B3 Lesions at Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy under Ultrasound or Mammography Guidance: A Single-Center Experience on 3634 Consecutive Biopsies
The rate of upgrade to cancer for breast lesions with uncertain malignant potential (B3 lesions) diagnosed at needle biopsy is highly influenced by several factors, but large series are seldom available. We retrospectively assessed the upgrade rates of a consecutive series of B3 lesions diagnosed at...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancers 2021-10, Vol.13 (21), p.5443 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 5443 |
container_title | Cancers |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Girardi, Veronica Guaragni, Monica Ruzzenenti, Nella Palmieri, Fabrizio Fogazzi, Gianluca Cozzi, Andrea Lucchini, Diana Buffoli, Alberto Schiaffino, Simone Sardanelli, Francesco |
description | The rate of upgrade to cancer for breast lesions with uncertain malignant potential (B3 lesions) diagnosed at needle biopsy is highly influenced by several factors, but large series are seldom available. We retrospectively assessed the upgrade rates of a consecutive series of B3 lesions diagnosed at ultrasound- or mammography-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) at an EUSOMA-certified Breast Unit over a 7-year timeframe. The upgrade rate was defined as the number of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive cancer at pathology after excision or during follow-up divided by the total number of B3 lesions. All lesions were reviewed by one of four pathologists with a second opinion for discordant assessments of borderline cases. Excision or surveillance were defined by the multidisciplinary tumor board, with 6- and 12-month follow-up. Out of 3634 VABs (63% ultrasound-guided), 604 (17%) yielded a B3 lesion. After excision, 17/604 B3 lesions were finally upgraded to malignancy (2.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-4.5%), 10/17 (59%) being upgraded to DCIS and 7/17 (41%) to invasive carcinoma. No cases were upgraded during follow-up. B3a lesions showed a significantly lower upgrade rate (0.4%, 95% CI 0.1-2.1%) than B3b lesions (4.7%, 95% CI 2.9-7.5%,
= 0.001), that had a 22.0 adjusted odds ratio for upgrade (95% CI 2.1-232.3). No significant difference was found in upgrade rates according to imaging guidance or needle caliper. Surveillance-oriented management can be considered for B3a lesions, while surgical excision should be pursued for B3b lesions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/cancers13215443 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8582448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2596013576</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-6c9ad688c9797e9468a40d22b611939f92eb9efefbbdb4f3c798cbc556e200a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9v1DAQxS0EolXpmRuyxIVLqP_Fjjkg7a5KQVrEAcrVcpzJ1lUSBzuu2A_Bd8arLVWpL7Y1v3nzRg-h15S851yTC2cnBzFRzmgtBH-GThlRrJJSi-eP3ifoPKVbUg7nVEn1Ep1woRSVRJ6iP2uOt5B8mBK2C_5pXc5jtUrJpwU6vI5g04LXPsxpj_PUQcTXwxJtCuWDQ8Rf7TiGXbTzzR5fZd8dPH3AK_zdT7sBqg1MS-m5_D1D9FBqOEyYSy7wpowElxd_B0d9D-kVetHbIcH5_X2Grj9d_th8rrbfrr5sVtvKCUaXSjptO9k0TiutQAvZWEE6xlpJqea61wxaDT30bdu1oudO6ca1rq4lMEIs52fo41F3zu0InSsmox3MHP1o494E683_lcnfmF24M03dMCGaIvDuXiCGXxnSYkafHAyDnSDkZFitldA1aUhB3z5Bb0OOU1nvQElCea1koS6OlIshpQj9gxlKzCFt8yTt0vHm8Q4P_L9s-V-aVqiR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2596013576</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>B3 Lesions at Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy under Ultrasound or Mammography Guidance: A Single-Center Experience on 3634 Consecutive Biopsies</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Girardi, Veronica ; Guaragni, Monica ; Ruzzenenti, Nella ; Palmieri, Fabrizio ; Fogazzi, Gianluca ; Cozzi, Andrea ; Lucchini, Diana ; Buffoli, Alberto ; Schiaffino, Simone ; Sardanelli, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Girardi, Veronica ; Guaragni, Monica ; Ruzzenenti, Nella ; Palmieri, Fabrizio ; Fogazzi, Gianluca ; Cozzi, Andrea ; Lucchini, Diana ; Buffoli, Alberto ; Schiaffino, Simone ; Sardanelli, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>The rate of upgrade to cancer for breast lesions with uncertain malignant potential (B3 lesions) diagnosed at needle biopsy is highly influenced by several factors, but large series are seldom available. We retrospectively assessed the upgrade rates of a consecutive series of B3 lesions diagnosed at ultrasound- or mammography-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) at an EUSOMA-certified Breast Unit over a 7-year timeframe. The upgrade rate was defined as the number of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive cancer at pathology after excision or during follow-up divided by the total number of B3 lesions. All lesions were reviewed by one of four pathologists with a second opinion for discordant assessments of borderline cases. Excision or surveillance were defined by the multidisciplinary tumor board, with 6- and 12-month follow-up. Out of 3634 VABs (63% ultrasound-guided), 604 (17%) yielded a B3 lesion. After excision, 17/604 B3 lesions were finally upgraded to malignancy (2.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-4.5%), 10/17 (59%) being upgraded to DCIS and 7/17 (41%) to invasive carcinoma. No cases were upgraded during follow-up. B3a lesions showed a significantly lower upgrade rate (0.4%, 95% CI 0.1-2.1%) than B3b lesions (4.7%, 95% CI 2.9-7.5%,
= 0.001), that had a 22.0 adjusted odds ratio for upgrade (95% CI 2.1-232.3). No significant difference was found in upgrade rates according to imaging guidance or needle caliper. Surveillance-oriented management can be considered for B3a lesions, while surgical excision should be pursued for B3b lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215443</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34771606</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Hyperplasia ; Invasiveness ; Lesions ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Malignancy ; Mammography ; Pathology ; Patients ; Surgery ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; Vacuum</subject><ispartof>Cancers, 2021-10, Vol.13 (21), p.5443</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-6c9ad688c9797e9468a40d22b611939f92eb9efefbbdb4f3c798cbc556e200a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-6c9ad688c9797e9468a40d22b611939f92eb9efefbbdb4f3c798cbc556e200a33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6545-9427 ; 0000-0003-4243-888X ; 0000-0003-4922-7065</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582448/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582448/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34771606$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Girardi, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guaragni, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruzzenenti, Nella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmieri, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fogazzi, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cozzi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucchini, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffoli, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiaffino, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sardanelli, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>B3 Lesions at Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy under Ultrasound or Mammography Guidance: A Single-Center Experience on 3634 Consecutive Biopsies</title><title>Cancers</title><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><description>The rate of upgrade to cancer for breast lesions with uncertain malignant potential (B3 lesions) diagnosed at needle biopsy is highly influenced by several factors, but large series are seldom available. We retrospectively assessed the upgrade rates of a consecutive series of B3 lesions diagnosed at ultrasound- or mammography-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) at an EUSOMA-certified Breast Unit over a 7-year timeframe. The upgrade rate was defined as the number of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive cancer at pathology after excision or during follow-up divided by the total number of B3 lesions. All lesions were reviewed by one of four pathologists with a second opinion for discordant assessments of borderline cases. Excision or surveillance were defined by the multidisciplinary tumor board, with 6- and 12-month follow-up. Out of 3634 VABs (63% ultrasound-guided), 604 (17%) yielded a B3 lesion. After excision, 17/604 B3 lesions were finally upgraded to malignancy (2.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-4.5%), 10/17 (59%) being upgraded to DCIS and 7/17 (41%) to invasive carcinoma. No cases were upgraded during follow-up. B3a lesions showed a significantly lower upgrade rate (0.4%, 95% CI 0.1-2.1%) than B3b lesions (4.7%, 95% CI 2.9-7.5%,
= 0.001), that had a 22.0 adjusted odds ratio for upgrade (95% CI 2.1-232.3). No significant difference was found in upgrade rates according to imaging guidance or needle caliper. Surveillance-oriented management can be considered for B3a lesions, while surgical excision should be pursued for B3b lesions.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Hyperplasia</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Malignancy</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Vacuum</subject><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9v1DAQxS0EolXpmRuyxIVLqP_Fjjkg7a5KQVrEAcrVcpzJ1lUSBzuu2A_Bd8arLVWpL7Y1v3nzRg-h15S851yTC2cnBzFRzmgtBH-GThlRrJJSi-eP3ifoPKVbUg7nVEn1Ep1woRSVRJ6iP2uOt5B8mBK2C_5pXc5jtUrJpwU6vI5g04LXPsxpj_PUQcTXwxJtCuWDQ8Rf7TiGXbTzzR5fZd8dPH3AK_zdT7sBqg1MS-m5_D1D9FBqOEyYSy7wpowElxd_B0d9D-kVetHbIcH5_X2Grj9d_th8rrbfrr5sVtvKCUaXSjptO9k0TiutQAvZWEE6xlpJqea61wxaDT30bdu1oudO6ca1rq4lMEIs52fo41F3zu0InSsmox3MHP1o494E683_lcnfmF24M03dMCGaIvDuXiCGXxnSYkafHAyDnSDkZFitldA1aUhB3z5Bb0OOU1nvQElCea1koS6OlIshpQj9gxlKzCFt8yTt0vHm8Q4P_L9s-V-aVqiR</recordid><startdate>20211029</startdate><enddate>20211029</enddate><creator>Girardi, Veronica</creator><creator>Guaragni, Monica</creator><creator>Ruzzenenti, Nella</creator><creator>Palmieri, Fabrizio</creator><creator>Fogazzi, Gianluca</creator><creator>Cozzi, Andrea</creator><creator>Lucchini, Diana</creator><creator>Buffoli, Alberto</creator><creator>Schiaffino, Simone</creator><creator>Sardanelli, Francesco</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-9427</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4243-888X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4922-7065</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211029</creationdate><title>B3 Lesions at Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy under Ultrasound or Mammography Guidance: A Single-Center Experience on 3634 Consecutive Biopsies</title><author>Girardi, Veronica ; Guaragni, Monica ; Ruzzenenti, Nella ; Palmieri, Fabrizio ; Fogazzi, Gianluca ; Cozzi, Andrea ; Lucchini, Diana ; Buffoli, Alberto ; Schiaffino, Simone ; Sardanelli, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-6c9ad688c9797e9468a40d22b611939f92eb9efefbbdb4f3c798cbc556e200a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Hyperplasia</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Malignancy</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Vacuum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Girardi, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guaragni, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruzzenenti, Nella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmieri, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fogazzi, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cozzi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucchini, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffoli, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiaffino, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sardanelli, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Girardi, Veronica</au><au>Guaragni, Monica</au><au>Ruzzenenti, Nella</au><au>Palmieri, Fabrizio</au><au>Fogazzi, Gianluca</au><au>Cozzi, Andrea</au><au>Lucchini, Diana</au><au>Buffoli, Alberto</au><au>Schiaffino, Simone</au><au>Sardanelli, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>B3 Lesions at Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy under Ultrasound or Mammography Guidance: A Single-Center Experience on 3634 Consecutive Biopsies</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><date>2021-10-29</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>5443</spage><pages>5443-</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>The rate of upgrade to cancer for breast lesions with uncertain malignant potential (B3 lesions) diagnosed at needle biopsy is highly influenced by several factors, but large series are seldom available. We retrospectively assessed the upgrade rates of a consecutive series of B3 lesions diagnosed at ultrasound- or mammography-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) at an EUSOMA-certified Breast Unit over a 7-year timeframe. The upgrade rate was defined as the number of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive cancer at pathology after excision or during follow-up divided by the total number of B3 lesions. All lesions were reviewed by one of four pathologists with a second opinion for discordant assessments of borderline cases. Excision or surveillance were defined by the multidisciplinary tumor board, with 6- and 12-month follow-up. Out of 3634 VABs (63% ultrasound-guided), 604 (17%) yielded a B3 lesion. After excision, 17/604 B3 lesions were finally upgraded to malignancy (2.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-4.5%), 10/17 (59%) being upgraded to DCIS and 7/17 (41%) to invasive carcinoma. No cases were upgraded during follow-up. B3a lesions showed a significantly lower upgrade rate (0.4%, 95% CI 0.1-2.1%) than B3b lesions (4.7%, 95% CI 2.9-7.5%,
= 0.001), that had a 22.0 adjusted odds ratio for upgrade (95% CI 2.1-232.3). No significant difference was found in upgrade rates according to imaging guidance or needle caliper. Surveillance-oriented management can be considered for B3a lesions, while surgical excision should be pursued for B3b lesions.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34771606</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers13215443</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-9427</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4243-888X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4922-7065</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2072-6694 |
ispartof | Cancers, 2021-10, Vol.13 (21), p.5443 |
issn | 2072-6694 2072-6694 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8582448 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central |
subjects | Biopsy Breast cancer Hyperplasia Invasiveness Lesions Magnetic resonance imaging Malignancy Mammography Pathology Patients Surgery Tumors Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasound Vacuum |
title | B3 Lesions at Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy under Ultrasound or Mammography Guidance: A Single-Center Experience on 3634 Consecutive Biopsies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T23%3A17%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=B3%20Lesions%20at%20Vacuum-Assisted%20Breast%20Biopsy%20under%20Ultrasound%20or%20Mammography%20Guidance:%20A%20Single-Center%20Experience%20on%203634%20Consecutive%20Biopsies&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Girardi,%20Veronica&rft.date=2021-10-29&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=5443&rft.pages=5443-&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers13215443&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2596013576%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2596013576&rft_id=info:pmid/34771606&rfr_iscdi=true |