Sex Differences in Clinical Course and Intensive Care Unit Admission in a National Cohort of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19

Males have a higher risk for an adverse outcome of COVID-19. The aim of the study was to analyze sex differences in the clinical course with focus on patients who received intensive care. Research was conducted as an observational retrospective cohort study. A group of 23,235 patients from 83 hospit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2021-10, Vol.10 (21), p.4954
Hauptverfasser: Nachtigall, Irit, Bonsignore, Marzia, Thürmann, Petra, Hohenstein, Sven, Jóźwiak, Katarzyna, Hauptmann, Michael, Eifert, Sandra, Dengler, Julius, Bollmann, Andreas, Groesdonk, Heinrich V., Kuhlen, Ralf, Meier-Hellmann, Andreas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 21
container_start_page 4954
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 10
creator Nachtigall, Irit
Bonsignore, Marzia
Thürmann, Petra
Hohenstein, Sven
Jóźwiak, Katarzyna
Hauptmann, Michael
Eifert, Sandra
Dengler, Julius
Bollmann, Andreas
Groesdonk, Heinrich V.
Kuhlen, Ralf
Meier-Hellmann, Andreas
description Males have a higher risk for an adverse outcome of COVID-19. The aim of the study was to analyze sex differences in the clinical course with focus on patients who received intensive care. Research was conducted as an observational retrospective cohort study. A group of 23,235 patients from 83 hospitals with PCR-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 between 4 February 2020 and 22 March 2021 were included. Data on symptoms were retrieved from a separate registry, which served as a routine infection control system. Males accounted for 51.4% of all included patients. Males received more intensive care (ratio OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.51–1.71) and mechanical ventilation (invasive or noninvasive, OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.73–2.01). A model for the prediction of mortality showed that until the age 60 y, mortality increased with age with no substantial difference between sexes. After 60 y, the risk of death increased more in males than in females. At 90 y, females had a predicted mortality risk of 31%, corresponding to males of 84 y. In the intensive care unit (ICU) cohort, females of 90 y had a mortality risk of 46%, equivalent to males of 72 y. Seventy-five percent of males over 90 died, but only 46% of females of the same age. In conclusion, the sex gap was most evident among the oldest in the ICU. Understanding sex-determined differences in COVID-19 can be useful to facilitate individualized treatments.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm10214954
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8584819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2596036705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-a105285fac33f796ce0094fe81f5dc9700a612dba99073a132143823065a5bf13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUclKBDEQDaKoqCd_IOBRWpNOp5NcBGm3AVHB5Roy6cTJ0JOMSWZcTn66cUG0LlVQr15VvQfALkYHhAh0ONUzjGrcCNqsgM0aMVYhwsnqn3oD7KQ0RSU4b2rM1sEGaVjLG0Y2wfuteYEnzloTjdcmQedhNzjvtBpgFxYxGah8D0c-G5_c0sBORQPvvcvwuJ-5lFzwn0MKXqlc6q-xSYgZBgsvQpq7rAb3Znp4U_rG5wSfXZ7A7vphdFJhsQ3WrBqS2fnJW-D-7PSuu6gur89H3fFlpQlvc6UwojWnVmlCLBOtNgiJxhqOLe21YAipFtf9WAmBGFGYFE0IrwlqqaJji8kWOPrmnS_GM9PrcklUg5xHN1PxVQbl5P-OdxP5GJaSU95wLArB3g9BDE8Lk7KcFnnKv0nWVLSItAzRgtr_RukYUorG_m7ASH46Jv84Rj4AXnuHMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2596036705</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex Differences in Clinical Course and Intensive Care Unit Admission in a National Cohort of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Nachtigall, Irit ; Bonsignore, Marzia ; Thürmann, Petra ; Hohenstein, Sven ; Jóźwiak, Katarzyna ; Hauptmann, Michael ; Eifert, Sandra ; Dengler, Julius ; Bollmann, Andreas ; Groesdonk, Heinrich V. ; Kuhlen, Ralf ; Meier-Hellmann, Andreas</creator><creatorcontrib>Nachtigall, Irit ; Bonsignore, Marzia ; Thürmann, Petra ; Hohenstein, Sven ; Jóźwiak, Katarzyna ; Hauptmann, Michael ; Eifert, Sandra ; Dengler, Julius ; Bollmann, Andreas ; Groesdonk, Heinrich V. ; Kuhlen, Ralf ; Meier-Hellmann, Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>Males have a higher risk for an adverse outcome of COVID-19. The aim of the study was to analyze sex differences in the clinical course with focus on patients who received intensive care. Research was conducted as an observational retrospective cohort study. A group of 23,235 patients from 83 hospitals with PCR-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 between 4 February 2020 and 22 March 2021 were included. Data on symptoms were retrieved from a separate registry, which served as a routine infection control system. Males accounted for 51.4% of all included patients. Males received more intensive care (ratio OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.51–1.71) and mechanical ventilation (invasive or noninvasive, OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.73–2.01). A model for the prediction of mortality showed that until the age 60 y, mortality increased with age with no substantial difference between sexes. After 60 y, the risk of death increased more in males than in females. At 90 y, females had a predicted mortality risk of 31%, corresponding to males of 84 y. In the intensive care unit (ICU) cohort, females of 90 y had a mortality risk of 46%, equivalent to males of 72 y. Seventy-five percent of males over 90 died, but only 46% of females of the same age. In conclusion, the sex gap was most evident among the oldest in the ICU. Understanding sex-determined differences in COVID-19 can be useful to facilitate individualized treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214954</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34768473</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Age groups ; Clinical medicine ; Comorbidity ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Disease control ; Dyspnea ; Females ; Gender differences ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Infections ; Intensive care ; Length of stay ; Males ; Mortality ; Ostomy ; Patients ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Sexes ; Variables ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2021-10, Vol.10 (21), p.4954</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-a105285fac33f796ce0094fe81f5dc9700a612dba99073a132143823065a5bf13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-a105285fac33f796ce0094fe81f5dc9700a612dba99073a132143823065a5bf13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5441-3906 ; 0000-0001-8539-0148 ; 0000-0002-9976-9295 ; 0000-0001-9724-1422 ; 0000-0002-9708-1593 ; 0000-0002-4670-6127</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584819/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584819/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nachtigall, Irit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonsignore, Marzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thürmann, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hohenstein, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jóźwiak, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauptmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eifert, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dengler, Julius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollmann, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groesdonk, Heinrich V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhlen, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier-Hellmann, Andreas</creatorcontrib><title>Sex Differences in Clinical Course and Intensive Care Unit Admission in a National Cohort of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><description>Males have a higher risk for an adverse outcome of COVID-19. The aim of the study was to analyze sex differences in the clinical course with focus on patients who received intensive care. Research was conducted as an observational retrospective cohort study. A group of 23,235 patients from 83 hospitals with PCR-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 between 4 February 2020 and 22 March 2021 were included. Data on symptoms were retrieved from a separate registry, which served as a routine infection control system. Males accounted for 51.4% of all included patients. Males received more intensive care (ratio OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.51–1.71) and mechanical ventilation (invasive or noninvasive, OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.73–2.01). A model for the prediction of mortality showed that until the age 60 y, mortality increased with age with no substantial difference between sexes. After 60 y, the risk of death increased more in males than in females. At 90 y, females had a predicted mortality risk of 31%, corresponding to males of 84 y. In the intensive care unit (ICU) cohort, females of 90 y had a mortality risk of 46%, equivalent to males of 72 y. Seventy-five percent of males over 90 died, but only 46% of females of the same age. In conclusion, the sex gap was most evident among the oldest in the ICU. Understanding sex-determined differences in COVID-19 can be useful to facilitate individualized treatments.</description><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Dyspnea</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Sexes</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUclKBDEQDaKoqCd_IOBRWpNOp5NcBGm3AVHB5Roy6cTJ0JOMSWZcTn66cUG0LlVQr15VvQfALkYHhAh0ONUzjGrcCNqsgM0aMVYhwsnqn3oD7KQ0RSU4b2rM1sEGaVjLG0Y2wfuteYEnzloTjdcmQedhNzjvtBpgFxYxGah8D0c-G5_c0sBORQPvvcvwuJ-5lFzwn0MKXqlc6q-xSYgZBgsvQpq7rAb3Znp4U_rG5wSfXZ7A7vphdFJhsQ3WrBqS2fnJW-D-7PSuu6gur89H3fFlpQlvc6UwojWnVmlCLBOtNgiJxhqOLe21YAipFtf9WAmBGFGYFE0IrwlqqaJji8kWOPrmnS_GM9PrcklUg5xHN1PxVQbl5P-OdxP5GJaSU95wLArB3g9BDE8Lk7KcFnnKv0nWVLSItAzRgtr_RukYUorG_m7ASH46Jv84Rj4AXnuHMg</recordid><startdate>20211026</startdate><enddate>20211026</enddate><creator>Nachtigall, Irit</creator><creator>Bonsignore, Marzia</creator><creator>Thürmann, Petra</creator><creator>Hohenstein, Sven</creator><creator>Jóźwiak, Katarzyna</creator><creator>Hauptmann, Michael</creator><creator>Eifert, Sandra</creator><creator>Dengler, Julius</creator><creator>Bollmann, Andreas</creator><creator>Groesdonk, Heinrich V.</creator><creator>Kuhlen, Ralf</creator><creator>Meier-Hellmann, Andreas</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5441-3906</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8539-0148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9976-9295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9724-1422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9708-1593</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4670-6127</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211026</creationdate><title>Sex Differences in Clinical Course and Intensive Care Unit Admission in a National Cohort of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19</title><author>Nachtigall, Irit ; Bonsignore, Marzia ; Thürmann, Petra ; Hohenstein, Sven ; Jóźwiak, Katarzyna ; Hauptmann, Michael ; Eifert, Sandra ; Dengler, Julius ; Bollmann, Andreas ; Groesdonk, Heinrich V. ; Kuhlen, Ralf ; Meier-Hellmann, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-a105285fac33f796ce0094fe81f5dc9700a612dba99073a132143823065a5bf13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Dyspnea</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Sexes</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nachtigall, Irit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonsignore, Marzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thürmann, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hohenstein, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jóźwiak, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauptmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eifert, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dengler, Julius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollmann, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groesdonk, Heinrich V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhlen, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier-Hellmann, Andreas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nachtigall, Irit</au><au>Bonsignore, Marzia</au><au>Thürmann, Petra</au><au>Hohenstein, Sven</au><au>Jóźwiak, Katarzyna</au><au>Hauptmann, Michael</au><au>Eifert, Sandra</au><au>Dengler, Julius</au><au>Bollmann, Andreas</au><au>Groesdonk, Heinrich V.</au><au>Kuhlen, Ralf</au><au>Meier-Hellmann, Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex Differences in Clinical Course and Intensive Care Unit Admission in a National Cohort of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><date>2021-10-26</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>4954</spage><pages>4954-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>Males have a higher risk for an adverse outcome of COVID-19. The aim of the study was to analyze sex differences in the clinical course with focus on patients who received intensive care. Research was conducted as an observational retrospective cohort study. A group of 23,235 patients from 83 hospitals with PCR-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 between 4 February 2020 and 22 March 2021 were included. Data on symptoms were retrieved from a separate registry, which served as a routine infection control system. Males accounted for 51.4% of all included patients. Males received more intensive care (ratio OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.51–1.71) and mechanical ventilation (invasive or noninvasive, OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.73–2.01). A model for the prediction of mortality showed that until the age 60 y, mortality increased with age with no substantial difference between sexes. After 60 y, the risk of death increased more in males than in females. At 90 y, females had a predicted mortality risk of 31%, corresponding to males of 84 y. In the intensive care unit (ICU) cohort, females of 90 y had a mortality risk of 46%, equivalent to males of 72 y. Seventy-five percent of males over 90 died, but only 46% of females of the same age. In conclusion, the sex gap was most evident among the oldest in the ICU. Understanding sex-determined differences in COVID-19 can be useful to facilitate individualized treatments.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34768473</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm10214954</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5441-3906</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8539-0148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9976-9295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9724-1422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9708-1593</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4670-6127</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2021-10, Vol.10 (21), p.4954
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8584819
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Age groups
Clinical medicine
Comorbidity
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Disease control
Dyspnea
Females
Gender differences
Hospitalization
Hospitals
Infections
Intensive care
Length of stay
Males
Mortality
Ostomy
Patients
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Sexes
Variables
Ventilators
title Sex Differences in Clinical Course and Intensive Care Unit Admission in a National Cohort of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T12%3A00%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20Differences%20in%20Clinical%20Course%20and%20Intensive%20Care%20Unit%20Admission%20in%20a%20National%20Cohort%20of%20Hospitalized%20Patients%20with%20COVID-19&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Nachtigall,%20Irit&rft.date=2021-10-26&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=4954&rft.pages=4954-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm10214954&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2596036705%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2596036705&rft_id=info:pmid/34768473&rfr_iscdi=true