Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence—A Prospective Cohort Study
(1) Background: The Sphinkeeper implantation for faecal incontinence (FI) is a novel surgical procedure with limited data on its clinical efficacy. Therefore, we aimed to assess the functional outcome following Sphinkeeper surgery in patients with refractory FI. (2) Methods: Between 2018 and 2020, e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2021-10, Vol.10 (21), p.4965 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 4965 |
container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Dawoud, Christopher Bender, Leonhard Widmann, Kerstin Melanie Harpain, Felix Riss, Stefan |
description | (1) Background: The Sphinkeeper implantation for faecal incontinence (FI) is a novel surgical procedure with limited data on its clinical efficacy. Therefore, we aimed to assess the functional outcome following Sphinkeeper surgery in patients with refractory FI. (2) Methods: Between 2018 and 2020, eleven consecutive patients (9 female) with FI met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled for surgery. Functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated by standard questionnaires pre- and post-surgery. Migration of protheses was demonstrated by 3D endoanal ultrasound. The median follow-up time was eight months (range 3–18 months). (3) Results: The median age was 75 years (range 46–89 years) with a median BMI of 27.4 (range 21.2–30.1). The median number of implanted prostheses per intervention was nine (range 9–10). We found no intraoperative or early postoperative complications. After two months, two prostheses in one patient had to be removed due to pain at the perianal skin site. The median St. Mark’s incontinence score decreased significantly from 22 to 13 points (p = 0.008). The SF-12 showed a significant improvement (35.9 versus 46.3) after surgery (p = 0.028). A migration of at least one prosthesis was observed in ten patients (91%). Six (60%) prostheses were found at the same level in another ten patients. (4) Conclusion: Sphinkeeper implantation is a promising surgical technique for patients with severe FI. The complication rate is low, and short-term functional improvement can be achieved even in severe forms of FI. Migration of implants commonly occurs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm10214965 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8584920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2597485554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-defe10aab9231fec30fdf303f1cf4e86be3156b9845ad349f080646874d725823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1Kw0AQxxdRVKonXyDgRZDofmdzEaRYLRQUWi9elu1m1qamu3GTFHrzIXxCn8QURdS5zDDzmz_zgdAJwReM5fhyaVcEU8JzKXbQIcVZlmKm2O6v-AAdN80S96YUpyTbRweMZ1JxJQ_R07RelP4FoIaYPMRgoegiJC7EZBbBtKV_Tqawhj43MmBNlYy9Db7Pg7fw8fZ-ve1qarBtuYZkGBYhtsm07YrNEdpzpmrg-NsP0OPoZja8Syf3t-Ph9SS1TMk2LcABwcbMc8qIA8uwKxzDzBHrOCg5B0aEnOeKC1MwnjussORSZbzIqFCUDdDVl27dzVdQWPBtNJWuY7kycaODKfXfii8X-jmstRKK5xT3AmffAjG8dtC0elU2FqrKeAhdo6nIM66EELxHT_-hy9BF36-3pSRmIqdb6vyLsv1pmgjuZxiC9fZt-tfb2Cfyw4rC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2596035924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence—A Prospective Cohort Study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Dawoud, Christopher ; Bender, Leonhard ; Widmann, Kerstin Melanie ; Harpain, Felix ; Riss, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Dawoud, Christopher ; Bender, Leonhard ; Widmann, Kerstin Melanie ; Harpain, Felix ; Riss, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>(1) Background: The Sphinkeeper implantation for faecal incontinence (FI) is a novel surgical procedure with limited data on its clinical efficacy. Therefore, we aimed to assess the functional outcome following Sphinkeeper surgery in patients with refractory FI. (2) Methods: Between 2018 and 2020, eleven consecutive patients (9 female) with FI met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled for surgery. Functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated by standard questionnaires pre- and post-surgery. Migration of protheses was demonstrated by 3D endoanal ultrasound. The median follow-up time was eight months (range 3–18 months). (3) Results: The median age was 75 years (range 46–89 years) with a median BMI of 27.4 (range 21.2–30.1). The median number of implanted prostheses per intervention was nine (range 9–10). We found no intraoperative or early postoperative complications. After two months, two prostheses in one patient had to be removed due to pain at the perianal skin site. The median St. Mark’s incontinence score decreased significantly from 22 to 13 points (p = 0.008). The SF-12 showed a significant improvement (35.9 versus 46.3) after surgery (p = 0.028). A migration of at least one prosthesis was observed in ten patients (91%). Six (60%) prostheses were found at the same level in another ten patients. (4) Conclusion: Sphinkeeper implantation is a promising surgical technique for patients with severe FI. The complication rate is low, and short-term functional improvement can be achieved even in severe forms of FI. Migration of implants commonly occurs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214965</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34768486</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Anus ; Clinical medicine ; Cohort analysis ; Constipation ; Fecal incontinence ; Migration ; Patients ; Prostheses ; Quality of life ; Skin ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2021-10, Vol.10 (21), p.4965</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-defe10aab9231fec30fdf303f1cf4e86be3156b9845ad349f080646874d725823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-defe10aab9231fec30fdf303f1cf4e86be3156b9845ad349f080646874d725823</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1432-2804 ; 0000-0001-6589-5712</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584920/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584920/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dawoud, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Leonhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widmann, Kerstin Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harpain, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riss, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence—A Prospective Cohort Study</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><description>(1) Background: The Sphinkeeper implantation for faecal incontinence (FI) is a novel surgical procedure with limited data on its clinical efficacy. Therefore, we aimed to assess the functional outcome following Sphinkeeper surgery in patients with refractory FI. (2) Methods: Between 2018 and 2020, eleven consecutive patients (9 female) with FI met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled for surgery. Functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated by standard questionnaires pre- and post-surgery. Migration of protheses was demonstrated by 3D endoanal ultrasound. The median follow-up time was eight months (range 3–18 months). (3) Results: The median age was 75 years (range 46–89 years) with a median BMI of 27.4 (range 21.2–30.1). The median number of implanted prostheses per intervention was nine (range 9–10). We found no intraoperative or early postoperative complications. After two months, two prostheses in one patient had to be removed due to pain at the perianal skin site. The median St. Mark’s incontinence score decreased significantly from 22 to 13 points (p = 0.008). The SF-12 showed a significant improvement (35.9 versus 46.3) after surgery (p = 0.028). A migration of at least one prosthesis was observed in ten patients (91%). Six (60%) prostheses were found at the same level in another ten patients. (4) Conclusion: Sphinkeeper implantation is a promising surgical technique for patients with severe FI. The complication rate is low, and short-term functional improvement can be achieved even in severe forms of FI. Migration of implants commonly occurs.</description><subject>Anus</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Constipation</subject><subject>Fecal incontinence</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1Kw0AQxxdRVKonXyDgRZDofmdzEaRYLRQUWi9elu1m1qamu3GTFHrzIXxCn8QURdS5zDDzmz_zgdAJwReM5fhyaVcEU8JzKXbQIcVZlmKm2O6v-AAdN80S96YUpyTbRweMZ1JxJQ_R07RelP4FoIaYPMRgoegiJC7EZBbBtKV_Tqawhj43MmBNlYy9Db7Pg7fw8fZ-ve1qarBtuYZkGBYhtsm07YrNEdpzpmrg-NsP0OPoZja8Syf3t-Ph9SS1TMk2LcABwcbMc8qIA8uwKxzDzBHrOCg5B0aEnOeKC1MwnjussORSZbzIqFCUDdDVl27dzVdQWPBtNJWuY7kycaODKfXfii8X-jmstRKK5xT3AmffAjG8dtC0elU2FqrKeAhdo6nIM66EELxHT_-hy9BF36-3pSRmIqdb6vyLsv1pmgjuZxiC9fZt-tfb2Cfyw4rC</recordid><startdate>20211026</startdate><enddate>20211026</enddate><creator>Dawoud, Christopher</creator><creator>Bender, Leonhard</creator><creator>Widmann, Kerstin Melanie</creator><creator>Harpain, Felix</creator><creator>Riss, Stefan</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1432-2804</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6589-5712</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211026</creationdate><title>Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence—A Prospective Cohort Study</title><author>Dawoud, Christopher ; Bender, Leonhard ; Widmann, Kerstin Melanie ; Harpain, Felix ; Riss, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-defe10aab9231fec30fdf303f1cf4e86be3156b9845ad349f080646874d725823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anus</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Constipation</topic><topic>Fecal incontinence</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dawoud, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Leonhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widmann, Kerstin Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harpain, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riss, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dawoud, Christopher</au><au>Bender, Leonhard</au><au>Widmann, Kerstin Melanie</au><au>Harpain, Felix</au><au>Riss, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence—A Prospective Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><date>2021-10-26</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>4965</spage><pages>4965-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>(1) Background: The Sphinkeeper implantation for faecal incontinence (FI) is a novel surgical procedure with limited data on its clinical efficacy. Therefore, we aimed to assess the functional outcome following Sphinkeeper surgery in patients with refractory FI. (2) Methods: Between 2018 and 2020, eleven consecutive patients (9 female) with FI met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled for surgery. Functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated by standard questionnaires pre- and post-surgery. Migration of protheses was demonstrated by 3D endoanal ultrasound. The median follow-up time was eight months (range 3–18 months). (3) Results: The median age was 75 years (range 46–89 years) with a median BMI of 27.4 (range 21.2–30.1). The median number of implanted prostheses per intervention was nine (range 9–10). We found no intraoperative or early postoperative complications. After two months, two prostheses in one patient had to be removed due to pain at the perianal skin site. The median St. Mark’s incontinence score decreased significantly from 22 to 13 points (p = 0.008). The SF-12 showed a significant improvement (35.9 versus 46.3) after surgery (p = 0.028). A migration of at least one prosthesis was observed in ten patients (91%). Six (60%) prostheses were found at the same level in another ten patients. (4) Conclusion: Sphinkeeper implantation is a promising surgical technique for patients with severe FI. The complication rate is low, and short-term functional improvement can be achieved even in severe forms of FI. Migration of implants commonly occurs.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34768486</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm10214965</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1432-2804</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6589-5712</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2021-10, Vol.10 (21), p.4965 |
issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8584920 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central |
subjects | Anus Clinical medicine Cohort analysis Constipation Fecal incontinence Migration Patients Prostheses Quality of life Skin Statistical analysis Surgery |
title | Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence—A Prospective Cohort Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T20%3A34%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sphinkeeper%20Procedure%20for%20Treating%20Severe%20Faecal%20Incontinence%E2%80%94A%20Prospective%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Dawoud,%20Christopher&rft.date=2021-10-26&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=4965&rft.pages=4965-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm10214965&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2597485554%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2596035924&rft_id=info:pmid/34768486&rfr_iscdi=true |