between March and June 2020. 984 RT-PCR positive and 1043 RT-PCR negative radiographs were reviewed by 10 emergency radiologists from 4 academic centers. 100 cases were read by all radiologists and 1927 cases by 2 radiologists. Each radiologist chose the single best label per case: Normal, COVID-19, Other – Infectious, Other – Noninfectious, Non-diagnostic, and Endotracheal Tube. Cases labeled with endotracheal tube (246) or non-diagnostic (54) were excluded. Remaining cases were analyzed for label distribution, clinical history, and inter-reader agreement.
1727 radiographs (732 RT-PCR positive, 995 RT-PCR negative) were included from 1594 patients (51.2% male, 48.8% female, age 59 ± 19 years). For 89 cases read by all readers, there was poor agreement for RT-PCR positive (Fleiss Score 0.36) and negative (Fleiss Score 0.46) exams. Agreement between two readers on 1638 cases was 54.2% (373/688) for RT-PCR positive cases and 71.4% (679/950) for negative cases. Agreement was highest for RT-PCR negative cases labeled as Normal (50.4%, n = 479). Reader performance did not improve with clinical history or time between CXR and RT-PCR result.
At the time of presentation to the emergency department, emergency radiologist performance is non-specific for diagnosing COVID-19.
•Emergency radiologists have non-specific performance for interpreting COVID-19 on CXR with a high rate of disagreement.•Radiologist performance is not improved by provision of clinical history for COVID-19 diagnosis.•Increased time between COVID-19 RT-PCR test and CXR did not improve performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-7071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.10.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34798562</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; African Americans ; Aged ; Agreements ; Cardiothoracic Imaging ; Chest ; Chest X-ray ; Coronavirus ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 Testing ; CXR ; Disease transmission ; Emergencies ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pandemics ; Patients ; Performance evaluation ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Radiographs ; Radiography ; Radiography, Thoracic ; Radiologists ; Retrospective Studies ; RNA-directed DNA polymerase ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Clinical imaging, 2022-02, Vol.82, p.77-82</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Feb 2022</rights><rights>2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-3f53100475e153871cccace9cc58ca952781e89c160c6544990421a012a6bb383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.10.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34798562$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gichoya, Judy W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Priyanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunkle, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamlin, Scott A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herr, Keith D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoff, Carrie N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letter, Haley P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAdams, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puthoff, Gregory D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Kevin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steenburg, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Imon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trivedi, Hari</creatorcontrib><title>Multireader evaluation of radiologist performance for COVID-19 detection on emergency department chest radiographs</title><title>Clinical imaging</title><addtitle>Clin Imaging</addtitle><description>Chest radiographs (CXR) are frequently used as a screening tool for patients with suspected COVID-19 infection pending reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results, despite recommendations against this. We evaluated radiologist performance for COVID-19 diagnosis on CXR at the time of patient presentation in the Emergency Department (ED).
We extracted RT-PCR results, clinical history, and CXRs of all patients from a single institution between March and June 2020. 984 RT-PCR positive and 1043 RT-PCR negative radiographs were reviewed by 10 emergency radiologists from 4 academic centers. 100 cases were read by all radiologists and 1927 cases by 2 radiologists. Each radiologist chose the single best label per case: Normal, COVID-19, Other – Infectious, Other – Noninfectious, Non-diagnostic, and Endotracheal Tube. Cases labeled with endotracheal tube (246) or non-diagnostic (54) were excluded. Remaining cases were analyzed for label distribution, clinical history, and inter-reader agreement.
1727 radiographs (732 RT-PCR positive, 995 RT-PCR negative) were included from 1594 patients (51.2% male, 48.8% female, age 59 ± 19 years). For 89 cases read by all readers, there was poor agreement for RT-PCR positive (Fleiss Score 0.36) and negative (Fleiss Score 0.46) exams. Agreement between two readers on 1638 cases was 54.2% (373/688) for RT-PCR positive cases and 71.4% (679/950) for negative cases. Agreement was highest for RT-PCR negative cases labeled as Normal (50.4%, n = 479). Reader performance did not improve with clinical history or time between CXR and RT-PCR result.
At the time of presentation to the emergency department, emergency radiologist performance is non-specific for diagnosing COVID-19.
•Emergency radiologists have non-specific performance for interpreting COVID-19 on CXR with a high rate of disagreement.•Radiologist performance is not improved by provision of clinical history for COVID-19 diagnosis.•Increased time between COVID-19 RT-PCR test and CXR did not improve performance.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Cardiothoracic Imaging</subject><subject>Chest</subject><subject>Chest X-ray</subject><subject>Coronavirus</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 Testing</subject><subject>CXR</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Radiographs</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radiography, Thoracic</subject><subject>Radiologists</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>RNA-directed DNA polymerase</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>0899-7071</issn><issn>1873-4499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1v1DAUtBCILoW_UEXiwiWLnfjzgkBbCpWKegGulvflJetVEgc7Wan_Hm-3rYALJ1vjmfGbN4RcMLpmlMn3-zX0fvSD69YVrVgG15TpZ2TFtKpLzo15TlZUG1MqqtgZeZXSnmah4eolOau5MlrIakXit6WffUTXYCzw4PrFzT6MRWiL6Bof-tD5NBcTxjbEwY2ARb4Um9uf15clM0WDM8JJMRY4YOxwhLsMTy7OA45zATvMBvdmXXTTLr0mL1rXJ3zzcJ6TH1efv2--lje3X643n25K4FzOZd2KmlHKlUAmaq0YADhAAyA0OCMqpRlqA0xSkOKYmPKKOcoqJ7fbWtfn5MPJd1q2AzaQh4mut1PMW4t3Njhv_34Z_c524WC10MIIlQ3ePRjE8GvJKezgE2DfuxHDkmwlKa00l0Zk6tt_qPuwxDHHyyymKqkl5ZklTyyIIaWI7dMwjNpjrXZvH2u1x1qPeK41Cy_-jPIke-wxEz6eCJgXevAYbQKfm8AmdwuzbYL_3x-_ATCHuLk</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Gichoya, Judy W.</creator><creator>Sinha, Priyanshu</creator><creator>Davis, Melissa</creator><creator>Dunkle, Jeffrey W.</creator><creator>Hamlin, Scott A.</creator><creator>Herr, Keith D.</creator><creator>Hoff, Carrie N.</creator><creator>Letter, Haley P.</creator><creator>McAdams, Christopher R.</creator><creator>Puthoff, Gregory D.</creator><creator>Smith, Kevin L.</creator><creator>Steenburg, Scott D.</creator><creator>Banerjee, Imon</creator><creator>Trivedi, Hari</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Published by Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Multireader evaluation of radiologist performance for COVID-19 detection on emergency department chest radiographs</title><author>Gichoya, Judy W. ; Sinha, Priyanshu ; Davis, Melissa ; Dunkle, Jeffrey W. ; Hamlin, Scott A. ; Herr, Keith D. ; Hoff, Carrie N. ; Letter, Haley P. ; McAdams, Christopher R. ; Puthoff, Gregory D. ; Smith, Kevin L. ; Steenburg, Scott D. ; Banerjee, Imon ; Trivedi, Hari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-3f53100475e153871cccace9cc58ca952781e89c160c6544990421a012a6bb383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Cardiothoracic Imaging</topic><topic>Chest</topic><topic>Chest X-ray</topic><topic>Coronavirus</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 Testing</topic><topic>CXR</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Radiographs</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radiography, Thoracic</topic><topic>Radiologists</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>RNA-directed DNA polymerase</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gichoya, Judy W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Priyanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunkle, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamlin, Scott A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herr, Keith D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoff, Carrie N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letter, Haley P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAdams, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puthoff, Gregory D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Kevin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steenburg, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Imon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trivedi, Hari</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gichoya, Judy W.</au><au>Sinha, Priyanshu</au><au>Davis, Melissa</au><au>Dunkle, Jeffrey W.</au><au>Hamlin, Scott A.</au><au>Herr, Keith D.</au><au>Hoff, Carrie N.</au><au>Letter, Haley P.</au><au>McAdams, Christopher R.</au><au>Puthoff, Gregory D.</au><au>Smith, Kevin L.</au><au>Steenburg, Scott D.</au><au>Banerjee, Imon</au><au>Trivedi, Hari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multireader evaluation of radiologist performance for COVID-19 detection on emergency department chest radiographs</atitle><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Imaging</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>82</volume><spage>77</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>77-82</pages><issn>0899-7071</issn><eissn>1873-4499</eissn><abstract>Chest radiographs (CXR) are frequently used as a screening tool for patients with suspected COVID-19 infection pending reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results, despite recommendations against this. We evaluated radiologist performance for COVID-19 diagnosis on CXR at the time of patient presentation in the Emergency Department (ED).
We extracted RT-PCR results, clinical history, and CXRs of all patients from a single institution between March and June 2020. 984 RT-PCR positive and 1043 RT-PCR negative radiographs were reviewed by 10 emergency radiologists from 4 academic centers. 100 cases were read by all radiologists and 1927 cases by 2 radiologists. Each radiologist chose the single best label per case: Normal, COVID-19, Other – Infectious, Other – Noninfectious, Non-diagnostic, and Endotracheal Tube. Cases labeled with endotracheal tube (246) or non-diagnostic (54) were excluded. Remaining cases were analyzed for label distribution, clinical history, and inter-reader agreement.
1727 radiographs (732 RT-PCR positive, 995 RT-PCR negative) were included from 1594 patients (51.2% male, 48.8% female, age 59 ± 19 years). For 89 cases read by all readers, there was poor agreement for RT-PCR positive (Fleiss Score 0.36) and negative (Fleiss Score 0.46) exams. Agreement between two readers on 1638 cases was 54.2% (373/688) for RT-PCR positive cases and 71.4% (679/950) for negative cases. Agreement was highest for RT-PCR negative cases labeled as Normal (50.4%, n = 479). Reader performance did not improve with clinical history or time between CXR and RT-PCR result.
At the time of presentation to the emergency department, emergency radiologist performance is non-specific for diagnosing COVID-19.
•Emergency radiologists have non-specific performance for interpreting COVID-19 on CXR with a high rate of disagreement.•Radiologist performance is not improved by provision of clinical history for COVID-19 diagnosis.•Increased time between COVID-19 RT-PCR test and CXR did not improve performance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34798562</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.10.018</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-7071 |
ispartof | Clinical imaging, 2022-02, Vol.82, p.77-82 |
issn | 0899-7071 1873-4499 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8585957 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult African Americans Aged Agreements Cardiothoracic Imaging Chest Chest X-ray Coronavirus Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 Testing CXR Disease transmission Emergencies Emergency medical care Emergency medical services Emergency Service, Hospital Female Humans Male Middle Aged Pandemics Patients Performance evaluation Polymerase chain reaction Radiographs Radiography Radiography, Thoracic Radiologists Retrospective Studies RNA-directed DNA polymerase SARS-CoV-2 Statistical analysis |
title | Multireader evaluation of radiologist performance for COVID-19 detection on emergency department chest radiographs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T12%3A07%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multireader%20evaluation%20of%20radiologist%20performance%20for%20COVID-19%20detection%20on%20emergency%20department%20chest%20radiographs&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20imaging&rft.au=Gichoya,%20Judy%20W.&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=82&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=77-82&rft.issn=0899-7071&rft.eissn=1873-4499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.10.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2617268604%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2617268604&rft_id=info:pmid/34798562&rft_els_id=S089970712100423X&rfr_iscdi=true |